Is Palpation Sufficient for Estimation of IOP Immediately Following Cataract Surgery?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of standard palpation techniques and Barraquer tonometry relative to Tono-Pen for measurement of postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) immediately following routine micro-incision cataract surgery (MICS). We conducted a prospective comparative analysis of postoperative IOP immediately after MICS in a single academic outpatient surgery center. A random block of 166 eyes that underwent MICS at our institution was selected for inclusion. Exclusion criteria consisted of any complications including posterior capsule rupture. IOP was measured immediately postoperatively, first with palpation or a Barraquer tonometer, then with a Tono-Pen handheld applanation tonometer. Measurements obtained by each method were compared. The mean difference between IOP measurements obtained by palpation and Tono-Pen was 10 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI; 8, 12); whereas the mean difference between IOP measurements obtained by Barraquer tonometer and Tono-Pen was 2 mmHg, 95% CI (1, 3). IOP measurements acquired via palpation differed from their corresponding Tono-Pen measurements by > 5 mmHg in 48.0% of cases compared to only 5.9% of measurements acquired using a Barraquer tonometer. Spearman correlation coefficient for measurements obtained by standard palpation and Tono-Pen was r = 0.397 (p < 0.01) compared to r = 0.774 (p < 0.01) for those obtained by Barraquer tonometer and Tono-Pen. In conclusion, palpation is not an accurate method for estimating IOP immediately after cataract surgery compared to Tono-Pen. Appropriate measurement and adjustment of IOP at the end of cataract surgery may decrease complications such as cystoid macular edema. In settings where a Tono-Pen is not readily available, Barraquer tonometry may serve as a reasonable and cost-effective alternative.

Safety and efficacy of transpupillary silicone oil removal in combination with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery: comparison with 23-gauge approach

Background

To evaluate safety and efficacy of transpupillary silicone oil removal combined with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery, and to compare results of transpupillary with 23-gauge three-port vitrectomy approach.

Methods

Consecutive cases that underwent silicone oil removal using either transpupillary or three-port approach in combination with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measures were postoperative detachment rate, silicone oil residuals, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP).

Results

A total of 64 cases were included, 19 in transpupillary and 45 in three-port. Postoperative detachment rate within 3 months in transpupillary versus three-port was 15.8% versus 4.4% (p = 0.14), Silicone oil residuals was 7.4 ± 3.2% versus 7.1 ± 2.8% (transpupillary vs. three-port, p = 0.71). Preoperative versus postoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.49 ± 0.61 versus 1.42 ± 0.61 in transpupillary approach (p = 0.28) and 1.53 ± 0.48 versus 1.45 ± 0.57 in three-port approach (p = 0.11). Transpupillary approach resulted in lower IOP at postoperative day 2 (12.2 ± 2.3 mmHg vs. 13.5 ± 2.2 mmHg, p < 0.05), while postoperative follow-up at 1 month revealed no significant difference (p = 0.21).

Conclusions

Transpupillary silicone oil removal combined with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery is less invasive and can be an alternative in some circumstances.