Endoscopic variceal ligation compared with endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for treatment of esophageal variceal hemorrhage: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare the effect of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) with that of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) in the treatment of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding.

METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of multiple online electronic databases. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of combined studies for the treatment of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding between EVL and EIS.

RESULTS: Fourteen studies comprising 1236 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rebleeding rate in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly lower than that in the EIS group (RR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.57-0.81). The variceal eradication rate in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly higher than that in the EIS group (RR = 1.06, 95%CI: 1.01-1.12). There was no significant difference about mortality rate between the EVL group and EIS group (RR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.77-1.17). The rate of complications in actively bleeding varices patients in the EVL group was significantly lower than that in the EIS group (RR = 0.28, 95%CI: 0.13-0.58).

CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis has found that EVL is better than EIS in terms of the lower rates of rebleeding, complications, and the higher rate of variceal eradication. Therefore, EVL is the first choice for esophageal variceal bleeding.

Risk factors for predicting early variceal rebleeding after endoscopic variceal ligation

AIM: To analyze the clinical risk factors for early variceal rebleeding after endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL).

METHODS: 342 cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices who received elective EVL to prevent bleeding or rebleeding at our endoscopy center between January 2005 and July 2010. were included in this study. The early rebleeding cases after EVL were confirmed by clinical signs or endoscopy. A case-control study was performed comparing the patients presenting with early rebleeding with those without this complication.

RESULTS: The incidence of early rebleeding after EVL was 7.60%, and the morbidity of rebleeding was 26.9%. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that four variables were independent risk factors for early rebleeding: moderate to excessive ascites [odds ratio (OR) 62.83, 95% CI: 9.39-420.56, P < 0.001], the number of bands placed (OR 17.36, 95% CI: 4.00-75.34, P < 0.001), the extent of varices (OR 15.41, 95% CI: 2.84-83.52, P = 0.002) and prothrombin time (PT) > 18 s (OR 11.35, 95% CI: 1.93-66.70, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION: The early rebleeding rate after EVL is mainly affected by the volume of ascites, number of rubber bands used to ligate, severity of varices and prolonged PT. Effective measures for prevention and treatment should be adopted before and after EVL.

Endoscopic Treatment of Esophageal Varices

Acute variceal bleeding is a complication of portal hypertension, usually due to cirrhosis, with high morbidity and mortality. There are 3 scenarios for endoscopic treatment of esophageal varices: prevention of first variceal bleed, treatment of active variceal bleed, and prevention of rebleeding. Patients with cirrhosis should be screened for esophageal varices. Recommended endoscopic therapy for acute variceal bleeding is endoscopic variceal banding. Although banding is the first-choice treatment, sclerotherapy may have a role. Treatment with Sengstaken-Blakemore tube or self-expanding covered metallic esophageal stent can be used for acute variceal bleeding refractory to standard pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy.

Current approaches to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding

OBJECTIVE

Esophageal variceal bleeding is the most dangerous complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, and it is accompanied by high mortality. Their treatment can be complex, and requires a multidisciplinary approach. This review examines current approaches to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews were searched for articles published between 1987 and 2015. Relevant articles were identified using the following terms: 'esophageal variceal bleeding', 'portal hypertension' and 'complications of liver cirrhosis'. The reference lists of articles identified were also searched for other relevant publications. Inclusion criteria were restricted to the management of patients with liver cirrhosis who have acute esophageal variceal bleeding.

RESULTS

It is currently recommended to combine vasoactive drugs (preferable somatostatin or terlipressin) and endoscopic therapies (endoscopic band ligation as first choice, sclerotherapy if endoscopic band ligation not feasible) for the initial treatment of acute variceal bleeding. Antibiotic prophylaxis must be regarded as an integral part of the treatment. The use of a Sengstaken-Blakemore tube is appropriate only in cases of refractory bleeding if the above methods cannot be used. An alternative to balloon tamponade may be the installation of self-expandable metal stents. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is an extremely useful technique for the treatment of acute bleeding from esophageal varices. Although most current clinical guidelines classify it as second-line therapy, the Baveno VI workshop recommends early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents within 72 h (ideally <24 h) in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding at high risk of treatment failure (e.g. Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C < 14 points or Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with active bleeding) after initial pharmacological and endoscopic therapy. Urgent surgical intervention is rarely performed and can be considered only in case of failure of conservative and/or endoscopic therapy and being unable to use a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Among surgical operations described in the literature are a variety of portocaval anastomosis and azygoportal disconnection procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve the results of treatment for patients with liver cirrhosis who develop acute esophageal variceal bleeding, it is important to stratify patients into risk groups, which will allow one to tailor therapeutic approaches to the expected results.

