The lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts the efficacy of isatuximab plus pomalidomide in multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND

Isatuximab, an anti-CD38 antibody, has been widely used in treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Despite its high efficacy, not all patients achieve a lasting therapeutic response with isatuximab.

OBJECTIVE

We tried to identify biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of isatuximab by focusing on the host's immune status before treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 134 relapsed/refractory MM patients in the Kansai Myeloma Forum database who had received only a first isatuximab treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 134 patients, an isatuximab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-PD) regimen, isatuximab, carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-KD) regimen and isatuximab and/or dexamethasone (Isa-D) regimen were used in 112, 15 and 7 patients, respectively. The median age at treatment, number of prior treatment regimens, and progression-free survival (PFS) were 71, 6, and 6.54 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the PFS under the Isa-PD regimen was longer in patients with higher lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR ≥ 4), fewer prior treatment regimens (< 6), and no use of prior daratumumab treatment. The OS under the Isa-PD regimen was longer in patients with higher white blood cell counts (WBC counts ≥ 3000/μL) and higher LMR. The PFS under the Isa-D regimen was longer in patients with fewer prior treatment regimens in univariate analysis, but no parameters were correlated with PFS/OS under the Isa-KD regimen.

CONCLUSION

We found that the patients with higher LMR (≥ 4) could obtain longer PFS and OS under the Isa-PD regimen. Other cohort studies of isatuximab treatment might be necessary to substantiate our results.

Varicella zoster virus reactivation reported with isatuximab use

Isatuximab is a CD38-directed antibody indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. The Division of Pharmacovigilance at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed case reports from postmarketing sources, including the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), PubMed, and Embase, to investigate a potential association between isatuximab and the risk of varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation. We identified 20 reports of which 15 met our case definition and causality criteria. All 15 patients (80% male, median age = 60 years) received isatuximab for a hematologic neoplasm; eight (53%) for previously untreated multiple myeloma. All cases described additional risk factors for VZV reactivation, including concomitant proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug (n = 10, 67%) use. Based on this postmarket analysis, the U.S. Prescribing Information for isatuximab was updated to include this new safety information, including recommendations for antiviral prophylaxis.

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

The incorporation of monoclonal antibodies into backbone regimens has substantially improved the clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Although the SLAMF7-targeting antibody elotuzumab has no single- agent activity, there is clinical synergy between elotuzumab and immunomodulatory drugs in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Daratumumab and isatuximab are CD38-targeting antibodies which have single-agent activity and a favorable safety profile, which make these agents an attractive component of combination regimens. Monoclonal antibodies may cause infusion-related reactions, but with subcutaneous administration these are less frequently observed. All therapeutic antibodies may interfere with assessment of complete response. Next-generation Fc-engineered monoclonal antibodies are in development with the potential to further improve the outcome of patients with MM.

Clinical Significance of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Patients With Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Who Were Treated With Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody: A Retrospective Analysis in a Single Institution

INTRODUCTION

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have improved the prognosis of patients with plasma cell dyscrasia (PCD), but are also associated with increased infectious adverse events. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common latent pathogen that is reactivated in immunocompromised individuals. Although CMV reactivation has mostly been reported after high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation in patients with PCD, cases of reactivation during anti-CD38 mAb therapy have been reported recently. Due to limited studies, we aimed to determine the frequency and impact of CMV reactivation during anti-CD38 mAb therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 154 consecutive patients with PCD who were treated with anti-CD38 mAbs at a single institution.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were evaluated for CMV reactivation by CMV pp65 antigen testing, and 29 (38%) patients, including nine with newly diagnosed PCD, showed positive results. Patients who tested positive for the CMV pp65 antigen had substantially lower serum albumin levels than those who tested negative. However, the two groups showed no marked difference in the concurrent anti-PCD medications or baseline absolute lymphocyte count. Although most patients showing positive results in the CMV pp65 antigen test had mild or no symptoms, with fever being the most common symptom, some patients developed CMV end-organ disease. In addition, CMV reactivation interfered with the course of anti-PCD treatment in most patients, necessitating dose reductions, delays, and discontinuation of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an overview of the clinical impact of CMV reactivation in patients with PCD treated with anti-CD38 mAb-containing regimens.

