Latissimus dorsi seroma prevention with running quilting suture using barbed suture

Dorsal seroma is a common complication of autologous latissimus dorsi flap (ALDF) in breast reconstruction, and has limited the use of this technique, despite its aesthetic success. It is important to find a right technique to limit the incidence of seroma formation after ALDF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of a dorsal quilting technique called "running quilting" using barbed resorbable suture in seroma prevention. Three hundred patients who underwent ALDF breast reconstruction in the period between 2004 and 2014 were included in this study. The population was divided in 3 groups; without quilting, with simple quilting suture, and with running quilting using barbed suture. The incidence of small seromas (requiring 1 or 2 aspirations during routine postoperative visits without adding additional appointments to the follow-up routine) was not significantly decreased: it was 54% in the non-quilted group, 47% in group 2 Quilting, and 34% in group 3 running quilting. However, quilting reduced the duration of drainage, and the rate of late seromas (from 8% to 0%), and chronic sero-hematomas completely disappeared in our experience. Running quilting using barbed suture is highly effective in preventing late and refractory donor-site seromas. Its effectiveness is expected to increase the use of ALDF in breast reconstruction, which we consider currently as one of the best autologous reconstruction techniques.

[Secondary surgery of breast reconstructions by breast implant. Assessment of patient satisfaction based on surgical technique implant conservation vs. autologous conversion]

INTRODUCTION

Breast reconstruction with implants has long-term disadvantages and is leading an increasing number of patients to request secondary corrective surgery. Two surgical strategies are possible: implant replacement (associated with capsulectomy/capsulotomy and/or lipofilling procedures) and implant removal associated with the provision of autologous tissue (flap and/or lipofilling).

METHOD

Between 2010 and 2018, 54 patients underwent secondary surgery for correction of a first implant breast reconstruction. The reasons for dissatisfaction with the initial reconstruction, the procedures performed, and postoperative complications were analysed. Patient well-being and satisfaction were evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients benefited from a prosthesis change and 20 patients benefited from a permanent removal of their prosthesis combined with the addition of autologous tissue. The presence of a periprosthetic shell, pain, fixed appearance of the breast and breast asymmetry were the most frequent reasons for dissatisfaction. With a mean follow-up of 2.6 years, autologous conversion patients were generally more satisfied with the appearance of their breasts than patients who retained a breast implant (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In cases of poor esthetic or functional outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction, removal of the prosthesis in combination with autologous reconstruction provides better results in terms of well-being and satisfaction than implant replacement.

[Breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi flap: Towards an evolution of ideas]

AIM OF THE STUDY

Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and fat grafting is a technique widely used in current practice. Some operators still complain at the lack of final results at the first intervention and the need for repeated lipofilling sessions. The objective of this study was to compare the number of reoperations in patients who underwent reconstruction with latissimus dorsi with prosthesis versus without prosthesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included all patients operated for breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap, with or without prosthesis between 2008 and 2012 in our center. We noted the number of new surgical interventions in these patients on the reconstructed breast. We also noted the average weight of mastectomy in two groups each year.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-six patients were included in this study. Ninety-one patients underwent reconstruction with latissimus dorsi and prosthesis, and 95 patients reconstruction by latissimus dorsi and fat graft. It has not been demonstrated significant differences in the number of new surgical procedures between the two groups. The average weight of mastectomies in the autologous group has steadily increased over the five years. There was no significant difference in the average weight of mastectomies between the two groups over the last two years.

CONCLUSION

For breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap, surgical indications changed in our center to the absence of prosthetic implant, whatever the volume of the breast.