Time-frame comparison of
hystero-preservation in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study, 2006-2013 versus 1997-2005.
Int Urogynecol J 2019;
31:1839-1850. [PMID:
31802163 DOI:
10.1007/s00192-019-04128-z]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
The purpose of our study was to describe the surgical trend and time-frame comparison between 1997-2005 (1stperiod) and 2006-2013 (2nd period) of hystero-preservation for uterine prolapse, based upon a nationwide population-based National Health Insurance (NHI) claim data in Taiwan.
METHODS
Women, who underwent primary surgeries for uterine prolapse, either uterine suspension with hystero-preservation or hysterectomy during 1997-2013, were identified from National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).We analyzed the related variables including surgical types (hystero-preservation or hysterectomy), patient age and concomitant anti-incontinence surgery, surgeon age, gender, and service volume; and hospital accreditation level, and service volume.
RESULTS
We identified a total of 46,968 inpatients, 6629 (14.11%) hystero-preservation group, and 40,339 (85.89%) hysterectomy group. Hystero-preservation significantly increased during the 17 year follow-up study period (1997 to 2013) (P value =0.0147). The overall surgeries for uterine prolapse increased among patients ≥70 years, with concomitant anti-incontinence surgery, surgeons ≥45 years, high volume surgeons, and hospitals. Multiple logistic regression revealed hysterectomy was less used in 2nd period (OR 0.45, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.48). Hysterectomy was more often used in patient aged ≥50 years, surgeon aged ≥45 years, and low volume hospitals. In case of concomitant anti-incontinence surgery (OR 0.48, CI 0.45-0.52), high volume surgeons (more than 30 surgeries) and hospitals (more than 73 surgeries) hystero-preservation was more often used.
CONCLUSIONS
Time-frames, younger patients, concomitant anti-incontinence surgery, younger surgeons, and high volume surgeons and hospitals increase hystero-preservation for uterine prolapse. Surgeons and hospitals should be ready to respond to the wishes of female patients who want to preserve the uterus.
Collapse