Takahashi N, Harada M, Oi N, Izumi G, Momozawa K, Matsuzawa A, Tokunaga Y, Hirata T, Fujii T, Osuga Y. Preclinical validation of the new vitrification device possessing a feature of absorbing excess vitrification solution for the cryopreservation of human embryos.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2020;
46:302-309. [PMID:
31922309 DOI:
10.1111/jog.14176]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM
The cryopreservation of embryos is essential for assisted reproductive technology field. The aim of the present study is to examine the efficacy and ease of use of a new vitrification device, Kitasato Vitrification System (KVS), in cryopreservation of human embryos.
METHODS
Human embryos at the cleavage or blastocyst stage were vitrified and warmed by KVS or Cryotop (control device). The survival of cleavage- and blastocyst-stage embryos and the developmental competence of cleavage-stage embryos were evaluated. Four individuals inexperienced in vitrification and warming embryos tested both KVS and Cryotop. The vitrification time and the detachment time of the embryos were evaluated.
RESULTS
At the cleavage stage, there were no significant differences in the survival rate and the development rate to the blastocyst stage between KVS and Cryotop (100 vs 96.8% and 63.3 vs 61.3%, respectively). At the blastocyst stage, there was no significant difference in the re-expansion rate between KVS and Cryotop (100 vs 88.9%). The vitrification time was shorter for KVS than Cryotop. There was no significant difference in the detachment time between KVS and Cryotop.
CONCLUSION
Kitasato Vitrification System is easy to operate, even for inexperienced users, and the viability of human embryos vitrified by KVS is comparable to that of Cryotop, a widely used vitrification device.
Collapse