Low concordance of short-term and long-term selection responses in experimental Drosophila populations

Experimental evolution is becoming a popular approach to study the genomic selection response of evolving populations. Computer simulation studies suggest that the accuracy of the signature increases with the duration of the experiment. Since some assumptions of the computer simulations may be violated, it is important to scrutinize the influence of the experimental duration with real data. Here, we use a highly replicated Evolve and Resequence study in Drosophila simulans to compare the selection targets inferred at different time points. At each time point, approximately the same number of SNPs deviates from neutral expectations, but only 10% of the selected haplotype blocks identified from the full data set can be detected after 20 generations. Those haplotype blocks that emerge already after 20 generations differ from the others by being strongly selected at the beginning of the experiment and display a more parallel selection response. Consistent with previous computer simulations, our results demonstrate that only Evolve and Resequence experiments with a sufficient number of generations can characterize complex adaptive architectures.

Partial Selfing Can Reduce Genetic Loads While Maintaining Diversity During Experimental Evolution

Partial selfing, whereby self- and cross- fertilization occur in populations at intermediate frequencies, is generally thought to be evolutionarily unstable. Yet, it is found in natural populations. This could be explained if populations with partial selfing are able to reduce genetic loads and the possibility for inbreeding depression while keeping genetic diversity that may be important for future adaptation. To address this hypothesis, we compare the experimental evolution of Caenorhabditis elegans populations under partial selfing, exclusive selfing or predominant outcrossing, while they adapt to osmotically challenging conditions. We find that the ancestral genetic load, as measured by the risk of extinction upon inbreeding by selfing, is maintained as long as outcrossing is the main reproductive mode, but becomes reduced otherwise. Analysis of genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) during experimental evolution and among the inbred lines that survived enforced inbreeding indicates that populations with predominant outcrossing or partial selfing maintained more genetic diversity than expected with neutrality or purifying selection. We discuss the conditions under which this could be explained by the presence of recessive deleterious alleles and/or overdominant loci. Taken together, our observations suggest that populations evolving under partial selfing can gain some of the benefits of eliminating unlinked deleterious recessive alleles and also the benefits of maintaining genetic diversity at partially dominant or overdominant loci that become associated due to variance of inbreeding levels.