Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of HER2-0 and HER2-Low-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: Real-World Data from Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

In our study, we observed the long-term survival outcomes investigated for HER2-0 and HER2-low-positive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Between 1998 and 2020, 10,333 patients with primary breast cancer were treated, including 1373 patients with HER2-0 or HER2-low-positive disease with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Descriptive analyses were performed, and logistic regression models and survival analyses were calculated for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Among the 1373 patients, 930 (67.73%) had HER2-low-positive and 443 (32.27%) had HER2-0 tumors. Patients with HER2-0 tumors had a significantly better pathological complete response, 29.25% vs. 20.09%, and pathological complete response/in situ, 31.97% vs. 24.08%, than patients with HER2-low-positive tumors (p < 0.001; p = 0.003), regardless of the hormone receptor (HR) status. No statistically significant differences were observed for the HR-positive (p = 0.315; p = 0.43) or HR-negative subgroups (p = 0.573; p = 0.931). DFS and OS were significantly longer for HR-positive, HER2-low-positive patients (log-rank p = 0.02; p = 0.012). OS was significantly longer for HR-negative, HER2-0 patients (log-rank p = 0.032). No significant DFS differences were found for the HR-negative cohort (log-rank p = 0.232). For the overall cohort, no significant differences were noted between HER2-low-positive and HER2-0 patients, either for DFS (log-rank p = 0.220) or OS (log-rank p = 0.403). These results show different survival outcomes for HER2-0 and HER2-low-positive tumors relative to HR status. These different cohorts can be identified using standardized immunohistochemistry, even retrospectively.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes provides recent survival information for early-stage HER2-low-positive breast cancer: a large cohort retrospective study

Purpose

It has been reported that breast cancer (BC) with low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) might be a distinct subtype of BC. However, the prognostic effect of low HER2 expression on BC patients remains controversial. We aim to conduct this single-institution retrospective analysis to assess HER2-low-positive BC outcomes in Chinese women and the prognostic role of TILs in HER2-low-positive early-stage BC.

Method

We retrospectively enrolled 1,763 BC patients treated in a single institution from 2017 to 2018. TILs are regarded as continuous variables and are divided into low TILs (≤10%) and high TILs (>10%) for statistical analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test the associations between TILs and disease-free survival (DFS) with adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics.

Result

High TIL levels (>10%) were associated with tumor size (>2 cm, p = 0.042), age at diagnosis (p = 0.005), Ki-67 index (>25%; p <0.001), HR (hormone receptor) status (positive, p <0.001), advanced pathological stage (p = 0.043), subtype (p <0.001), and HER2 status (p <0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that no significant difference in DFS (p = 0.83) could be found between HER2-positive, HER2-low-positive, and HER2-0 BC. The DFS of HER2-low-positive BC and HER2-nonamplified BC with high levels of TILs was statistically better than that of patients with low levels of TILs (p = 0.015; p = 0.047). In HER2-low-positive BC patients with high TIL levels (>10%), DFS was significantly improved in both the univariate (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.87, P = 0.018) and multivariate (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, P = 0.035) Cox models. For further subgroup analysis, HR (+)/HER2-low-positive BC with high TIL (>10%) levels was associated with improved DFS in both the univariate (HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.90, P = 0.025) and multivariate (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, P = 0.032) Cox models. The HR (-)/HER2-0 BC with high TIL (>10%) level was not statistically significant in the univariate Cox model, but it was statistically significant in the multivariate (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.28-0.96, P = 0.045) Cox model.

Conclusion

Among early-stage BC, no significant survival difference could be found between the HER2-positive, HER2-low-positive, and HER2-0 cohorts. High levels of TILs were significantly associated with improved DFS in HER2-low-positive patients, especially in the HR (+)/HER2-low-positive subtype.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with HER2-low-positive and HER2-zero breast cancer

Previous studies have observed that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-positive patients and HER2-zero patients have different prognoses. This study was conducted to investigate whether there are differences in clinicopathological characteristics and the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) defined as systemic treatment prior to surgery between HER2-low-positive patients and HER2-zero patients. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who received NST at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2014 to 2021. There were 238 patients with HER2-low-positive status and 198 patients with HER2-zero status. The proportion of hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients in the HER2-low-positive group was significantly higher than that in the HER2-zero group (82.8% vs 52.0%, p < 0.001). The HER2-low-positive group had more patients with low Ki67 expression (23.9% vs 16.2%, p = 0.045), higher mastectomy rate (94.5% vs 88.9%, p = 0.031), and larger pathological tumor size (21.6 vs 17.8 mm, p = 0.028) than the HER2-zero group. However, no significant differences were found in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates between the two groups. We draw a conclusion that patients with HER2-low status and HER2-zero status were not found to have different pCR rates after NST, irrespective of HR status. However, differences were observed in some clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups.

HER2-low-positive and response to NACT and prognosis in HER2-negative non-metastatic BC

PURPOSE

With the release of promising data from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, there is a new therapeutic direction in HER2-low expression breast cancer (BC). This study aims to evaluate the differences in clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-low-positive and HER2-zero BC, including response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and prognosis.

METHODS

Records of HER2-negative (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0, + 1, or + 2 non-amplified by in situ hybridization [ISH]) patients who received NACT at our cancer center between January 2017 and December 2017 were retrospectively collected. HER2-low-positive was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or IHC2 + /in-situ hybridization negative and HER2-zero was defined as IHC0. The coprimary objectives were to compare pathological complete response (pCR) and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models and Cox-proportional hazards models were performed for analysis of the endpoints pCR, RFS, and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 239 [84.5%] of 283 tumors were HER2-low-positive (including 132 [55.2%] HER2-1 + and 107 [44.8%] HER2-2 + /ISH non-amplified) and 44 [15.5%] were HER2-zero. Patients in the HER2-low-positive group had more commonly hormone receptor positivity than HER2-zero patients (188 [78.7%] vs. 19 [43.2%], P = 0.000), but there was no difference between HER2-1 + and HER2-2 + / ISH non-amplified (99 [75.0%] vs. 89 [83.2%], P = 0.125). HER2-zero tumors had a significantly higher pCR rate than HER2-low-positive tumors (15 [34.1%] of 44 vs. 22 [9.2%] of 239, P = 0.000). Pathological complete response was also significantly higher in HER2-zero tumors versus HER2-low-positive tumors in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup (13 [52.0%] of 25 vs. 14 [27.5%] of 51, P = 0.036), but not in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup (2 [10.5%] of 19 vs 8 [4.3%] of 188, P = 0.231). No significant difference was observed in 5-year RFS between the two groups (HR 0.577, 95% CI 0.298-1.118, P = 0.103). However, HER2-low-positive tumors showed significantly better OS than HER2-zero tumors (HR 0.280, 95% CI 0.122-0.697, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that HER2-low-positive tumors have specific biological characteristics according to the hormone receptor status and exhibit different responses to NACT and prognosis.