1
|
Bae J, Lee DDU, Lee KT, Pyon JK, Jeon BJ, Mun GH. The early postoperative effects of rinsing the breast pocket with tranexamic acid in prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 89:125-133. [PMID: 38181633 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) has been reported in breast surgery; however, its application and duration have varied across studies. This study aimed to assess the early postoperative outcomes of rinsing the breast pocket with TXA during prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction using an acellular dermal matrix (ADM). METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted in consecutive patients who underwent immediate prosthetic prepectoral reconstruction between August 2021 and December 2022. For cases performed during the earlier part of the study period (up to April 2022), TXA was not administered (non-TXA group), whereas those performed after April 2022 received topical TXA application during surgery (TXA group). Postoperative outcomes including hematoma, seroma, drainage volume, and drain maintenance duration were compared between the two groups using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS A total of 674 breasts were analyzed; 280 in the TXA group and 394 were in the non-TXA group. There were 251 breasts in each group after PSM, and their characteristics were similar. The incidence of hematoma in the first 24 hours and total drain output were significantly lower in the TXA group than the non-TXA group. In cases of direct-to-implant cases, the TXA group showed a significantly lower seroma rate. CONCLUSIONS Rinsing the breast pocket with TXA can potentially reduce the occurrence of hematoma and decrease drain output in prepectoral ADM-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction. Moreover, this approach may be beneficial in lowering the incidence of seroma in direct-to-implant reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juyoung Bae
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dianne Dong Un Lee
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyeong-Tae Lee
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jai Kyong Pyon
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byung-Joon Jeon
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Goo-Hyun Mun
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marquez JL, French M, Ormiston L, Pires G, Martheswaran T, Eddington D, Tuncer F, Agarwal JP, Kwok AC. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 89:97-104. [PMID: 38160591 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
As prepectoral implant placement becomes widely adopted, recent studies investigating the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) during tissue expander placement have demonstrated no major benefit with regard to postoperative outcomes. We sought to evaluate second-stage outcomes 1 year after tissue expander exchange to implant with and without ADM. Consecutive patients who underwent prepectoral tissue expander-based breast reconstruction with and without ADM were identified. Patients were followed up for 1 year after tissue expander exchange to implant. Second-stage outcomes of interest including implant rippling, capsular contracture, implant explantation, additional revision surgeries, and patient-reported outcomes were collected and compared. Sixty-eight breasts in the ADM cohort and sixty-one breasts in the no ADM cohort underwent tissue expander exchange to implant. Second-stage outcomes of interest were similar between the ADM and no ADM cohorts with no statistically significant differences identified regarding incidences of implant rippling (24.6% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.08), capsular contracture (4.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 1.00), and explantation (6.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.67) between the two cohorts. BREAST-Q scores were similar between the two cohorts with the exception of physical wellbeing and satisfaction in terms of implant rippling, as can be seen, which improved in the no ADM cohort (p = 0.04). Our study reports no major benefit for the inclusion of ADM with respect to implant rippling, capsular contracture, explantation, need for additional revision surgeries, and patient-reported satisfaction in prepectoral second-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Marquez
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mackenzie French
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Laurel Ormiston
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Giovanna Pires
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tanisha Martheswaran
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Devin Eddington
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Fatma Tuncer
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jayant P Agarwal
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Alvin C Kwok
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Wang ML, Black GG, Qin N, Zhou G, Bernstein JL, Chinta M, Otterburn DM. Machine-Learning Prediction of Capsular Contraction after Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction. JPRAS Open 2023; 38:1-13. [PMID: 37662866 PMCID: PMC10472234 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Two-stage breast reconstruction is a common technique used to restore preoperative appearance in patients undergoing mastectomy. However, capsular contracture may develop and lead to implant failure and significant morbidity. The objective of this study is to build a machine-learning model that can determine the risk of developing contracture formation after two-stage breast reconstruction. Methods A total of 209 women (406 samples) were included in the study cohort. Patient characteristics that were readily accessible at the preoperative visit and details pertaining to the surgical approach were used as input data for the machine-learning model. Supervised learning models were assessed using 5-fold cross validation. A neural network model is also evaluated using a 0.8/0.1/0.1 train/validate/test split. Results Among the subjects, 144 (35.47%) developed capsular contracture. Older age, smaller nipple-inframammary fold distance, retropectoral implant placement, synthetic mesh usage, and postoperative radiation increased the odds of capsular contracture (p < 0.05). The neural network achieved the best performance metrics among the models tested, with a test accuracy of 0.82 and area under receiver operative curve of 0.79. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study that uses a neural network to predict the development of capsular contraction after two-stage implant-based reconstruction. At the preoperative visit, surgeons may counsel high-risk patients on the potential need for further revisions or guide them toward autologous reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunchan Chen