Stem cell collection after lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone plus elotuzumab or isatuximab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single centre experience from the GMMG-HD6 and -HD7 trials

BACKGROUND

While quadruplet induction therapies deepen responses in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, their impact on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection remains incompletely understood. This analysis aims to evaluate the effects of prolonged lenalidomide induction and isatuximab- or elotuzumab-containing quadruplet induction therapies on PBSC mobilization and collection.

METHODS

A total of 179 transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM treated at a single academic center were included. The patients were evaluated based on PBSC mobilization and collection parameters, including overall collection results, CD34+ cell levels in peripheral blood, leukapheresis (LP) delays, overall number of LP sessions, and the rate of rescue mobilization with plerixafor. The patients underwent four different induction regimens: Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd, six 21-day cycles, n = 44), isatuximab-RVd (six 21-day cycles, n = 35), RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 51), or elotuzumab-RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 49).

RESULTS

The patients' characteristics were well balanced across the different groups. Collection failures, defined as the inability to collect three sufficient PBSC transplants, were rare (n = 3, 2%), with no occurrences in the isatuximab-RVd and elotuzumab-RVd groups. Intensified induction with six 21-day cycles of RVd did not negatively impact the overall number of collected PBSCs (9.7 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.331) compared to four 21-day cycles of RVd. Plerixafor usage was more common after six cycles of RVd compared to four cycles (16% versus 8%). Addition of elotuzumab to RVd did not adversely affect overall PBSC collection (10.9 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.915). Patients treated with isatuximab-RVd (six cycles) had lower numbers of collected stem cells compared to those receiving RVd (six cycles) induction (8.8 × 106/kg bw versus 9.7 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.801), without experiencing significant delays in LP or increased numbers of LP sessions in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Plerixafor usage was more common after isatuximab plus RVd compared to RVd alone (34% versus 16%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that stem cell collection is feasible after prolonged induction with isatuximab-RVd without collection failures and might be further explored as induction therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Patients were treated within the randomized phase III clinical trials GMMG-HD6 (NCT02495922, 24/06/2015) and GMMG-HD7 (NCT03617731, 24/07/2018). However, during stem cell mobilization and -collection, no study-specific therapeutic intervention was performed.

Real-world clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma treated with isatuximab after daratumumab treatment

Isatuximab and daratumumab are anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies used to treat refractory multiple myeloma. Isatuximab is often used after unsuccessful daratumumab treatment; however, the clinical benefits of receiving isatuximab after daratumumab treatment have not been fully evaluated. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study assessed the clinical outcomes of 39 patients with multiple myeloma who were administered isatuximab after daratumumab. The median follow-up period was 8.7 months (range 0.1-25.0 months). The overall response rate was 46.2% (18 patients). The 1-year overall survival was 53.9%, with a median progression-free survival of 5.6 months. The median progression-free survival in patients with high and normal lactate dehydrogenase levels was 4.5 and 9.6 months, respectively (P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival in patients with and without triple-class refractory disease was 5.1 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.001). The median overall survival in patients with high and normal lactate dehydrogenase levels was not reached and 9.3 months, respectively (P = 0.001). The median overall survival in patients with and without triple-class refractory disease was 9.9 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.038). Our findings provide insight into the optimal use and timing of anti-CD38 antibody therapy.

Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: IKEMA Subgroup Analysis by Prior Transplantation

In the era of highly active novel agents for multiple myeloma (MM), the role, ideal timing, and impact of transplantation on further therapy after relapse remains a matter of debate. The impact of prior transplantation on treatment benefit from monoclonal antibodies in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) is largely unknown. Few Phase 3 studies of monoclonal antibody combinations with proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulatory agents have reported outcomes according to transplantation status. This subgroup analysis examined efficacy and safety in patients from the Phase 3 IKEMA study with and without previous transplantation. IKEMA (NCT03275285) was a randomized, open-label, multinational, parallel-group Phase 3 study that investigated isatuximab (Isa), an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, combined with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd; experimental group) versus Kd (control group) in 302 patients with RRMM and 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Patients were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to either Isa-Kd or Kd, with stratification by number of prior lines (1 versus more than 1) and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage (I or II versus III versus not classified). Treatment was given until progressive disease, unacceptable adverse events, or patient choice. Of the 302 randomized patients in IKEMA, 185 (61.3%) had received a prior transplant, comprising 116 of 179 (64.8%) patients in the Isa-Kd arm and 69 of 123 (56.1%) patients in the Kd arm. After a median follow-up of 20.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with prior transplant was not reached with Isa-Kd versus 19.15 months with Kd (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.16). After a median follow-up of 20.8 months, median PFS in patients without prior transplant was not reached with Isa-Kd versus 18.99 months with Kd (HR = 0.44; 99% CI, 0.18-1.05). The overall response rate in patients with prior transplant was 87.9% (Isa-Kd) versus 85.5% (Kd). More patients in the Isa-Kd arm achieved a complete response or better compared with the Kd arm (43.1% versus 29.0%). The overall response rate in patients without prior transplant was 84.1% (Isa-Kd) versus 79.6% (Kd). More patients in the Isa-Kd arm achieved a complete response or better compared with the Kd arm (33.3% versus 25.9%). The minimal residual disease negativity rate was higher with Isa-Kd versus Kd in patients with (31.9% versus 13.0%) and without prior transplantation (25.4% versus 13.0%). In patients with prior transplant, Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more common with Isa-Kd; however, no increases in serious TEAEs or definitive treatment discontinuations were seen versus Kd. Among patients without prior transplant, serious treatment-related TEAEs were similar, and there were fewer TEAEs leading to definitive discontinuation with Isa-Kd. The most common Grade 3 or higher TEAEs in patients with and without prior transplant were hypertension and pneumonia. For patients who underwent prior transplantation, Isa-Kd is an effective treatment option. Overall, these data demonstrate that Isa-Kd represents a standard of care for patients with RRMM, regardless of prior transplant status.

Early Intervention With a Curative Intent Through an Intensive Therapy Versus Immunologic Disease Control Using a Minimal Intensity Approach in the Management of High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review of Evidence From Clinical Trials

A subset of individuals with smoldering myeloma (SMM) are at a high risk of progression to symptomatic myeloma. Current efforts are focused on identifying this high-risk group and intercepting the disease process before its progression. There is no consensus on what the goal of an intervention should be, whether to aim for a cure through a high-intensity intervention or pursue immunologic disease control using the least intense approach. This systematic review summarized current evidence in support of the optimum approach. A database search of Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Wiley Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, and conference proceedings of ASH, EHA, ASCO, ESMO was performed. Results were presented using narrative synthesis of quantitative data. Of the 2088 identified records, a total of 10 eligible studies made up of 6 minimal-intensity clinical trials, 3 moderate-intensity trials, and 1 high-intensity trial were included in this review with a total demographic population of 588 high-risk SMM patients. Minimal intensity lenalidomide-based regimen demonstrated clinical effectiveness in delaying disease progression and improving overall survival in high-risk SMM. The single-agent monoclonal antibodies did not have any major impact on improving overall survival, although the studies were not powered to do so. There is a marked increase in the depth of response as the intensity of treatment increases without a proportional improvement in overall survival. Moderate- and high-intensity interventions yielded similar minimal residual disease negativity rates and overall survival. The minimal, moderate, and high-intensity approaches all demonstrated clinical benefits in delaying disease progression and improving overall survival in patients with high-risk SMM and increasing intensity of intervention does not necessarily translate to improved overall survival.

