Efficacy and safety of halo-gravity traction in the treatment of spinal deformities: A systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To determine, through a systematic review, the effects of halo-gravity traction (HGT) in spinal deformity.

METHODS

Prospective studies or case series of patients with scoliosis or kyphosis treated with cranial HGT were included. Radiological outcomes were measured in the sagittal and/or coronal planes. Pulmonary function was also assessed. Perioperative complications were also collected.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included. Congenital etiology was the most frequent etiology observed. Most studies provided clinically relevant curve correction values in the sagittal and coronal planes. Pulmonary values improved significantly after the use of HGT. Finally, there were a pool of 83 complications in 356 patients (23.3%). The most frequent complications were screw infection (38 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative HGT appears to be a safe and effective intervention for deformity that allows correction prior to surgery. However, there is a lack of homogeneity in the published studies.

First surgical experience treating scoliosis using HGT and ECMO: a case report

CASE PRESENTATION

A 13-year-old female with congenital diaphragmatic hernia-associated pulmonary hypertension presented with severe and rapidly progressing scoliosis. The patient suffered from chronic respiratory failure and high risk of hypertensive crisis with potentially life-threating consequences. The scoliosis was treated with a multidisciplinary approach combining preoperative halo-gravity traction, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and posterior spinal instrumented fusion. After 2 years of follow-up, results are excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment combination reported here for the first time aims to limit surgical aggressiveness. It could be an effective and safe approach for treating severe spinal deformities in very fragile patients with high surgical risk.

Evaluation of outpatient halo-gravity traction in patients with severe scoliosis: development of a monitoring device

INTRODUCTION

Patients with severe spinal deformities represent a major clinical and surgical challenge. Halo-gravity traction (HGT) is a traditional method to correct the deformity prior to surgery. Typically, children undergoing HGT remain in the hospital until surgery. Therefore, it has been suggested to treat these children at lower level healthcare centers or even at home. The aim of this study was to develop a tool to assess patient adherence to HGT together with a program to analyze traction results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An original recording system was designed with an Arduino Nano^®. The data extracted from the memory card were compiled into a text file and then analyzed with the MatLab R2018a MathWorks^®.

RESULTS

Five patients receiving HGT for severe scoliosis were asked to use the device both in the wheelchair and in bed to evaluate its usefulness.

CONCLUSIONS

A device was developed to monitor the use of HGT at home. The device provides information on the time of HGT use and the traction weight placed throughout the day, as well as on the correct functioning of the system in bed and in the wheelchair.

Neuromuscular lordoscoliosis: an unusual response to post-operative halo-gravity traction

PURPOSE

To report the results of prolonged post-operative halo-gravity traction in a patient in whom the surgery had to be interrupted unexpectedly and for whom subsequently specific clinical circumstances contraindicated completion of the surgical procedure.

METHODS

The patient was a 15-year-old male with severe cervico-dorsolumbar lordoscoliosis who was being studied for associated diffuse axonal injury. He performed halo-gravity traction for 12 weeks. Subsequent surgical management consisted of occipito-lumbar posterior instrumented fusion. During the surgical approach, electrocardiographic changes with hemodynamic decompensation were detected that did not improve with anesthetic reanimation. The intervention was stopped, the surgical wound was closed, and the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). It was decided that a revision surgery with the aim to continue with the previous strategy would imply a high risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Orthopedic management was decided upon consisting of continued halo-gravity traction with wheelchair modification at home, which was extended to a period of 12 months because of the good results obtained in terms of cervicothoracic realignment. Two years after halo-gravity discontinuation, clinical and radiographic occipito-cervical alignment was good and the patient conserved certain occipito-cervical range of motion and had the capacity of maintaining a horizontal gaze.

CONCLUSION

We considered the outcome extraordinary and relevant in this complex and unusual patient. A longer follow-up will provide more data regarding the final outcome of this treatment.

