[What is confirmed in the diagnostics of autoinflammatory fever diseases?]

Periodic fever syndromes (PFS) are a group of rare autoinflammatory diseases, which are characterized by disorders of the innate immune reaction and life-long recurrent episodes of inflammatory symptoms. This article describes the diagnostic approach. In addition to the patient medical history, physical examination and laboratory determinations, gene tests are becoming increasingly more important. The panel diagnostics using high throughput sequencing or next generation sequencing (NGS) is the method of choice for the detection of a genetic cause of PFS. This article discusses the diagnostic decision support systems (DDSS) that can play a future role in the diagnosis of rare diseases, especially those with complex patterns of symptoms.

IL-1β blockade in periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome: case-based review

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) are considered as inflammasome disorders associated with uncontrolled interleukin (IL)-1β production. Anti-IL1 agents are used in colchicine-resistant cases of FMF. Increase in pro-inflammatory mediators even between febrile attacks in PFAPA suggests that anti-IL1 treatment might be beneficial in these patients. We describe a child presenting with recurrent, self-limited febrile attacks at 1 year of age who was diagnosed as FMF being heterozygous for M694 V mutation. Her clinical findings were only controlled by the addition of canakinumab (2 mg/kg/8 week) to colchicine treatment. However, she developed typical PFAPA attacks during this treatment at 3 years of age. We conducted a literature search focusing on English articles with keywords including PFAPA, anakinra, canakinumab, and rilonacept. Five children and one adult patient with PFAPA were found and evaluated. Anakinra was reported to abort PFAPA attacks in children, while the adult patient first responded and then became resistant to anakinra. Canakinumab was effective in preventing febrile attacks in this patient. Failure of canakinumab to prevent PFAPA attacks in our case may arise from the differences in the pathophysiology of PFAPA and FMF. Thus, further experience with higher doses or shorter intervals of canakinumab is needed in children with PFAPA.

Neither hereditary periodic fever nor periodic fever, aphthae, pharingitis, adenitis: Undifferentiated periodic fever in a tertiary pediatric center

AIM

To describe the frequency and clinical characteristics of patients with undifferentiated periodic fever (UPF) and to investigate whether a clinical classification of UPF based on the PRINTO-Eurofever score can help predicting the response to treatment and the outcome at follow-up.

METHODS

Clinical and therapeutic information of patients with recurrent fever who presented at a single pediatric rheumatology center from January 2006 through April 2016 were retrospectively collected. Patients with a clinical suspicion of hereditary periodic fever (HPF) syndrome and patients with clinical picture of periodic fever, aphthae, pharingitis, adenitis (PFAPA) who were refractory to tonsillectomy underwent molecular analysis of five HPF-related genes: MEFV (NM_000243.2), MVK (NM_000431.3), TNFRSF1A (NM_001065.3), NLRP3 (NM_001079821.2), NLRP12 (NM_001277126.1). All patients who had a negative genetic result were defined as UPF and further investigated. PRINTO-Eurofever score for clinical diagnosis of HPF was calculated in all cases.

RESULTS

Of the 221 patients evaluated for periodic fever, twelve subjects with a clinical picture of PFAPA who were refractory to tonsillectomy and 22 subjects with a clinical suspicion of HPF underwent genetic analysis. Twenty-three patients (10.4%) resulted negative and were classified as UPF. The median age at presentation of patients with UPF was 9.5 mo (IQR 4-24). Patients with UPF had a higher frequency of aphthae (52.2% vs 0%, P = 0.0026) and musculoskeletal pain (65.2% vs 18.2%, P = 0.0255) than patients with genetic confirmed HPF. Also, patients with UPF had a higher frequency of aphthous stomatitis (52.2% vs 10.7%, P < 0.0001), musculoskeletal pain (65.2% vs 8,0%, P < 0.0001), and abdominal pain (52.2% vs 4.8%, P < 0.0001) and a lower frequency of pharyngitis (56.6% vs 81.3%, P = 0.0127) compared with typical PFAPA in the same cohort. Twenty-one of 23 patients with UPF (91.3%) received steroids, being effective in 16; 13 (56.2%) were given colchicine, which was effective in 6. Symptoms resolution occurred in 2 patients with UPF at last follow-up. Classification according to the PRINTO-Eurofever score did not correlate with treatment response and prognosis.

