Effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of wearable cardioverter-defibrillators in the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest - Results from a health technology assessment

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) in adult persons with high risk for sudden cardiac arrest and for which an implantable cardioverter is currently not applicable.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CRD-databases. Study selection was performed by two reviewers independently. Data were presented quantitatively; due to heterogeneity of studies no meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

One randomized-controlled trial (RCT), one non-randomized comparative trial, and forty-four non-comparative trials were included. The RCT reported an overall mortality of 3.1 percent in the WCD group versus 4.9 percent in controls (relative risk [RR]: .64; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], .43-.98, p = .04), but no significant effect on arrhythmia-related mortality. The RR for arrhythmia-related mortality amounted to .67 (95 percent CI, .37-1.21, p = .18) as assessed in the RCT. Appropriate shocks were observed in 1.3 percent of patients in both comparative studies, and inappropriate shocks in .6 percent of patients in the RCT. Termination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was successful in 75 to 100 percent of appropriate shocks in all studies. Adverse events assessed in the RCT showed a lower incidence of shortness of breath (38.8 percent vs. 45.3 percent; p = .004), higher incidence of rash at any location (15.3 percent vs. 7.1 percent; p < .001), and higher incidence of itching at any location (17.2 percent vs. 6.4 percent; p < .001) for WCD.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence demonstrates that the WCD detects and terminates VT/VF events reliably and shows a high rate of appropriate shocks in mixed patient populations. Data of large registries confirm that the WCD is a safe intervention.

High-energy external defibrillation and transcutaneous pacing during MRI: feasibility and safety

BACKGROUND

Rapid application of external defibrillation, a crucial first-line therapy for ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest, is currently unavailable in the setting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), raising concerns about patient safety during MRI tests and MRI-guided procedures, particularly in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility and safety of defibrillation/pacing for the entire range of clinically useful shock energies inside the MRI bore and during scans, using defibrillation/pacing outside the magnet as a control.

METHODS

Experiments were conducted using a commercial defibrillator (LIFEPAK 20, Physio-Control, Redmond, Washington, USA) with a custom high-voltage, twisted-pair cable with two mounted resonant floating radiofrequency traps to reduce emission from the defibrillator and the MRI scanner. A total of 18 high-energy (200-360 J) defibrillation experiments were conducted in six swine on a 1.5 T MRI scanner outside the magnet bore, inside the bore, and during scanning, using adult and pediatric defibrillation pads. Defibrillation was followed by cardiac pacing (with capture) in a subset of two animals. Monitored signals included: high-fidelity temperature (0.01 °C, 10 samples/sec) under the pads and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) using an MRI-compatible ECG system.

RESULTS

Defibrillation/pacing was successful in all experiments. Temperature was higher during defibrillation inside the bore and during scanning compared with outside the bore, but the differences were small (ΔT: 0.5 and 0.7 °C, p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). During scans, temperature after defibrillation tended to be higher for pediatric vs. adult pads (p = 0.08). MR-image quality (signal-to-noise ratio) decreased by ~ 10% when the defibrillator was turned on.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of in-bore defibrillation for the full range of defibrillation energies used in clinical practice, as well as of transcutaneous cardiac pacing inside the MRI bore. Methods for Improving MR-image quality in the presence of a working defibrillator require further study.