Infant illness severity and perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for perinatal posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among parents of an infant in the NICU have varied in previous literature. The relationships between perception of illness severity and objective measures of illness severity with PTSD are not well understood.

AIMS

To determine if PTSD among parents after an infant NICU discharge can be predicted by 1) objective measures of infant illness severity or 2) perceptions of infant illness severity.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, observational study.

SUBJECTS

Parent/infant dyads who were in the NICU for ≥14 days.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Objective measures of illness severity were obtained from the electronic health record. Perceptions of illness were measured by the response to the question, "How sick is your child/patient?" on a 5-point Likert scale. The Perinatal Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Questionnaire (PPQ) was completed by parents three months after discharge.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four dyads participated in the study, 86% of parents completed follow up screening. 25% of parents screened positive for PTSD. Parents perceived infants to be sick more often than hospital caregivers. In bivariate analysis many objective measures of illness severity were associated with PTSD. Parent perceptions of illness were also associated with PTSD after adjusting for objective measures of illness (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-6.1, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

PTSD in parents after NICU discharge is multifactorial. Objective illness risk factors can be used to screen parents at risk. Hospital caregivers should strive to understand parents' perception of illness and improve communication to potentially decrease PTSD after discharge.

Exploring the relationship between breastfeeding and the incidence of infant illnesses in Ireland: evidence from a nationally representative prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Ireland has one of the lowest BF rates in the world. This study investigates the association between breastfeeding and infant health in Ireland.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, secondary analysis of data collected from Growing Up in Ireland (GUI): the National Longitudinal Study of Children was conducted. The average morbidity for 2212. infants exclusively breastfed for at least 90 days (EBF90days) was compared to data for 3987 infants in the non-breastfed (Non-BF) group. Data were weighted using entropy balancing to ensure the comparability of groups. Sensitivity analyses considered alternative definitions of the breastfeeding group.

RESULTS

Infants who were EBF90days were significantly less likely to be admitted to hospital (CI: - 0.06 to - 0.03), spent less nights in hospital (CI: - 0.37 to - 0.11), and were less likely to develop respiratory diseases including asthma (CI: - 0.03 to - 0.01), chest infections (CI: - 0.12 to - 0.08), snuffles/common colds (CI: - 0.07 to - 0.02), ear infections (CI: - 0.08 to - 0.04), eczema (CI: - 0.08 to - 0.04), skin problems (CI: - 0.04 to - 0.00), wheezing or asthma (CI: - 0.06 to - 0.03), vomiting (CI: - 0.03 to - 0.00), and colic (CI: - 0.04 to - 0.01). Further outcomes such as current health of the infant at time of interview (CI: - 0.04 to - 0.00), feeding problems (CI: - 0.04 to - 0.02) and sleeping problems (CI: - 0.02 to - 0.00) indicated a protective effect of EBF90days versus Non-BF. However, these infants were also more likely to fail to gain weight (CI: 0.01 to 0.02) and were at a slightly higher risk of developing nappy rash (CI: 0.00 to 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Exclusive breastfeeding for 90+ days is associated with protection against childhood morbidity. Given the protective effect of breastfeeding on adverse health effects in infants, policy makers should prioritise policies that support, promote and protect exclusive breastfeeding.