A critical evaluation of cortical bone fracture toughness testing methods

Cortical bone fracture mechanics which quantifies the tissue's resistance to fracture is widely regarded as important to finding key determinants of bone fragility and fracture. Currently, the most widely used fracture mechanics approach is the J-integral resistance (J-R) curve as defined in ASTM E1820 standard. This standard employs an unloading compliance (UC) method to estimate crack extension, necessary for fracture toughness and resistance curve (R-curve) quantification. Further, this UC method requires a series of unload-reload cycles to be conducted during the fracture test. However, cortical bone violates some assumptions on which the UC method is based, which are: no energy loss during the unload-reload cycles and any change in unloading compliance is only due to crack extension. Consequently, the aim of this study was to examine the impact of the UC method on the accuracy of fracture toughness measurement for bovine cortical bone. Ten pairs of single edged notched bend specimens were prepared from the posterior diaphysis of bovine tibiae and underwent three-point bending fracture tests. The paired specimens were divided into two groups: a cyclic loaded group and a monotonic loaded group. Further, crack extension was determined by the UC method for the cyclic group and by an optical method for both the cyclic and monotonic groups. From these, three different approaches were used to generate J-R curves from which three fracture toughness parameters were computed and compared between the three approaches. This comparison allowed the impact of crack extension estimation by the UC method as well as the unload-reload cycles on the accuracy of the fracture toughness measures to be assessed. Results show that the UC method underestimates crack extension by an average error of 73%. In addition, the combined effects from crack extension estimation using the UC method and the unload-reload cycles lead to a significant overestimation of the specimen's fracture toughness measures. This highlights the need for more studies to establish a standardized approach to cortical bone fracture testing.

The flexural strength of CAD/CAM polymer crowns and the effect of artificial ageing on the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM polymer and ceramic single crowns

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the fracture resistance, flexural strength and Weibull modulus of an innovative CAD/CAM polymer and to compare its fracture resistance with that of glass ceramics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 32 (n = 16 IPS e.max CAD (LIDI); n = 16 LuxaCam Composite (LUXA)) first mandibular molar crowns were fabricated and cemented onto metal dies by use of luting composite. Half of the specimens were loaded until fracture without prior artificial ageing. The other half were subjected to thermal (5°/55 °C) and mechanical (1,200,000 cycles, 80 N) cycling before fracture loading. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyse fracture behaviour. A three-point bending test of the flexural strength of LUXA was performed according to ISO 6872:2008. Data were analysed by means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05) and Weibull statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Initial fracture resistance of LIDI was significantly higher than that of LUXA. However, the initial fracture resistance of LIDI decreased significantly after artificial ageing. After ageing, fracture resistance was 1050.29 ± 325.08 N for LUXA and 1250.09 ± 32.53 N for LIDI. Three-point bending test yielded a mean flexural strength value for LUXA of 145.28 ± 18.21 MPa and a Weibull modulus of m = 9.51.

CONCLUSIONS

Polymer-based material tested in this study had a lower fracture resistance than that of the glass-ceramic material. Fracture resistance and flexural strength of LuxaCam Composite are sufficient for use in the first molar region.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The mechanical properties of this innovative polymer-based material indicate it can be used in the first molar region as a suitable alternative to glass ceramics. Further clinical studies are required to confirm this. The study presents an innovative material as an alternative to glassceramic for the clinical use in dentistry. The materials investigated were differently affected by artificial aging. Clinical use for patients with bruxism may be considered.