1
|
Vucic S, Ferguson TA, Cummings C, Hotchkin MT, Genge A, Glanzman R, Roet KCD, Cudkowicz M, Kiernan MC. Gold Coast diagnostic criteria: Implications for ALS diagnosis and clinical trial enrollment. Muscle Nerve 2021; 64:532-537. [PMID: 34378224 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are complex, incorporating multiple levels of certainty from possible through to definite, and are thereby prone to error. Specifically, interrater variability was previously established to be poor, thereby limiting utility as diagnostic enrollment criteria for clinical trials. In addition, the different levels of diagnostic certainty do not necessarily reflect disease progression, adding confusion to the diagnostic algorithm. Realizing these inherent limitations, the World Federation of Neurology, the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the International Alliance of ALS/MND Associations, the ALS Association (United States), and the Motor Neuron Disease Association convened a consensus meeting (Gold Coast, Australia, 2019) to consider the development of simpler criteria that better reflect clinical practice, and that could merge diagnostic categories into a single entity. The diagnostic accuracy of the novel Gold Coast criteria was subsequently interrogated through a large cross-sectional study, which established an increased sensitivity for ALS diagnosis when compared with previous criteria. Diagnostic accuracy was maintained irrespective of disease duration, functional status, or site of disease onset. Importantly, the Gold Coast criteria differentiated atypical phenotypes, such as primary lateral sclerosis, from the more typical ALS phenotype. It is proposed that the Gold Coast criteria should be incorporated into routine practice and clinical trial settings.
Collapse
|
Journal Article |
4 |
24 |
2
|
Jewett G, Khayambashi S, Frost GS, Beland B, Lee A, Hodgkinson V, Korngut L, Chhibber S. Gold Coast criteria expand clinical trial eligibility in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 2022; 66:397-403. [PMID: 35673968 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS Consensus criteria to formalize the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and refine clinical trial populations have evolved. The recently proposed Gold Coast consensus criteria are intended to simplify use and increase sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate the potential impact of these criteria on clinical trial eligibility. METHODS We performed a single-center, retrospective study of people diagnosed with ALS between 2016 and 2021 to determine the numbers of those meeting Gold Coast, revised El Escorial (rEEC) criteria, and Awaji criteria. We identified the proportion of those who would have been eligible for participation in three major ALS clinical trials if Gold Coast were used in place of rEEC definite/probable criteria. (rEEC D/P). RESULTS Two hundred six people with ALS were included in our study. 48.5% met Gold Coast criteria but not rEEC D/P. Using the Gold Coast criteria would result in higher rates of clinical trial eligibility after other inclusion criteria were met: 95.2% vs 42.5% (P < .001) in a phase III study of riluzole; 100% vs 31.0% (P = .002) in a phase III study of edaravone; and 95.6% vs 45.3% (P < .001) in an ongoing phase III study of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol. The sensitivity of the Gold Coast criteria (96.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 92.2%-98.2%) was significantly higher than that of rEEC D/P (47.6%; 95% CI, 40.6%-54.6%; for difference, χ2 = 117.6; P < .001). DISCUSSION Until robust biomarkers are available to diagnose ALS, consensus diagnostic criteria remain necessary. Gold Coast criteria would expand research and clinical trial eligibility and improve external validity of clinical trial results.
Collapse
|
|
3 |
13 |
3
|
Stikvoort García DJL, Sleutjes BTHM, van Schelven LJ, Goedee HS, van den Berg LH. Diagnostic accuracy of nerve excitability and compound muscle action potential scan derived biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:3068-3078. [PMID: 37354059 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The lack of reliable early biomarkers still causes substantial diagnostic delays in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a novel electrophysiological protocol in patients with suspected motor neuron disease (MND). METHODS Consecutive patients with suspected MND were prospectively recruited at our tertiary referral centre for MND in Utrecht, The Netherlands. Procedures were performed in accordance with the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. In addition to the standard diagnostic workup, an electrophysiological protocol of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans and nerve excitability tests was performed on patients' thenar muscles. The combined diagnostic yield of nerve excitability and CMAP scan based motor unit number estimation was compared to the Awaji and Gold Coast criteria and their added value was determined. RESULTS In all, 153 ALS or progressive muscular atrophy patients, 63 disease controls and 43 healthy controls were included. Our electrophysiological protocol had high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.80-0.90), even in muscles with undetectable axon loss (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.85) and in bulbar-onset patients (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.95). Twenty-four of 33 (73%) ALS patients who could not be diagnosed during the same visit were correctly identified, as well as 8/13 (62%) ALS patients not meeting the Gold Coast criteria and 49/59 (83%) ALS patients not meeting the Awaji criteria during this first visit. CONCLUSIONS Our practical and non-invasive electrophysiological protocol may improve early diagnosis in clinically challenging patients with suspected ALS. Routine incorporation may boost early diagnosis, enhance patient selection and generate baseline measures for clinical trials.
