Cavus E, Schneider JN, di Carluccio E, Ziegler A, Haack A, Ojeda F, Chevalier C, Jahnke C, Riedl KA, Radunski UK, Twerenbold R, Kirchhof P, Blankenberg S, Adam G, Tahir E, Lund GK, Muellerleile K. Unrecognized myocardial scar by
late-gadolinium-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Insights from the population-based Hamburg City Health Study.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2024;
26:101008. [PMID:
38341145 PMCID:
PMC10944257 DOI:
10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101008]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The presence of myocardial scar is associated with poor prognosis in several underlying diseases. Late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging reveals clinically silent "unrecognized myocardial scar" (UMS), but the etiology of UMS often remains unclear. This population-based CMR study evaluated prevalence, localization, patterns, and risk factors of UMS.
METHODS
The study population consisted of 1064 consecutive Hamburg City Health Study participants without a history of coronary heart disease or myocarditis. UMS was assessed by standard-phase-sensitive-inversion-recovery LGE CMR.
RESULTS
Median age was 66 [quartiles 59, 71] years and 37% (388/1064) were females. UMS was detected in 244 (23%) participants. Twenty-five participants (10%) had ischemic, and 217 participants (89%) had non-ischemic scar patterns, predominantly involving the basal inferolateral left-ventricular (LV) myocardium (75%). Two participants (1%) had coincident ischemic and non-ischemic scar. The presence of any UMS was independently associated with LV ejection fraction (odds ratios (OR) per standard deviation (SD) 0.77 (confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.90), p = 0.002) and LV mass (OR per SD 1.54 (CI 1.31-1.82), p < 0.001). Ischemic UMS was independently associated with LV ejection fraction (OR per SD 0.58 (CI 0.39-0.86), p = 0.007), LV mass (OR per SD 1.74 (CI 1.25-2.45), p = 0.001), and diabetes (OR 4.91 (CI 1.66-13.03), p = 0.002). Non-ischemic UMS was only independently associated with LV mass (OR per SD 1.44 (CI 1.24-1.69), p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
UMS, in particular with a non-ischemic pattern, is frequent in individuals without known cardiac disease and predominantly involves the basal inferolateral LV myocardium. Presence of UMS is independently associated with a lower LVEF, a higher LV mass, and a history of diabetes.
Collapse