The effect of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing on fibromyalgia: A multiple-baseline experimental case study across ten participants

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and stiffness in muscles and joints. Traumatic life experiences and post-traumatic stress symptoms play a role in its development and persistence. Although previous research suggests that pain and FM symptoms decrease after eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy, its effectiveness has not been investigated in a controlled manner. The present study investigated the effectiveness of a six-session, 90-minute EMDR therapy using a multiple baseline single-case experimental design (SCED) across ten adult females with FM. The SCED involved a baseline, intervention, one- and three-month follow-up phase. The primary outcome was pain. Secondary outcomes included post-traumatic stress symptoms, other FM symptoms (fatigue, stiffness in muscles and joints), and the impact of FM on daily activities and sleep. Data were statistically analyzed by primarily testing means across phases on an individual and group level. Post-traumatic stress symptoms improved significantly in seven participants. Pain severity decreased significantly in six participants, with three of them maintaining significant improvement three months later. One participant showed clinically relevant change one month later. Furthermore, improvements were observed in secondary outcome measures. The findings support the efficacy of EMDR in reducing FM symptoms.

Methylation factors as biomarkers of fibromyalgia

Background

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common and intractable chronic musculoskeletal pain syndrome, but its exact underlying mechanisms are unknown. This study sought to identify biomarkers of FM and the underlying molecular mechanisms of the disease.

Methods

FM-related gene expression profiles (GSE67311) and methylation profiles (GSE85506) were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and a differential expression analysis was performed to identify the methylation factors. Subsequently, an enrichment analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were conducted to examine the methylation factors. In addition, the transcriptional regulators of the methylation factors were predicted, and key methylation factors were identified by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and nomogram models. Finally, the relationship between FM and cell death (pyroptosis, necroptosis, and cuproptosis) was assessed by a GSEA and gene set variation analysis.

Results

A total of 455 methylation factors were identified. The enrichment analysis and GSEA results showed that methylation factors were clearly involved in the biological functions and signaling pathways related to neural, immune inflammation, and pain responses. The transcriptional regulator specificity protein 1 (SP1) may have a broad regulatory role. Finally, seven key methylation factors were identified, of which amino beta (A4) precursor protein binding family B member 2 (APBB2), A-kinase anchor protein 12 (AKAP12), and cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) had strong clinical diagnostic power. In addition, AKAP12 and CD38 were significantly and negatively associated with sepsis, necrotizing sepsis, and cupular sepsis.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that FM is associated with deoxyribonucleic acid methylation. The methylation factors APBB2, AKAP12, and CD38 may be potential biomarkers and should be further examined to provide a new biological framework of the possible disease mechanisms underlying FM.

Juvenile Fibromyalgia: Different from the Adult Chronic Pain Syndrome?

While a majority of research has focused on adult fibromyalgia (FM), recent evidence has provided insights into the presence and impact of FM in children and adolescents. Commonly referred as juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM), youths, particularly adolescent girls, present with persistent widespread pain and cardinal symptoms observed in adult FM. A majority of youth with JFM continue to experience symptoms into adulthood, which highlights the importance of early recognition and intervention. Some differences are observed between adult and juvenile-onset FM syndrome with regard to comorbidities (e.g., joint hypermobility is common in JFM). Psychological comorbidities are common but less severe in JFM. Compared to adult FM, approved pharmacological treatments for JFM are lacking, but non-pharmacologic approaches (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy and exercise) show promise. A number of conceptual issues still remain including (1) directly comparing similarities and differences in symptoms and (2) identifying shared and unique mechanisms underlying FM in adults and youths.