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marcos Lu Wang
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Grant G. Black
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Qin
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - George Zhou
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - David M. Otterburn
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cazzato V, Scarabosio A, Bottosso S, Rodda A, Vita L, Renzi N, Caputo G, Ramella V, Parodi PC, Papa G. Early Seroma Treatment Protocol Based on US-Guided Aspiration in DTI Prepectoral Reconstruction: A Prospective Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:e542-e548. [PMID: 37806916 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Seroma is a common complication after prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction with ADM, leading to wound dehiscencse, infection, and even loss of reconstruction at last. A new ultrasound (US) guided follow-up protocol has been applied to compare primary and secondary complications incidence and their treatment, and evaluate the effect of precocious seroma detection and its evacuation in reducing secondary complications. METHODS We enrolled 406 patients from January 1st, 2021 to July 1st, 2023 who underwent mastectomy and 1-stage prepectoral reconstruction with ADM. Experimental group counted 96 patients, whom have been treated as protocol fashion, therefore with multiple US-guided evaluations and eventual evacuations along with postoperative period; control group (310 patients) has exclusively been clinically evaluated. RESULTS Seroma incidence detected rate among experimental group, after 1-year follow-up, was 32.2%, compared to 16.8% in control cohort, additionally no other secondary complications were detected in the first group. Referring to the wound dehiscence incidence, a statistically significant higher frequency was observed in control group compared with treatment 1 (21.2% vs. 0%; P = .0027). CONCLUSIONS Seroma and correlated secondary complications may lead to additional surgeries, higher sanitary costs and even reconstructive failure. With a seriated US follow-up protocol application, the surgeon could promptly manage and treat seroma, decreasing additional complications rate, particularly wound dehiscence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vito Cazzato
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Anna Scarabosio
- Department of Medical Area (DIME), Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Stefano Bottosso
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Agostino Rodda
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ludovica Vita
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nadia Renzi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Glenda Caputo
- Department of Medical Area (DIME), Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Vittorio Ramella
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Pier Camillo Parodi
- Department of Medical Area (DIME), Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Papa
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wederfoort JLM, Voeten N, Smeins NNPM, Hommes JE, Essers BAB, van der Hulst RRWJ, Piatkowski A. A Dutch randomized controlled study shows autologous fat transfer with pre-expansion is more cost-effective in the long term than implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 84:398-412. [PMID: 37399660 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One in seven women will develop breast cancer, making it the most common female cancer worldwide. Consequently, breast cancer-related treatment, including breast reconstruction, impacts societal costs. Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is a relatively new breast reconstruction technique; however, several surgeries are necessary. This study investigates if AFT with pre-expansion is more cost-effective than implant-based reconstruction (IBR). METHODS Seven centers assigned patients randomly from 2015 to 2021 to evaluate costs and EQ-5D-5L quality-adjusted life years (QALY) of AFT vs. IBR at 12 months postoperative. Costs were calculated, including direct costs related to treatment and PROductivity and DISease Questionnaire, to estimate productivity loss (indirect costs). Sensitivity analyses were performed for 10- and 30 years to estimate costs for patients replacing or explanting their breast implants over time. RESULTS A total of 152 women, of which 91 received AFT (mean age 49.3) and 80 IBR (mean age 49.1). The mean EQ-5D-5L QALY in the AFT group was 0.83, compared with the IBR group of 0.79. Total costs for AFT at 12 months postoperative were higher than IBR (incremental cost: €6763.59). Sensitivity analyses for 10- and 30-year scenarios showed mean incremental costs of respectively €2586.56 and €680.22. CONCLUSION Mean EQ-5D-5L QALY and costs were higher for AFT over the first year after reconstruction. However, these costs were low; therefore, AFT was estimated to be more cost-effective over the 10- and 30-year period since no additional surgeries are necessary for this group. Larger cohorts are required to confirm AFT is more cost-effective in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L M Wederfoort
- Department of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - N Voeten
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - N N P M Smeins
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J E Hommes
- Department of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - B A B Essers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R R W J van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A Piatkowski