Efficacy of Halo-Gravity Traction in the Perioperative Treatment of Severe Scoliosis and Kyphosis: A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of halo-gravity traction (HGT) with subsequent surgical treatment in adolescent and adult patients with severe scoliosis by evaluating the radiographic outcomes and clinical complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with severe scoliosis who underwent a posterior spinal instrumented fusion with HGT during the perioperative period between March 2010 and June 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups: adults (age >18 years) and adolescents (age 10-18 years). All patients were followed with full posteroanterior and lateral spine radiographs, bending films, neurological complications, and lung function tests for a minimum of 2 years. Deformity correction, pulmonary function testing, and clinical complications were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

We identified 29 adults (8 males and 21 females, mean age = 23.7 ± 8.7 years) and 22 adolescents (10 males and 12 females, mean age = 13.0 ± 4.5 years). In the adult group, the mean Cobb angle of the main curve before HGT was 141.7 ± 18.2°, which improved to 126.4 ± 8.6° and 67.5 ± 10.2° after traction and operation, respectively. The kyphotic angle was corrected from 137.1 ± 15.6° before traction to 122.5 ± 11.3° after traction to 67.6 ± 13.8° after operation. The mean functional vital capacity% and forced expiratory volume in one second% were 43.1% and 37.5%, which improved to 46.7% and 41.7% after traction, respectively. In the adolescent group, the mean correction of the main curve improved from 139.3 ± 12.6° before traction to 112.1 ± 8.3° after traction to 59 ± 13.1° after surgical intervention. The kyphotic angle was corrected from 130.7 ± 9.4° before traction to 101.5 ± 12.2° after traction and then to 48.2 ± 10.1° after surgical intervention. Overall, patients in both groups showed significant improvement in their main scoliosis and kyphosis (P < 0.05), while the correction rate of the main curve and kyphosis was significantly higher in the adolescent group than that in the adult group (P < 0.05). The functional vital capacity% increased from 44.8% to 55.0% and the forced expiratory volume in one second% increased from 44.0% to 51.0% after using HGT. In terms of surgical outcomes, the incidence of postoperative neurological complications was 27.6% and 18.2% in the 2 groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HGT is an effective and safe method to correct spinal deformities and improve lung function, especially in adolescent patients with severe scoliosis. In addition, it can potentially reduce the risk of neurological complications and the level of osteotomy in posterior spinal instrumented fusion surgery.

One-stage multiple posterior column osteotomies and fusion and pre-op halo-gravity traction may result in a comparative and safer correction of complex spine deformity than vertebral column resection

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of prospectively collected from patients recruited at a single center.

PURPOSE

To test whether safe and optimal correction can be obtained with preoperative halo-gravity traction and posterior spinal fusion with adjunctive procedures but without VCR. Posterior vertebral column resection(VCR) is gaining popularity for correction of severe spinal deformity. However, it is a highly technically demanding procedure with potential risk for complications and neurological injury.

METHODS

In total, 72 patients with severe spinal deformity (Cobb angle > 100º) who underwent HGT followed by definitive PSF with PCO, with or without concave rib osteotomy and thoracoplasty. Demographic and surgical data were collected. Conventional coronal and sagittal radiographic measurements were obtained pre-traction, post-traction, post-op and at follow-up to determine the final deformity correction. Postoperative neurological and major complications were reviewed. We used Chi-square to compare proportion between groups and t test to compare groups in quantitative/ordinal variables.

RESULTS

There were 72 patients (35 females, 37 males). The etiology was congenital (21),idiopathic (45), neurofibromatosis (2) and neuromuscular (4). The mean was: age 18 ± 4.6 years; duration of HGT 103 ± 35 days; coronal Cobb angle before traction 131.5 ± 21.4º vs 92. ± 15.9º after HGT (30% correction) and 72.8 ± 12.7º after fusion (47% correction); kyphosis angle before traction 134.7 ± 32.3º vs 97.1 ± 22.4º after HGT and 73.7 ± 21.3º post-fusion. Number of fusion levels 14 ± 1; EBL 1730 ± 744 cc; number of PCOs done 5 ± 2; number of concave rib osteotomies (2 ± 2). There were 16 patients with postoperative complications (22.2%), 10 medical, one wound infection, 2 implant related and 3 post-op neuro-deficits (all of whom recovered at follow-up). There was one death (cardiac arrest).