New index to predict esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients

AIM: To develop a safe, simple, noninvasive and affordable system to predict esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) in decompensated cirrhosis patients.

METHODS: Four hundred and eighty-six patients with decompensated cirrhosis (238 males and 248 females), with a mean age of 63.1 ± 11.2 years, were admitted to Changshu Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University between May 2008 and March 2011. Patients enrolled in this study underwent ultrasound-Doppler (US-Doppler) to assess left gastric vein (LGV) blood flow velocity (LGVV) and blood flow direction (LGVBFD), and were evaluated by the Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system. All patients received follow-up evaluations every three months. The resulting data were entered into a database after each time point collection.

RESULTS: Four hundred and sixteen patients completed follow-up evaluations for an average of 31.6 mo (range: 12 to 47 mo). Fifty-one (12.3%) patients experienced EVB. The change in the MELD score over three months (ΔMELD), LGVV and LGVBFD were independently associated with EVB occurrence. MELD-US-Doppler Index (MUI), a new index, was developed and calculated using the following logistic regression equation: MUI = Logit (P) = 1.667 (ΔMELD) + 2.096 (LGVV) - 3.245 (LGVBFD) - 1.697. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of EVB occurrence was significantly higher for the MUI [0.858 (95%CI: 0.774-0.920)] than for ΔMELD [0.734 (95%CI: 0.636-0.817); P < 0.05], LGVV [0.679 (95%CI: 0.578-0.769); P < 0.05] or LGVBFD [0.726 (95%CI: 0.627-0.810); P < 0.05] alone. When the MUI was set at 46, the index had high diagnostic accuracy (85.8%), with high specificity (80%) and sensitivity (87.27%).

CONCLUSION: The MUI, a noninvasive and affordable index, can predict EVB occurrence in decompensated cirrhotic patients and serve as an alternative when conventional endoscopic screening is declined.

Antiviral therapy delays esophageal variceal bleeding in hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis

AIM: To investigate the effect of antiviral therapy with nucleoside analogs in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis and esophageal varices.

METHODS: Eligible patients with HBV-related cirrhosis and esophageal varices who consulted two tertiary hospitals in Beijing, China, the Chinese Second Artillery General Hospital and Chinese PLA General Hospital, were enrolled in the study from January 2005 to December 2009. Of 117 patients, 79 received treatment with different nucleoside analogs and 38 served as controls. Bleeding rate, change in variceal grade and non-bleeding duration were analyzed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify factors related to esophageal variceal bleeding.

RESULTS: The bleeding rate was decreased in the antiviral group compared to the control group (29.1% vs 65.8%, P < 0.001). Antiviral therapy was an independent factor related to esophageal bleeding in multivariate analysis (HR = 11.3, P < 0.001). The mean increase in variceal grade per year was lower in the antiviral group (1.0 ± 1.3 vs 1.7 ± 1.2, P = 0.003). Non-bleeding duration in the antiviral group was prolonged in the Kaplan-Meier model. Viral load rebound was observed in 3 cases in the lamivudine group and in 1 case in the adefovir group, all of whom experienced bleeding. Entecavir and adefovir resulted in lower bleeding rates (17.2% and 28.6%, respectively) than the control (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively), whereas lamivudine (53.3%) did not (P = 0.531).

CONCLUSION: Antiviral therapy delays the progression of esophageal varices and reduces bleeding risk in HBV-related cirrhosis, however, high-resistance agents tend to be ineffective for long-term treatment.

