Plasma Proteomic Analysis Based on 4D-DIA Evaluates the Clinical Response to Imrecoxib in the Early Treatment of Osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the primary treatment for osteoarthritis (OA), but prolonged use has adverse effects and varying efficacy. Among NSAIDs, imrecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, reduces side effects yet remains ineffective for half of the patient population. This study aims to identify biomarkers for early evaluation of imrecoxib efficacy in OA for personalized therapy optimization.

METHODS

From September 2021 to January 2022, imrecoxib was administered to patients with OA at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Plasma samples from these patients underwent proteomic analysis through the four-dimensional data-independent acquisition (4D-DIA) method, followed by bioinformatics analysis. Potential differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were validated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA).

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients with knee OA were included and divided into responders (n = 35) and non-responders (n = 31). Proteomic analysis was conducted on 15 patients from each group, with ELISA validation for every patient. We found 140 DEPs between the two groups after imrecoxib treatment, characterized by 29 proteins showing upregulation and 111 displaying downregulation (P < 0.05, fold change >  ± 1.2). Galectin-1 (LGALS1), galectin-3 (LGALS3), and cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44) were identified as potential markers for evaluating clinical response to imrecoxib in OA following ELISA validation.

CONCLUSION

This study successfully identified biomarkers for evaluating imrecoxib's clinical response in patients with OA using 4D-DIA technology. These biomarkers may play a vital role in future personalized OA treatment strategies, pending further confirmation.

Imrecoxib attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an incurable chronic progressive disease with a low survival rate and ineffective therapeutic options. We examined the effects of imrecoxib, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, on experimental pulmonary fibrosis. The mouse IPF model was established by intratracheal instillation of bleomycin. From Day 0 to Day 13, the mice were orally administered imrecoxib (100 mg/kg) and pirfenidone (200 mg/kg) daily, and from Day 7 to Day 13, the mice were orally administered pirfenidone and imrecoxib daily. The tissues were dissected on the 14th day. Mouse body weight was measured, and histopathological examination and hydroxyproline content analysis confirmed that the administration of imrecoxib exerted a similar effect to pirfenidone. Compared with bleomycin-induced mice, imrecoxib-treated mice showed significantly reduced inflammatory factor expression (IL-1 and TNF-α) and inflammatory cell numbers (macrophages, lymphocytes, and neutrophils) in BALF (bronchoalveolar lavage fluid). Our experiment tested the ability of imrecoxib to inhibit the signal pathway involved in gene expression induced by TGF-β1 in the NIH-3T3 cell line in vitro. Western blotting showed that imrecoxib (20 μM and 40 μM) inhibited the expression of fibronectin, type I collagen and CTGF. In addition, imrecoxib reduced the levels of p-ERK1/2. The changes in the expression of related proteins in mouse lung tissue were similar to those in cells. In summary, our findings suggested that the administration of imrecoxib prevented and treated murine IPF by inhibiting inflammation and the TGF-β1-ERK1/2 signaling pathway.

Postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of imrecoxib versus celecoxib in hip osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a multi-center, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND

Imrecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, possesses a certain postoperative analgesic effect for several orthopedic surgeries. This multi-center, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study intended to investigate the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety profile of imrecoxib (versus celecoxib) in hip osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

156 hip osteoarthritis patients planned for THA were randomized into imrecoxib (N = 78) and celecoxib (N = 78) groups. Patients were orally administrated with imrecoxib or celecoxib 200 mg at 2 h (h) after THA, 200 mg every 12 h to day (D)3, and 200 mg every 24 h to D7; additionally, each patient received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 2 days.

RESULTS

Resting pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 6 h, 12 h, D1, D2, D3, and D7 post THA was not varied between imrecoxib and celecoxib groups (all P > 0.050), neither was moving pain VAS score (all P > 0.050). Importantly, the upper of 95% confidence interval of pain VAS score margin between imrecoxib and celecoxib groups was within the non-inferiority threshold (Δ = 1.0), indicating the fact that non-inferiority was established. The additional and total consumption of PCA was not varied between imrecoxib and celecoxib groups (both P > 0.050). Also, no difference was seen in Harris hip score, European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) total and VAS scores at month (M)1, M3 between the two groups (all P > 0.050). Besides, the incidences of all adverse events were not different between imrecoxib and celecoxib groups (all P > 0.050).

CONCLUSION

Imrecoxib is non-inferior to celecoxib for postoperative analgesia in hip osteoarthritis patients undergoing THA.

