Tick repellents and acaricides of botanical origin: a green roadmap to control tick-borne diseases?

Arthropods are dangerous vectors of agents of deadly diseases, which may hit as epidemics or pandemics in the increasing world population of humans and animals. Among them, ticks transmit more pathogen species than any other group of blood-feeding arthropods worldwide. Thus, the effective and eco-friendly control of tick vectors in a constantly changing environment is a crucial challenge. A number of novel routes have been attempted to prevent and control tick-borne diseases, including the development of (i) vaccines against viruses vectored by ticks; (ii) pheromone-based control tools, with special reference to the "lure and kill" techniques; (iii) biological control programmes relying on ticks' natural enemies and pathogens; and (iv) the integrated pest management practices aimed at reducing tick interactions with livestock. However, the extensive employment of acaricides and tick repellents still remains the two most effective and ready-to-use strategies. Unfortunately, the first one is limited by the rapid development of resistance in ticks, as well as by serious environmental concerns. On the other hand, the exploitation of plants as sources of effective tick repellents is often promising. Here, we reviewed current knowledge concerning the effectiveness of plant extracts as acaricides or repellents against tick vectors of public health importance, with special reference to Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes persulcatus, Amblyomma cajennense, Haemaphysalis bispinosa, Haemaphysalis longicornis, Hyalomma anatolicum, Hyalomma marginatum rufipes, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Rhipicephalus pulchellus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Rhipicephalus turanicus. Eighty-three plant species from 35 botanical families were selected. The most frequent botanical families exploited as sources of acaricides and repellents against ticks were Asteraceae (15 % of the selected studies), Fabaceae (9 %), Lamiaceae (10 %), Meliaceae (5 %), Solanaceae (6 %) and Verbenaceae (5 %). Regression equation analyses showed that the literature grew by approximately 20 % per year (period: 2005-2015). Lastly, in the final section, insights for future research are discussed. We focused on some caveats for future data collection and analysis. Current critical points mainly deal with (a) not uniform methods used, which prevent proper comparison of the results; (b) inaccurate tested concentrations, frequently 100 % concentration corresponded to the gross extract, where the exact amounts of extracted substances are unknown; and (c) not homogeneous size of tested tick instars and species. Overall, the knowledge summarized in this review may be helpful for comparative screening among extensive numbers of plant-borne preparations, in order to develop newer and safer tick control tools.

The crystal structure of the AgamOBP1•Icaridin complex reveals alternative binding modes and stereo-selective repellent recognition

Anopheles gambiae Odorant Binding Protein 1 in complex with the most widely used insect repellent DEET, was the first reported crystal structure of an olfactory macromolecule with a repellent, and paved the way for OBP1-structure-based approaches for discovery of new host-seeking disruptors. In this work, we performed STD-NMR experiments to directly monitor and verify the formation of a complex between AgamOBP1 and Icaridin, an efficient DEET alternative. Furthermore, Isothermal Titration Calorimetry experiments provided evidence for two Icaridin-binding sites with different affinities (Kd = 0.034 and 0.714 mM) and thermodynamic profiles of ligand binding. To elucidate the binding mode of Icaridin, the crystal structure of AgamOBP1•Icaridin complex was determined at 1.75 Å resolution. We found that Icaridin binds to the DEET-binding site in two distinct orientations and also to a novel binding site located at the C-terminal region. Importantly, only the most active 1R,2S-isomer of Icaridin's equimolar diastereoisomeric mixture binds to the AgamOBP1 crystal, providing structural evidence for the possible contribution of OBP1 to the stereoselectivity of Icaridin perception in mosquitoes. Structural analysis revealed two ensembles of conformations differing mainly in spatial arrangement of their sec-butyl moieties. Moreover, structural comparison with DEET indicates a common recognition mechanism for these structurally related repellents. Ligand interactions with both sites and binding modes were further confirmed by 2D 1H-15N HSQC NMR spectroscopy. The identification of a novel repellent-binding site in AgamOBP1 and the observed structural conservation and stereoselectivity of its DEET/Icaridin-binding sites open new perspectives for the OBP1-structure-based discovery of next-generation insect repellents.

Do insect repellents induce drift behaviour in aquatic non-target organisms?