The role of computed tomography for the prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding: Current status and future perspectives

Esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) is one of the most common and severe complications related to portal hypertension (PH). Despite marked advances in its management during the last three decades, EVB is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The risk of first EVB is related to the severity of both PH and liver disease, and to the size and endoscopic appearance of esophageal varices. Indeed, hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) are currently recognized as the “gold standard” and the diagnostic reference standard for the prediction of EVB, respectively. However, HVPG is an invasive, expensive, and technically complex procedure, not widely available in clinical practice, whereas EGD is mainly limited by its invasive nature. In this scenario, computed tomography (CT) has been recently proposed as a promising modality for the non-invasive prediction of EVB. Although CT is only a diagnostic modality, thus being not capable of supplanting EGD or HVPG in providing therapeutic and physiological data, it could potentially assist liver disease scores, HVPG, and EGD in a more effective prediction of EVB. However, to date, evidence concerning the role of CT in this setting is still lacking. Our review aimed to summarize and discuss the current evidence concerning the role of CT in predicting the risk of EVB.

Quantitative measurements of esophageal varices using computed tomography for prediction of severe varices and the risk of bleeding: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess whether the quantitative parameters of esophageal varices (EV) based on computed tomography (CT) can noninvasively predict severe EV and the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB).

METHODS

A total of 136 endoscopically confirmed EV patients were included in this retrospective study and were divided into a non-conspicuous (mild-to-moderate EV, n = 30) and a conspicuous EV group (severe EV, n = 106), a bleeding (n = 89) and a non-bleeding group (n = 47). EV grade (EVG), EV diameter (EVD), cross-sectional surface area (CSA), EV volume (EVV), spleen volume (SV), splenic vein (SNV), portal vein (PV), diameter of left gastric vein (DLGV), and the opening type of LGV were measured independently using 3D-slicer. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis were used to determine the independent factors and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

The difference of EVG, EVD, CSA, EVV, DLGV, SNV between the conspicuous and non-conspicuous EV group were statistically significant (p < 0.05), area under the curves (AUCs) of them for predicting severe EV were 0.72, 0.772, 0.704, 0.768, 0.707, 0.65, with corresponding sensitivities of 70.3%, 63.5%, 50%, 74.3%, 52.7%, 48.6%, specificities of 71.4%, 85.7%, 100%, 71.4%, 81%, 81%, respectively. EVG, CSA (odds ratio 3.258, 95% CI 1.597-6.647; 1.029, 95% CI 1.008-1.050) were found to be independent predictive factors. However, there was no significant difference of the included indices between the bleeding and non-bleeding group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CT can be used as a noninvasive method to predict the severity of EV, which may reduce the invasive screening of endoscopy.

Future directions of noninvasive prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding: No worry about the present computed tomography inefficiency

In this editorial, we comment on the minireview by Martino A, published in the recent issue of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023; 15 (12): 681-689. We focused mainly on the possibility of replacing the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and endoscopy with noninvasive methods for predicting esophageal variceal bleeding. The risk factors for bleeding were the size of the varices, the red sign and the Child-Pugh score. The intrinsic core factor that drove these changes was the HVPG. Therefore, the present studies investigating noninvasive methods, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, elastography, and laboratory tests, are working on correlating imaging or serum marker data with intravenous pressure and clinical outcomes, such as bleeding. A single parameter is usually not enough to construct an efficient model. Therefore, multiple factors were used in most of the studies to construct predictive models. Encouraging results have been obtained, in which bleeding prediction was partly reached. However, these methods are not satisfactory enough to replace invasive methods, due to the many drawbacks of different studies. There is still plenty of room for future improvement. Prediction of the precise timing of bleeding using various models, and extracting the texture of variceal walls using high-definition imaging modalities to predict the red sign are interesting directions to lay investment on.

Comparison between effects of ligation and sclerotherapy in treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding after liver cirrhosis: a meta-analysis

AIM: To systematically evaluate the therapeutic effect of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) on esophageal variceal bleeding after liver cirrhosis.

METHODS: The correlated literature about the therapeutic effect of EIS and EVL on esophageal variceal were identified from Medline, EMBase and China Biological Medicine Disk between January, 1985 and November, 2005. RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for data analysis.

RESULTS: According to the included criteria, seven prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trials were selected finally. The combined results of meta-analysis showed that the rehaemorrhage rate of scherotherapy on the esophageal variceal bleeding after liver cirrhosis was higher than ligation (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.10-1.57, P < 0.05), while their motility rates were similar (RR = 1.24, 95%CI: 0.99-1.55, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: In comparing with EIS, EVL has a better effect on obviating rehaemorrhage in esophageal varices bleeding after liver cirrhosis but has no difference in degrading motility.

