[Impact of the Size and Depth of Pulmonary Nodules on the Surgical Approach for Lung Resection in the Treatment of Early-stage Lung Cancer ≤2 cm]

BACKGROUND

Current studies suggest that for early-stage lung cancers with a component of ground-glass opacity measuring ≤2 cm, sublobar resection is suitable if it ensures adequate margins. However, lobectomy may be necessary for some cases to achieve this. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of size and depth on surgical techniques for wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy in early-stage lung cancer ≤2 cm, and to determine methods for ensuring a safe resection margin during sublobar resections.

METHODS

Clinical data from 385 patients with early-stage lung cancer ≤2 cm, who underwent lung resection in 2022, were subject to a retrospective analysis, covering three types of procedures: wedge resection, segmentectomy and lobectomy. The depth indicator as the OA value, which is the shortest distance from the inner edge of a pulmonary nodule to the opening of the corresponding bronchus, and the AB value, which is the distance from the inner edge of the nodule to the pleura, were measured. For cases undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) was performed to statistically determine the number of subsegments required for segmentectomy. The cutting margin width for wedge resection and segmentectomy was recorded, as well as the specific subsegments and their quantities removed during lung segmentectomy were documented.

RESULTS

In wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy, the sizes of pulmonary nodules were (1.08±0.29) cm, (1.31±0.34) cm and (1.50±0.35) cm, respectively, while the depth of the nodules (OA values) was 6.05 (5.26, 6.85) cm, 4.43 (3.27, 5.43) cm and 3.04 (1.80, 4.18) cm for each procedure, showing a progressive increasing trend (P<0.001). The median resection margin width obtained from segmentectomy was 2.50 (1.50, 3.00) cm, significantly greater than the 1.50 (1.15, 2.00) cm from wedge resection (P<0.001). In wedge resections, cases where AB value >2 cm demonstrated a higher proportion of cases with resection margins less than 2 cm compared to those with margins greater than 2 cm (29.03% vs 12.90%, P=0.019). When utilizing the size of the nodule as the criterion for resection margin, the instances with AB value >2 cm continued to show a higher proportion in the ratio of margin distance to tumor size less than 1 (37.50% vs 17.39%, P=0.009). The median number of subsegments for segmentectomy was three, whereas lobectomy cases requiring segmentectomy involved five subsegments (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The selection of the surgical approach for lung resection is influenced by both the size and depth of pulmonary nodules. This study first confirms that larger portions of lung tissue must be removed for nodules that are deeper and larger to achieve a safe margin. A distance of ≤2 cm from the inner edge of the pulmonary nodule to the nearest pleura may be the ideal indication for performing wedge resection.

Does surgical margin affect recurrence and survival after sublobar pulmonary resection for lung cancer?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: How does surgical margin distance affect recurrence and survival after sublobar pulmonary resection for lung cancer? Altogether, 172 papers were found using the search strategy, of which 12 studies with 1946 stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using sublobar resection (wedge resection or segmentectomy) represented to be the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers were tabulated. Overall, 11 cohort studies and 1 prospective study were included. Four cohort studies demonstrated positive prognostic significance of surgical margin with specific cut-off points in each paper (ranged from 9 to 15 mm). Two retrospective studies and 1 prospective study found that a margin-to-tumour ratio of ≥1 was associated with better cytology and prognosis results. Other 5 studies showed that larger margin distance provided a favourable prognosis for NSCLC patients with poor-prognostic factors, including solid-dominant type, high invasive component size and Spread through Air Spaces-positive subtype. After reviewing all the included articles, we conclude that the standard of margin distance of >10 mm or margin-to-tumour ratio  ≥ 1 should be recommended for stage I NSCLC patients undergoing sublobar resection, especially in wedge resection. Patients with poor-prognostic factors like solid-predominant tumour or non-lepidic adenocarcinoma may benefit from larger margin distance and the proper margin distance for them still needs to be determined. For Spread through Air Spaces-positive patients, sublobar resection may not be the alternative to lobectomy.

