Transmission of violet and blue light through conventional (layered) and bulk cured resin-based composites

OBJECTIVES

This study measured the transmission of light in the 'violet' (350≤λ≤425nm) and 'blue' (425<λ≤550nm) spectral ranges from a polywave(®) LED curing light through different thicknesses of four commercial, resin-based composites (RBCs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples of conventional layered RBCs (Tetric EvoCeram A2, Filtek Supreme Ultra A2B), and bulk-curing resins (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill IVA, and SureFil SDR Flow U) were prepared. Three samples of each RBC were made at thicknesses of 0.1, 0.7, 1, 2, and 4-mm. The uncured RBC specimens were affixed at the entrance aperture of a 6-inch integrating sphere and light-cured once for 20s using a polywave(®) LED curing light (Bluephase G2) on its high power setting. The spectral radiant power transmitted through each RBC in the 'violet' and 'blue' regions was measured using a fiberoptic spectrometer.

RESULTS

As RBC thickness increased, an exponential attenuation of transmitted light was measured (R(2)>0.98). Attenuation was greater for the 'violet' than for the 'blue' spectral regions. At the light tip, the violet light component represented 15.4% of the light output. After passing through 4-mm of RBC, the violet light represented only between 1.2-3.1% of the transmitted light depending on the RBC. Depending on RBC, approximately 100mW from the Bluephase G2 was transmitted through 0.1-mm of RBC in the 'violet' range, falling at most to 11mW after passing through 2-mm of RBC, and to only 2mW at 4-mm depth.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing RBC thickness results in an exponential decrease in light transmission. This attenuation is RBC-dependent with shorter wavelengths (violet) attenuated to a greater extent than longer wavelengths (blue).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Despite the increased translucency of bulk curing RBCs, spectral radiant power shorter than 425nm from a curing light is unlikely to be effective at a depth of 4-mm or more.

The dark art of light curing in dentistry

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to show that the commonly reported irradiance values that are quoted in most publications inadequately describe the light output from light curing units (LCUs).

METHODS

The total spectral radiant power (mW) output from 12 contemporary LCUs was measured with a fiberoptic spectroradiometer and a calibrated integrating sphere. Five recordings were taken for each LCU and exposure mode. In addition, the irradiances (mW/cm²) delivered at 0-mm, 5-mm and 10-mm distances were recorded through a 6-mm diameter aperture and the radiant exposures (J/cm²) from the LCUs were calculated. Light beam profiles from the LCUs were recorded using a beam profiler, and the images were overlaid on a molar tooth to simulate a clinical setting. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean power outputs from the LCUs ranged from 380 to 2472 mW (p < 0.0001). The highest irradiance was recorded from the Cicada CV 215-G7 (3091 mW/cm² in its highest mode) and the lowest from the Radii Cal CX (731 mW/cm²). The emission spectra differed, even among the multi-peak and single-peak LCUs. Radiant exposures from the entire light tip ranged from 18.3 J/cm², Radii Cal CX, in its standard 25 s exposure mode to 3.9 J/cm² from the Monet Laser in a 3 s exposure setting. Half (50 %) of the measured irradiance values from the LCUs differed from the manufacturers' value by more than 10 %. There were significant differences in the impact of distance from the tip. The beam profiles visually highlighted the varying effects of distance from the LCU tip among different units.

CONCLUSION

There were significant differences in the emission spectra, power outputs, tip diameters, irradiances, radiant exposures, and the effect distance from the light tips. These differences underline the importance of manufacturers and researchers correctly measuring and reporting the output from the LCU to ensure that research is reproducible and that patients receive acceptable dental restorations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This article alerts clinicians, researchers and journal editors that providing only the tip irradiance (radiant exitance) value from the LCU is no longer sufficient. Manufacturers and researchers should include information on the spectral radiant power, emission spectrum, tip diameters, and also the effect of distance on the irradiance and radiant exposure, beam profiles and tooth access information when describing an LCU.