Effect of aluminum phosphate gel on prevention of early rebleeding after ligation of esophageal variceal hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Liver cirrhosis is the main cause of portal hypertension. The leading cause of death in patients with liver cirrhosis is its most common complication, esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB). Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is recommended by many guidelines to treat EVB and prevent rebleeding; however, esophageal ulcers occur after treatment. Delayed healing of ulcers and unhealed ulcers lead to high rebleeding and mortality rates. Thus, the prevention of early postoperative rebleeding is of great significance in improving the quality of life and prognosis of patients.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of aluminum phosphate gel (APG) plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in the prevention of early rebleeding after EVL in patients with EVB.

METHODS

The medical records of 792 patients who were diagnosed with EVB and in whom bleeding was successfully stopped by EVL at Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Guangdong Province, China from January 2015 to December 2020 were collected. According to the study inclusion and exclusion criteria, 401 cases were included in a PPI-monotherapy group (PPI group), and 377 cases were included in a PPI and APG combination therapy (PPI + APG) group. We compared the incidence rates of early rebleeding and other complications within 6 wk after treatment between the two groups. The two-sample t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and chi-squared test were adopted for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

No significant differences in age, sex, model for end-stage liver disease score, coagulation function, serum albumin level, or hemoglobin level were found between the two groups. The incidence of early rebleeding in the PPI + APG group (9/337; 2.39%) was significantly lower than that in the PPI group (30/401; 7.48%) (P = 0.001). Causes of early rebleeding in the PPI group were esophageal ulcer (3.99%, 16/401) and esophageal varices (3.49%, 14/401), while those in the PPI + APG group were also esophageal ulcers (5/377; 1.33%) and esophageal varices (4/377; 1.06%); such causes were significantly less frequent in the PPI + APG group than in the PPI group (P = 0.022 and 0.024, respectively). The early mortality rate within 6 wk in both groups was 0%, which was correlated with the timely rehospitalization of all patients with rebleeding and the conduct of emergency endoscopic therapy. The incidence of adverse events other than early bleeding in the PPI + APG group (28/377; 7.43%) was significantly lower than that in the PPI group (63/401; 15.71%) (P < 0.001). The incidence of chest pain in the PPI + APG group (9/377; 2.39%) was significantly lower than that in the PPI group (56/401; 13.97%) (P < 0.001). The incidence of constipation in the PPI + APG group (16/377; 4.24%) was significantly higher than that in the PPI group (3/401; 0.75%) (P = 0.002) but constipation was relieved after patients drank more water or took lactulose. In the PPI and PPI + APG groups, the incidence rates of spontaneous peritonitis within 6 wk after discharge were 0.50% (2/401) and 0.53% (2/377), respectively, and those of hepatic encephalopathy were 0.50% (2/401) and 0.27% (1/377), respectively, presenting no significant difference (P > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

PPI + APG combination therapy significantly reduces the incidence of early rebleeding and chest pain in patients with EVB after EVL.

Computed tomography for prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding

This letter to the editor relates to the study entitled “The role of computed tomography for the prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding: Current status and future perspectives”. Esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) is one of the most common and severe complications related to portal hypertension (PH). Despite marked advances in its management during the last three decades, EVB is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The risk of first EVB is related to the severity of both PH and liver disease, and to the size and endoscopic appearance of esophageal varices. Indeed, hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) are currently recognized as the “gold standard” and the diagnostic reference standard for the prediction of EVB, respectively. However, HVPG is an invasive, expensive, and technically complex procedure, not widely available in clinical practice, whereas EGD is mainly limited by its invasive nature. In this scenario, computed tomography (CT) has been recently proposed as a promising modality for the non-invasive prediction of EVB. While CT serves solely as a diagnostic tool and cannot replace EGD or HVPG for delivering therapeutic and physiological information, it has the potential to enhance the prediction of EVB more effectively when combined with liver disease scores, HVPG, and EGD. However, to date, evidence concerning the role of CT in this setting is still lacking, therefore we aim to summarize and discuss the current evidence concerning the role of CT in predicting the risk of EVB.