- Department of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Viecuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pagliara D, Schiavone L, Garganese G, Bove S, Montella RA, Costantini M, Rinaldi PM, Bottosso S, Grieco F, Rubino C, Salgarello M, Ribuffo D. Predicting Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Preoperative and Intraoperative Assessment Techniques. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:249-254. [PMID: 36725477 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Mastectomy skin-flap necrosis (MSFN) is one of the most feared complications of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR). Traditionally, mastectomy skin-flap viability was based only on surgeons' clinical experience. Even though numerous studies have already addressed the patients' risk factors for MSFN, few works have focused on assessing quality of breast envelope. This review investigates mastectomy's flap viability-assessment methods, both preoperative (PMFA) and intraoperative (IMFA), to predict MSFN and its sequalae. Between June and November 2022, we conducted a systematic review of Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane electronic databases. Only English studies regarding PMFA and IMFA applied to IIBR were selected. The use of digital mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and a combination of several methods before surgery was shown to be advantageous by several authors. Indocyanine performed better than other IMFA, however both thermal imaging and spectroscopy demonstrated novel and promising results. Anyway, the best prediction comes when preoperative and intraoperative values are combined. Particularly in prepectoral reconstruction, when mastectomy flaps are essential to determine a successful breast reconstruction, surgeons' clinical judgment is insufficient in assessing the risk of MSFN. Preoperative and intraoperative assessment techniques play an emerging key role in MSFN prediction. However, although there are several approaches to back up the surgeon's processing choice, there is still a dearth of pertinent literature on the subject, and more research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Pagliara
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy.
| | - Laurenza Schiavone
- Department of Surgery "P.Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Sonia Bove
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Rino Aldo Montella
- Radiology Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Melania Costantini
- Radiology Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Bottosso
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara, ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Federica Grieco
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Sassari, Italy
| | - Corrado Rubino
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marzia Salgarello
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Ribuffo
- Department of Surgery "P.Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Graziano FD, Lu J, Sbitany H. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2023; 50:235-242. [PMID: 36813401 DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Prepectoral breast reconstruction has gained popularity due to numerous benefits in properly selected patients. Compared with subpectoral implant reconstruction, prepectoral reconstruction offers preservation of the pectoralis major muscle in its native position, resulting in decreased pain, no animation deformity, and improved arm range of motion/strength. Although prepectoral reconstruction is safe and effective, the implant sits closer to the mastectomy skin flap. Acellular dermal matrices play a critical role, allowing for precise control of the breast envelope and providing long-term implant support. Careful patient selection and intraoperative mastectomy flap evaluation are critical to obtaining optimal results with prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis D Graziano
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jocelyn Lu
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hani Sbitany
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pagliara D, Montella RA, Garganese G, Bove S, Costantini M, Rinaldi PM, Pino V, Grieco F, Rubino C, Salgarello M. Improving Decision-making in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: The Key Role of Flap Thickness Ratio. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:e37-e44. [PMID: 36610826 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We report our experience in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with prepectoral polyurethane implants, with a focus on intraoperative mastectomy flap thickness compared to preoperative data (flap thickness ratio) as a reliable predictive variable of ischemic complications and reconstructive outcomes (satisfaction with breast). BACKGROUND The optimization of nipple sparing mastectomy and implant-based reconstruction techniques led to an increase in the popularity of prepectoral reconstruction. The aim of this study is to explore the ratio between the intraoperative and preoperative breast tissue coverage assessment as reliable tool in order to predict the risk of ischemic complications in prepectoral reconstruction. METHODS We analyzed 124 preoperative digital mammograms of 100 patients who underwent prepectoral implant-based reconstruction. We applied a Rancati modified score for breast tissue coverage classification, adding 4 measurements on the craniocaudal view. The intraoperative mastectomy flap thickness was measured using an intraoperative ultrasound assessment. We investigated the differences between the groups with and without ischemic complications related to the preoperative, intraoperative, and flap thickness ratio data. RESULTS The flap thickness ratio was lower in ischemic complication group compared to no ischemic complication group (0.4 vs. 0.8) with statistically significant differences for all ischemic complication subgroups: major mastectomy flap necrosis (P = .000), minor mastectomy flap necrosis (P = .005), partial nipple areola complex necrosis (P = .007), and implant exposure (P = .001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Pagliara
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy.
