An organizational assessment of 101 Community-Based Adult Services centers to identify and address gaps in influenza vaccination among Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries

INTRODUCTION

Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries are at high risk of experiencing severe disease from influenza. Yet, immunization assessment followed by influenza vaccination (when needed) are not regularly performed at Community-Based Adult Services (CBAS) centers in/near medically underserved areas. To better understand this challenge, an organizational assessment was conducted in early 2020 to identify and examine modifiable factors that may impede or facilitate immunization assessment and influenza vaccination at CBAS centers in Los Angeles County (LAC), California.

METHODS

All 158 CBAS centers in LAC were asked to complete a 17-question survey. The survey asked about immunization assessment, gaps in communication with primary care providers, knowledge and use of the California Immunization Registry (CAIR), and institutional policies for influenza vaccination. In addition, the survey asked each center about its vaccination policy for staff and clients, including whether or not increasing vaccinations was an interest/priority for the center. Best subsets algorithms (regression models) were performed to identify factors that may influence CBAS centers' practices on immunization assessment and vaccination.

RESULTS

Of the 158 centers, 101 (66 %) completed the survey. A majority did not conduct immunization assessments for influenza (n = 59; 58 %); nearly-two-thirds (n = 70; 71 %) reported it would be feasible to do so if the practice is integrated as part of the individualized/nursing plan of care. Best subsets algorithms showed the strongest factors influencing whether CBAS centers assess for influenza vaccination were: center size, staff training on CAIR, presence of barriers to vaccination, and the belief that it is the center's responsibility to conduct immunization assessments and vaccinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that practice gaps in immunization assessment and influenza vaccination are common at LAC's CBAS centers. Closing these gaps may help LAC (and California) improve influenza vaccine uptake and other vaccinations (e.g., pneumococcal, COVID-19) among the most vulnerable of the state's aging populations, Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries.

Development of a US trust measure to assess and monitor parental confidence in the vaccine system

OBJECTIVE

To develop a Vaccine Confidence Index (VCI) that is capable of detecting variations in parental confidence towards childhood immunizations centered on trust and concern issues that impact vaccine confidence.

METHODS

We used a web-based national poll of 893 parents of children <7 years in 2016 to assess the measures created for the Emory VCI (EVCI). EVCI measures were developed using constructs related to vaccine confidence identified by the U.S. National Vaccine Advisory Committee (i.e., "Information Environment", "Trust", "Healthcare Provider", "Attitudes and Beliefs", and "Social Norms"). Reliability for EVCI was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Using the variables related to each of the constructs, we calculated an overall EVCI score that was then assessed against self-reported childhood vaccine receipt using chi-square and the Cochrane-Armitage trend tests.

RESULTS

Respondents' EVCI scores could range from 0 to 24, and the full range of values was observed in this sample (Mean = 17.5 (SD 4.8)). EVCI scores were significantly different (p ≤ 0.006 for all comparisons) between parents who indicated their child(ren) received routinely recommended vaccines compared with parents who indicated they had delayed or declined recommended immunizations. There was also a significant, consistent association between higher EVCI scores and greater reported vaccine receipt.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed EVCI to reliably measure parental vaccine confidence, with individuals' scores linked to parental vaccine-related attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. As such, EVCI may be a useful tool for future monitoring of both population and individual confidence in childhood immunization.

Missed opportunities for adolescent vaccination, 2006-2011

OBJECTIVE

To describe missed opportunities for meningococcal (MCV); tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap); and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among adolescents.

METHODS

Retrospective electronic health record data review of adolescents aged 11-18 years at the time of their visit to a university-based pediatric practice in Seattle from 2006 to 2011. The primary outcome was missed vaccination opportunities, defined as the proportion of visits where a patient eligible for MCV, Tdap, and/or HPV remained unvaccinated. HPV vaccine analysis was limited to females. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression assessed variables associated with missed vaccination opportunities.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,628 adolescents made 9,180 visits. The percentage of visits that were missed opportunities was 82% for MCV, 85% for Tdap, and 82% for the first HPV dose (HPV1), 63% for the second, and 71% for the third. Adolescents with at least one preventive care visit were significantly less likely to have missed opportunities for MCV, Tdap, or HPV1. Nonpreventive visits were associated with more missed opportunities for MCV (OR = 19.2, 95% CI 15.3-24.0), Tdap (OR = 25.8, 95% CI 19.3-34.6), and HPV1 (OR = 12.1, 95% CI 9.0-16.1) than preventive visits. Adolescent females were more likely to have a missed opportunity for HPV1 than Tdap (p < .001) or MCV (p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Missed opportunities for adolescent vaccination against MCV, Tdap and HPV are common. Adolescents who utilize preventive care are less likely to have missed vaccination opportunities. Further research is needed to explore why missed vaccination opportunities occur and to develop evidence-based strategies to reduce missed opportunities and improve adolescent vaccination coverage.