Efficacy and safety of three different methods for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), propranolol and EVL plus propranolol for the primary prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.

METHODS: We chose 90 patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices at a high risk of bleeding and divided them into EVL (n = 30), propranolol (n = 30) and combination (n = 30) groups. Treatment effectiveness and side effects in the 3 groups were compared.

RESULTS: The three groups of patients had comparable baseline characteristics and follow-up time (EVL: 19.9 mo ± 7.2 mo; propranolol: 19.3 mo ± 6.7 mo; combination: 21.4 mo ± 5.3 mo). There were no significant differences in average ligation times between the EVL group and combination group (2.2 ± 1.2 vs 2.0 ± 0.9, P > 0.05), mean daily propranolol dose between the propranolol group and combination group(75.6 mg ± 23.4 mg vs 68.8 mg ± 30.5 mg, P > 0.05), rate of first variceal bleeding and bleeding-related mortality (10.0%, 16.7% vs 6.6%, both P > 0.05) or incidence of portal hypertensive gastropathy between the three groups (16.7%, 6.6% vs 10.0%, both P > 0.05). The incidence of complications and adverse reactions was significantly different between the three groups (50.0%, 26.7% vs 56.7%, both P < 0.05), but no serious complications or adverse reactions occurred. The difference in variceal recurrence rate was significant between the EVL group and combination group (26.7% vs 6.6%, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION: EVL, propranolol and EVL plus propranolol are effective and safe in primary prophylaxis of bleeding due to high-risk varices. The adverse effects caused by propranolol are minimal. The recurrence of varices is lower if propranolol is added to EVL, but without much more adverse reactions.

Novel balloon compression-assisted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal ligation in the treatment of esophageal varices: a prospective randomized study

Background

Herein, our group designed a novel technology, termed balloon compression-assisted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (bc-EIS), which was applied to improve the efficiency of eradicating esophageal varices (EVs). The present study aimed to compare the rate of eradication and efficacy between bc-EIS and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in the management of EVs.

Methods

Ninety-five patients with esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) were randomly assigned to receive bc-EIS or ligation alone. Additional treatment sessions were held 1 month later and then at 3-month intervals until eradication of the varices was achieved. Endoscopic follow-up examinations were carried out at 6-month intervals in the absence of recurrence or immediately if there was any recurrent bleeding.

Results

The mean physical injection points per session were 2.89 ± 0.79, and the mean volume of lauromacrogol used per session was 17.74 ± 7.09 ml in the bc-EIS group. The mean band per session was 6.13 ± 0.86. The rate of eradication after one to three rounds of bc-EIS was obviously higher than that of the EVL group (89.36%, 97.87%, and 100% vs. 37.5%, 43.75%, and 47.92%, respectively). Retrosternal pain or discomfort in the bc-EIS group was slightly lower than that in the EVL group (23.4%, 11/47 vs. 31.25%, 15/48). Two and five patients showed mild abdominal bloating and distension between the bc-EIS and EVL groups, respectively (2/47, 4.26% vs. 5/48, 10.42% P > 0.05). Nausea and vomiting were reported in one patient (1/47, 2.13%) in the bc-EIS group and three patients (3/48, 6.25%) in the EVL group. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). No fatal or severe complications, such as esophageal perforation, esophageal stricture or ectopic embolism, were observed.

Conclusion

The bc-EIS method was effective in eradicating EVs and was accompanied by fewer complications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09412-6.

Short-term prognostic factors in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding

AIM: To analyze short-term prognostic factors in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB).

METHODS: The clinical data for 146 hospitalized EVB patients with liver cirrhosis were analyzed retrospectively. Of these patients, 135 survived in hospital, and 11 died. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify short-term prognostic factors for acute EVB in these patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of different variables on prognosis.

