Analysis of severe psychological stressors in women during fertility treatment: Japan-Female Employment and Mental health in Assisted reproductive technology (J-FEMA) study

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors for severe psychological stress in women undergoing fertility treatment.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, multi-center study was conducted from August to December 2018. We recruited 1672 subjects who completed an anonymous, self-reported questionnaire regarding fertility treatment, conditions at work and home, and psychological stress using K6 score, which estimates psychological distress during the previous 30 days. We further focused our analysis on 1335 subjects who were working when starting fertility treatment.

RESULTS

Of 1672 women, mean K6 score (range 0-24) was 4.8 ± 4.4, including 103 women (6.2%) with K6 score ≥ 13 (high K6), and classified as probable severe psychological distress. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high K6 was strongly associated with low annual family income of ≤ USD55,700 (JPY6 million) (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-3.42), infertility duration of ≥ 2 years (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.08-3.25), and no experience of childbirth (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.05-3.97). Focusing on 1335 working women, 266 (19.9%) experienced resignation from work. High K6 was strongly associated with low family income (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.52-5.28), cessation of professional duties (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.05-4.14), infertility-related harassment in the workplace (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.08-3.98), and perceived difficulties to continue working during fertility treatment (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.15-7.50).

CONCLUSION

Severe psychological stressors in women during fertility treatment included low family income, long infertility duration, childlessness, infertility-related harassment, and perceived difficulty in working conditions or cessation from work. Establishment of mental health care support systems is urgently required in this population.

Relationships between suicidal ideation and psychosocial factors among residents living in Nagano Prefecture of Japan

OBJECTIVES

Feeling ashamed for seeking help when distressed is known to be a critical factor promoting suicidal behaviors. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between suicidal ideation and psychosocial factors, including worries or anxieties, having a person to confide in, feeling ashamed for seeking help when distressed, and K6 score.

METHODS

Fourteen out of 77 municipalities from Nagano Prefecture participated in this questionnaire survey. Participants of both sexes over 20 years of age were randomly selected according to age distribution in each municipality. Association between suicidal ideation and sociodemographic and psychosocial factors, including "feeling ashamed for seeking help", were determined by multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among a total of 11,100 participants, 7394 (66.6%) returned the questionnaire. 2147 participants responded properly to essential study parameters and were submitted to the final analyses. The adjusted odds ratio of suicidal ideation was 2.09 (95% CI 1.49-2.94) among participants feeling ashamed for seeking help, compared to those not feeling ashamed. Although the rate of "no person to confide in" was 4.4%, participants who responded with "no person to confide in" had significantly increased odds ratio of suicidal ideation compared with those who responded with "having a person to confide in" (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.12-3.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a need for tailored intervention targeting individuals at risk by gatekeepers to encourage individuals at risk to overcome feeling ashamed for seeking help and to cultivate an appropriate person to confide in.

Altered DNA methylation status of human brain derived neurotrophis factor gene could be useful as biomarker of depression

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is involved in the survival, development, and synaptic plasticity of neurons. BDNF is believed to be associated with the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Several studies have suggested the relevance of DNA methylation in its promoter region with depression. Here, we report different methylation statuses in groups with different depressive scores or undergoing different levels of job-stress. DNA samples were extracted from the saliva of 774 Japanese workers, and the methylation status was determined using the Illumina HumanMethylation 450 K Microarray. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Kessler's K6 questionnaire. Job-stress scales were assessed via a self-administered questionnaire. Independent DNA pools were formed based on K6 and job-strain scores, and the methylation levels were compared among these pools. The average DNA methylation rate was significantly decreased in the highest K6 score group compared to the lowest group (methylated signals, 14.2% vs. 16.5%, P = 2 · 16 × 10(-198)). This difference remained for the CpG island in the promoter region (10.4% vs. 5.8%, P = 3 · 67 × 10(-133)). Regarding the job-strain score, there was a slight increase in the methylation level of the whole gene in the group with the highest score compared to that with the lowest score; however, these groups showed no difference in the promoter region. Our results revealed significant changes in the DNA methylation status of the complete human BDNF gene in persons with depression compared to normal individuals, especially in the promoter region of exon 1. This indicates that DNA methylation in this gene is a promising biomarker for diagnosing depression.