Synthetic insect repellents are compounds applied to surfaces to discourage insects, mainly mosquitoes, from landing on those surfaces. As some of these repellents have repeatedly been detected in surface waters at significant concentrations, they may also exert repellent effects on aquatic non-target organisms. In running water systems, aquatic invertebrates actively enter downstream drift in order to avoid unfavourable environmental conditions. We thus tested the hypothesis that the widely used insect repellents DEET (N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide), EBAAP (3-[N-butyl-N-acetyl]-aminopropionic acid ethyl ester) and Icaridin (1-piperidinecarboxylic acid 2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-methylpropyl ester) induce downstream drift behaviour in the aquatic invertebrates Gammarus pulex (Crustacea, Amphipoda) and Cloeon dipterum (Insecta, Ephemeroptera), using a laboratory-scale drift assay. We found no clear increase in the drift behaviour of both invertebrate species across a concentration gradient of eight orders of magnitude and even beyond maximum environmental concentrations for any of the three repellents. We found no evidence for a direct drift-inducing activity of insect repellents on aquatic non-target organisms.

Use of 2D and co-culture cell models to assess the toxicity of zein nanoparticles loading insect repellents icaridin and geraniol

After the latest dengue and Zika outbreaks, the fight against mosquito vectors has become an emerging area of research. One tool for this combat is repellents; however, these products are composed of different toxic agents. Botanical compounds with repellent potential are an alternative; however these compounds are highly volatile. Thus, the present study aimed to synthesize zein-based polymeric nanoparticles as an efficient carrier system for the sustained release of the repellents icaridin and geraniol and evaluate the toxicity of these nanorepellents comparing two different cell models. In vitro tests were carried out due to current Brazilian legislation prohibiting animal testing for cosmetics (current classification of repellents). The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the nanoparticles were evaluated in 2D and co-culture cell models (A549/lung epithelium, HaCaT/keratinocytes, HT-29/intestinal epithelium, and THP-1/peripheral blood monocytes). Cell viability by mitochondrial activity, cell membrane integrity, damage to genetic material, and expression of genes involved in the allergic/inflammatory system were evaluated. The results of cytotoxicity evaluation showed cell viability above 70% in both cell models. No differences were observed in genotoxicity assessment between cells exposed to nanorepellents and controls. In contrast, gene expression analysis showed increased cytokine expression for the emulsion compounds in 2D cell cultures compared to co-cultures. These findings open perspectives that zein-based nanorepellents have potential applications due to the reduced toxicity observed when the compounds are encapsulated and emerge as an alternative for arbovirus control. In addition, the study demonstrated that depending on the analysis, different results might be observed when comparing 2D and co-culture cell models to evaluate the toxicity of new nanosystems.

No effect of insect repellents on the behaviour of Lymnaea stagnalis at environmentally relevant concentrations

Insect repellents are widely applied to various materials and to both human and animal skin to deter mosquitoes and ticks. The most common deterrent compounds applied are DEET, EBAAP and icaridin (picaridin, Bayrepel). Due to their extensive application, these repellents are frequently detected in surface waters in considerable concentrations. As these compounds are designed to alter invertebrates' behaviour rather than to intoxicate them, we hypothesised that insect repellents have the potential to modify the natural behaviour of non-target invertebrates in natural freshwater bodies. To test this, we used a well-established laboratory assay designed to quantify the odour-mediated foraging behaviour of freshwater gastropods and the great pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis (Linnaeus, 1758) as a model organism to test for potential deterrent effects of insect repellents on aquatic snails. Using a wide concentration range from the picogramme per litre to microgramme per litre range (and by far exceeding the range of concentrations reported from natural waters), we found no evidence for a deterrent effect of either of the three repellents on foraging L. stagnalis. Our data and other recent studies give no indication for undesirable behavioural alterations by common insect repellents in surface waters.

Preventing mosquito and tick bites: A Canadian update

The present practice point provides updated guidance on personal protective measures to safely and effectively prevent mosquito and tick bites in Canada. Means of avoidance as well as physical and chemical barriers are described. Current information regarding insect and tick repellents and recommendations for their use are provided, along with instructions for removing ticks. Guidance on using insecticide for additional chemical protection is offered.

In the arm-in-cage test, topical repellents activate mosquitoes to disengage upon contact instead of repelling them at distance

Topical repellents provide protection against mosquito bites and their efficacy is often assessed using the arm-in-cage test. The arm-in-cage test estimates the repellent's protection time by exposing a repellent-treated forearm to host-seeking mosquitoes inside a cage at regular intervals until the first confirmed mosquito bite. However, the test does not reveal the repellents' behavioural mode of action. To understand how mosquitoes interact with topical repellents in the arm-in-cage test, we used a 3D infrared video camera system to track individual Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi females during exposure to either a repellent-treated or an untreated forearm. The repellents tested were 20% (m/m) ethanolic solutions of N, N-diethyl-meta-toluamide, p-menthane-3,8-diol, icaridin and ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate. All four repellents substantially reduced the number of bites compared to an untreated forearm, while the flight trajectories indicate that the repellents do not prevent skin contact as the mosquitoes made multiple brief contacts with the treated forearm. We conclude that, in the context of the arm-in-cage test, topical repellents activate mosquitoes to disengage from the forearm with undirected displacements upon contact rather than being repelled at distance by volatile odorants.