Evaluation of isatuximab in patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas: An analysis from ICARIA-MM and IKEMA

The Phase 3 ICARIA-MM (NCT02990338) and IKEMA (NCT03275285) studies demonstrated that isatuximab (Isa) plus pomalidomide (P) and dexamethasone (d; Isa-Pd) or carfilzomib (K) and d (Isa-Kd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus Pd or Kd in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. In this post hoc analysis of patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas, we evaluated Isa-Pd/Isa-Kd efficacy using central radiology and central laboratory assessments. Given the low incidence of soft-tissue plasmacytomas (7.8 %, ICARIA-MM; 6.3 %, IKEMA), efficacy data were pooled across the two studies. PFS (HR, 0.47; 95 % CI, 0.21-1.08), overall response rate (50.0 % vs 17.7 %), and very good partial response or better rate (26.9 % vs 11.8 %) were improved with Isa-Pd/Isa-Kd versus Pd/Kd, with consistent improvements within individual studies. Patients with soft-tissue plasmacytomas who received Isa-Pd/Isa-Kd had similar median PFS compared with those without soft-tissue plasmacytomas and received Pd/Kd. Safety is reported individually per study. Longer median treatment duration and more Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the Isa versus control arms in ICARIA-MM (36.9 vs 8.4 weeks; 85.7 % vs 70.0 %) and IKEMA (41.9 vs 29.9 weeks; 100.0 % vs 57.1 %); however, Isa did not increase the percentage of patients with fatal events or drug discontinuation. Isa-Pd or Isa-Kd is a potential new treatment option and partially overcomes the poor prognosis associated with soft-tissue plasmacytomas in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.

Radiolabeling and cytotoxicity of monoclonal antibody Isatuximab functionalized silver nanoparticles on the growth of multiple myeloma

The goal of this article was to develop a new therapeutic strategy based on nanotechnology for multiple myeloma (MM) treatment which shows a synergism of different mechanisms. In this concern, 12.9 nm-sized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were prepared and functionalized with Isatuximab, anti-MM monoclonal antibody (mAb). Furthermore, the synthesized nanocomposite was radiolabelled with iodine-131 radionuclide and yielded 95.5 ± 1.5%. Then, the synergistic MM-proliferation inhibition efficacy of the radionanocomposite (¹³¹I-Isatuximab/AgNPs) was explored in-vitro in comparison to each single agent. The MTT investigation showed that the antiproliferation effect of ¹³¹I-Isatuximab/AgNPs increased by more than 1.5 fold if compared with Isatuximab, AgNPs, Isatuximab/AgNPs or ¹³¹I-Isatuximab. Additionally, ¹³¹I-Isatuximab/AgNPs exhibited an apoptotic effect on MM cells which was more than that of Isatuximab, AgNPs, Isatuximab/AgNPs or ¹³¹I-Isatuximab by 2, 1.8, 1.7 and 1.5 folds, respectively. In conclusion, the results expressed ¹³¹I-Isatuximab/AgNPs as a potential new anti-MM agent.

Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in East Asian patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: IKEMA subgroup analysis

In the phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285), isatuximab (Isa) plus carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), compared with Kd. This IKEMA subgroup analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd versus Kd among East Asian patients. Eligible patients had 1-3 prior lines of therapy and were stratified by number of prior lines and revised International Staging System. The primary endpoint was PFS. Key secondary endpoints included overall response, very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and complete response (CR) rate. Forty-six East Asian patients (19 Japanese, 27 South Korean) were randomized to Isa-Kd (n = 25) or Kd (n = 21). Isa-Kd improved PFS (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.23-1.76), ≥VGPR (80.0% vs 52.4%), MRD negativity rate (44.0% vs 9.5%), and CR (44.0% vs 23.8%). The rate of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 79% for Isa-Kd versus 55% for Kd. The rate of serious TEAEs was 46% versus 50%, and the rate of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was 4% versus 10%. Overall, Isa-Kd improved efficacy and safety versus Kd in East Asian patients with relapsed MM, consistent with the overall IKEMA population.