| | - Rino Aldo Montella
- Radiology Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital (Qatar Foundation Endowment and Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Foundation), Olbia, Italy
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Sonia Bove
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Melania Costantini
- Radiology Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital (Qatar Foundation Endowment and Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Foundation), Olbia, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Maria Rinaldi
- Radiology Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital (Qatar Foundation Endowment and Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Foundation), Olbia, Italy
| | - Valentina Pino
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Grieco
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Sassari, Italy
| | - Corrado Rubino
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marzia Salgarello
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Santanelli Di Pompeo F, Barone M, Salzillo R, Cogliandro A, Brunetti B, Ciarrocchi S, Alessandri Bonetti M, Tenna S, Sorotos M, Persichetti P. Predictive Factors of Satisfaction Following Breast Reconstruction: Do they Influence Patients? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46:610-618. [PMID: 34559281 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02584-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aims to analyze whether there is any patient- or treatment-related factor that can influence patients' body perception after mastectomy and autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent immediate implant-based or DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Predictive factors analyzed included chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, body mass index, age, type of mastectomy, and follow-up length. The BREAST-Q was administered postoperatively almost 2 years from the last surgical procedure. Mean BREAST-Q scores were reported for the overall cohort and by modality for the postoperative period. A linear regression model was applied to all BREAST-Q scores with all predictor factors. RESULTS In total, 325 patients were enrolled in this study (133 DIEP flap and 192 implant-based reconstructions). The DIEP flap reconstruction group with a previous nipple sparing mastectomy showed the highest scores. Patients with a longer follow-up were less satisfied than the ones with a shorter follow-up, which could be considered as an assessment of the outcome. No significant difference was reported between patients who underwent radiotherapy, chemotherapy or hormone therapy and those who did not. Furthermore, age and BMI had no influence on patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION This study is the first that groups a large number of patients and analyzes predictive factors of long-term satisfaction of patients undergoing breast reconstruction. This can be regarded as a pilot study to raise the awareness of everyone's clinical practice to predict the attitude that patients have after surgery and to prepare them in the best possible way. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Santanelli Di Pompeo
- Chair of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Barone
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo 200, Rome, Italy.
- Research group ``To be and to appear: Objective indication to Plastic Surgery'' of Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Rome, Italy.
- Institute of Philosophy of Scientific and Technological Activity, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Rosa Salzillo
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo 200, Rome, Italy
| | - Annalisa Cogliandro
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo 200, Rome, Italy
- Research group ``To be and to appear: Objective indication to Plastic Surgery'' of Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Beniamino Brunetti
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo 200, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Ciarrocchi
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo 200, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Alessandri Bonetti
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Galezzi, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Tenna
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo 200, Rome, Italy
| | - Michail Sorotos
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", PhD School of Translational Medicine of Development and Active Ageing, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Paolo Persichetti
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo 200, Rome, Italy
- Research group ``To be and to appear: Objective indication to Plastic Surgery'' of Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Persichetti P, Barone M, Salzillo R, Cogliandro A, Brunetti B, Ciarrocchi S, Alessandri Bonetti M, Tenna S, Sorotos M, Santanelli Di Pompeo F. Impact on Patient's Appearance Perception of Autologous and Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy Using BREAST-Q. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46:1153-1163. [PMID: 35229192 PMCID: PMC9411234 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-02776-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a better quality of life with one of the two techniques and if the results are in line with those already present in the literature. The hypothesis from which we started is to demonstrate that cancer patients who undergo a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction surgery are more satisfied and have a higher level of quality of life compared to those subjected to an intervention of reconstruction with prosthesis. Materials and Methods All patients undergoing reconstruction from January 2010 to July 2018 were eligible for inclusion. This is a retrospective cohort study carried out using the patients of two plastic surgery departments who have undergone monolateral or bilateral implant-based or DIEP flap breast reconstruction. We administered BREAST-Q questionnaire electronically almost 2 year after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. Baseline demographics and patient