RESULTS: Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that age, increased white blood cell count, hyperbilirubinemia, increased prothrombin time, decreased prothrombin time activity, hyponatremia, hepatic encephalopathy, Child-Pugh grade and Child-Pugh score were risk factors for prognosis of EVB, while antibiotic treatment and endoscopic treatment were protective factors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age (RR = 1.055, 95%CI: 1.010-1.103, P = 0.017), white blood cell count (RR = 1.352, 95%CI: 1.073-1.704, P = 0.011), and Child-Pugh grade (RR = 4.822, 95%CI: 1.465-15.873, P = 0.010) were risk factors for prognosis in cirrhotic patients with EVB, while antibiotic treatment (RR = 0.056, 95%CI: 0.012-0.264, P = 0.000) was a protective factor. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that higher Child-Pugh grade was associated with shorter survival time and lower survival ratio (χ² = 16.651, P < 0.0001), and patients without antibiotic treatment had shorter survival time and lower survival ratio than patients with antibiotic treatment (χ² = 17.135, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Age, white blood cell count, Child-Pugh grade and antibiotic treatment are short-term prognostic factors in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with acute EVB.

Behcet’s disease manifesting as esophageal variceal bleeding: A case report

BACKGROUND

Behcet’s disease (BD) is a chronic disease characterized by oral and vulvar ulcers as well as eye and skin damage and involves multiple systems. It presents as an alternating process of repeated attacks and remissions. Esophageal venous rupture and bleeding caused by BD is rarely reported at home and abroad. This paper reports a case of bleeding from oesophageal varices caused by BD, aiming to provide an additional dimension for considering the cause of bleeding from esophageal varices in the future.

CASE SUMMARY

A 38-year-old female patient was admitted due to a gradual increase in shortness of breath and chest tightness after the activity, and was admitted to our hospital for treatment. After admission, relevant examinations showed that the patient had multiple blood clots. Four days after admission, she suddenly experienced massive hematemesis. Emergency esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed bleeding from esophageal and gastric varices. The patient had no history of viral hepatitis or drinking habits, and no history of special genetic diseases or congenital vascular diseases. There is no obvious abnormality in liver function. After reviewing the medical history, it was found that the patient had recurred oral ulcers since childhood, ulcers were visible in the perineum during menstruation, and there was an intermittent red nodular rash and uveitis. The current skin acupuncture reaction is positive, combined with the evaluation of the external hospital and our hospital, the main diagnosis is BD. She received methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, immunomodulation, acid suppression, gastric protection, and anticoagulation and anti-infection treatments, and was discharged from the hospital. During the 1-year follow-up period, the patient did not vomit blood again.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights bleeding from esophageal varices caused by BD, aiming to provide an additional dimension concerning the cause of bleeding from esophageal varices in the future.

[Study on correlation between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level and esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients]

Objective: To explore the correlation between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25[OH]D(3)) levels and esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) in cirrhotic patients. Methods: Eighty-three cases with liver cirrhosis hospitalized from November 2016 to January 2017 were collected. The patients were divided into bleeding group (51 cases) and non-bleeding group (32 cases) depending on the presence or absence of bleeding under gastroscopy. Serological tests were performed on both groups, including hemoglobin (Hb), albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP),γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25[OH]D(3)). Both groups were analyzed by univariate analysis. The differences between both groups were compared by t-test, after normality test. The other variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. The correlation between the relevant variables and EVB were analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation and a multivariate analysis. Cases with primary biliary cirrhosis were relatively low in number (four cases in bleeding group, accounting for 8%, 10 cases in non-bleeding group, accounting for 31%). The effects of ALP and GGT on serum 25(OH)D(3) level were analyzed by stratified analysis. Moreover, ALP and GGT levels were divided into two and three groups: < 140 U/L and >140 U/L and < 30 U/L, > 30 U/L, and ~≤60 U/L. Results: Bleeding group had low levels of hemoglobin (t= -2.827,P= 0.005), alkaline phosphatase (t= -3.097,P= 0.002), gamma-glutamyltransferase (t= -2.292,P= 0.022), and 25(OH)D(3) (t= -3.134,P= 0.002) than non-bleeding group. Both groups (P> 0.05) had similar levels of albumin, interleukin-6, AAR, and FIB-4. Logistic regression analysis showed that 25(OH)D(3), alkaline phosphatase and hemoglobin were independent risk factors for EVB. Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis showed that 25(OH)D(3)was significantly positively and negatively correlated with interleukin-6 (r= 0.306,P= 0.005) and albumin (r= -0.327,P= 0.003). Stratified analysis showed that serum 25(OH)D(3) level was lower in ALP≤140U/L group and the bleeding group, and the difference was statistically significant than non-bleeding group (P= 0.007), while the serum level of 25(OH)D(3)was decreased in both groups for alkaline phosphatase > 140 U/L group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.051). Furthermore, in the GGT > 60 U/L group, the serum level of 25(OH)D(3)was significantly lower in the bleeding group, and the difference was statistically significant in non-bleeding group (P= 0.003), while the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P> 0.05) in GGT≤30 U/ L, > 30 U/L, and ~≤60 U/L group. Conclusion: Serum 25(OH)D(3)level was significantly lower in EVB cirrhotic patients, and it was an independent risk factor for EVB. Serum 25(OH)D(3) low levels was more apparent with ALP normalization or GGT level > 60 U/L.