Case report: Interference from isatuximab on serum protein electrophoresis prevented demonstration of complete remission in a myeloma patient

Multiple myeloma is a haematological cancer caused by malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow that can result in organ dysfunction and death. Recent novel treatments have contributed to improved survival rates, including monoclonal antibody therapies that target the CD38 protein on the surface of plasma cells. Anti-CD38 therapies are IgG kappa monoclonal antibodies that are given in doses high enough for the drug to be visible on serum protein electrophoresis as a small paraprotein. We present a case where isatuximab, the most recent anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to be approved for treatment of myeloma, obscured the patient's paraprotein on gel immunofixation, so that complete remission could not be demonstrated. This was resolved using the isatuximab Hydrashift assay. The interference on gel immunofixation was unexpected because isatuximab migrated in a position distinct from the patient's paraprotein on capillary zone electrophoresis. We demonstrate the surprising finding that isatuximab migrates in a different position on gel electrophoresis compared to capillary zone electrophoresis. It is vital that laboratories are aware of the possible interference on electrophoresis from anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody therapies, and are able to recognise these drugs on protein electrophoresis. The difference in isatuximab's electrophoretic mobility on capillary and gel protein electrophoresis makes this particularly challenging. Laboratories should have a strategy for alternative analyses in the event that the drugs interfere with assessment of the patient's paraprotein.

Current and prospective antibody-based therapies in multiple myeloma

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy involving clonal plasma cell proliferation. Unfortunately, MM remains an incurable disease. Over the past five years, the incorporation of novel monoclonal antibodies has synergized with standard of care to improve patient outcomes in both newly diagnosed MM as well as relapsed and refractory MM. This manuscript reviews current and prospective antibody-based treatments including naked monoclonal antibodies, immunoconjugates, and Bi-specific T-cell engagers (BiTE).

Isatuximab for the treatment of multiple myeloma

Isatuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 that has received regulatory approval in combination regimens for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. CD38 is an antigen with high surface expression on multiple myeloma cells. While daratumumab holds most of the market share for this drug class, isatuximab offers several unique aspects including a mechanism of action that may involve more direct myeloma-cell inhibition and killing and less reliance on cross-linking and immune effector cells, as well as subgroup data from pivotal trials showing notable efficacy in populations with renal impairment, high-risk cytogenetics and the elderly. While the administration of the drug remains intravenous, studies of fixed-volume infusion and rapid infusion may improve drug administration convenience. Ongoing studies are examining isatuximab in combination with other immune therapies and cellular therapies, conventional chemotherapy and across other disease entities.

Isatuximab plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in a Patient with Dialysis-Dependent Multiple Myeloma

The phase 3 ICARIA-MM trial showed that the addition of isatuximab improved the progression-free survival compared with pomalidomide/dexamethasone. However, the safety and efficacy of isatuximab for end-stage renal failure remains unclear. A 67-year-old man who started hemodialysis 5 years ago for diabetic nephropathy was diagnosed with International Staging System stage III multiple myeloma (MM) of IgD-λ type 3 years ago. After receiving a total of 7 treatment regimens, his free light chain (FLC) λ level increased from 419 to 2,070 mg/L, indicating progressive disease. Twelve days after starting isatuximab plus pomalidomide (3 mg daily) and dexamethasone (IsaPd), his FLC λ level rapidly decreased to 412 mg/L. The patient has now completed 7 courses of IsaPd with no adverse events, including infusion reactions and neutropenia. Isatuximab requires a lower dilution volume than daratumumab and can be safely and effectively administered to hemodialysis-dependent MM patients.