CONCLUSION

HGT and one-stage posterior fusion with PCO, with or without concave rib resection and thoracoplasty, without VCR, achieved satisfactory correction of rigid complex spine deformity with minimal neurological complications. The results compare favorably with previous reports of similar deformities treated with VCR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

How helpful is the halo-gravity traction in severe spinal deformity patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study sought to evaluate the complications and clinic outcome in radiographic parameters, pulmonary function, and nutritional status of halo-gravity traction (HGT) in treating severe spinal deformity.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science databases were searched comprehensively for relevant studies from inception to February 2021, by using combined text and MeSH terms and English language restriction was used. The data, including radiographic parameters, pulmonary function (FVC %), and nutritional status (BMI) was extracted from included studies. All meta-analyses were conducted using random or fixed-effects models according the between-study heterogeneity, estimated with I².

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-six studies were identified and twelve studies with a total of 372 patients were included in this review. Compared with pre-traction values, there were reduction in cobb angle of 28.12° [95% CI (22.18, 34.18)], decrease in thoracic kyphosis of 26.76°[95% CI (20.73, 32.78)], improvements in spine height[SMD = -0.89, 95% CI (- 1.56, - 0.21)] and in coronal balance[WMD = - 0.03, 95% CI (- 1.56, - 0.21), P = 0.84] with preoperative halo-gravity traction for severe spinal deformity patients. Besides, our pooled analysis showed the improvement in pulmonary function (FVC %) [WMD = - 9.56, 95% CI (- 1.56, - 0.21)] and increase in nutritional status (BMI) [WMD = - 0.50, 95% CI (- 1.56, - 0.21)].

CONCLUSION

Partial correction can be achieved by preoperative HGT, thereby reducing the difficulty of the operation and the risk of neurologic injury caused by excessive correction. Moreover, preoperative HGT can improve pulmonary function and nutritional status and, thus, increase patients' tolerance to surgery.

3D printed models can guide safe halo pin placement in patients with diastrophic dysplasia

PURPOSE

To trial the use of three-dimensional (3D) printed skull models to guide safe pin placement in two patients with diastrophic dysplasia (DTD) requiring prolonged pre-fusion halo-gravity traction (HGT).

METHODS

Two sisters aged 8 (ML) and 4 (BL) with DTD were planned for staged fusion for progressive kyphoscoliosis. Both sisters were admitted for pre-fusion HGT. Models of their skulls were generated from computer tomography (CT) scans using Mimics Innovation Suite and printed on a Guider II in polylactic acid. The 3D models were cut axially proximal to the skull equator, in-line where pins are usually inserted, allowing identification of the thickest skull portion to guide pin placement.

RESULTS

Eight pins were inserted into each patient's skull. Postoperative CT scans demonstrated adequate pin position. Pre-traction Cobb angles were 122° and 128° for ML and BL, improving to 83° and 86° following traction. Duration of HGT was 182 and 238 days for ML and BL. Prior to fusion, both patients returned to theatre twice for exchange of loose pins and there was one incidence of pin site infection. Surgery was performed via a posterior instrumented fusion. Postoperatively, both patients remained in their halos for 3 months. One pin in BL was removed for loosening. Both patients achieved fusion union by 9 months.

CONCLUSION

3D models of the skull can be a useful tool to guide safe pin placement in patients with skeletal dysplasias, who require prolonged pre-fusion HGT for severe deformity correction.

Halo pin positioning in the temporal bone; parameters for safe halo gravity traction

INTRODUCTION

Halo gravity traction (HGT) is increasingly used pre-operatively in the treatment of children with complex spinal deformities. However, the design of the current halo crowns is not optimal for that purpose. To prevent pin loosening and to avoid visual scars, fixation to the temporal area would be preferable. This study aims to determine whether this area could be safe for positioning HGT pins.

METHODS

A custom made traction setup plus three human cadaver skulls were used to determine the most optimal pin location, the resistance to migration and the load to failure on the temporal bone. A custom-made spring-loaded pin with an adjustable axial force was used. For the migration experiment, this pin was positioned at 10 predefined anatomical areas in the temporal region of adult cadaver skulls, with different predefined axial forces. Subsequently traction force was applied and increased until migration occurred. For the load-to-failure experiment, the pin was positioned on the most applicable temporal location on both sides of the skull.

