Intussusception Management in Children: A 15-Year Experience in a Referral Center

OBJECTIVE

To report a 15-y, single-center experience in the management and outcomes of ileocolic intussusception (ICI) episodes.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in patients with ICI episodes, who were treated at a single quaternary referral center from 2005 to 2019. Data evaluated included patient demographics, clinical presentation, treatment modalities, hospital stay, complications, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 546 ICI episodes (66.1% males) were included, with a median age at diagnosis of 15 mo. Enema reduction was performed in 478 patients (87.6%), with an overall success rate of 85.8%. Hydrostatic saline enema was the most effective method (89.3%) when compared to pneumatic (80.6%) or barium enema (79.8%), this difference being statistically significant (p = 0.031). No associated complications were observed during nonoperative reduction. Surgical treatment was performed in 101 patients, in whom 36 bowel resections were performed. Postoperative complications were reported in 6 patients (5.9%). Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with operative management (median 5 d vs. 1 d; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management has a high overall success rate and low complication and recurrence rates. Saline enema reduction presents the highest effectiveness, and should be considered the first-line treatment.

Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents

Ileocolic intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children under two years of age. Treatment in most cases is radiologically guided reduction. In Slovenia, ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction is currently the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of US-guided hydrostatic reduction when performed by subspecialty-trained pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with ileocolic intussusception who underwent US-guided hydrostatic intussusception reduction at University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2012 and December 2022 (n = 101). During regular daily working hours, the reduction was performed by pediatric radiologists. After hours (evenings and overnight), pediatric radiologists, non-pediatric radiologists, or radiology residents performed the reduction procedure. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operator performing the procedure. Data was analyzed using the chi-square test. Pediatric radiologists had thirty-seven (75.5%) successful first attempts, non-pediatric radiologists had nineteen (76.0%), and radiology residents had twenty (74.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of ileocolic intussusception reduction depending on the operator who performed the procedure (p = 0.98). No perforation was observed in either group during the reduction attempts.  Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that US-guided hydrostatic reduction is a reliable and safe procedure that achieves good results even in the hands of less experienced, however appropriately trained, radiologists. The results should encourage more medical centers to consider the implementation of US-guided hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception. What is Known: • US-guided hydrostatic reduction is a well-established method of treatment for ileocolic intussusception in children. • The results regarding the influence of operator's experience with the procedure on its success rate are scarce and contradictory. What is New: • US-guided hydrostatic intussusception reduction is a reliable and safe technique that achieves similar success rates when performed by experienced subspecialized pediatric radiologists or less experienced but trained operators such as non-pediatric radiologists and radiology residents. • The implementation of US-guided hydrostatic reduction in general hospitals without subspecialized pediatric radiologists could improve patient care by increasing access to radiologically guided reduction and simultaneously decreasing the time to reduction attempts.

Incidental appendectomy in surgical treatment of ileocolic intussusception in children. Is it safe to perform?

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of ileo-colic intussusception (ICI) has been reported as the second cause of emergency laparotomy in children. The performance of incidental appendectomy after surgical reduction is currently controversial. The aim is to analyse the outcomes of performing incidental appendectomy after surgical ICI reduction with or without associated bowel resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in patients with ICI episodes, who underwent surgical treatment in our institution between 2005-2019. Patients were divided in two groups according to the performance of associated appendectomy (AA group) or not (NA group). Subsequently, a stratified analysis was performed according to the need for bowel resection in both groups. Demographic variables, intraoperative findings, surgical time, hospital stay, postoperative complications and recurrences were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients (77 AA group; 24 NA group) were included, without differences in demographics or intraoperative findings. A total of 36 bowel resections were performed (24 group AA; 10 group NA), with no differences in surgical time (55.7 min in group AA vs. 61.2 min in group NA; p = 0.587) or hospital stay (median 5 days in both groups). There were also no differences in postoperative complications or recurrences between the two groups. Stratified analysis showed that bowel resection increases operative time, hospital stay and postoperative complications, regardless of whether associated appendectomy was performed or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental appendectomy during surgical treatment of ICI in children is a safe procedure that does not increase operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications or recurrence.

Outcomes in pediatric patients with documented delays between ileocolic intussusception diagnosis and therapeutic enema attempt: evaluation of reduction efficacy and complication rate

BACKGROUND

Ileocolic intussusception is considered a pediatric emergency, with concerns for risk of significant morbidity in children with a prolonged intussusception state. Emergent therapy is standard of care, as prior studies have shown poor outcomes in patients with long delays (> 24 h) before intervention. Various factors can result in shorter delays, and there are limited studies evaluating outcomes in these patients. This study aimed to determine if there were differences in reduction success rates associated with short in-hospital time delays.