Imrecoxib and celecoxib affect sacroiliac joint inflammation in axSpA by regulating bone metabolism and angiogenesis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the changes in the levels of bone metabolism markers related to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) inflammation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) after treatment with imrecoxib and celecoxib and evaluate their relationship with clinical efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with axSpA with at least 2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) SIJ scans during a 12-week follow-up were enrolled. The levels of bone metabolism markers, including dickkopf-1(DKK-1), sclerostin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), osteoprotegerin (OPG), noggin, β-catenin, and RUNX2, were measured twice, and their association with disease activity and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) score for SIJ were analyzed by univariate analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients completed the follow-up. The levels of sclerostin, OPG, noggin, DKK-1, and RUNX2 were increased, whereas those of VEGF and β-catenin were decreased. The levels of sclerostin and OPG were negatively correlated with disease duration. The levels of VEGF and β-catenin were significantly decreased (F = 7.866, P = 0.003; F = 4.106, P = 0.047) in patients with disease remission. A decrease in ESR was significantly correlated with decreased levels of Runx2 and SPARCC scores, with the levels of sclerostin being significantly elevated in the SPARCC-reduced group. There were no statistically significant differences between the imrecoxib and celecoxib groups (P> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Imrecoxib and celecoxib affect SIJ inflammation, disease activity, and the course of disease by regulating bone metabolism and angiogenesis in axSpA. Key Points •After treatment with imrecoxib and celecoxib, the levels of sclerostin, OPG, noggin, DKK-1, and RUNX2 were increased, whereas those of VEGF and β-catenin were decreased, correlating with the course of disease, disease activity, and SIJ inflammation. • A decrease in ESR was significantly correlated with a decrease in the levels of RUNX2 and SIJ inflammation.. • The levels of sclerostin were more significantly elevated in SIJ inflammation remission group.. •Imrecoxib and celecoxib affect SIJ inflammation by regulating bone metabolism and angiogenesis in axSpA..

Imrecoxib versus celecoxib as postoperative analgesia for patients receiving arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study

OBJECTIVE

Imrecoxib is a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor independently developed in China, which exhibits a good efficacy and tolerance in orthopedic disorders. The current study aimed to further compare its efficacy and safety with celecoxib as postoperative analgesia in arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS).

METHODS

Patients receiving AKS were enrolled and randomly assigned to imrecoxib (n = 64) and celecoxib (n = 62) group to receive analgesia for 72 h after surgery. Pain at rest and movement, pethidine consumption, patient's satisfaction, Lysholm score, and adverse events were assessed after AKS. Meanwhile the upper limit of 95% CI of pain-score mean difference (MD) between imrecoxib and celecoxib was calculated, then, the non-inferiority was defined if the all-time-point upper limits of 95% CI less than 1.

RESULTS

Imrecoxib was non-inferior to celecoxib for alleviating pain at rest (upper limit of 95% CI of MD ranging from 0.443 to 0.782, all time-point values less than 1); as well as for attenuating pain at movement (upper limit of 95% CI of MD ranging from 0.398 to 0.582, all time-point values less than 1). Moreover, rescue analgesia rate (P = 0.583), pethidine consumption (P = 0.454), patient's satisfaction at 72 h (P = 0.408), and Lysholm score at M3 (P = 0.776) were of no difference between imrecoxib group and celecoxib group. Additionally, the main adverse events in two groups were nausea (P = 0.425), constipation (P = 1.000), vomiting (P = 0.715), headache (P = 1.000), and dizziness (P = 0.667), which were mild and manageable.

CONCLUSION

Imrecoxib is non-inferior to celecoxib in postoperative analgesia and exhibits an acceptable tolerance in patients undergoing AKS.

Cost-utility analysis of imrecoxib compared with diclofenac for patients with osteoarthritis

Background

To estimate the cost -utility of imrecoxib compared with diclofenac, as well as the addition of a proton pump inhibitor to both two treatment strategies, for patients with osteoarthritis, from a Chinese healthcare perspective.

Methods

A Markov model was built. Costs of managing osteoarthritis and initial adverse events were collected from a Medical Database which collected information from 170 hospitals. Other parameters were obtained from the literature. Subgroup analyses were conducted for people at high risk of gastrointestinal or cardiovascular adverse events. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

Imrecoxib was highly cost-effective than diclofenac (the ICER was $401.58 and $492.77 in patients at low and high gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk, respectively). The addition of a proton pump inhibitor was more cost -effective compared with single drug for both treatment strategies. Findings remained robust to sensitivity analyses. 59.04% and 57.16% probability for the co-prescription of imrecoxib and a proton pump inhibitor to be the most cost-effective strategy in all patients considered using the cost-effectiveness threshold of $30,000.

