Phase I Trial to Evaluate the Tolerance, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of the Broad-Spectrum ErbB Family Inhibitor Larotinib Mesylate in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Background: The presented phase I, first-in-human study evaluated the tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of larotinib mesylate in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods: Cancer patients were assigned to receive larotinib mesylate at 50–400 mg dose levels until disease progression or intolerance. Dose-limiting toxicities were assessed during Cycles 0 and 1. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed after the first dose and at steady-state.

Results: Twenty-five patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the dose-escalation study. No DLTs were observed. Acne-like rash (68.0%), diarrhea (48.0%), paronychia (48.0%), and anemia (48.0%) were the most reported treatment-related adverse events. No clear linear pharmacokinetic characteristic could be drawn, and obvious accumulation was observed. Two patients with non-small cell lung cancer experienced a partial response, and 15 patients had stable disease after treatment.

Conclusion: Continuous oral administration of larotinib mesylate at 50–400 mg daily demonstrated a favorable safety profile, and anti-tumor activity was observed in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Afatinib With Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: The LUX-Lung IO/KEYNOTE 497 Study Protocol

BACKGROUND

Afatinib is a selective, irreversible ErbB family blocker that has shown survival benefit in lung squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) patients. Pembrolizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody to the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor, has also shown survival benefit in lung SCC. Concurrent inhibition of the PD-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways represents a rational approach to improve responses and delay the onset of treatment resistance in lung SCC.

TRIAL DESIGN

This phase II, open-label, single-arm study (NCT03157089) is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with stage IIIB/IV lung SCC that has progressed during/after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients must have ≥1 target lesion (as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) and must have not received previous immune checkpoint inhibitor/EGFR-targeted therapy. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and safety profile will be determined during a safety run-in with oral afatinib (starting dose, 40 mg/d) with intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). In the main study, all patients will receive afatinib at the RP2D with pembrolizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 35 cycles. The primary end point is objective response (complete + partial response). Other end points include disease control, duration of objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival, tumor shrinkage, RP2D, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory biomarker analysis will be performed. This study is being conducted in the United States, Spain, France, South Korea, and Turkey. Enrollment commenced in September 2017, with a target of 50 to 62 patients.

A phase 1b study of afatinib in combination with standard-dose cetuximab in patients with advanced solid tumours

This phase 1b, open-label trial assessed the combination of afatinib, an ErbB family blocker, with cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, in heavily pretreated patients with unselected/EGFR wild-type, advanced solid tumours. In Part A, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib + cetuximab was evaluated using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design; the starting dose was afatinib 30 mg/day plus cetuximab 250 mg/m²/week (after cetuximab 400 mg/m² loading dose), escalating to afatinib 40 mg/day. Part B further evaluated safety and tolerability at the MTD and preliminary anti-tumour activity in three patient cohorts with squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and other solid tumours. Nine patients were treated in Part A; the MTD and recommended dose was determined as afatinib 40 mg/day plus cetuximab 250 mg/m²/week. In Part B, 49 patients were treated at the recommended dose (12 with squamous NSCLC, 15 with HNSCC and 22 with other tumours). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) across all 58 patients were diarrhoea (63.8%) and acneiform dermatitis (43.1%). Overall, the best confirmed response was stable disease (SD; 53.4%); mean duration of disease control was 4.5 months; median progression-free survival was 2.6 months. In Part B, 55.1% of patients had SD (squamous NSCLC, 75.0%; HNSCC, 66.7%; other tumours; 36.4%). In conclusion, the recommended phase 2 dose was determined as afatinib 40 mg/day plus cetuximab 250 mg/m²/week. AEs were predictable and manageable, and anti-tumour activity was observed in some patients, particularly in those with squamous NSCLC and HNSCC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02020577.

A Phase I dose-escalation study of afatinib combined with nintedanib in patients with advanced solid tumors

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib combined with nintedanib.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Patients received afatinib 10-20 mg daily plus nintedanib 150-200 mg twice daily (28-day cycle). Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design.

RESULTS

Patients received afatinib/nintedanib: 10/150 mg (n = 11); 10/200 mg (n = 13; MTD); 20/200 mg (n = 4). Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities (all grade 3): increased alanine aminotransferase (afatinib/nintedanib: 10/150 mg), diarrhea (10/200 mg), dehydration (20/200 mg), diarrhea with elevated liver enzymes (20/200 mg). Frequent treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, fatigue and vomiting. In total, 14 patients (46.2%) had objective responses at the MTD.

CONCLUSION

The MTD, afatinib 10 mg daily plus nintedanib 200 mg twice daily, had a manageable safety profile, but was considered subtherapeutic for Phase II evaluation.

A neoadjuvant, randomized, open-label phase II trial of afatinib versus trastuzumab versus lapatinib in patients with locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is standard neoadjuvant treatment of LA BC. Patients with HER2-positive BC require targeted therapy. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab, which target HER2, with chemotherapy are approved as neoadjuvant therapy, however, treatments with different mechanisms of action might provide a broader range of activity. In this study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib, versus trastuzumab or lapatinib in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, LA BC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive, HER2-positive BC patients with stage IIIA, B, C or inflammatory disease were randomized 1:1:1 to daily afatinib (50 mg), lapatinib (1500 mg), or weekly trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose, then 2 mg/kg/wk) for 6 weeks until surgery or follow-up neoadjuvant treatment. The primary end point was objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.0).

RESULTS

Recruitment was stopped early because of slow patient enrollment; 29 patients were randomized to afatinib (n = 10), lapatinib (n = 8), or trastuzumab (n = 11). Objective response was seen in 8 afatinib-, 6 lapatinib-, and 4 trastuzumab-treated patients. Eleven patients had stable disease (best response); 1 lapatinib- and 1 trastuzumab-treated patient had progressive disease. All 10 afatinib-treated patients experienced drug-related adverse events (commonly diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia) versus 6 of 8 lapatinib- (diarrhea and rash) and 5 of 11 trastuzumab-treated patients (vomiting and arthralgia).

CONCLUSION

Afatinib demonstrated clinical activity that compared favorably to trastuzumab and lapatinib for neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive BC, with a safety profile consistent with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.