Giant inguinal hernia repair using standard transverse inguinal incision with mesh. A retrospective case control study

BACKGROUND

Giant inguinal hernia (GIH) is a rare condition in the developed world, and the literature is scarce. Case reports describe different techniques in an attempt to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). We aimed to review our experience with GIH repair.

METHOD

A retrospective review of the medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent a tension-free mesh GIH repair using a transverse inguinal incision between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary university referral center. In brief, the technique included head-down positioning, maximal pre-incision reduction of hernia contents, and repair with mesh. Follow-up was conducted in outpatient clinic. We compared the results to a time-based open standard inguinal hernia repair group (control group).

RESULTS

During the study period, 58 patients underwent an open GIH repair with mesh without abdominal preparation. 232 patients were included in the control group. The mean surgery duration was 125.5 min in the GIH group and 84 min in the control group (p < 0.001). Bowel resection was not necessary in any case. In-hospital complication rates were 13.8% vs. 5.6% in the GIH and control groups, respectively (p = 0.045). Early complication rates (up to 30 days post-operatively) were 62.1% vs. 14.7% in the GIH and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Late complications rate was similar (p = 0.476). ACS and mortality were not reported. No recurrence event was reported in the GIH group.

CONCLUSION

Tension-free mesh repair for GIH using a standard transverse inguinal incision is feasible and safe and there is no need for abdominal cavity preparation. Early complications are more common than in the control group, but there were no higher rate of late or severe complications and no recurrence event.

Giant recurrent left inguinal hernia with femoral nerve injury: a report of a rare case

Background

Giant inguinal hernia(GIH), a rare disease, has brought great challenges to surgeons. GIH is defined as an inguinal hernia that extends below the midpoint of the inner thigh in standing position. However, a giant recurrent inguinal hernia resulting from previous operations that destroy the anatomical structure of the inguinal region is extremely rare. Nerve injury, a complication following inguinal hernia repair, is mostly found in ilioinguinal nerve and iliohypogastric nerve, which often presents as numbness and acute or chronic pain, while postoperative muscular dysfunction results from femoral nerve injury is rare.

Case presentation

A 77-years-old woman presented with a complaint of a reducible mass in the left inguinal of duration 1 year. The patient had three previous inguinal hernia repairs. Physical examination and auxiliary examination indicated a giant inguinal hernia with femoral nerve injury. After preoperative evaluation and preparation, a transabdominal partial extraperitoneal(TAPE) repair have performed. Finally, the patient recovered and was discharged.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we reported a rare case of a giant recurrent inguinal hernia with femoral nerve injury and made a successful treatment for the patient via transabdominal partial extraperitoneal(TAPE) repair.

Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum: The answer for treating giant inguinal hernias while avoiding morbidities?

PURPOSE

Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) is mostly used for giant abdominal incisional hernias, and only a few isolated or paired cases that used PPP in the treatment of giant inguinal hernias (GIH) have been reported. The main objective of this study is to describe our technique in the use of PPP in the treatment of GIH in a series of patients who presented with this challenging condition.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of a series of patients treated with PPP for GIH during a 6-year period (2012-2018) at a single institution. The demographics, preoperative, and surgical characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 7 patients were treated for GIH with PPP. The median age was 64 (range 30-89) years. The median history time with the inguinal hernia was 8 (range 2-20) years. The median time of PPP was 22 (range 15-30) days. All patients underwent the Lichtenstein technique. The median follow-up time was 12 (range 3-84) months. Three (42.8%) of the patients had preoperative complications. Two patients developed mild dyspnea during PPP, and another patient had subcutaneous emphysema during the insertion of the catheter. Two (28.5%) patients had postoperative complications. One of them developed a right scrotal abscess, and another patient developed bilateral grade III hydrocele.

CONCLUSION

With our limited experience, it is too early to tell if this should be the gold standard for the treatment of GIH. To see if there is superiority among different procedures, more studies that compare the morbidity of PPP with that of other trans operative techniques are needed. Nevertheless, the procedure we propose has provided satisfactory results.

Giant Left-Sided Amyand's Hernia: A Challenging Procedure in a Rural Hospital

The finding of a vermiform appendix in the case of an inguinal hernia that extends below the midpoint of the inner thigh when the patient is in a standing position is defined as giant left-sided Amyand's hernia. It is a very rare case and significantly challenging in terms of preoperative diagnosis and surgical management. Here we present our experience with a case of a giant left-sided Amyand's hernia that was followed up for 2 months.

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for giant inguinal hernias

BACKGROUND

Many surgical techniques have been developed to treat inguinal hernia. In recent years, the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach has been widely performed to repair inguinal hernia. Giant inguinal hernia (GIH) is an extremely rare disease that is a challenge for general surgeons. GIH appears when patients neglect the treatment for many years and it is defined as an inguinal hernia that extends below the midpoint of inner thigh in standing position. According to previous publications, the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty is recommended to repair GIH. In this article, we describe consecutive four cases of GIH repaired via the TAPP approach.