Optimal margins for early stage peripheral lung adenocarcinoma resection

Background

A pathologically confirmed negative margin is required when performing sublobar resection in patients with early stage peripheral lung adenocarcinoma. However, the optimal margin distance to ensure complete tumor resection while preserving healthy lung tissue remains unknown. We aimed to establish a reliable distance range for negative margins.

Methods

A total of 52 intraoperative para-cancer tissue specimens from patients with peripheral lung adenocarcinoma with pathological tumors ≤2 cm in size were examined. Depending on the distance from the tumor edge (D), the para-cancer tissues were divided into the following five groups: D < 0.5 cm (group I); 0.5 cm ≤ D < 1.0 cm (group II); 1.0 cm ≤ D < 1.5 cm (group III); 1.5 cm ≤ D < 2.0 cm (group IV); and D ≥ 2.0 cm (group V). During pathological examination of the specimens under a microscope, the presence of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia or more severe lesions was considered unsafe, whereas the presence of normal lung tissue or benign hyperplasia was considered safe.

Results

Group V, in which the margin was the farthest from the tumor edge, was the safest. There were significant safety differences in between groups I and V (χ² = 26.217, P < 0.001). Significant safety differences also existed between groups II and V (χ² = 9.420, P < 0.005). There were no significant safety differences between group III or IV and group V (P = 0.207; P = 0.610).

Conclusions

We suggest that when performing sublobar resection in patients with early stage peripheral lung adenocarcinoma with pathological tumor sizes ≤2 cm, the resection margin distance should be ≥1 cm to ensure a negative margin.

Optimal sublobar resection for c-stage I non-small cell lung cancer: significance of margin distance to tumor size ratio and margin cytology (Supplementary analysis of KLSG-0801): complete republication

BACKGROUND

Sublobar resection for lung cancer is associated with a higher risk of recurrence than that of lobectomy; we evaluated the factors considered to be predictors of recurrence.

METHODS

By analyzing multicenter prospective studies of sublobar resection for patients with c-stage I non-small lung cancer who were unable to undergo lobectomy (KLSG-0801), we investigated the relationship between (1) tumor location (TL) and margin distance from the stump (MD), (2) the MD/tumor size (TS) ratio and prognosis, (3) and the margin cytology (MC) and prognosis.

RESULTS

The correlation between TS and MD was statistically significant in cases of easily resectable regions defined by Lewis' classification (n = 18). However, there was no correlation in difficult-to-resect regions (n = 14). Among cases of recurrence, the MD/TS ratio was less than 1. The 3-year survival rate was 100% for patients with MD/TS > 1 (n = 12), 59.7% for patients with MD/TS ≤ 1 (n = 20) (p = 0.06), 88.1% in cases of negative MC (n = 18), and 20% in cases of positive MC (n = 5) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Cases with positive MC had a significantly worse prognosis than those with negative MC. It may be difficult to secure an MD greater than the TS in a difficult-to-resect region according to Lewis' classification.

Role of tumour-free margin distance for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer-a subset analysis of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie CaRE-1 multicenter study

AIM OF THE STUDY

A tumour-free pathological resection margin of ≥8 mm is considered state-of-the-art. Available evidence is based on heterogeneous cohorts. This study was designed to clarify the relevance of the resection margin for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer.

METHODS

AGO-CaRE-1 is a large retrospective study. Patients (n = 1618) with vulvar cancer ≥ FIGO stage IB treated at 29 German gynecologic-cancer-centres 1998-2008 were included. This subgroup analysis focuses on solely surgically treated node-negative patients with complete tumour resection (n = 289).