characteristics were analyzed using a Students t-test (continuous variables) or Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test (categorical variables). Mean standard deviation BREAST-Q scores were reported for the overall cohort and by modality for the postoperative period. The linear regression model was applied to all BREAST-Q score with all predictor factors. Results Of the 1125 patients involved, only 325 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study; specifically, 133 (41%) DIEP and 192 (59%) prosthetic reconstructions. We summarized the results of the principal scales of BREAST-Q module: satisfaction with breast, psychosocial well-being, satisfaction with outcome, and sexual well-being in which the autologous group was always more satisfied. We reported results of all linear regression models with higher values for the DIEP group independently from predictors. Conclusion This is the first study performed on the Italian population that compares autologous surgical techniques with the implantation of breast implants. In this population, DIEP is considered the technique that leads to the highest satisfaction in all BREAST-Q scores. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Persichetti
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Philosophy of Scientific and Technological Activity, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Barone
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Research group "To be and to appear: Objective indication to Plastic Surgery" of Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Philosophy of Scientific and Technological Activity, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Salzillo
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Annalisa Cogliandro
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Beniamino Brunetti
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Ciarrocchi
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Alessandri Bonetti
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Galeazzi, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Tenna
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michail Sorotos
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", PhD School of Translational Medicine of Development and Active Ageing, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Santanelli Di Pompeo
- Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, U.O.D. Chirurgia Plastica, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jung S, Kim JI, Park JM, Shin KH, Kim JH, Choi CH. Comparison of treatment plans between static jaw and jaw tracking techniques in postmastectomy intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys Eng Sci Med 2022; 45:181-187. [PMID: 35041187 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01100-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This study reports a dosimetric comparison between treatment plans using static jaw and jaw tracking techniques in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Seventeen patients treated for left-sided breast cancer with implant-based reconstruction were subjected to IMRT plans. Another group of 22 patients treated for left-sided breast cancer without reconstruction was also subjected to IMRT plans. The plans were generated using the Eclipse treatment planning system with static jaw and jaw tracking techniques. The dose-volume histograms and dosimetric indices, such as mean dose (Dmean), V20 Gy, V10 Gy, and V5 Gy (volumes receiving 20, 10, and 5 Gy at the least, respectively), and generalized equivalent uniform dose for organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed. A significant difference in the value of the dosimetric indices between the static jaw and jaw tracking plans was observed. For jaw tracking plans, the Dmean of the heart for the patients with implant-based reconstruction reduced from 11.6 ± 1.1 Gy to 10.0 ± 1.8 Gy, whereas the V5 Gy reduced from 92.0 ± 4.5% to 85.1 ± 8.4%. The Dmean of the heart for patients without reconstruction reduced from 11.0 ± 2.3 Gy to 9.8 ± 2.6 Gy, whereas the V5 Gy reduced from 81.4 ± 13.6% to 66.7 ± 17.4%. The dosimetric indices of OARs in the jaw tracking plans were significantly lower than those of the OARs in the static jaw plans. The jaw tracking technique was more effective for patients without reconstruction than for those with implant-based reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongmoon Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-In Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Min Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Ho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Heon Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. .,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Coyette M, Coulie J, Lentini A, Gerdom A, Lengelé B. Prepectoral immediate breast reconstruction with polyurethane foam-coated implants: Feasibility and early results in risk-reducing and therapeutic mastectomies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74:2876-2884. [PMID: 34011475 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a renewed interest for prepectoral reconstruction. We aimed to describe the feasibility and the early complications associated with immediate one-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction using prepectoral anatomical polyurethane (PU) foam-coated implants alone, for women with breast cancer or mutation carriers undergoing risk-reducing surgery. METHODS We performed a single-center, retrospective review of 50 patients (mean age of 49 years), who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate prepectoral PU implant-based reconstruction. All procedures were performed by the same senior operator, from July 2018 to March 2020. RESULTS A total of 64 mastectomies (25 SSMs and 39 NSMs) with one-stage prepectoral PU foam-coated implant reconstruction were performed. Out of 50 patients, 6 required surgical revision within 30 days, because of hematoma (2), wound dehiscence (2) infection (1), and full thickness nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis (1). Four patients developed a cutaneous rash with spontaneous resolution. Statistical analysis showed a significant influence of hypothyroidism and previous radiotherapy on the risk of complications. The association with prior radiotherapy (pRT) was not significant using binary logistic regression. When excluding oncological reasons and patient's wish for NAC excision, our decision to perform an NSM was influenced by breast cup size, preoperative measurements, and breast weight. CONCLUSIONS Early experience with immediate prepectoral DTI reconstruction with PU-covered implants alone suggests that it is a reliable procedure. Prior breast irradiation does not increase postoperative complication rates in our series. NAC preservation was decided according to preoperative lower breast measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maude Coyette