OBJECTIVE

This study is to determine enema success rate and morbidity in patients with documented time delays between intussusception diagnosis and therapeutic enema.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of pediatric patients with intussusception at a single children's hospital between 2007 and 2019 was performed. Patient's records were reviewed for time of symptom onset, radiologic diagnosis, and attempted enema. Ultrasounds and radiographs were reviewed for bowel obstruction, free peritoneal fluid, trapped fluid around the intussusceptum, and absent bowel wall perfusion. Patients were evaluated for efficacy of reduction attempt, requirement for surgical reduction, and complications including bowel resection and bowel perforation.

RESULTS

There were 175 cases of ileocolic intussusception requiring enema reduction. Successful reduction occurred in 72.2% (13/18) of cases performed within 1 h of diagnosis; 74.3% (78/105) between 1 and3 h; 73.2% (30/41) between 3 and 6 h; and 81.2% (9/11) with greater than 6 h. Need for bowel resection was not associated with short delays between diagnosis and reduction attempts (p = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in intussusception reduction efficacy or complication rate in patients with increasing time between imaging diagnosis of ileocolic intussusception and reduction attempt, including delay intervals up to 8 h.

Appendiceal mucocele presenting as a leading point in ileocolic intussusceptions: "Case report"

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Appendiceal mucocele is a rare clinical scenario, which is found in 0.2-0.7 % of appendectomies. Ileocecal/ileocolic intusception caused by appendiceal mucocele is an extremely rare condition with few case reports in literatures. The treatment is surgery with the extent determined by intra-operative findings. Ultrasound and CECT scan can suggest the diagnosis, but definitive diagnosis is by histopathology. The aim of this presentation is to discuss appendiceal mucocele in terms of clinical features, diagnostic imaging and treatment. This case report can create awareness to primary care physicians, radiologists, surgeons and pathologists aiding in accurate diagnosis and early surgical intervention to prevent rupture.

PRESENTATION OF THE CASE

A fifty years old woman presented with intermittent colicky peri umbilical abdominal pain of one-week duration. She had nausea, vomiting, mild abdominal distension, and failure to pass feces and flatus. Physical examination was normal. Imaging suggested ileocolic intussusceptions with cystic leading point on ultrasound, but on CECT scan, no leading point reported. Appendiceal mucocele diagnosed intra operatively and confirmed by pathology.

CONCLUSION

Appendiceal mucocele is rare and can be benign or malignant. Preoperative diagnosis is often difficult. Definitive diagnosis is by histopathology. Appendiceal mucocele can rarely present with ileocolic intussusceptions. Radiologists, pathologists, primary care physicians and surgeons must be aware of this condition. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and early surgical treatment of appendiceal mucocele is important to prevent complications like pseudo myxoma peritonei(PMP), which has poor prognosis.

Successful reduction of recalcitrant ileocolic intussusception with a double-balloon-tipped catheter that prevents air leaks and catheter expulsion

Noninvasive reduction of ileocolic intussusception requires increasing intracolonic pressure via gas or liquid administered through a rectal catheter. A tight seal around the catheter is required to maintain intracolonic pressures and this tight seal is difficult to maintain with existing techniques. I describe the safe and effective use of a catheter with 2 balloons near the tip that surround the anus internally and externally to prevent leakage of air during an enema on a toddler after failure with a single-balloon tipped catheter.

Accurately distinguishing pediatric ileocolic intussusception from small-bowel intussusception using ultrasonography

PURPOSE

The clinical treatment of ileocolic intussusception is different from that of small-bowel intussusception (SBI). This study aimed to analyze the differences between the two groups using ultrasonoscopy to avoid misdiagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of intussusception in patients aged 0-18 years from September 2018 to March 2020. Clinical and ultrasonoscopy data were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 183 cases of intussusception were included in this study (123 cases of SBI and 60 of ileocolic intussusception). Ultrasonoscopy features that were significantly different between the two groups (p<0.05) included the lesion diameter, fat core thickness, outer wall thickness, lymph nodes inside intussusception, and lesion length. In the SBI group, 85% (104/123) of the normal ileocecal region was found in the right lower quadrant and 98% (120/123) of the normal ascending colon was found in the right side of the abdomen. In the ileocolic intussusception group, none of the normal ileocecal region was found and the ascending colon was found in only 5 cases (8%) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ultrasonography is the most practical method to distinguish SBI from ileocolic intussusception. In addition to comparing the differences between lesions, conventional probing of the ileocecal region and ascending colon will help to accurately differentiate between the types of intussusception and avoid misdiagnosis.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic.

Point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis of small bowel-small bowel vs ileocolic intussusception

BACKGROUND

Identification of intussusception is feasible with emergency department (ED) point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) due to its ease-of-use and high accuracy. Little is known about the clinical characteristics and outcomes of small bowel-small bowel intussusception (SB-SBI) relative to ileocolic intussusception (ICI) identified by PoCUS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single, tertiary care, urban pediatric ED of intussusception identified by PoCUS. Demographic information, clinical data, and outcomes, including clinical course, intussusception characteristics, recurrence rates, and interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa), were evaluated.

