Internal pudendal perforator artery flap harvesting without pre-operative imaging: Reliability and approach

Since its initial description in 1996 by Yii and Niranjan, the internal pudendal perforator flap (also known as the Singapore flap, the gluteal fold flap, and the lotus petal flap) has become a workhorse in perineal soft tissue reconstruction. In 2001, Hashimoto described the presence of three to five perforators in the perineal anogenital triangle. The ischial tuberosity has thus become a useful anatomic landmark for the safe boundary of medial dissection during flap elevation, in order to avoid damaging the perforator vessels. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the perforators' positions within the anogenital triangle by using color Doppler ultrasound. In a study of 15 subjects in the lithotomy position, we identified a total of 24 perforator vessels with a diameter greater than 5 mm. We noted the vessels' positions using orthonormal measurements, according to the distance from the midline and the distance on a straight line between the two ischial tuberosities (i.e. consistent bony anatomic landmarks that are independent of the patient's height and body mass index). The mean distance between the ischial tuberosity and the internal pudendal perforator was 27.3 mm. Based on our present results, we consider that routine ultrasound identification and dissection of the perforators is not always required before pudendal flap harvesting. This decreases the operating time and simplifies the flap harvesting procedure.

Lotus petal flap and vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in vulvoperineal reconstruction: a systematic review of differences in complications

BACKGROUND

Vulvoperineal defects resulting from surgical treatment of (pre)malignancies may result in reconstructive challenges. The vertical rectus abdominis muscle flap and, more recently, the fasciocutaneous lotus petal flap are often used for reconstruction in this area. The goal of this review is to compare the postoperative complications of application of these flaps. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases was performed until 6 June 2020. Search terms included the lotus petal flap, vertical rectus abdominis muscle flap and the vulvoperineal area. Articles were independently screened by two researchers according to the PRISMA-guidelines. Results: A total of 1074 citations were retrieved and reviewed, of which 55 were included for full text analysis. Following lotus petal flap reconstructions, the complication rate varied from 0.0% to 69.9%, with more complications concerning the recipient site compared with the donor site complications (26.0% versus 4.5%). Following vertical rectus abdominis muscle flap reconstructions the complication rate varied between 0.0% and 85.7% with almost twice the number of recipient site complications compared to donor site complications (37.1% versus 17.8%). Conclusions: Overall, the lotus petal flap has lower complication rates at both the donor and the recipient site compared with the vertical rectus abdominis muscle flap. When both options seem viable, the lotus petal flap procedure may be preferred on the basis of the reported lower complication rates. Abbreviations: APE: abdominoperineal excision; ELAPE: extra levator abdominoperineal excision; LP flap: lotus petal flap; NIH: National Institute of Health; NR: not reported; RCT: randomized controlled trial; VRAM flap: vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.

Combined use of a petal flap and V-Y advancement flap for reconstruction of presacral defects following rectal resection

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of flaps for the reconstruction of presacral defects following abdominoperineal resections: a paramedian vertically oriented caudally based lotus petal flap for presacral defects combined with a horizontal V-Y advancement flap for closure of the superficial donor site defect.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients with a residual defect following an abdominoperineal resection between 2010 and 2017 in the Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep. The primary endpoint was complications related to the reconstruction.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included, all reconstructions healed well. Three patients had a grade I or II complication (Clavien Dindo classification).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a petal flap and V-Y advancement flap for reconstruction of presacral defects was found to be safe and simple, and should, therefore, be considered in the management of such problems.

Use of negative pressure wound therapy after infection and flap dehiscence in radical vulvectomy: A case report

•

Radical vulvectomy is a very agressive surgery.

•

Deshiscence of vulvar wound is one of the most feared complications.

•

Negative wound pressure therapy could be incorporate in the management of this complications.

Introduction

Vulvar cancer has a lower incidence in high income countries, but is rising, in part, due to the high life expectancy in these societies. Radical vulvectomy is still the standard treatment in initial stages. Wound dehiscence contitututes one of the most common postoperative complications.

Presentation of case

A 76 year old patient with a squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, FIGO staged, IIIb is presented. Radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection with lotus petal flaps reconstruction are performed as the first treatment. Wound infection and dehiscence of lotus petal flaps was seen postoperatively. Initial management consisted in antibiotics administration and removing necrotic tissue from surgical wound. After this initial treatment, negative wound pressure therapy was applied for 37 days with good results.

Discussion

Wound dehiscence in radical vulvectomy remains the most frequent complication in the treatment of vulvar cancer. The treatment of this complications is still challenging for most gynecologic oncologist surgeons.

Conclusion

The utilization of the negative wound pressure therapy could contribute to reduce hospitalization and the direct and indirect costs of these complications.