Determination of skin-insect repellent icaridin and DEET in human urine using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and its application to a sample of Japanese adults

BACKGROUND

Icaridin and DEET are common insect repellents widely used on human skin and clothing (skin-insect repellents [skin-IR]) to repel common pests, such as mosquitoes and biting flies. Novel analytical methods for urinary skin-IR exposure biomarkers that can be effectively applied in epidemiological studies and provide strong evidence related to risk assessment associated with daily exposure are required. In this study, we aimed to develop a method for analyzing the concentrations of icaridin, DEET, and two DEET metabolites N,N-diethyl-3-(hydroxymethyl) benzamide and 3-(diethylcarbamoyl) benzoic acid in human urine.

METHODS

In this analysis, after formic acid-induced acidification of the urine sample, exposure biomarkers were extracted using solid-phase extraction composed of a modified polystyrenedivinylbenzene polymer for reversed phase (hydrophobic) retention. Subsequently, high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was performed within 10 min for a separation analysis. The present method was applied to five Japanese adults (aged 20-43 years) who used icaridin or DEET-containing products within a week.

RESULTS

Limits of detection were 0.06-0.11 µg/L. Extraction recoveries were 74%-88%. The intraday and interday variations were 1.5-17.5 and 0.9-15.8% relative standard deviation, respectively. All exposure biomarkers were successfully detected in all five adults. Urinary concentrations of exposure biomarkers reached their maximum values within 15 h after starting to use skin-IR.

CONCLUSIONS

This method was successful in measuring urinary exposure biomarkers of skin-IR, including icaridin and DEET. Moreover, this study presents the first application of biomonitoring of urinary icaridin concentrations after using a commercial product.

HL-TRP channel is required for various repellents for the parthenogenetic Haemaphysalis longicornis

BACKGROUND

Ticks can transmit a wide range of pathogens that endanger human and animal health. Although repellents are commonly used for tick control, understanding their mechanisms aren't  complete.

METHODS

The repellent effects of N, N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET); sec-butyl 2-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperidine-1-carboxylate (icaridin); N, N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (IR3535); and cinnamaldehyde on the parthenogenetic tick Haemaphysalis longicornis at the nymph stage were assessed using Y-tubes. The involvement of transient receptor potential (HL-TRP) channel molecules in the repellent mechanism was investigated through in situ hybridization, subcellular localization, real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), RNA interference, and electroantennography. In addition, the binding affinity of HL-TRP molecules to repellents was predicted using AlphaFold3.

RESULTS

DEET, icaridin, IR3535, and cinnamaldehyde have been shown to effectively repel nymphs. HL-TRP channel is shared among various arthropods, particularly several species of ticks. It is localized to the cell membrane and Haller's organ. Moreover, microinjection of double-stranded RNA elicited tick repellency behavior, and the electroantennogram responses to those repellents were significantly decreased. The TYR783 site was proposed as an essential binding site to establish hydrogen bonds with icaridin, DEET, and cinnamaldehyde.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploration of ticks and repellents found that HL-TRP channel functions as a chemosensory receptor for repellents and, thereby, mediates avoidance behavior.

Repellent activity of icaridin-impregnated horsecloth against horse flies

Horseflies are pests that cause discomfort from blood-sucking and disease transmission, and economic losses in the equine industry. This study evaluated the efficacy of horsecloth impregnated with icaridin in reducing horsefly attacks and deterring horseflies. Repellent activities were evaluated under three conditions: treatment 1 (no horsecloth), 2 (horsecloth without icaridin), and 3 (horsecloth impregnated with icaridin), using three native Hokkaido horses (Dosanko) and three mixed-breed horses (Dosanko and Haflinger) in July 2023 at a riding horse club in Hokkaido, Japan. Treatment 3 significantly reduced the number of horseflies. Treatment 2 did not significantly reduce horsefly numbers. Treatments 2 and 3 significantly reduced the number of avoidance actions. The reduction in avoidance actions in treatment 3 was greater than that in treatment 2. Lighter-colored horses experienced fewer fly attacks and avoidance actions than darker-colored horses. Overall, using icaridin-impregnated horsecloths (treatment 3) was more effective for repelling horseflies than the use of physical barriers alone (treatment 2). This study suggests that integrating chemical repellents with physical protection can enhance horsefly control strategies, improve horse welfare, and improve the safety of horses interacting with them. Further research is recommended to assess the generalizability of these findings to different horse breeds and environments with a greater number of horses.