RESULTS

Of the 289 analysed patients, 141 (48.8%) had pT1b, 140 (48.4%) pT2 and 8 (2.8%) pT3 tumours. One hundred twenty-five (43.3%) underwent complete vulvectomy, 127 (43.9%) partial vulvectomy and 37 (12.8%) radical local excision. The median minimal resection margin was 5 mm (1 mm-33 mm); all patients received groin staging, in 86.5% with full dissection. Median follow-up was 35.1 months. 46 (15.9%) patients developed recurrence, thereof 34 (11.8%) at the vulva, after a median of 18.3 months. Vulvar recurrence rates were 12.6% in patients with a margin <8 mm and 10.2% in patients with a margin ≥8 mm. When analysed as a continuous variable, the margin distance had no statistically significant impact on local recurrence (HR per mm increase: 0.930, 95% CI: 0.849-1.020; p = 0.125). Multivariate analyses did also not reveal a significant association between the margin and local recurrence neither when analysed as continuous variable nor categorically based on the 8 mm cutoff. Results were consistent when looking at disease-free-survival and time-to-recurrence at any site (HR per mm increase: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.864-1.041; p = 0.267).

CONCLUSIONS

The need for a minimal margin of 8 mm could not be confirmed in the large and homogeneous node-negative cohort of the AGO-CaRE database.

How important is the pathological margin distance in vulvar cancer?

PURPOSE

The ideal pathological margin in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is still debated. Our aim was to analyze the value of tumor-free pathological margin distance with regard to local recurrence in VSCC.

METHODS

We analyzed a series of 205 patients who were treated for VSCC from January 1980 to November 2007. Patients were categorized into 3 groups, based on pathological free margin (PFM): <3 mm (n = 18); ≥3 and <8 mm (n = 61); and ≥8 mm (n = 126).

RESULTS

The median age was 69 years. The median PFM was 10 mm (range: 1-65). Of 168 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, 64 (38.1%) developed LN metastasis. After a median follow-up of 36.2 months, 78 (38%) cases recurred-47 (60.2%) experienced a local recurrence (LR). LR occurred in 16.7% of patients with a PFM of <3 mm, 24.6% with a PFM ≥3 and <8 mm, and 22.2% of those with a PFM ≥8 mm (p = 0.77). PFM did not correlate with LR when analyzed continuously (p = 0.98). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) for LR was 79.6%. Margin distance did not negatively impact DFS (p = 0.94); the presence of perineural invasion was the only variable that negatively influenced DFS (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Although our results suggest no correlation between LR and pathological margin distance, the tumor-free resection margin remains significant with regard to locoregional control in vulvar cancer. A more conservative surgical approach may be considered in certain situations, such as margins near the clitoris, urethra, and anus.

Prognostic factors associated with local recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

Objective

To analyze the prognostic factors related to the recurrence rate of vulvar cancer.

Methods

Retrospective study of 87 patients diagnosed of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed at a tertiary hospital in Madrid between January 2000 and December 2010.

Results

The pathological mean tumor size was 35.1±22.8 mm, with stromal invasion of 7.7±6.6 mm. The mean free margin after surgery was 16.8±10.5 mm. Among all patients, 31 (35.6%) presented local recurrence (mean time 10 months; range, 1 to 114 months) and 7 (8%) had distant metastases (mean time, 5 months; range, 1 to 114 months). We found significant differences in the mean tumor size between patients who presented a relapse and those who did not (37.6±21.3 mm vs. 28.9±12.1 mm; p=0.05). Patients with free margins equal or less than 8 mm presented a relapse rate of 52.6% vs. 43.5% of those with free margin greater than 8 mm (p=0.50). However, with a cut-off of 15 mm, we observed a local recurrence rate of 55.6% vs. 34.5%, respectively (p=0.09). When the stromal invasion cut-off was >4 mm, local recurrence rate increased up to 52.9% compared to 37.5% when the stromal invasion was ≤4 mm (p=0.20).

Conclusion

Tumor size, pathologic margin distance and stromal invasion seem to be the most important predictors of local vulvar recurrence. We consider the cut-off of 35 mm of tumor size, 15 mm tumor-free surgical margin and stromal invasion >4 mm, high risk predictors of local recurrence rate.