METHODS

From April 2015 to March 2017, 200 patients underwent hernioplasty against inguinal hernia at our hospital. Inguinal hernias were treated via the TAPP approach in principle. We performed hernioplasty via the TAPP approach in all 4 patients (2%) who met the definition of Type 1 GIH. Demographic information, maximum diameter of hernia sac, hernia orifice size, and surgical data were obtained.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 135 min. No intraoperative complications were encountered. All patients could walk from postoperative day 1 and were discharged home early, but they all had scrotal seromas. Three patients did not need puncture or drainage, but one of them required puncture. All seromas disappeared within 6 months. There was no recurrence in the 8- to 24-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The TAPP approach is a feasible, safe therapeutic option that may reduce wound size and pain following surgical treatment of Type 1 GIH.

Duodenal rupture due to giant inguinal hernia: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Giant inguinal hernia is unusual, and duodenal rupture accompanying it is particularly very rare and significantly hard to manage surgically.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

An 81-year-old man was admitted to our institution with upper abdominal pain. He had tenderness of the upper mid abdomen and a bilateral large inguinal hernia but he did not have pain in the inguinal-scrotal area. Computed tomography (CT) showed slight dilatation of the small bowel and stomach. There were no remarkable signs of incarceration of the inguinal hernia. Therefore, he was admitted to the internal ward. On the second day in hospital, he suddenly went into shock. CT revealed that there was free air and ascites in the inguinal hernia and therefore an emergency operation was performed. The tranverse colon, ascending colon, and ileum were incarcerated, and perfolation of the cecum was found. We also detected duodenal rupture at the inferior duodenal angle. We resected the terminal ileal (almost 90cm) and ileocecal area, followed by side-to-side anastomosis of duodenum and jejunum. We only repaired the peritoneum at the internal hernia ring. After the operation, despite intensive-care therapy, this patient passed away on the 18th postoperative day.

DISCUSSION

The mesocolon and third portion of the duodenum were strongly pulled down into giant inguinal hernia, probably causing the rupture of the inferior duodenal angle.

CONCLUSION

Giant inguinal hernia possibly provokes duodenal rupture and therefore should definitively be repaired if feasible.

Treatment of a half century year old giant inguinoscrotal hernia. A case report

•

Giant inguinoscrotal hernias are a rare entity in modern clinical practice mainly because of the patient’s neglect.

•

Our patient had a type II giant inguinoscrotal hernia extending below the midline between mid-inner thigh and suprapatellar bone lines.

•

We avoided preoperative or intraoperative procedures for the lengthening of the abdominal wall.

•

Despite the longevity and size of the hernia, we avoided a debulking procedure, instead we performed a lower midline incision and connected it with an extended right inguinal incision.

•

Patient’s recovery was uneventful with no complications or signs of recurrence at 6 month follow up.

Introduction

Inguinal hernias, although a common medical entity, can on rare occasions present as giant inguinoscrotal hernias, mostly because of the patient’s rejection of timely surgical management.

Presentation of case

A 77 year old patient, with a giant inguinoscrotal hernia history for more than 50 years, was advised to undergo surgical treatment due to recurrent urinary tract infections and vague abdominal pain. Physical examination showed a right sided giant inguinoscrotal hernia extending below the midpoint of the inner thigh. Preoperative CT examination confirmed a giant inguinoscrotal hernia containing the whole of the small bowel along with its mesentery.

Discussion

Giant inguinoscrotal hernias are classified into three types based on size, with each one posing a challenge to treat. There are a number of surgical options and recommendations available, depending on the type of hernia. They require close postoperative observation, because the sudden increase in the intra-abdominal pressure can account for a number of complications. Our case was classified as a type II hernia, having longevity of more than 50 years. Despite this, it was treated with forced reduction and no debulking through an extended inguinal and lower midline incision, forming a ‘V shaped’ incision. Patient recovery was uneventful and he was discharged on the 10th postoperative day.

Conclusion

Preoperative management and the correct surgical plan depending on the case are key elements in the successful treatment of this rare surgical entity.

Acute Gastric Rupture in a Giant Inguinoscrotal Hernia

Inguinoscrotal gastric herniation is a rare occurrence and generally presents with obstruction when encountered. We present a case of acute spontaneous gastric rupture in a giant inguinoscrotal hernia which was managed surgically in a one-stage procedure with primary gastric and hernia repair. A subtotal colectomy was performed due to risk of volvulus as well as allowing for primary closure of the abdominal wall. This case illustrates the possibilities in terms of hernia size and contents, in addition to the potential complications that may ensue. Moreover, this case illustrates that adherence to the principles of hernia repair can equip the surgeon to deal with rare and unfamiliar presentations.

Giant inguinal hernia: Report of a case and reviews of surgical techniques

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernia is one of the most surgical common diseases. Giant inguinal hernia is more unusual and significantly challenging in terms of surgical management. It is defined as an inguinal hernia that extends below the midpoint of inner thigh when the patient is in standing position.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 67-year-old male presented with giant right-side inguinal hernia with symptoms of partial colonic obstruction and significant weight loss. Barium enema revealed ascending colon, cecum and ileum contained in hernia sac without significant lesions of large bowel. He underwent hernia repair with omentectomy. Hernioplasty with polypropylene mesh was performed without any complications. He recovered uneventfully.

DISCUSSION

There were several repair techniques suggested by published articles such as resection of the content and increased intraabdominal volume procedure. Many key factors for management of the giant inquinal hernia were discussed. A new classification of the giant inquinal hernia was described.

CONCLUSION

Surgical repair for the giant inquinal hernia is challenging and correlated with significant morbidity and mortality due to increased intra-abdominal pressure.