Treatment with IgM-enriched immunoglobulin in sepsis: a matched case-control analysis

The therapeutic potential of IgM-enriched immunoglobulin preparations (IgGAM) in sepsis remains a field of debate. The use of polyclonal immunoglobulins as adjuvant therapy (Esen & Tugrul, 2009; Kaukonen et al., 2014; Molnár et al., 2013; Taccone et al., 2009) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in terms of mortality. This study analyze the impact of IgM-enriched IgG (IgGM) as additional immunomodulation. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective registry of 1196 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock from nine Intensive Care Units in Colombia, from routine clinical practice; 220 patients treated with IgGAM were registered. Fully matched comparators for severity and type of infection selected among patients non-treated with IgGAM. Mortality after 28 days was 30.5% among IgGAM-treated patients and 40.5% among matched comparators. Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed IgGAM treatment to be the only variable protective from death after 28 days (hazard ratio 0.62; 0.45-0.86; p: 0.004). Results reinforce the importance of IgGAM treatment for favorable outcome after septic shock and are in line with recent published meta-analyses. This study showed that treatment with IgGM in patients with sepsis was an independent modulator of the 28-day associated with a lower mortality.

A Position Paper on IgM-Enriched Intravenous Immunoglobulin Adjunctive Therapy in Severe Acute Bacterial Infections: The TO-PIRO SCORE Proposal

IgM-enriched immunoglobulins (e-IgM) may be useful in patients with severe acute bacterial infections. The evidence for the administration of e-IgM is not extensive and a definitive consensus has never been reached on its best use in patients with acute infections as well as in critically ill patients. However, the official indication in several countries, including Italy, is quite wide and mainly refers to supportive treatment of patients with acute severe bacterial infections. A multidisciplinary meeting of Italian Experts in Infectious Diseases, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Pneumology, Microbiology and Oncohaematology aimed to produce a statement on the best practical methodological score that could improve the use of e-IgM in patients with different infections, variable severity of disease and etiology. The Expert Panel reviewed the literature and the available guidelines, discussed the experience and eventually proposed to adapt the PIRO score to the practical methodological needs of a simple tool that could guide the administration of e-IgM.