Collapse
|
|
2 |
13 |
4
|
Ohnari K, Mafune K, Adachi H. Usefulness of the Gold Coast criteria in diagnosing fast-progressing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2025; 471:123418. [PMID: 39987720 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2025.123418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2024] [Revised: 01/14/2025] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Abstract
The Gold Coast criteria are reportedly more sensitive for diagnosing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) than the previously used criteria; however, the sensitivity of these sets of criteria among groups classified according to their prognosis has not been compared. In this study, we examined the difference in the sensitivity for ALS diagnosis among these criteria, especially in patients with fast-progression ALS. We enrolled 95 patients diagnosed with ALS and retrospectively classified them into three groups based on the interval between disease onset and death or tracheostomy. We retrospectively examined the number of patients meeting the Gold Coast, Awaji, or revised El Escorial criteria (rEEC) (definite/probable/possible) at initial clinical examination and electromyography and compared the rates of diagnosis according to each set of criteria among the three groups. The sensitivity of the Gold Coast criteria was significantly higher than that of the Awaji and rEEC criteria (sensitivity, 92.6 % vs. 71.8 % vs. 71.7 %, p < 0.001). The sensitivity of the Gold Coast criteria in patients with fast progression (n = 30) was significantly higher than that of the Awaji and rEEC criteria (sensitivity, 100 % vs. 73.3 % vs. 73.3 %, p = 0.001). Most patients diagnosed only based on the Gold Coast criteria had lower motor signs. Hence, the Gold Coast criteria are particularly useful for diagnosing fast-progression ALS.
Collapse
|
|
1 |
1 |
5
|
Jewett G, Khayambashi S, Frost GS, Beland B, Lee A, Hodgkinson V, Korngut L, Chhibber S. Diagnostic criteria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Time for a change. Muscle Nerve 2022; 66:E34-E35. [PMID: 36116127 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
Letter |
3 |
1 |
6
|
Kiernan MC, Timmins HC. Utility of the Gold Coast criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Experience with fast progressors. J Neurol Sci 2025; 470:123417. [PMID: 39954573 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2025.123417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2025] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
|
Editorial |
1 |
|
7
|
Ferullo L, Risi B, Caria F, Olivieri E, Poli L, Gazzina S, Leggio U, Bertella E, Giovanelli G, Labella B, Padovani A, Filosto M. Gold Coast Criteria in ALS Diagnosis: A Real-World Experience. Brain Sci 2024; 14:1055. [PMID: 39595818 PMCID: PMC11592046 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2024] [Revised: 10/22/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Revised El Escorial (rEEC) and Awaji criteria are currently used for diagnosing and categorizing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, they are complex; their sensitivity is still not optimal for research purposes, and they present high inter-rater variability in clinical practice. To address these points, in 2019, a new set of diagnostic criteria was proposed, namely the Gold Coast criteria (GCC), characterized by a dichotomous diagnostic categorization, i.e., ALS or not ALS. Methods: In order to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, and clinical usefulness of GCC in a practical clinical setting, we retrospectively evaluated 131 patients diagnosed with ALS and 104 control subjects. ALSFRS-R score, electrophysiological tests, neuroradiological investigations, and CSF analysis were obtained. rEEC, Awaji, and GCC were applied at the first and last evaluations. Results: The sensitivity of GCC (93.1%; 96.1%) was greater than rEEC (71.8%; 87%) and Awaji criteria (77.8%; 89.3%) both at the first visit and last follow-up. The GCC's specificity (28.8%) is lower than that of the other two criteria (rEEC 45.2%; Awaji 43.3%). Conclusions: Our study suggests that in a real-world setting, the GCC are more sensitive and have substantially lower risk of false negative diagnoses than rEEC and Awaji criteria. Although rEEC had the highest specificity, they may delay the diagnosis. Systematically using the GCC could help to achieve an earlier diagnosis and quickly refer patients to the correct management. The low specificity of GCC is likely to not significantly impact patient recruitment in clinical trials; therefore, its use might allow a faster and earlier enrollment.
Collapse
|
brief-report |
1 |
|
8
|
Otani R, Shibuya K, Shimizu T, Kitaoji T, Noto YI, Bokuda K, Kimura H, Suichi T, Nakamura K, Kano H, Morooka M, Aotsuka Y, Ogushi M, Misawa S, Kuwabara S. Diagnostic utility of Gold Coast criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Asia. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2024; 25:264-270. [PMID: 38226616 DOI: 10.1080/21678421.2024.2303062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to reveal the diagnostic utility of Gold Coast (GC) criteria in Japanese patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by comparing the sensitivity/specificity with revised El Escorial (R-EE) and Awaji criteria, because its utility has not been studied in Asian ALS. Methods: Consecutive 639 patients (529 with ALS and 110 with ALS mimics), who were suspected of ALS and referred to three Japanese ALS centers, were enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy and characteristics of false positive and negative in GC criteria were compared with those of the Awaji and R-EE criteria. Patients were categorized as definite, probable or possible ALS according to each criterion. Results: The sensitivity of GC criteria (96.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.3-98.3%) was higher than that of Awaji (89.6%, 95% CI: 87.0-92.2%) and R-EEC (89.2, 95% CI: 86.6-91.8%) criteria (both, p < 0.001). The specificity was also higher with GC criteria (77.3%, 95% CI: 69.5-85.1%) than Awaji (65.5%, 95% CI: 56.6-74.4%) and R-EEC (66.4, 95% CI: 57.6-75.2%) criteria (both, p < 0.01). Using GC criteria, patients with cervical spondylosis and Parkinson's syndrome tended to be diagnosed with ALS (i.e. "false positive"). Additionally, ALS patients diagnosed only by GC criteria less frequently had upper motor neuron (UMN) signs, compared with the other two criteria. Conclusion: Gold Coast criteria improve diagnostic accuracy for ALS in an Asian population, especially in patients with subtle UMN signs.
