Interests and Barriers to Medical Students Participation in a Dedicated Global Surgery Curriculum

INTRODUCTION

Despite many institutions establishing global surgery (GS) programs to support clinical care and education in resource-limited settings, few have established a specific curriculum in GS. This study's objective was to assess medical student interest in such a curriculum and prospects for future careers in GS/global health (GH), and to define the barriers to pursuing an international rotation.

METHODS

We conducted an anonymous online survey of all 495 medical students at a major academic medical center in the mid-South that collected demographic data, country of origin, interest in a GS/GH elective, and barriers to pursuing a GS/GH rotation abroad. The data were analyzed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Prior international experience increased the likelihood of a student's involvement in GS/GH and more preclinical (years 1 & 2) students (90%) than clinical students. (years 3 & 4) (70%) felt strongly about the value of a GS/GH experience. Of the 163 students who completed the survey, 80% expressed interest in a GS/GH elective, with preclinical students expressing more interest (90%) than clinical students (71%). This interest strongly correlated with an interest in pursuing a career in GH (94%) and/or GS (100%). Identified barriers to engagement in a GS/GH experience abroad included financing (74%), scheduling (58%), family obligations (23%), and personal safety (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

The students we surveyed were very interested in a GS/GH curriculum that included a rotation abroad, especially if they were to receive financial support. Preclinical students expressed more willingness to self-fund such experiences. The findings of this survey further strengthen the need to incorporate GS/GH in medical school curricula.

Medical School Clinical Trials Educational Intervention: Impact on Knowledge and Attitudes

Medical student knowledge and opinions of clinical research have important ramifications for how likely they will be to refer patients into clinical trials as practicing physicians. This study examined students understanding, knowledge, and attitudes about clinical trials at the start of medical school and after completion of a multi-faceted intervention designed to increase medical students' confidence in understanding and explaining clinical trials during the pre-clinical and clinical years. Medical students were surveyed about their knowledge of and attitudes toward clinical trials in their first (N = 724) and third (N = 191) years of medical school. During the intervening years, students attend a lecture delivered by University of Hawai 'i Cancer Center faculty, were provided a resource manual from National Cancer Institute, participated in two problem-based learning clinical scenarios, and completed an optional practicum. After completing the comprehensive clinical trials education, there were significant increases in student understanding and knowledge and a decrease in student perception that clinical trials exploit participants. Most students agreed or strongly agreed that inclusion of clinical trials in the curriculum was important and would influence their future practice. Integration of clinical trials education into the medical school curriculum improved students' understanding of clinical research, their ability to communicate the clinical trials process, and confidence in conducting, referring to, and locating clinical trials. Medical students appreciate the importance of clinical trials in advancing medicine and medical education. Further integration of clinical trials education and opportunities to engage in research during medical school are warranted to address students' uncertainty about the benefits of participation for patients.

Preparing Students to Deliver Care to Diverse Populations

The purpose of this study was to increase student exposure to diverse patients using patient ID cards in problem-based learning (PBL) at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU). The pre-clerkship curriculum capitalizes on facilitated small-group, case-based discussions to promote inquiry and learning of the foundational sciences. Quantitative and qualitative results supported a finding of added value to case-discussions and the humanization of case-patients. The inclusion of the patient ID cards resulted in most students indicating that it helped them learn about and prepare to care for their future population of diverse patients. The patient ID cards will allow us to develop specific learning objectives about the demographics to increase learning about diverse patient care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01648-0.

