Antibiotic susceptibility in Endophthalmitis Management Study and intravitreal antibiotic practice trend in India-EMS Report #5

AIM

Analyze antibiotic susceptibility in the Endophthalmitis Management Study (EMS) and compare it with the current intravitreal antibiotic practice trend of members of the Vitreoretinal Society of India (VRSI) practicing in India.

METHODS

The microbiology work-up of undiluted vitreous included microscopy, culture-susceptibility, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). VRSI members were invited to the survey. The EMS conventional culture-susceptibility (PCR and NGS excluded) results were compared vis-a-vis gram-positive cocci (GPC), gram-negative bacilli (GNB), and less commonly used antibiotics with the current recommended intravitreal antibiotics. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Culture and positivity (culture + PCR/NGS) positivity was 28.8% and 56.1%, respectively. GPC was most susceptible to cefazolin, linezolid, and vancomycin; GNB was most susceptible to amikacin, ceftazidime, colistin, and imipenem. There was no susceptibility difference between cefazolin and vancomycin (p = 0.999) and between ceftazidime and imipenem (p = 1.0). Colistin was superior to ceftazidime (p = 0.047) against GNB. The GNB resistant to amikacin (n = 14) were equally susceptible to ceftazidime and colistin; resistant to ceftazidime (n = 16) were susceptible to colistin; and resistant to colistin (n = 7) were susceptible to ceftazidime. The preference of VRSI members (n = 231) practicing in India was a vancomycin-ceftazidime combination (82%), vancomycin for GPC (94%), ceftazidime for GNB (61%), and voriconazole for fungi (74%).

CONCLUSION

In EMS, GPC had good susceptibility to vancomycin; GNB had good susceptibility to ceftazidime and colistin. Given the lower resistance of colistin, a vancomycin-colistin combination could be an alternative empiric treatment in post-cataract endophthalmitis in India.

Retinal detachment after post-operative endophthalmitis: clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors

PURPOSE

To describe clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) following treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis (PE).

METHODS

Analysis of cross-referenced data from two service reviews of patients with RRD and bacterial PE treated between 01/01/2013 and 01/07/2020. The main outcome measure was final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary measures include proportion of patients with BCVA of ≤ 0.3 logMAR and ≥ 1.0 logMAR, rate of phthsis, and rate of eye removal.

RESULTS

Ninety-four cases of PE were analysed finding 21 cases of RRD (22%). Seven (35%) experienced recurrent RRD. Seven eyes (35%) were left with permanent silicone oil fill. All RRD cases had vitrectomy. After PE with RRD the median BCVA was 1.1 logMAR, compared with 0.4 logMAR for PE without RRD (p < 0.04). Fifty-seven percent (12/21) of RRD eyes attained BCVA of ≥ 1.0 logMAR vs. 29% (21/73) of PE without RRD (p = 0.01). Nineteen percent (4/21) of eyes with RRD attained BCVA of ≤ 0.3 logMAR, whereas those without RRD did so in 43% (31/73) of cases (p = 0.02). Five eyes with RRD (24%) and 2 eyes without RRD (3%) developed phthisis (p < 0.01). Three non-RRD cases required removal of the eye (4%, p = 0.46). Higher bacterial virulence was associated with worse final BCVA (2.1 logMAR vs. 0.3 logMAR; p < 0.01). RRD rate did not differ by bacterial virulence (OR 1.9; CI95: 0.6-6.9; p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

RRD following PE leads to worse clinical outcomes. Eyes which developed RRD were more likely to have undergone vitrectomy. Final BCVA was worse in cases with more virulent micro-organisms.

[Treatment of postoperative endophthalmitis : Operate or only inject?]

BACKGROUND

Postoperative endophthalmitis is among the most feared complications encountered after intraocular surgery. A prompt diagnosis and initiation of treatment are crucial for the visual prognosis, which also depends on the causative microorganism. Despite advances in prevention and the availability of more epidemiological data, most of the evidence for treatment dates back to a single study, the early vitrectomy study (EVS) carried out in the early 1990s. The EVS showed that vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics was superior to intravitreal antibiotics alone, only when visual acuity was light perception or below. The addition of systemic antibiotics did not have any benefits. Over the last 30 years, however, surgical techniques have continued to evolve and the medicinal options have also been expanded. Moreover, the EVS examined only endophthalmitis after cataract surgery and strictly speaking the results cannot be transferred to endophthalmitis from other causes.

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the current evidence for the different treatment modalities of the most important types of postoperative endophthalmitis.

CONCLUSION

The EVS provided important guidelines for the initial management of endophthalmitis and these guidelines remain relevant to this day; however, in view of the refinement of surgical techniques, novel treatment options, especially the nowadays continuously growing number of intravitreal injections and even some new antibiotics, it would be desirable if new controlled trials addressing the treatment of endophthalmitis would be performed.

Current Perspectives of Prophylaxis and Management of Acute Infective Endophthalmitis

Endophthalmitis is an intraocular inflammatory condition which may or may not be caused by infective agents. Noninfectious (sterile) endophthalmitis may be attributable to various causes including postoperative retained soft lens matter or toxicity following introduction of other agents into the eye. Infectious endophthalmitis is further subdivided into endogenous and exogenous. In endogenous endophthalmitis there is hematogenous spread of organisms from a distant source of infection whereas in exogenous endophthalmitis direct microbial inoculation may occur usually following ocular surgery or penetrating eye injury with or without intraocular foreign bodies. Acute infective endophthalmitis is usually exogenous induced by inoculation of pathogens following ocular surgery, open-globe injury and intravitreal injections. More infrequently the infective source is internal and septicemia spreads to the eye resulting in endogenous endophthalmitis. Several risk factors have been implicated including immunosuppression, ocular surface abnormalities, poor surgical wound construction, complicated cataract surgery with vitreous loss and certain types of intraocular lens. Comprehensive guidelines and recommendations on prophylaxis and monitoring of surgical cases have been proposed to minimize the risk of acute endophthalmitis. Early diagnosis and prompt management of infective endophthalmitis employing appropriately selected intravitreal antibiotics are essential to optimize visual outcome.

Delayed-Onset Post-Keratoplasty Endophthalmitis Caused by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium

Background

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) endophthalmitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) is very rare, the management is a challenge due to both the pattern of antibiotic resistance and the aggressive nature of the infectious process. We report the first delayed-onset case of VRE endophthalmitis after PKP.

Materials and Methods

Case report of a 51-year-old female with a 7-week history of PKP who arrived at the emergency room with signs and symptoms of endophthalmitis. Initial visual acuity was light perception, and a posterior pole exam was not possible due to the intense vitreous reaction. Mode B ultrasound was used to assess the posterior pole. The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy and received intravitreous antibiotics.

Results

Vitreous stains and cultures were positive for Enterococcus faecium resistant to vancomycin. Donor rim cultures and viral PCR were negative. Treatment was carried out by repeated intravitreal antibiotics and systemic linezolid. Clinical improvement was seen after the second dose of intravitreous antibiotics and systemic linezolid, but visual acuity remained at light perception consistent with the ischemic changes observed in the posterior pole.

Conclusion

VRE endophthalmitis might be associated with positive donor rim cultures. Prompt use of systemic linezolid in addition to intravitreous antibiotics is recommendable, but even with prompt treatment, visual prognosis is guarded.