Application of machine learning methods for predicting esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

To develop and compare machine learning models based on CT morphology features, serum biomarkers, and basic physical conditions to predict esophageal variceal bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred twenty-four cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding and non-bleeding were included in the retrospective study. Clinical and serum biomarkers were used in our study. In addition, the open-access segmentation model was used to generate segmentation masks of the liver and spleen. Four machine learning models based on selected features are used for building prediction models, and the diagnostic performances of models were measured using the receiver operator characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-four cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices, including 112 patients with bleeding (mean age 52.8 ± 11.5 years, range 18-80 years) and 112 patients with non-bleeding (mean age 57.3 ± 10.5 years, range 34-85 years). The two groups showed significant differences in standardized spleen volume, fibrinogen, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, D-dimer, platelet, and age. The ratio of the training set to the test set was 8:2 in our research, and the 5-fold cross-validation was used in the research. The AUCs of linear regression, random forest, support vector machine, and adaptive boosting were, respectively, 0.742, 0.854, 0.719, and 0.821 in the training set. For the test set, the AUCs of models were, respectively, 0.763, 0.818, 0.648, and 0.804.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study used CT morphological measurements, serum biomarkers, and age to build machine learning models, and the random forest and adaptive boosting had potential added value in predictive model construction.

KEY POINTS

Question Esophageal variceal bleeding is an intractable complication of liver cirrhosis. Early prediction and prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding is important for patients with liver cirrhosis. Findings It was feasible and clinically meaningful to construct machine learning models based on CT morphology features, serum biomarkers, and physical conditions to predict variceal bleeding. Clinical relevance Our study may provide a promising tool with which clinicians can conduct therapeutic decisions on fewer invasive procedures for the prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding.

When Can we Feed after a Gastrointestinal Bleed?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding can carry minimal or significant risk for recurrent hemorrhage. Timing of feeding after GI bleeding remains an area of debate, and here we review the evidence supporting recommendations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved understanding of the pathophysiology of GI bleeding and the evolution of treatment strategies has significantly altered the management of GI bleeding and the associated propensity for rebleeding. Early feeding following peptic ulcer bleeding remains ill-advised for high risk lesions while early initiation of liquid diets following cessation of esophageal variceal bleeding is appropriate and shortens hospital stays. Time to feeding following GI bleeding is inherently based on the disease etiology, severity, and risk of recurrent hemorrhage. With evolving standards of care, rates of rebleeding following endoscopic hemostasis are decreasing. Some evidence exists for early feeding however, larger multi-center trials are needed to help optimize timing of feeding in higher risk lesions.

Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic with endoscopic treatment plus anticoagulation for esophageal variceal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The optimal management of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in liver cirrhosis has not been well-established. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and endoscopic treatment (ET) plus anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients with EVB and PVT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 66 cirrhotic patients with PVT and EVB (31 in the TIPS group and 35 in the ET plus anticoagulation group) were evaluated retrospectively between January 2016 and January 2022.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 85.5% of patients in the TIPS group achieved complete recanalization of the portal vein, as compared with 19.6% in the ET plus anticoagulation group (p < .001). The cumulative 5-year rate of variceal rebleeding in the TIPS group was significantly lower than that in the ET plus anticoagulation group (31.0 vs. 50.1%; p = .017). The TIPS group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) than the ET plus anticoagulation group (25.8 vs. 5.7%; p = .037). No difference in the 5-year survival rate (74.1 vs. 85.7%; p = .692) and probability of other complications was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TIPS was superior to ET plus anticoagulation in preventing variceal rebleeding and achieving recanalization of PVT but increased the incidence of overt HE without improving the survival rate.

