Comparison of surgical outcomes of sleep surgeries preoperatively evaluated with drug-induced sleep endoscopy and Müller's maneuver

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) when the procedure was based on the results of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) vs. the awake Müller's maneuver (MM). Methods Forty-seven patients with OSA who underwent sleep surgery were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their preoperative upper airway evaluation method. Twenty-five patients received only MM for surgical decision making (MM group), and 22 patients received both MM and DISE (DISE group) for surgical decision making. Results The surgical success rate of the DISE group was higher than that of the MM group (59% vs. 36%), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.118). The differences between pre- and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) values in both the MM and DISE group were highly significantly different (p < 0.001). Fifteen patients in the DISE group (68.2%) received multi-level surgery, while in the MM group only 7 patients (28%) received multi-level surgery. Patients with more severe OSA (AHI > 22 or lowest O2 saturation < 81%) had better surgical outcomes when their surgical procedures were based on the findings of DISE, rather than those of MM. Conclusion The results indicate that DISE provides no benefits with respect to surgical outcomes for patients with mild to moderate OSA; however, for patients with more severe OSA surgical procedures based on DISE result in better outcomes.

Impact of upper airway configuration on CPAP titration assessed by CT during Müller's maneuver in OSA patients

PURPOSE

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the current gold-standard treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and upper airway anatomy plays an increasingly important role in evaluating the efficacy of CPAP therapy. The aim of this observational study was to investigate the influence of upper airway anatomy on CPAP titration in OSA patients assessed by computed tomography (CT) during Müller's maneuver.

METHODS

Consecutive patients under investigation for OSA by undergoing polysomnography and CT scan of the upper airway while awake were enrolled. Successful full-night manual titration was performed to determine the optimal CPAP pressure level for OSA patients in supine position using a nasal mask.

RESULTS

A total of 157 subjects (134 males and 23 females) were included. Both apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and LaSO2 significantly correlated with CPAP titration level, upper airway length (UAL), distance from mandibular plane to hyoid bone (MPH), and neck circumference (all p < 0.05). There were significant positive correlations between CPAP titration level and UAL (r = 0.348, p = 0.000) and MPH (r = 0.313, p = 0.002). Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent predictors of AHI, LaSO2, and CPAP titration level. CPAP titration level was identified as an independent explanatory variable for AHI and LaSO2 after adjustment for confounders. Multiple linear regression analyses also indicated that body mass index (BMI) and UAL were independently associated with CPAP titration level (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Upper airway abnormalities combined with anthropometric parameters play important roles in CPAP titration for OSA patients, providing additional insight into the factors influencing OSA treatment strategies. UAL and BMI should be taken into consideration when choosing CPAP titration level to improve CPAP compliance.

Positional Awake Endoscopy Versus DISE in Assessment of OSA: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare awake endoscopy with Müller's maneuver (MM) during both sitting and supine positions, with drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) as regard determination of different levels, patterns, and degrees of collapse of the upper airway in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

The study included adult patients with OSA symptoms, who had apnea hypopnea index (AHI) > 15. Patients were examined by MM in a sitting position, then during supine position; DISE then followed. Site, pattern, and degree of obstruction were assessed by experienced examiners according to the nose oropharynx hypopharynx and larynx classification.

RESULTS

Eighty-one adult subjects were included. The most common pattern of collapse at the retro-palatal level was the concentric pattern, while the predominant pattern at the hypopharyngeal level was the lateral wall collapse. The analysis of the pattern of collapse of the study group revealed that the individual pattern did not change (for the same patient at the same level) in the majority of patients whatever the maneuver or the position.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the feasibility of positional awake endoscopy for providing valuable surgical information as regard level, pattern, and degree of severity in OSA. The data of positional awake endoscopy were comparable to those gained from DISE with less morbidity and costs. The idea and results of this work provide a useful foundation for future research in this area. Multicenter studies are encouraged to obtain more reliable conclusions and more clear standards aiming at a better surgical planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:2269-2274, 2020.

[Comparative study of VOTE classification in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome patients between awake and sleep state]

Objective:To compare the differences of the sites of airway obstruction in OSAHS patients between awake and sleep state by using the VOTE classification system. Method:Forty OSAHS patients diagnosed by PSG underwent awake Müller's maneuver and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). Video and compare the observation. Its findings were described using the VOTE classification system which include the following features: level, degree and configuration of obstruction. Associations were analyzed between different degrees of obstruction, BMI, AHI, minimal SaO₂ and average SaO₂. Result:Our patients had 52.5% complete velum collapse and 30.0% complete oropharyngeal lateral wall collapse in awake Müller's maneuver. In DISE, airway closure of 95.0% cases related to velum occurred collapse in concentric configuration, and 90.0% cases showed completely obstructive. We found that 60.0% complete oropharyngeal lateral wall collapse and 17.5% complete tongue base collapse. There was a significant difference in the VOTE scores between DISE and awake Müller's maneuver, and the VOTE scores of DISE were higher in all levels (P<0.05). No association was found between degrees of obstruction, AHI, BMI, minimal SaO2 and average SaO₂ in Müller's maneuver (P>0.05). Complete velum collapse was just significantly associated with AHI and minimal SaO₂ in DISE (P<0.05). Conclusion:The VOTE scores of DISE were higher than awake Müller's maneuver, reflected by more obstructive levels and severe degree. The difference between different degrees of obstruction, BMI, AHI, minimal SaO₂ and average SaO₂ was not significant.

Comparison of drug-induced sleep endoscopy and Müller's maneuver in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea using the VOTE classification system

Introduction

Knowledge of the site of obstruction and the pattern of airway collapse is essential for determining correct surgical and medical management of patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS). To this end, several diagnostic tests and procedures have been developed.

Objective

To determine whether drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) or Müller's maneuver (MM) would be more successful at identifying the site of obstruction and the pattern of upper airway collapse in patients with OSAS.

Methods

The study included 63 patients (52 male and 11 female) who were diagnosed with OSAS at our clinic. Ages ranged from 30 to 66 years old and the average age was 48.5 years. All patients underwent DISE and MM and the results of these examinations were characterized according to the region/degree of obstruction as well as the VOTE classification. The results of each test were analyzed per upper airway level and compared using statistical analysis (Cohen's kappa statistic test).

Results

There was statistically significant concordance between the results from DISE and MM for procedures involving the anteroposterior (73%), lateral (92.1%), and concentric (74.6%) configuration of the velum. Results from the lateral part of the oropharynx were also in concordance between the tests (58.7%). Results from the lateral configuration of the epiglottis were in concordance between the tests (87.3%). There was no statistically significant concordance between the two examinations for procedures involving the anteroposterior of the tongue (23.8%) and epiglottis (42.9%).

Conclusion

We suggest that DISE has several advantages including safety, ease of use, and reliability, which outweigh MM in terms of the ability to diagnose sites of obstruction and the pattern of upper airway collapse. Also, MM can provide some knowledge of the pattern of pharyngeal collapse. Furthermore, we also recommend using the VOTE classification in combination with DISE.