Collapse
|
|
1 |
|
9
|
Cassereau J, Bernard E, Genestet S, Chebbah M, Le Clanche S, Verschueren A, Couratier P. Management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in clinical practice: Results of the expert consensus using the Delphi methodology. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:1134-1144. [PMID: 37827930 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare disease characterized by a progressive and irreversible degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons leading to death. In France, limited data exist describing the criteria used in clinical practice for diagnosis and follow-up, and how novel therapies may fit in. The objective of this Delphi panel was to obtain an overview of current French practices in ALS diagnosis, management, and follow-up by determining the scales and criteria used in clinical practice outside of clinical trials, as well as the place of a future treatment like AMX0035, acting on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, in the current therapeutic strategies. A questionnaire was administered to 24 ALS healthcare providers practicing in ALS centers in France. Two rounds of remote voting were organized, before proposition of final consensus statements. Consensus was considered reached when at least 66% of the voters agreed. Consensus were obtained to define the new Gold Coast criteria as the ones used in clinical practice to establish the diagnosis of ALS, thus replacing the revised El Escorial criteria, considered too complex and now mainly used to characterize the patient populations to be included in clinical trials. The clinical factors considered to establish ALS diagnosis are mainly the demonstration of progression of the motor deficit and elimination of differential diagnoses. The ALSFRS-R scale is used in daily clinical practice to assess patient's functional impairment in terms of number of points lost, with the bulbar, respiratory, and fine motor subscores being the most important to evaluate independently. A critical medical need was identified regarding the provision of new therapeutic alternatives in ALS. The panel members would support the earliest management of patients. In this landscape, based on data from a very encouraging phase II (Centaur trial), AMX0035 represents a new tool of choice in current treatment strategies for all patients for whom experts are confident in the diagnosis of ALS, in combination with riluzole. These results will need to be confirmed by the ongoing phase III trial (Phoenix trial).
Collapse
|
|
2 |
|
10
|
García-Casanova PH, Vázquez-Costa JF. Advances in the early diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother 2025; 25:415-425. [PMID: 39998997 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2471556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2025] [Accepted: 02/20/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressing neurodegenerative disease. Despite rapid disease progression, diagnostic delay of 10-16 months persists, influenced by disease-specific factors and healthcare systems. Reducing it is crucial for early intervention, multidisciplinary care planning, and patient participation in clinical trials. AREAS COVERED The authors review relevant studies identified through PubMed from 1990 to 2024. The article explores factors contributing to diagnostic delay, the importance of early diagnosis, and strategies for improvement, including the role of diagnostic criteria and biomarkers. EXPERT OPINION Diagnosis of ALS remains clinical, with clinical expertise as the main modifiable factor in the diagnostic delay. Some biomarkers may be useful to speed up diagnosis at an earlier stage of the disease and in patients with atypical presentations or co-morbidities. However, the use of biomarkers for ALS diagnosis in clinical practice is far from being established and poses considerable challenges, including the lack of disease-specific biomarkers and the potential for delayed results. Until disease-specific biomarkers become available, early referral to ALS specialists, together with physician education programs, will remain the main tools to reduce diagnostic delay in the next years.
Collapse
|
Review |
1 |
|
11
|
Garnier M, Camdessanché JP, Cassereau J, Codron P. From suspicion to diagnosis: exploration strategy for suspected amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Med 2024; 56:2398199. [PMID: 39233624 PMCID: PMC11378651 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2398199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is based on evidence of upper and lower motor neuron degeneration in the bulbar, cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions in a patient with progressive motor weakness, in the absence of differential diagnosis. Despite these well-defined criteria, ALS can be difficult to diagnose, given the wide variety of clinical phenotypes. Indeed, the central or peripheral location of the disease varies with a spectrum ranging from predominantly central to exclusively peripheral, symptoms can be extensive or limited to the limbs, bulbar area or respiratory muscles, and the duration of the disease may range from a few months to several decades. In the absence of a specific test, the diagnostic strategy relies on clinical, electrophysiological, biological and radiological investigations to confirm the disease and exclude ALS mimics. The main challenge is to establish a diagnosis based on robust clinical and paraclinical evidence without delaying treatment initiation by increasing the number of additional tests. This approach requires a thorough knowledge of the phenotypes of ALS and its main differential diagnoses.
Collapse
|
Review |
1 |
|