Evaluation of ATSDR's MRL and EPA's RfCs/RfDs: Similarities, Differences, and Rationales

Objectives

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) derive minimal risk levels (MRLs) and reference concentrations and doses (RfCs and RfDs), respectively, for environmental contaminants to help identify potential health risks to exposed populations. MRLs, RfDs, and RfCs involve similar derivation methods, but the values sometimes differ for the same chemical. The objectives of this manuscript are to quantitatively assess similarities and differences between MRLs, RfCs, and RfDs, qualitatively describe how a number of factors can influence the development of the health guidance values (HGVs) and identify ongoing collaborations and opportunities for increased coordination of efforts.

Materials and Methods

We collected MRLs and RfCs/RfDs, assessment date, and description of the derivation process from ATSDR's toxicological profiles and EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) and Office of Pesticide Program (OPP) and identified reasons for differences between MRLs and RfCs/RfDs.

Results

The most frequent types of differences in values that we found in our analysis included use of different methodologies, use of different studies, and/or completion of a more recent chemical evaluation. These can stem from differences in scientific judgement.

Conclusion

To avoid confusion when disparate HGVs occur between government agencies, a keen understanding of these differences can be helpful for appropriate risk characterization and communication when applying HGVs.

A simple procedure for estimating pseudo risk ratios from exposure to non-carcinogenic chemical mixtures

Non-cancer risk assessment traditionally assumes a threshold of effect, below which there is a negligible risk of an adverse effect. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry derives health-based guidance values known as Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) as estimates of the toxicity threshold for non-carcinogens. Although the definition of an MRL, as well as EPA reference dose values (RfD and RfC), is a level that corresponds to "negligible risk," they represent daily exposure doses or concentrations, not risks. We present a new approach to calculate the risk at exposure to specific doses for chemical mixtures, the assumption in this approach is to assign de minimis risk at the MRL. The assigned risk enables the estimation of parameters in an exponential model, providing a complete dose-response curve for each compound from the chosen point of departure to zero. We estimated parameters for 27 chemicals. The value of k, which determines the shape of the dose-response curve, was moderately insensitive to the choice of the risk at the MRL. The approach presented here allows for the calculation of a risk from a single substance or the combined risk from multiple chemical exposures in a community. The methodology is applicable from point of departure data derived from quantal data, such as data from benchmark dose analyses or from data that can be transformed into probabilities, such as lowest-observed-adverse-effect level. The individual risks are used to calculate risk ratios that can facilitate comparison and cost-benefit analyses of environmental contamination control strategies.