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Julien Coulie
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Audrey Lentini
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexander Gerdom
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Benoît Lengelé
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salgarello M, Pagliara D, Barone Adesi L, Visconti G, Wild JB, Matey P. Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction With Prepectoral Micropolyurethane Foam-Coated Implant: Analysis of Patient Satisfaction. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 21:e454-e461. [PMID: 33627298 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immediate implant reconstruction after mastectomy with submuscular implant placement is widely used in order to avoid implant exposure, capsular contracture and poor aesthetic result. Postoperative complications can be reduced by maintain mastectomy flap thickness and asses flap vascularity with near infrared imaging. The prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane implants has been utilized with encouraging results. Postoperative patient satisfaction was assessed with the BREAST-Q scores in patients who underwent prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane implants. Additionally the impact of mastectomy flap thickness on breast reconstruction was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Breast Q-scores of satisfaction with the breast, the postoperative outcome and physical well-being of the chest in 70 patients underwent immediate implant breast reconstructions with prepectoral polyurethane implant were retrospectively reviewed. The correlation between mastectomy flap thickness and satisfaction with breast was analyzed. RESULTS At 12-month follow-up the mean Q-score for satisfaction with breast was 71.73 (standard deviation: 13.31), and for physical well-being chest was 70.73 (standard deviation: 7.94). A positive linear correlation between mastectomy flap thickness and satisfaction with the breast was identified. CONCLUSIONS The postoperative Q-scores are encouraging in the use of polyurethane prepectoral implants in immediate breast reconstruction, especially in patients with "thick" mastectomy flaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Salgarello
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Domenico Pagliara
- Mater Olbia Hospital, Strada Statale 125 Orientale Sarda, 07026 Olbia (SS), Italy.
| | - Liliana Barone Adesi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Visconti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | | | - Pilar Matey
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patel AA, Martin SA, Cheesborough JE, Lee GK, Nazerali RS. The safety and efficacy of autologous fat grafting during second stage breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 74:792-799. [PMID: 33189618 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients often pursue revisions following implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) to achieve their desired result. Fat grafting is a popular choice for patients and can be performed at second stage reconstruction or at a future date as a revisionary surgery. We investigate the best time to fat graft in IBR by comparing the outcomes of patients who received fat grafting during implant placement with those who pursued fat grafting during a tertiary procedure. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 157 patients (270 breasts) who underwent immediate two-stage IBR and fat grafting over a five-year period (2012-2016) at our institution. Two cohorts were created based on timing of first fat grafting procedure: immediate (IFG) and delayed (DFG). Charts were reviewed for postoperative complications or revisions. RESULTS Complication rates were lower when fat grafting was performed during the second stage (p = 0.0331). Patients in the DFG cohort required more than one additional revision (p < 0.001) until the completion of reconstruction. Patients in the IFG cohort completed their reconstruction and revisions more than one year earlier than the DFG cohort (p < 0.001). Multivariable regressions showed IFG to be associated with decreased revisions (p < 0.001) and total fat grafting procedures (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that fat grafting at the second stage does not increase overall complication rates, require fewer additional surgeries, and enables patients to reach their desired aesthetic appearance in a shorter time frame. Fewer total surgeries translate not only to a more economical option but also obviate the risk of complications that come with additional surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashraf A Patel
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 770 Welch Rd, Suite 400, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - Shanique A Martin
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 770 Welch Rd, Suite 400, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Jennifer E Cheesborough
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 770 Welch Rd, Suite 400, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Gordon K Lee
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 770 Welch Rd, Suite 400, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Rahim S Nazerali