Development of a cultural competency curriculum

There has been increased focus on health disparities and how to address them (Baciu et al., 2017; National Institutes of Health, 2021; Williams et al., 2021). Greater integration of social determinants of health (SDoH) education into undergraduate medical education has been identified as one possible intervention (Mangold et al., 2019; Doobay-Persaud et al., 2019; Lewis et al., 2020). The Liaison Committee on Medical Education places this education among its accreditation requirements (Mangold et al., 2019); however, no consensus exists on the most effective programming for training culturally competent physicians. This paper describes the development, implementation, and reception of one such program; a combined two-week Diversity Retreat and Washington University Medical Plunge at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. This program exposed students to the historical, social, and cultural context of health disparities in the city and challenged them to recognize their own biases. Survey data showed that the program was well received and increased learners' subjective understandings of SDoH, the background of St. Louis, and patient-centered care. Learners also identified separation of SDoH material from other aspects of the curriculum and limited reinforcement of SDoH as areas for improvement. In 2020, the program was expanded and integrated into the broader curriculum. Here, we present WUMP, an example of one approach to SDoH training for medical students that was grounded in the local political and social context of St. Louis and prepared students to learn, train, and practice within that context.

The Impact of Meeting Patients with Neurological Disorders on Medical Student Empathy

PURPOSE

Empathy tends to decline during medical education, typically beginning in the third year of medical school and often continuing throughout residency and the physician's medical career. The purpose of this study was to determine if first year medical student empathy is affected by small group interactions with patients with neurological disorders, and to investigate if changes in empathy persisted over time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty first year medical students participating in a Neuroscience Module interacted with a variety of neurological patients in a small group informational session. Prior to the experience, participants completed the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-Student (JSPE-S) version. After the experience, students completed a post-test JSPE-S questionnaire, and a final post-post-test JSPE-S questionnaire was completed 5 weeks later. Empathy scores were compared with a repeated measures MANOVA. The relationship between gender and empathy, and the effect of the age of the neurological patients on empathy scores were also examined.

RESULTS

Empathy scores for seventy-one students who completed the JSPE-S questionnaires were analyzed. Students had significantly higher empathy immediately after the patient interaction experience, and the change in empathy was sustained over the course of 5 weeks (p = 0.015). The age of the neurological patients had a significant effect on empathy scores. There was no significant difference between empathy scores and gender.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the incorporation of a group patient interaction experience into the medical school curriculum as an inexpensive and practical method of enhancing medical student empathy in a non-clinical setting.

Shortened pre-clerkship medical school curriculum associated with reduced student performance on surgery clerkship shelf exam

BACKGROUND

Many U.S. medical schools are modifying their curricula with limited understanding of the impact on students' clinical knowledge.

METHODS

The surgical rotations and Surgery Shelf Exam score reports of 1514 students at a single medical school over nine academic years (2010-2018), which included a four-year transition period to a condensed pre-clerkship curriculum. Subject-specific results were compared by rotation type using Mann-Whitney tests. Regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between scores and time.

RESULTS

Data from 1514 students were included. Shelf scores decreased each year of the transition curriculum compared to the reference year (2014-2015). However, clinical exposure to specific rotations resulted in better scores in related shelf subjects. For example, students who rotated on Vascular Surgery achieved statistically better scores on the related subject than their colleagues (3.62 vs. 3.44; p = 0.0014).

CONCLUSIONS

The transition curriculum was associated with a lower performance on the surgical shelf exam when compared to the traditional curriculum, regardless of when surgery was taken during their clerkship year.

What Physicians Wished They Would Have Learned in Medical School: a Survey

PURPOSE

Medical students must be provided the basic science knowledge appropriate and applicable for preparing them for best-practice medicine. To date, there have been no documented studies in the USA that have directly surveyed practicing physicians on their perspectives of their basic science/preclinical medical school education and how it could be modified to help them deliver best patient care. This study was the first to examine this information.

METHOD

A survey was administered to the alumni of Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Harlem, NY (2011-2018), with questions on examining perspectives on basic science disciplines, the need for a basic science refresher course, and other educational topics. In addition, questions relating to demographics and type of medical practice were also asked. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.