CONCLUSION

UPF is not a rare diagnosis among patients with periodic fever. Clinical presentation place UPF half way on a clinical spectrum between PFAPA and HPF. The PRINTO-Eurofever score is not useful to predict clinical outcome and treatment response in these patients.

Evidence for genetic overlap between adult onset Still's disease and hereditary periodic fever syndromes

OBJECTIVE

Adult onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a severe, autoimmune disease that can be challenging to treat with conventional therapeutics and biologicals in a considerable number of cases. Therefore, there is a high need to understand its pathogenesis better. As major clinical symptoms overlap between AOSD and hereditary periodic fever syndromes (HPFS), we analysed four known HPFS genes in AOSD.

METHODS

We performed Sanger sequencing and quantitative analysis of all coding regions of MEFV, TNFRSF1A, MVK and NLRP3 in 40 AOSD patients. All rare coding variants (n = 6) were evaluated for several aspects to classify them as benign to pathogenic variants. Statistical analysis was performed to analyse whether variants classified as (likely) pathogenic were associated with AOSD.

RESULTS

We identified three rare variants in MEFV, one previously not described. Association to the three likely pathogenic MEFV variants was significant (p _c = 2.34E- 03), and two of the three carriers had a severe course of disease. We observed strong evidence for significant association to mutations in TNFRSF1A (p _c = 2.40E- 04), as 5% of patients (2/40) carried a (likely) pathogenic variant in this gene. Both of them received a biological for treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate TNFRSF1A as a relevant gene in AOSD, especially in patients with a more challenging course of disease, while causal variants remain to be identified in the majority of patients.

The diagnostic evaluation of patients with a suspected hereditary periodic fever syndrome: experience from a referral center in Italy

The study aims are to describe the activity of our Unit on the diagnostics of monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), and to apply the clinical classification criteria for periodic fevers from the Eurofever Registry to our cohort of patients, thus evaluating their usefulness in the real life. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients referring to our Center for recurrent fever attacks, and undergoing genetic analysis between April 2014 and July 2016, and we applied the classification criteria to both genetically positive and -negative patients. We visited 195 patients (101 females, 94 males); 126 (64.6%) were adults and 192 (98.5%) Caucasians; 12.3% carried mutations and 12.7% of adults were genetically positive. No statistically significant differences were identified in the frequency of genetic diagnosis between adults and children (p = 0.82) as well as in the frequency of genetic diagnosis, based on the number of genes evaluated (p = 0.57). When we applied the Eurofever criteria, 126/195 (64.6%) patients were classified for at least one among the four main monogenic AIDs; 22 (11.3%) patients fulfilled criteria for 2 diseases and 4 (2.1%) for 3 diseases. Among patients carrying mutations, 12/24 (50%) correctly fulfilled the score, 3/24 (12.5%) fulfilled criteria differently from their genetic diagnosis; 9/22 (40.9%) recieved no classification. An expanded genetic testing does not seem useful, while a correct interpretation of patients' clinical picture may allow performing specific genetic testing. The classification criteria from the Eurofever Registry have shown to be a beneficial tool in the evaluation of patients with a suspected monogenic AID.

Systemic and organ involvement in monogenic autoinflammatory disorders: a global review filtered through internists' lens

Monogenic autoinflammatory disorders (AIDs) are rare diseases driven by cytokine-mediated extraordinary sterile inflammation that results from the activation of innate immune pathways. The clinical hallmark of these diseases is the recurrence of stereotyped episodes of systemic- and organ-specific inflammation; the most common systems involved being the skin, musculoskeletal system, gastrointestinal tract, and central nervous system. The autoinflammatory disorders may have a profound impact on the quality of life of the affected patients, and a delayed diagnosis may lead to severe complications, the most dreadful of which is AA-Amyloidosis. This review gives an overview on the four main AIDs, namely familial Mediterranean fever, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome, cryopyrinopathies, and mevalonate kinase deficiency, focusing on their clinical phenotype in adults and differential diagnosis, suggesting a diagnostic algorithm, and reviewing the available treatments.