[Evaluation of an "Emergency Thrombosis" care system in a university-hospital department of general emergencies]

GOAL

Describe the use of diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic algorithms for venous thromboembolism (VTE), derived from the 2014 European guidelines, in a teaching hospital's emergencies department and compare two groups: the 2015 group "without a care path" and the 2017 group "with a care path".

METHOD

Comparative and retrospective study of the characteristics of emergencies department patients admitted for VTE from January to June 2015 for the 2015 group and from January to June 2017 for the 2017 group.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included in the 2015 group and 62 patients in the 2017 group. In 24% of cases a clinical probability rule was calculated in the 2017 group (vs. no score in 2015, P<0.05). In the 2015 group, 10% of patients did not have a D-Dimer measurement in case of low clinical probability (vs. 0% in 2017, P<0.05). For both groups, the severity score sPESI was not noted in the medical record. All patients with pulmonary embolism were hospitalized in both groups. A total of 36% of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were hospitalized in the 2015 group (vs. none in 2017, P<0.05). A total of 52.5% of patients were treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAS) in the 2017 group vs. 32.5% in the 2015 group (P<0.05). In 18% of cases DOAS were prescribed by emergency physicians in the 2017 group vs. 2.5% in the 2015 group (P<0.05). Mean hospital stay was 7.4 days in the 2017 group and 9.4 days in the 2015 group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

We observed a change in clinical practices and prescriptions after the establishment of an "Emergency Thrombosis" care system. Indeed, improvement in the calculation of the clinical probability score, increase in the outpatient management of DVT, increase in prescribing DOAS and reducing the length of hospital stay were the main revisions. The implementation of standardized digitally calculated clinical and prognostic probability scores would optimize this care path, as well as allow a better distribution of the post-emergency consultations created for outpatients.

[Interest of extrahospital multidisciplinary unit of neuro-psycho-geriatric intervened in nursing home: Analysis of 288 interventions]

INTRODUCTION

Geriatrics Mobile Units are a new organisation operating in nursing homes. Their mission is to propose globally oriented neuro-psychiatric and geriatric care. The purpose of the study is to assess their activity and impact over a 21-month period.

METHOD

A prospective single center study of UMNPG's data including intervention characteristics, patient characteristics, recommendations and reassessment after intervention. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory Nursing Home version (NPI-NH) was measured during intervention and reassessed after 30 days (Student's t-test).

RESULTS

From March 2014 to December 2015, UMNPG conducted 288 interventions mainly for medical advices (81%), clinical assessments (54%) and health care team support (46%). The average age was 84.6±7.3years, 73.3% of whom were women. The patients were dependent (62% of GIR 1 or 2) with dementia (60%) and under several medications (83.7%). The symptoms were mainly agitation/aggression (76.4%), anxiety (75%), depression (66.7%), irritability (60.4%), aberrant motor behaviour (55.9%) and delusions (48.6%). The main proposals of UMNPG were a change in treatment (79.5%), a health care team support (85.4%) and hospitalization (8.4%). The rate of follow-up on recommendation was 83% on the 15th day and 80% on the 30th day. The rate of avoided hospitalizations was 16%. The average NPI-NH decreased (on day 0 NPI=50±19.2; on day 30 NPI=33.9±19.6, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

UMNPG-EHPAD intervenes for frail elderly residents with multiple disorders in crisis situations. Medical recommendations help to support people in nursing homes and decrease NPI-NH. UMNPG-EHPAD is part of geriatric network strengthening the city/hospital connection.