RESULTS

The most optimal position was identified as just antero-cranial to the auricle. The resistance to migration was clearly related to the axial tightening force. With an axial force of only 100 N, which corresponds to a torque of 0.06 Nm (0.5 in-lb), a vertical traction force of at least 200 N was needed for pin migration. A tightening force of 200 N (torque 0.2 Nm or 2 in-lb) was sufficient to resist migration at the maximal applied force of 360 N for all but one of the pins. The load-to-failure experiment showed a failure range of 780-1270 N axial force, which was not obviously related to skull thickness.

CONCLUSION

The temporal bone area of adult skulls allows axial tightening forces that are well above those needed for HGT in children. The generally applied torque of 0.5 Nm (4 in-lb) which corresponds to about 350 N axial force, appeared well below the failure load of these skulls and much higher than needed for firm fixation.

Inpatient versus outpatient halo-gravity traction in children with severe spinal deformity

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results, complications, and costs of preoperative halo-gravity traction in in- and outpatient settings.

BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical management of severe spinal deformities remains complex and controversial. Preoperative halo-gravity traction results in a decreased need for aggressive surgical techniques, lower incidence of intraoperative neurologic complications, and improvement of nutritional parameters and preoperative cardiopulmonary function.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients younger than 18 years with kyphoscoliosis undergoing preoperative halo-gravity traction were divided into two groups: inpatients (n: 15) and outpatients (n: 14, home care or care at the Foundation). Traction time (weeks), traction weight (kg), radiographic curve correction, complications, and costs were compared. For statistical analysis, t test and odds ratio were calculated with a significance of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Mean traction time was 6 weeks for in- and 4 weeks for outpatients (p = 0.038). Initial traction weight was 6 kg in both groups, while final traction weight was 13 kg for in- and 15 kg for outpatients (p = 0.50). At the end of the traction period, coronal correction was 24° in in- and 28° in outpatients (p = 0.5), while sagittal correction was 27° and 29°, respectively (p = 0.80). Pin loosening was observed in 2 patients in each group, of whom 1 outpatient developed pin-site infection. In each group, one patient developed transient neurologic complications (odds ratio 1.091). Mean treatment cost per patient was 2.8-fold higher in inpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering complications and costs, our results show that preoperative halo-gravity traction in an outpatient setting is an option to be taken into account.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Grade III.

Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Scoliosis with Intraspinal Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of scoliosis with intramedullary anomalies.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients with scoliosis with intramedullary anomalies were evaluated. All patients were treated with preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery. The average age was 11.4 years (range, 7-21 years). All patients were followed-up for at least 2 years (mean, 3.5 years; range, 2-5 years). Their radiologic presentations and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

The operating time was 7.9 hours, and the intraoperative bleeding amount was 1890 mL. Both the Cobb angle of scoliosis and kyphosis were significantly improved after halo-gravity traction and the operation (P < 0.05). Tethered cords were released, and intraspinal masses (neurofibromatosis and lipoma) were excised. Syringomyelia and split spinal cord malformations were left untreated. None of the patients experienced deterioration in their neurologic status after surgery. No severe complications, such as infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, failed internal fixation, or fractured pedicle screws or rods occurred after the operation. There was no deterioration of neurologic function, delayed infection, or pseudoarthrosis during the follow-up visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery provided patients who had scoliosis and intramedullary anomalies an effective and safe treatment option with few complications.

Preoperative halo-gravity traction for treatment of severe adult kyphosis and scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of preoperative halo-gravity traction (HGT) in the treatment for severe adult kyphosis and scoliosis. Preoperative HGT improves severe curve magnitude and clinical condition in pediatric spinal deformity. However, the efficacy of HGT on severe adult spinal deformity has rarely been studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 18 patients with severe adult kyphosis and scoliosis (age ≥ 18) who underwent a preoperative HGT (mean 4 weeks), and subsequent definitive posterior-alone corrective fusion. Etiologies were neurofibromatosis (n = 5), adult idiopathic (n = 3), multiple vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis (n = 1) and multiple myeloma (n = 1), degenerative failed back syndrome (n = 1), Scheuermann kyphosis (n = 1), Marfan syndrome (n = 1), and other genetic and connective tissue disorders (n = 5). We reviewed baseline demographics, including coronal and sagittal radiographic profiles. The changes in major curve magnitude, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and nutritional status were assessed between pre- and post-traction and immediate post-definitive corrective surgery.