RESULTS

ED PoCUS identified thirty-seven patients with intussusception over a 4-year period. Twenty-one patients (57%) identified were SB-SBI. The median age was 54 months (IQR 35-76 months) for SB-SBI and 8 months (IQR 5.8-13.5 months) for ICI. The mean diameter was 1.68 cm (SD 0.52 cm) for SB-SBI and 2.74 cm (SD 0.43 cm) for ICI (p < 0.05). Two of 21 (9.5%) SB-SBI subjects required surgical intervention, while the rest spontaneously reduced. Fourteen of 16 (88%) ICI subjects required intervention. There were two (9.5%) recurrences of SB-SBI and 1 (6.3%) recurrence of ICI confirmed on PoCUS. Cohen's kappa was 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

SB-SBI may be identified more frequently than previously thought when screened with ED PoCUS. Older children with SB-SBI may have underlying lead-points and may require surgical intervention. PoCUS can help differentiate between variants of intussusception that range from a surgical emergency to a transient source of abdominal pain that may be recurrent and otherwise unexplained, allowing clinicians to better manage these patients accordingly.

Pediatric ileocolic intussusception: new observations and unexpected implications

BACKGROUND

Ileocolic intussusception occurs when the terminal ileum "telescopes" into the colon. We observed that ileocolic intussusception lengths are similar regardless of location in the colon.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the uniformity of ileocolic intussusception length and its relationship to colon location, symptom duration and reducibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound-diagnosed pediatric ileocolic intussusceptions initially treated with pneumatic reduction at the Mayo Clinic or Texas Children's Hospital. We recorded demographic, imaging and surgical findings including age, gender, symptom duration, location of the ileocolic intussusception, reducibility with air enema and, if fluoroscopically irreducible, surgical findings.

RESULTS

We identified 119 ileocolic intussusceptions (64% boys), with 81% in the right colon. There was no significant relationship between ileocolic intussusception length and colon location (P=0.15), nor ileocolic intussusception length and symptom duration (P=0.36). Ileocolic intussusceptions were more distal with increasing symptom duration (P=0.016). Successful reductions were unrelated to symptom duration (P=0.84) but were more likely with proximal versus distal locations (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Ileocolic intussusception lengths are relatively uniform regardless of location along the course of the colon where they present. Our findings suggest that most of the apparent distal propagation of ileocolic intussusceptions is not caused by increasing telescoping of small bowel across the ileocecal valve but rather by foreshortening of the right colon. This implies poor cecal fixation and confirms fluoroscopic and surgical observations of cecal displacement from the right lower quadrant with ileocolic intussusceptions. The movement of the leading edge of the ileocolic intussusception during reduction is first due to "relocating" the cecum into the right lower quadrant after which the reduction of small bowel back across the ileocecal valve then occurs.

Surgical approach to intussusception in older children: influence of lead points

BACKGROUND

The likelihood of a lead point as the cause of ileocolic intussusception increases as children get older. This study looks at whether a different management strategy should be employed in older patients.

METHODS

7 year multi-institutional retrospective study of intussusception in patients aged <12 years.

RESULTS

Ileocolic intussusception with complete data was found in 153 patients: 109 0-2 years, 34 3-5 years, and 10 6-12 years, respectively. Bloody stools occurred in 42/143 of 0-5 years and 0/10 of 6-12 years, p<0.001. Combined hydrostatic and/or surgical reduction was successful in 113/143 0-5 year olds vs 5/10 6-12 year olds, p<0.001. Enemas were safe but reduced only 1 patient over age 5. Resections were required in 29 patients (15 idiopathic, 14 lead points). Lead points were found in 4/109 children under 3 years, in 5/34 aged 3-5 years and 5/10 aged 6-12 years (p=0.04 vs 3-5 years and p <0.001 vs 0-5 years). Lead points consisted of 7 Meckel's diverticula and 7 others.

CONCLUSION

Children older than 5 years are much more likely to have a pathologic lead point and early surgical intervention should be considered. In this study, enema reduction was safe but minimally beneficial in this age group.

Single port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for ileocolic intussusception

A 36-year-old male was admitted with right lower abdominal pain and diarrhea for more than 3 mo. Colonoscopy and a barium enema study revealed a submucosal tumor over the cecum, but computed tomography showed an ileal lipoma. There was no definitive diagnosis preoperatively, but ileocolic intussusception was noted during surgery. Single port laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy was performed because intra-operative reduction failed. The histological diagnosis of the resected tumor was lipoma. Single port laparoscopic surgery has recently been proven to be safe and feasible. There are advantages compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, such as smaller incision wounds, fewer port site complications, and easier conversion. However, there are some drawbacks which need to be overcome, such as difficulties in triangulation and instrument clashing. If there are no contraindications to laparoscopy, single port laparoscopic surgery can be performed safely and should be considered for diagnosis and treatment of intussusception in adults. Here, we report the first case of ileocolic intussusception successfully treated by single port laparoscopic surgery.