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 770 Welch Rd, Suite 400, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aliotta RE, Duraes EFR, Scomacao I, Morisada M, Orra S, Moreira A, Bernard S, Schwarz G, Djohan R. A controlled cost and outcomes analysis of acellular dermal matrix and implant-based reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020; 74:1229-1238. [PMID: 33526361 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for breast reconstruction continues to change in both single- and two-stage reconstruction. Determining optimal outcomes clinically, aesthetically, financially as well as for the patient's quality of life has become a priority. METHODS A retrospective review of implant-based reconstructions was performed at a single center from 2010 to 2016, with patients blindly matched 1:1:1 into three cohorts based on reconstruction type: 1) single stage direct to implant with ADM, 2) two-stage tissue expander to implant (TE/I) without ADM, and 3) two-stage TE/I with ADM. Relative cost between groups, esthetic outcomes, and quality of life within each group was analyzed. RESULTS Group 1 was more likely to be older and use intraoperative angiography, but with fewer overall surgeries and postoperative visits (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in reconstructive success among all three groups (p = 0.85). Cost was significantly higher for group 3 relative to groups 1 and 2. Overall appearance was higher in groups 1 and 3 relative to group 2, with radiation therapy the only independent factor. Group 1 had higher scores using Breast-Q for the physical well-being domain (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION This is the first study to incorporate clinical outcomes, esthetic visual grading, and patient-reported quality within the same cohort of individuals, considering both use of ADM and staging. Despite the added ADM cost, it is proven safe, eliminates time and cost associated with tissue expanders, decreases post-operative visits and can lead to equally as functional and aesthetically pleasing outcomes in single- and two-stage breast reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E Aliotta
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Eliana F R Duraes
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Isis Scomacao
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Megan Morisada
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Susan Orra
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Andrea Moreira
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Steven Bernard
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Graham Schwarz
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Risal Djohan
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A60 Crile Building, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Eck DL, Nguyen DC, Barnes LL, Jansen DA. Treatment of Breast Animation Deformity in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Selective Nerve Ablation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42:1472-1475. [PMID: 29959495 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-018-1184-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Breast animation deformity is a known complication of subpectoral implant placement that is usually corrected by repositioning the implant to the prepectoral position. Other less common treatment options include performing the muscle splitting biplanar technique, triple plane technique, neuromodulator injections, and secondary neurotomies via transection of the pectoral muscle. We report a patient with animation deformity successfully treated with direct identification and ablation of the medial and lateral pectoral nerves using selective bipolar electrocautery. The patient is a woman with a history of invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent bilateral mastectomy and breast reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement and autologous fat grafting. Within 1 year of her breast reconstruction, she developed hyperactive pectoralis muscle contraction with resulting distortion of both breasts. Given the disadvantages of repositioning the implant to the prepectoral position and transecting the pectoralis muscles via secondary neurotomy, we chose to directly identify and selectively ablate distal branches of the medial and lateral pectoral nerves. This offers a novel technique for correcting breast animation deformity without transecting the pectoralis muscles, causing muscle atrophy, and preserving the subpectoral implant position.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the table of contents or the online instructions to authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
|
17
|
Mylvaganam S, Conroy EJ, Williamson PR, Barnes NLP, Cutress RI, Gardiner MD, Jain A, Skillman JM, Thrush S, Whisker LJ, Blazeby JM, Potter S, Holcombe C. Adherence to best practice consensus guidelines for implant-based breast reconstruction: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire survey. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:708-716. [PMID: 29472041 PMCID: PMC5937851 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 2008 National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit demonstrated marked variation in the practice and outcomes of breast reconstruction in the UK. To standardise practice and improve outcomes for patients, the British professional associations developed best-practice guidelines with specific guidance for newer mesh-assisted implant-based techniques. We explored the degree of uptake of best-practice guidelines within units performing implant-based reconstruction (IBBR) as the first phase of the implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation (iBRA) study. METHODS A questionnaire developed by the iBRA Steering Group was completed by trainee and consultant leads at breast and plastic surgical units across the UK. Simple summary statistics were calculated for each survey item to assess compliance with current best-practice guidelines. RESULTS 81 units from 79 NHS Trusts completed the questionnaire. Marked variation was observed in adherence to guidelines, especially those relating to clinical governance and infection prevention strategies. Less than half (n = 28, 47%) of units obtained local clinical governance board approval prior to offering new mesh-based techniques and prospective audit of the clinical, cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes of surgery was infrequent. Most units screened for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus prior to surgery but fewer than 1 in 3 screened for methicillin-sensitive strains. Laminar-flow theatres (recommended for IBBR) were not widely-available with less than 1 in 5 units having regular access. Peri-operative antibiotics were widely-used, but the type and duration were highly-variable. CONCLUSIONS The iBRA national practice questionnaire has demonstrated variation in reported practice and adherence to IBBR guidelines. High-quality evidence is urgently required to inform best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senthurun Mylvaganam