EMA Review of Isatuximab in Combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Isatuximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the human CD38 antigen. On May 30, 2020, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (IsaPd) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). The recommended dose of isatuximab was 10 mg/kg, administered intravenously weekly at cycle 1 and then biweekly in subsequent 28-day cycles. Isatuximab was evaluated in a phase III, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial that randomly allocated IsaPd versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Pd) to adult patients with RR MM. The primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee, which was superior for the IsaPd arm (hazard ratio, 0.596; 95% confidence interval, 0.436-0.814; p = .001) compared with the Pd arm. Treatment with IsaPd led to higher incidences of treatment-related adverse events (AEs), grade ≥ 3 AEs, and serious AEs compared with Pd treatment. Most frequently observed AEs that occurred more often in the IsaPd arm were infusion-related reactions, infections, respiratory AEs, neutropenia (including neutropenic complications), and thrombocytopenia. The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Isatuximab was approved in the European Union, in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have already received therapy but whose disease did not respond or relapsed afterward. The addition of isatuximab resulted in a clinically meaningful and significant prolongation of the time from treatment initiation to further disease relapse or patient's death. The safety profile was considered acceptable, and the benefit-risk ratio was determined to be positive.

An evaluation of isatuximab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone for adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Despite therapeutic advances, myeloma remains an essentially incurable disease, with a median survival of approximately 8 - 10 years. Most patients will develop disease that is refractory to immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and treatment regimens containing drugs with different mechanisms of action are necessary. Isatuximab is one such novel agent, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (MoAb), and is the second drug in this class after daratumumab. This paper will consider the current role for isatuximab with pomalidomide for the treatment of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM).

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the pharmacological characteristics of isatuximab, and its clinical development including safety and efficacy data to date.

EXPERT OPINION

Isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone offers a new treatment option for those patients with RRMM who are refractory to PIs and lenalidomide, a patient group with poor prognosis and unmet clinical need. The challenge of where it is best placed in the treatment algorithm remains, particularly with the increasing application of daratumumab particularly in the front- and second-line settings.

Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma according to prior lines of treatment and refractory status: ICARIA-MM subgroup analysis

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) experience several relapses, and become refractory to successive therapies. In the ICARIA-MM trial (NCT02990338), isatuximab plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with RRMM. This subgroup analysis of ICARIA-MM assessed the treatment benefit of isatuximab by prior lines of therapy and refractory status. A total of 307 patients were randomized to isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (n = 154) or pomalidomide-dexamethasone (n = 153). Isatuximab (10 mg/kg intravenously) was given weekly in the first 28-day cycle, then every other week. Standard pomalidomide-dexamethasone doses were given. PFS was assessed by prior lines and refractory status. Overall, 102 (66 %) patients receiving isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone and 101 (66 %) patients receiving pomalidomide-dexamethasone had received 2-3 prior lines; 52 (34 %) and 52 (34 %) had received >3 prior lines, respectively. Median PFS was higher with isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone for patients who received 2-3 prior lines of therapy (12.3 vs. 7.8 months) and >3 prior lines of therapy (9.4 vs. 4.3 months). Median PFS was higher with isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone for patients who were lenalidomide-refractory (11.4 vs. 5.6 months), lenalidomide-refractory at last line (11.6 vs. 5.7 months), refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) (11.4 vs. 5.6 months), and double-refractory (11.2 vs. 4.8 months). Overall response rate (ORR) in patients receiving isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone versus pomalidomide-dexamethasone was 59.0 % versus 31.4 % in lenalidomide-refractory; 60.2 % versus 32.2 % in PI-refractory; and 58.6 % versus 29.9 % in double-refractory patients. Isatuximab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone improved PFS and ORR regardless of prior lines of therapy or refractory status, consistent with the benefit in the overall population.

[Antibody therapy for multiple myeloma: novel approaches and future perspectives]

Although multiple myeloma has been defined as incurable, and the treatment outcome has recently improved rapidly. Antibodies against multiple myeloma, elotuzumab, and daratumumab can safely enhance their effects even when added to the combination therapy of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulators that have been used till date. Initially, triplet therapy combining antibody therapy with doublet therapy was approved in Japan for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In 2019, daratumumab combination therapies were approved for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, and these therapies are the new standard of care. Recently, the results of clinical trials that added daratumumab to the triplet therapies of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and dexamethasone have been reported. These trials report greater therapeutic effects, with a significant improvement in the MRD negative rate. We hope that quadruplet therapy including these antibodies will be available in clinical practice, leading to further improvements in the treatment outcomes.