RESULTS

There were 11 male and 7 female patients, aged 18-69 years with their major coronal and sagittal curves being 92.0° ± 25.2° and 111.6° ± 40.1°, respectively. The major coronal and sagittal curves were reduced by 18.4% and 16.8% after halo-traction, and 54.7% and 44.2% after definitive fusion, respectively. PFTs showed significant increase in %FEV1 and %FVC when comparing pre- and post-traction [43.0% ± 17.4% vs. 49.6% ± 18.7%, and 44.8%. ± 16.7% vs. 54.3% ± 20.7%, respectively, p < 0.01 (n = 11)]. Effective weight gain was observed after traction (46.8 ± 14.5 vs. 49.3 ± 13.5 kg, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Halo-gravity traction (HGT) for severe coronal and sagittal plane spinal deformity in adult patients significantly reduced Cobb angles, improved PFTs, and allowed for effective weight gain in the preoperative period. The use of preoperative HGT is extremely beneficial to optimize the alignment and overall health of severe adult spinal deformity patients before their spinal reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Posterior vertebral column resection for rigid proximal thoracic kyphoscoliosis with broken growing rods in a patient with Desbuquois dysplasia

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the importance of preoperative halo-gravity traction and posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) for severe proximal thoracic kyphoscoliosis associated with Desbuquois dysplasia, after breakage of a growing rod construct. Desbuquois dysplasia is a rare, autosomal recessive chondrodysplasia characterized by short stature, joint laxity, kyphoscoliosis, and characteristic facial dysmorphism. Our 8-year-old patient developed severe, progressive, infantile-onset kyphoscoliosis and had been initially treated with Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) rods. She subsequently underwent growing rod placement, but the eventual rod fracture resulted in a severe angular kyphosis.

METHODS

Clinical and radiographic case review.

RESULTS

The broken implants were removed, and she was treated with 2.5 months of preoperative halo-gravity traction. She then underwent a T4 PVCR and C7-L4 instrumented posterior spinal fusion. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course without any neurologic problems. Two years postoperatively, correction was well maintained with appropriate alignment and balance without implant breakage.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report of treatment of spinal deformity associated with Desbuquois dysplasia. Our results suggest that preoperative halo-gravity traction and PVCR are safe and efficacious techniques for severe rigid kyphoscoliosis in the cervicothoracic region associated with broken growing rods in a patient with Desbuquois dysplasia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Neurologic Deficit During Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Severe Thoracic Kyphoscoliotic Spinal Deformity

Correction of severe spinal deformity is a significant challenge for spinal surgeons. Although halo-gravity traction (HGT) has been shown to be well-tolerated and safe, we report here a case of neurologic decline during treatment. A 24-year-old male presents with severe thoracic kyphoscoliosis with > 180° of 3-dimensional deformity. Magnetic resonance imaging showed his thoracic spinal cord draped across his T7-9 apex. His neurologic exam showed lower extremity myelopathy. During week 7 at a goal traction weight of 18.1 kg, his distal lower extremity exam declined from 4+/5 to 2/5. His traction weight was lowered to 11.3 kg. He subsequently sustained a ground-level fall and became paraparetic with a motor exam of 1-2/5. He subsequently underwent a T1-L4 posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion with a T7-9 vertebral column resection. Postoperatively, he was noted to have a complete return to his baseline neurologic exam. At his 4-month postoperative visit, he was now full strength in his lower extremities with complete resolution of his myelopathy. We present here a case of neurologic decline in a patient with severe kyphoscoliosis who underwent HGT and discuss the management decisions associated with this challenging scenario.