Short-term vasoactive agent treatment driven by physicians' preference in acute esophageal variceal bleeding in a tertiary center

Background

Vasoactive drugs are frequently used in combination with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB). The aim of study was to assess physicians’ preference of vasoactive agents in acute EVB, their reasons of preference and efficacy and safety of these short course regimens.

Methods

Cirrhotic patients with suspected EVB were screened (n = 352). Eligible patients were assigned based on the physician’s preference to either somatostatin (group S) or terlipressin (group T) followed by EVL. In group S, intravenous bolus (250 µg) of somatostatin followed by 250 µg/hour was continued for three days. In group T, 2 mg bolus injection of terlipressin was followed by 1 mg infusion every 6 h for three days.

Results

A total of 150 patients were enrolled; 41 in group S and 109 in group T. Reasons for physician preference was convenience in administration (77.1%) for group T and good safety profile (73.2%) for group S. Very early rebleeding within 49–120 h occurred in one patient in groups S and T (p = 0.469). Four patients in group S and 14 patients in group T have variceal rebleeding episodes within 6–42 d (p = 0.781). Overall treatment-related adverse effects were compatible in groups S and T (p = 0.878), but the total cost of terlipressin and somatostatin differed i.e., USD 621.32 and USD 496.43 respectively.

Conclusions

Terlipressin is the preferred vasoactive agent by physicians in our institution for acute EVB. Convenience in administration and safety profile are main considerations of physicians. Safety and hemostatic effects did not differ significantly between short-course somatostatin or terlipressin, although terlipressin is more expensive.

Risk factors for esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis

AIM: To investigate risk factors for esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS: Clinical data for 178 esophageal varices patients with liver cirrhosis were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into either an EVB group (n = 118) or a non-EVB group (n = 60). Twenty-four potential factors were analyzed by t-test, chi-square test and multivariate Logistic regression analysis to identify the risk factors for EVB.

RESULTS: Red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin (Hb), albumin (ALB), prothrombin time activity (PTA), Child-Pugh class B and C hepatic function, history of EVB, portal vein width, splenic vein width, splenic thickness, and red-color sign demonstrated statistically significant differences between the EVB group and the non-EVB group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed and Hb (OR = 0.204, P = 0.001) and ALB (OR = 0.126, P = 0.000) were correlated negatively with EVB, while history of EVB (OR = 3.622, P = 0.01), portal vein width (OR = 2.619, P = 0.032) and red-color sign (OR = 4.647, P = 0.001) were correlated positively with EVB.

CONCLUSION: Anemia, hypoalbuminemia, history of EVB, extended portal vein width, and positive red-color sign are independent risk factors for EVB.

Balloon-compression endoscopic injection sclerotherapy versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for esophageal variceal rebleeding

BACKGROUND

In cirrhotic patients, recurrent bleeding after the first episode of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) is common and lethal. The present study was aimed to compare balloon-compression endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (bc-EIS) with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for the prophylaxis of variceal rebleeding.

METHODS

Between June 2020 and September 2022, 81 cirrhotic patients with EVB (42 in the bc-EIS group and 39 in the TIPS group) were evaluated retrospectively. The occurrence of rebleeding, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) or other complications, as well as liver functions and survival rate were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

During the 12 months of follow-up, variceal eradication was achieved in 40 (95.24%) patients of the bc-EIS group after a mean of 1.80 ± 0.94 sessions. TIPS was successfully performed in 39 (100%) patients. No significant difference in the variceal rebleeding rate was observed between bc-EIS and TIPS groups (16.67 vs. 17.95%; p = 0.111). While the bc-EIS group showed significantly decreased incidence of HE (2.38 vs. 17.95%; p < 0.001) and lower level of total bilirubin (p < 0.05) in comparison with the TIPS group. The difference in mortality between the two groups failed to reach statistical significance (0.00 vs. 7.69%; p = 0.107).

CONCLUSION

Bc-EIS is not inferior to TIPS in the survival and control of variceal rebleeding, but associated with decreased risk of HE and liver dysfunction.