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wednesfield Way, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK
| | - Elizabeth J Conroy
- Clinical Trials Research Centre (CTRC), North West Hub for Trials Methodology/University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Paula R Williamson
- Clinical Trials Research Centre (CTRC), North West Hub for Trials Methodology/University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Nicola L P Barnes
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Ramsey I Cutress
- Breast Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Matthew D Gardiner
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK; Department of Plastic Surgery, Imperial College London NHS Trust, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Abhilash Jain
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK; Department of Plastic Surgery, Imperial College London NHS Trust, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Joanna M Skillman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Steven Thrush
- Breast Unit, Worcester Royal Hospital, Charles Hastings Way, Worcester, WR5 1DD, UK
| | - Lisa J Whisker
- Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Shelley Potter
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK; Bristol Breast Cancer Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| | - Christopher Holcombe
- Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mylvaganam S, Conroy E, Williamson PR, Barnes NLP, Cutress RI, Gardiner MD, Jain A, Skillman JM, Thrush S, Whisker LJ, Blazeby JM, Potter S, Holcombe C. Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire. Breast 2017; 35:182-190. [PMID: 28768227 PMCID: PMC5590633 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2017] [Revised: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The introduction of biological and synthetic meshes has revolutionised the practice of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) but evidence for effectiveness is lacking. The iBRA (implant Breast Reconstruction evAluation) study is a national trainee-led project that aims to explore the practice and outcomes of IBBR to inform the design of a future trial. We report the results of the iBRA National Practice Questionnaire (NPQ) which aimed to comprehensively describe the provision and practice of IBBR across the UK. Methods A questionnaire investigating local practice and service provision of IBBR developed by the iBRA Steering Group was completed by trainee and consultant leads at breast and plastic surgical units across the UK. Summary data for each survey item were calculated and variation between centres and overall provision of care examined. Results 81 units within 79 NHS-hospitals completed the questionnaire. Units offered a range of reconstructive techniques, with IBBR accounting for 70% (IQR:50–80%) of participating units' immediate procedures. Units on average were staffed by 2.5 breast surgeons (IQR:2.0–3.0) and 2.0 plastic surgeons (IQR:1.0–3.0) performing 35 IBBR cases per year (IQR:20-50). Variation was demonstrated in the provision of novel different techniques for IBBR especially the use of biological (n = 62) and synthetic (n = 25) meshes and in patient selection for these procedures. Conclusions The iBRA-NPQ has demonstrated marked variation in the provision and practice of IBBR in the UK. The prospective audit phase of the iBRA study will determine the safety and effectiveness of different approaches to IBBR and allow evidence-based best practice to be explored. Implant breast reconstruction (IBBR) and the range of techniques is poorly evidence based. We aimed to explore the current practice of IBBR in the UK to inform the design of a future definitive study. Significant variation was demonstrated in the availability of techniques and patient selection for IBBR. There is a need for well-designed studies to establish best practice and improve outcomes for patients considering IBBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senthurun Mylvaganam
- New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wednesfield Way, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK
| | - Elizabeth Conroy
- Clinical Trials Research Centre (CTRC), North West Hub for Trials Methodology/University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Paula R Williamson
- Clinical Trials Research Centre (CTRC), North West Hub for Trials Methodology/University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK
| | - Nicola L P Barnes
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Ramsey I Cutress
- Breast Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK; Faculty of Medicine, Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Matthew D Gardiner
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK; Department of Plastic Surgery, Imperial College London NHS Trust, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Abhilash Jain
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK; Department of Plastic Surgery, Imperial College London NHS Trust, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Joanna M Skillman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Steven Thrush
- Breast Unit, Worcester Royal Hospital, Charles Hastings Way, Worcester, WR5 1DD, UK
| | - Lisa J Whisker
- Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Shelley Potter
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK; Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
| | - Christopher Holcombe
- Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|