A novel radiographic classification of severe spinal curvatures exceeding 100°: the Omega (Ω), gamma (γ) and alpha (α) deformities

PURPOSE

For spine curvatures with Cobb angles > 100°, curve classification and characterization become more difficult with conventional radiographs. 3-D computerized axial tomography scans add relevant information to categorize and describe a new classification to aid preoperative assessment in communication and patient evaluation. The purpose of this study is to describe a radiographic classification system of curves exceeding 100°.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients with curves exceeding 100° underwent a full spine radiographic review using conventional radiographs and 3-D CT. A descriptive analysis was performed to categorize curves into 4 main types (1, 2, 3 and 4) and 6 subtypes (1C, 1S, 1CS, 2P, 2D and 2PD) based on the location of the Cobb angle of the major scoliotic and kyphotic deformity as well as the location of the upper/lower end vertebra relative to the apical vertebra.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 51 males and 47 females with an average age of 17.8 ± 4.5 years. The diagnosis included idiopathic (48); congenital (24); neuromuscular (4); and neurofibromatosis (2). The mean major coronal and sagittal Cobb (kyphosis) were 131.2° ± 23.4° and 154 ± 45.6, respectively. The classification scheme yielded 4 main types (1, 2, 3 and 4) and 6 subtypes under types 1 and 2 (1C, 1S, 1CS, 2P, 2D and 2PD).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study describes a novel method of classifying severe spinal curvatures exceeding 100° using erect AP/lateral radiographs and 3-D CT reconstructive images. We hope that the descriptive analysis and classification will expand our understanding of these complex deformities. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

[Efficiency of preoperative Halo-gravity traction in severe kyphoscoliosis secondary to neurofibromatosis type Ⅰ]

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of preoperative Halo-gravity traction (HGT) in the treatment of severe kyphoscoliosis secondary to neurofibromatosis type Ⅰ (NF1). Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with severe kyphoscoliosis secondary to NF1 at Department of Spinal Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University between July 2007 and May 2016. A total of 29 patients including 17 males and 12 females were finally enrolled and the age was (13.7±2.9) years. The Cobb angle of major coronal curve and global kyphosis were measured before and after HGT. The forced vital capacity (FVC)and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) before and after traction were also recorded. The paired t test was used for comparison analysis. Results: The average maximum traction weight of HGT was (12.2±2.8) kg and the traction duration was (10.2±6.6) weeks. The coronal Cobb angle before HGT was (87.5±36.5)°, which improved to (68.4±25.9)° after HGT with a correction rate of (21.9±12.1)% (t=9.14, P<0.001); the average global kyphosis before HGT was (79.1±27.1)°, which improved to (59.9±19.4)° after HGT and the correction rate was (20.2±14.1)% (t=8.55, P<0.001). One patient had transient brachial plexus palsy which resolved completely after reducing the traction weight. After HGT treatment, FVC increased from (0.83±0.16) L to (0.89±0.19) L (t=1.48, P=0.12) and FEV(1) increased from (0.72±0.16) L to (0.78±0.20) L (t=0.49,P=0.63). FVC predicted and FEV(1) predicted improved from (42.9±20.1)% and (40.6±19.6)% to (46.9±20.5)% (t=0.98,P=0.33) and (43.6±25.8)% (t=1.24,P=0.22), respectively. Conclusion: Preoperative HGT in the treatment of severe kyphoscoliosis secondary to NF1 can improve spinal deformity and pulmonary function to some extent, which can further benefit the patients by improving their surgical tolerance.

Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Halo-gravity traction has been reported to successfully assist in managing severe spinal deformity. This is a systematic review of all studies on halo-gravity traction in the treatment of spinal deformity to provide information for clinical practice.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted for articles on halo-gravity traction in the treatment of spinal deformity according to the PRISMA guidelines. Appropriate studies would be included and analyzed. Preoperative correction rate of spinal deformity, change of pulmonary function and prevalence of complications were the main measurements.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies, a total of 351 patients, were included in this review. Generally, the initial Cobb angle was 101.1° in the coronal plane and 80.5° in the sagittal plane, and it was corrected to 49.4° and 56.0° after final spinal fusion. The preoperative correction due to traction alone was 24.1 and 19.3%, respectively. With traction, the flexibility improved 6.1% but postoperatively the patients did not have better correction. Less aggressive procedures and improved pulmonary function were observed in patients with traction. The prevalence of traction-related complications was 22% and three cases of neurologic complication related to traction were noted. The prevalence of total complications related to surgery was 32% and that of neurologic complications was 1%.

