Techniques and challenges of the expanded endoscopic endonasal access to the ventrolateral skull base during the "far-medial" and "extreme medial" approaches

BACKGROUND

Expanding the ventrolateral skull base corridor from the midline of lower clivus to the petroclival fissure is a challenging endonasal surgical task. Resection of lytic lesions like chondrosarcoma can cause cranial nerve morbidities and injury of ICA, necessitating accurate knowledge of correlative endoscopic anatomy with stereotactic landmarks.

METHODS

We describe an extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for a right petroclival chondrosarcoma with the demonstration of ipsilateral surgical landmarks with contralateral normal correlates, using a stepwise comparative image-guided cadaveric dissection study.

CONCLUSION

EEA for lytic lesions like chondrosarcomas needs to address brain shift and displacement of ICA, posing a chance for cranial nerve morbidities and ICA injury. Meticulous utilization of intraoperative stereotactic landmarks can help avoid and mitigate surgical complications.

Comparative analysis of surgical exposure and freedom between the subtonsillar, endoscope-assisted subtonsillar, and far-lateral approaches to the lower clivus: A cadaveric study

The far-lateral (FL)approach is a classic technique for skull base surgeries involving the lower clivus (LC).Recently, a modified suboccipital midline approach known as the subtonsillar (ST) approach, along with the endoscope-assisted subtonsillar (EST) approach, has been described as a minimally invasive technique to treat LC lesions. However, there is no quantitative study on comparing these approaches together for reaching LC. We aimed to compare surgical exposure and freedom provided by ST, EST, and FL approaches for various targets at LC. These approaches were performed on each side of five cadaveric specimens (total 10 sides), and relevant parameters were quantified and compared using a repeated measures ANOVA test. FL approach yielded the greatest surgical area (237.8 ± 56.0 mm²) and exposure, including lengths of glossopharyngeal nerve (16.2 ± 1.9 mm), hypoglossal nerve (11.4 ± 2.4 mm), vertebral artery (23.9 ± 3.3 mm), followed by EST and ST approaches. For surgical freedom, FL approach provided the greatest angle of attack (90.0 ± 14.0° at jugular foramen, 95.1 ± 15.8° at hypoglossal canal, 83.4 ± 31.4° at bifurcation point of posterior inferior cerebellar artery and vertebral artery). Our systematic comparison suggests that EST approach, compared to ST approach, can significantly increase surgical exposure to the medial side of LC, but FL approach still provides the greatest surgical exposure and freedom at LC. Despite the limitations of a cadaveric study, our quantitative data can update the literature on currently available surgical techniques for reaching LC and better inform preoperative planning in this area. Further studies should be performed to evaluate these approaches in clinical practice.

How I do it: endoscopic endonasal approach to the inferior third of the clivus

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, endoscopic endonasal expanded approach targeting for the clival lower third is well described in literature. Nonetheless, great variations can be found among surgical groups, specially during the earlier stages of this procedure.

METHOD

We present a step by step description of the clival lower third approach until entering the dural space, setting its bony limits. We describe the basipharyngeal flap tailoring as a helpful option for latter reconstruction. The study of cadaveric specimens adds clarifying dissections.

CONCLUSIONS

The expansion in the coronal plane is providential in most of the intradural lesions of the inferior clivus. Basipharyngeal flap may help seal the surgical defects in this area.