Conclusions

The addition of a proton pump inhibitor to both imrecoxib and diclofenac was advised. Imrecoxib provides a valuable option for patients with osteoarthritis. Uncertainties existed in the model, and the suggestions can be adopted with caution.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00275-7.

Cost-utility analysis of imrecoxib compared with celecoxib for patients with osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to compare the long-term cost-utility of imrecoxib and celecoxib for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS

An economic model was built based on the model from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The simulation was carried out initially for 100 cycles of 3 months each, starting with 10,000 patients. A discount rate of 5% was applied both for cost and utility. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were adopted as the utility indicator, and real-world data from the hospital information systems of 170 hospitals was collected to indicate cost. The relative incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) with imrecoxib and celecoxib were collected from randomized controlled trials. Sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

In the base case analysis (6-month treatment duration, 55 years old and above), imrecoxib was the more cost-effective option compared to celecoxib, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $3,041.14. This finding remained unchanged after varying the treatment duration and the age of the patients. The main drivers of the results were the relative incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), the cost of imrecoxib, and the utility of OA patients without any AEs. Probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) showed that there was a 59.02% probability of imrecoxib as the more cost-effective option, with a threshold of $30,000.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were uncertainties, imrecoxib was the more cost-effective option compared to celecoxib, with a definite possibility. Due to the limitations of the original model and this study, the results of this study should be adopted with caution.

Dose investigation of imrecoxib in patients with renal insufficiency based on modelling and simulation

OBJECTIVE

Imrecoxib is a new moderately selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor. A previous study has shown that drug exposure differs significantly in renally impaired patients. We aim to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of imrecoxib (M0) and its two metabolites (M1, M2) to provide a theoretical basis for investigating imrecoxib doses for renally impaired patients.

METHODS

Using PPK analysis, 24 patients with 257 different plasma concentrations were studied. Of these, 12 had severe renal impairment and 12 had normal renal function. The dose regimen was simulated based on the final model to compare the ratio (Cu,ss/IC50) of the average unbound concentration at steady state (Cu,ss) to the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of COX-2.

RESULTS

Imrecoxib and its metabolite concentrations were satisfactorily described by a two-compartment with first-order transit absorption model for imrecoxib and a one-compartment model for its metabolites. Renal function was a significant binary covariate. Scenarios of '75 mg q12h' and '50 mg q8h' in renally impaired patients had similar Cu,ss/IC50 values with a '100 mg q12h' regimen in subjects with normal renal function.

CONCLUSION

A PPK model of imrecoxib and its two metabolites is presented. The renal insufficiency regimen should be reduced to '75 mg q12h' or '50 mg q8h'.

Simultaneous determination of imrecoxib and its two active metabolites in plasma of hepatic impairment patients by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Imrecoxib is a specific inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2. Its hydroxymethyl (M1) and carboxylic acid (M2) metabolites are the major circulating components in human plasma. It has been demonstrated that the anti-inflammatory activities of M1 and M2 are both equal to the parent drug. In the current study, a highly sensitive and rapid method was established and validated for the determination of imrecoxib, M1 and M2 in human plasma via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. To our knowledge, this is the first study that simultaneously analyzed imrecoxib and its two active metabolites following a rapid protein-precipitation clean-up. Imrecoxib and its metabolites were separated on a reversed-C18 column (3.5 μm; 100 × 4.6 mm), and the mobile phase was optimized as 5 mM ammonium acetate: acetonitrile: formic acid (35: 65: 0.1, v/v/v), based on the pKa values of analytes. Mass spectrometric detection was conducted in a positive multiple reaction monitoring mode. The m/z transitions of imrecoxib (370.2 → 278.2), M1 (386.2 → 278.2) and M2 (400.2 → 236.2) were selected for an effective balance between sensitivity and selectivity. An excellent linearity was demonstrated over the concentration ranges of 0.100-40.0, 0.200-80.0 and 2.00-800 ng/mL for imrecoxib, M1 and M2, respectively. The method validation was carried out in agreement with the FDA guidance. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic properties of imrecoxib and its two active metabolites were characterized in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, by using the developed and validated method.