CONCLUSION

Partial correction could be achieved preoperatively with halo-gravity traction, and it may help decrease aggressive procedures, improve preoperative pulmonary function, and reduce neurologic complications. However, traction could not increase preoperative flexibility or final correction. Traction-related complications, although usually not severe, were not rare.

Preoperative halo-gravity traction with and without thoracoscopic anterior release for skeletal dysplasia patients with severe kyphoscoliosis

PURPOSE

Recent work has shown the safety and efficacy of halo-gravity traction as an operative adjunct. However, there are no reports specifically looking at halo-gravity traction in patients with skeletal dysplasia. Our purpose was to assess the safety and efficacy of traction in children with skeletal dysplasia who present with severe kyphoscoliosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed eight consecutive children with skeletal dysplasia who were treated with halo-gravity traction preoperatively. Six of the patients had a thoracoscopic anterior release prior to the halo-gravity traction. All patients were ambulatory and presented with severe, rigid kyphoscoliosis.

RESULTS

The mean duration of traction was 32 days. There were no neurologic complications with traction or after posterior spinal instrumentation. The majority of kyphoscoliosis correction was with the halo-gravity traction alone: major curve (MC) Cobb angle improved 41 %; C7-center sacral vertical line, 75 %; C7-MC apex, 21 %; and T2-T12 kyphosis, 35 %. Trunk height increased 37 % and thoracic height 44 %. An additional amount of correction was obtained with posterior spinal instrumentation (±fusion), decreasing MC Cobb angle an additional 23 %; C7-apex, 16 %; and T2-T12 kyphosis, 10 %. There was no additional correction of thoracic height. Two years after posterior spinal instrumentation (±fusion), a mild-to-moderate amount of correction was lost: MC Cobb angle decreased 23 %; compensatory Cobb angle, 28 %; C7-CSVL, 24 %; C7-S1, 22 %; regional kyphosis, 31 %; thoracic kyphosis, 29 %; and trunk height, 27 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Among children with skeletal dysplasia and severe kyphosis, halo-gravity traction is well tolerated and safe. Most of the corrections in radiographic parameters were achieved with traction alone. Traction improves coronal balance, apical translation, thoracic height, and kyphosis. In this specific population, the potential for neurologic injury during corrective surgery is high. However, preoperative halo-gravity traction provides slow, progressive correction in a safe manner and avoided neurologic injury in these patients. This study did not compare patients without halo-gravity traction to patients with halo-gravity traction, therefore it cannot be concluded that going straight to instrumentation without traction will give a poorer radiographic result.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Preoperative Halo-Gravity Traction for Severe Pediatric Spinal Deformity: Complications, Radiographic Correction and Changes in Pulmonary Function

BACKGROUND SUMMARY

The use of preoperative halo-gravity traction (HGT) improves both spinal deformity and pulmonary function and is a helpful adjuvant in the treatment of complex spinal deformity. Despite the benefits of preoperative HGT, there is no consensus on the optimal traction protocol.

METHODS

We evaluated the treatment of 33 patients treated with preoperative HGT to determine the safety and efficacy of preoperative HGT with regards to deformity correction; to quantify changes in pulmonary function; and to better define an ideal preoperative traction protocol. All patients were treated at the same tertiary-care pediatric hospital between 1998 and 2007. Inclusion criteria were preoperative HGT (before anterior and/or posterior spinal fusion), pretraction spinal Radiographs, repeat Radiographs taken during the traction period, and repeat Radiographs taken at the completion of traction and final Radiographs after surgical correction. The average duration of preoperative HGT was 70.1 days. The average traction weight applied was 38.5% of total body weight. Maximal traction weight was achieved in an average of 30.5 days.

RESULTS

Our results, 35% correction of the coronal Cobb and 35% correction of the sagittal Cobb, are consistent with others reported in the literature. Pulmonary function tests taken before and after traction were available for 22 patients. Treatment with HGT improved pulmonary function results in 19 patients. There were no serious complications.

CONCLUSION

We found that preoperative HGT is a safe and useful adjuvant to the treatment of patients with severe scoliosis. Significant deformity correction averaging 35% percent can be expected, with the majority of deformity correction occurring after 3 to 4 weeks. In the majority of patients, this correction is maintained or even improved with subsequent surgical correction.