CD38 and Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies in AL Amyloidosis: Targeting Plasma Cells and beyond

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) is a rare systemic disease characterized by monoclonal light chains (LCs) depositing in tissue as insoluble fibrils, causing irreversible tissue damage. The mechanisms involved in aggregation and deposition of LCs are not fully understood, but CD138/38 plasma cells (PCs) are undoubtedly involved in monoclonal LC production.CD38 is a pleiotropic molecule detectable on the surface of PCs and maintained during the neoplastic transformation in multiple myeloma (MM). CD38 is expressed on T, B and NK cell populations as well, though at a lower cell surface density. CD38 is an ideal target in the management of PC dyscrasia, including AL amyloidosis, and indeed anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) have promising therapeutic potential. Anti-CD38 MoAbs act both as PC-depleting agents and as modulators of the balance of the immune cells. These aspects, together with their interaction with Fc receptors (FcRs) and neonatal FcRs, are specifically addressed in this paper. Moreover, the initiallyavailable experiences with the anti-CD38 MoAb DARA in AL amyloidosis are reviewed.

Therapeutic potential of isatuximab in the treatment of multiple myeloma: Evidence to date

Management of multiple myeloma represents an ever changing paradigm with monoclonal antibodies adding the ability to treat patients with 3 and 4 drug regimens with acceptable toxicity profiles. In recent years, we have seen the FDA approve a number of regimens with both elotuzumab and daratumumab in combination with the standard approaches of immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and steroids. Isatuximab is a naked, humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against CD38. With the recent FDA approval in March 2020, we seek to summarize the presented data to date and where this drug will fit into the future gestalt of myeloma therapy.

Investigational agents in immunotherapy: a new horizon for the treatment of multiple myeloma

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has gone through several major advances over the last 5 years with the introduction of next generation proteasome inhibitors (PI; carfilzomib, ixazomib) and immunomodulatory derivatives (IMiD; pomalidomide), with these new agents having a substantial impact on patient outcome. However, despite these advances, MM remains a highly resistant disease given its propensity for clonal heterogeneity and its complex interaction with the surrounding bone marrow microenvironment. Almost all patients eventually relapse despite therapeutic responses to a PI, IMiD or both. With the regulatory approval of the monoclonal antibodies Daratumumab and Elotuzumab in 2015, impressive and durable responses are being observed, even in heavily pre-treated patients who have exhausted other therapeutic options, suggesting immunological approaches in this setting have real merit. This review will focus on newer monoclonal antibodies and chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T cell strategies currently under investigation and in various stages of clinical development.

Treatment of multiple myeloma with monoclonal antibodies and the dilemma of false positive M-spikes in peripheral blood

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the effect of three humanized IgG κ monoclonal antibodies (daratumumab, isatuximab, and elotuzumab) on the interpretation of results generated by protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, free light chain, and heavy/light chain assays performed on human serum.

METHODS

Healthy volunteer serum and serum from multiple myeloma patients were supplemented with clinically relevant concentrations of each of the three monoclonal antibodies. These specimens then underwent analysis via serum protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, serum free light chain quantification, heavy/light chain quantification, total IgG, and total protein. In addition, serum specimens from patients who had undergone treatment with elotuzumab for multiple myeloma underwent similar analysis.

RESULTS

Addition of the study drugs to serum from both the healthy donor as well as multiple myeloma patients resulted in a visible and quantifiable M-protein on SPEP and a visible IgGκ band by IFE. Increases were also noted in total IgG, IgGκ, and IgGκ/IgGλ-ratios. Analysis of serum from multiple myeloma patients receiving study drug showed similar findings with an additional IgGκ band and quantifiable M-protein with similar migration patterns in specimens drawn after administration.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of multiple myeloma patients with monoclonal antibodies results in a visible and quantifiable M-protein that has the potential to falsely indicate poor response to therapy.