The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: a wider role than contraception

The Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG IUD) provides excellent contraception; it may reduce the rate of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and ectopic pregnancy compared to other 'modern' copper releasing IUDs; it can safely be used in the puerperium for breast-feeding mothers, and it significantly reduces menstrual blood loss and pain. While it was developed primarily as a contraceptive, its potential role in managing heavy and painful menstruation and the symptoms of the climacteric may eventually be just as important. Amongst developed countries New Zealand and Australia have some of the highest hysterectomy rates. By the age of 50 years 1 in 4 women in New Zealand and 1 in 5 women in Australia will have had a hysterectomy (A,B). In New Zealand 90% of these are performed for heavy menstrual bleeding and fibroids (A). The LNG IUD has been shown to be effective treatment for both these conditions and its introduction to New Zealand and Australia would offer women an additional choice beyond surgery.

A risk-benefit assessment of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), has been developed by Leiras Pharmaceuticals, Turku, Finland. It is a new systemic hormonal contraceptive that releases levonorgestrel 20 micrograms every 24 hours. The device provides fertility control comparable with that of female sterilisation, complete reversibility and convenience, and has an excellent tolerability record. The low dosage of levonorgestrel released by its unique delivery system ensures minimal hormone-related systemic adverse effects, which tend to be in the category of 'nuisance' rather than hazardous, and gradually diminish after the first few months of use. In some respects, the contraceptive characteristics of the LNG-IUS have over-shadowed a substantial range of noncontraceptive beneficial effects that are rarely seen with inert or copper-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs), and have important and positive gynaecological and public health implications. This applies particularly to the profound reduction in duration and quantity of menstrual bleeding, and alleviation of dysmenorrhoea, which are associated with the use of the device. Recent studies have shown that the LNG-IUS is effective in preventing endometrial proliferation associated with oral or transdermal estradiol therapy, and in inducing regression of endometrial hyperplasia. Further research is required to determine whether it has a role in regulating the growth of uterine fibroids, and preventing pelvic inflammatory disease. The unique unwanted noncontraceptive effects of the system, including possible development of functional ovarian cysts, and the relationship between menstrual bleeding pattern and ovarian function, also require better understanding, in order to offer appropriate patient counselling and maximise acceptability and continuation of use of the method.

Transdermal estrogen with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device for climacteric complaints: clinical and endometrial responses

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to study the effects of intrauterine release of a daily dose of 20 micrograms levonorgestrel by an intrauterine device on climacteric symptoms, bleeding pattern, and endometrial histologic features in postmenopausal women receiving transdermal estrogen replacement therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty parous postmenopausal women were randomly allocated into two groups for 1 year: 20 women receiving a continuous transdermal daily dose of 50 micrograms of estradiol had a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device inserted, and the control group of 20 women received a continuous oral dose of 2 mg of estradiol valerate and 1 mg of norethisterone acetate daily. The climacteric symptoms, bleeding patterns, endometrial thickness, and endometrial changes in biopsy samples were analyzed. Serum levels of estradiol in both groups and levonorgestrel levels in the intrauterine device group were also determined.

RESULTS

Both treatment regimens effectively relieved climacteric symptoms. Spotting was more common in the intrauterine contraceptive device group than in the oral therapy group for the first 3 months. After that, the proportion of women without any bleeding was similar in both groups. Two patients in each group dropped out because of bleeding.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary findings suggest that the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device is a useful alternative mode of progestin administration for certain selected women receiving estrogen replacement therapy.