RESULTS

(1) Gender (N = 122): 55% male and 44% female; (2) medical specialty (N = 107): 51.40% Primary Care physicians (Family medicine, Internal medicine, Pediatrics), 48.60% Other Specialties; (3) top Disciplines that "should have more": Physiology (41.1%), Pharmacology (39.3%), and Preventative Medicine/Public Health (39.3%); Top disciplines that "should have less": Histology Laboratory (38.32%), Embryology (35.51%), Histology (didactic) (28.30%) (N = 107); (4) top topics "most important" to be included in curriculum: Analysis of Journal Articles (70.10%), Clinical Cases (70.1%), and Early Patient Exposure (64.5%) (N = 107); (5) presentation of a clinically relevant Basic Science refresher course had a positive response (84.4%) (N = 107).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacology, Physiology, Clinical Cases, Journal Article Analysis, and Early Patient exposure were among topics requiring "more" in preclinical education. A clinically relevant basic science course was deemed useful. The perspectives of practicing physicians should be included when designing future medical school curriculums.

Evaluation of medical student retention of clinical skills following simulation training

BACKGROUND

Adequate clinical skills training is a challenge for present day medical education. Simulation Based Education (SBE) is playing an increasingly important role in healthcare education worldwide to teach invasive procedures. The impact of this teaching on students along with retention of what is taught is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the retention levels of practical skills taught and assessed by SBE and to explore the degree of re-training required to restore decayed performance. In exploring this aim, the study further investigates how skilled performance decays over time and which dimensions of clinical skills were more likely to decay.

METHODS

Study participants were 51 final year medical students. They were provided with online pre-course videos and procedural guides asynchronously with repeatedly access. 7 of the skills taught over 2 years using task trainers were selected. Following demonstration from faculty, students practiced in small groups with faculty facilitated supervision and peer support prior to formal testing. Score sheets with itemised procedure checklists detailing the minimum passing standard (MPS) for each skill were designed. To test retention of skills, 18 months later, there was an unannounced test to demonstrate proficiency in the skills. Students were asked to complete a questionnaire indicating how many times and where they had practiced or performed the skills.

RESULTS

55% of the students were deficient in 3 or more skills and 4% were not competent in 5 or more skills. A significant number of students had never practiced some skills following the initial teaching session. A relationship was noted with the number of times students self-declared that they had practiced and their performance. Decay is evident in both psychomotor and cognitive domains of the skills.

CONCLUSION

A curriculum with deliberate practice significantly increases the competence of students in defined clinical skills. Deliberate practice of clinical skills, under supervision of an engaged instructor, is a key component of the mastery model. Experiences and assessments in the clinical setting need to be augmented with focus on direct observation and focused feedback to reinforce the skills acquired in the simulated setting.

Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology: Medical Student Feedback on Team Case-Based Versus Lecture Format

OBJECTIVE

Team-based learning with case presentations in small groups in the medical school education setting allows students to be actively engaged and interactive with their peers to work through real-world clinical scenarios. Our objective is to assess the effects of this curriculum on the medical student experience.

DESIGN

This study was designed to gather feedback from medical students on an ophthalmology elective regarding their experience with our newly developed team-based learning curriculum.

SETTINGS

Feedback evaluations were completed by medical students at the end of their elective and consisted of both a Likert scare rating and a free-response section.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 30 medical students.

RESULTS

Students rated the case-based sessions significantly better than traditional lecture format with respect to the overall learning experience (p = 0.004), enjoyment of learning (p < 0.001), and increasing retention and ability to apply knowledge (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong preference by medical students for team-based learning within clinical ophthalmology.

Problem-based learning in medical school: A student's perspective

Problem-based learning (PBL) has been a concept in existence for decades yet its implementation in medical student education is limited. Considering the nature of a physician's work, PBL is a logical step towards developing students' abilities to synthesize and integrate foundational concepts into clinical medicine. Harvard's recently redesigned Pathways curriculum has shifted almost exclusively towards PBL in its one-year preclinical curriculum. This piece provides my thoughts, both derived from my own reflections as well as conversations and observations of my peers, on the effectiveness, advantages, and disadvantages of a PBL curriculum. All in all, the feelings of my peers and I regarding PBL has been overwhelmingly positive despite potential areas of improvement and continued fine-tuning.