Ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 717 patients across ten studies

BACKGROUND

Acetabulum fracture is one of the most challenging fractures to manage and operate for orthopaedic surgeons; anatomical reduction of fractures and reconstruction of the joint is of utmost importance. These factors in turn are dependent on the appropriate surgical approach used to improve the clinical outcomes and reduce associated complications. Hence, this meta-analysis aims to compare the outcomes of ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced acetabular fractures.

METHODS

Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception to 10th of June 2021 for both randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and or non-randomized studies comparing the outcomes of ilioinguinal approach and modified Stoppa approach for the ORIF of acetabular fractures. The estimates of treatment effects were described by mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables with corresponding 95% confidence (95% CI) intervals. The risk of bias was assessed by MINORS tool for the non-randomized, and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool for RCTs.

RESULT

A total of ten studies (717 patients), three RCTs and seven retrospective studies, were included. Modified Stoppa approach showed shorter mean duration of surgery (MD 47.13, 95% CI: 27.30-66.96), lesser number of overall complications (OR 2.14, 95% CI: 1.46-3.13), less intraoperative blood loss (MD 259.65, 95% CI: 152.66-366.64), and lower rates of infection (OR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.14-4.15). However, ilioinguinal approach showed a better quality of fracture reduction (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.82). Results were equivocal in terms of vascular injuries (OR 1.88 (95% CI: 0.86-4.09), nerve injuries (OR 1.77, 95% CI: 0.99-3.17), heterotopic ossification (OR1.74, 95% CI: 0.63-4.82), and clinical outcome (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.45-1.47) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Modified Stoppa approach carries a lesser duration of surgery, lesser intraoperative blood loss, fewer overall complications, and lesser postoperative infection rates compared to ilioinguinal approach. Although a better anatomical reduction is achieved by ilioinguinal approach, however, this does not translate into better clinic functional outcomes which remain comparable between the two approaches. So overall, modified Stoppa approach seems a better alternative for managing these fractures.

Safety of modified Stoppa approach for Ganz periacetabular osteotomy: A preliminary cadaveric study

Objective

The aim of this cadaveric study was to investigate the efficacy of the modified Stoppa approach in Ganz periacetabular osteotomy (PAO).

Methods

The Ganz PAO was performed on 10 hemipelvises with normal hips, from 5 cadavers using the modified Stoppa approach through the Pfannenstiel incision. All of the osteotomies were performed under fluoroscopic control and direct visualizing the osteotomy site from the same incision. After the osteotomy, the acetabulum was medialized and redirected anterolaterally, and fixed with 2 screws. The neurovascular structures and the joints were examined by dissecting the soft tissues after fixation of the osteotomies. Outcome parameters were center-edge (CE) angle, the distances between the osteotomy and anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), and between the osteotomy and the sciatic notch, neurovascular and joint penetrations.

Results

After the osteotomy, the mean CE angle was improved from 19.8° to 25.2°, mean distance between the osteotomy and ASIS was 3.1 cm, and the mean distance between the osteotomy and the sciatic notch was 10.2 mm. The neurovascular structures and the joints were examined by dissecting the soft tissues after fixation of the osteotomies. No damage to the joint, surrounding arteries, veins or nerves was detected in any of the cadavers.

Conclusions

Bilateral dysplastic hips can be treated with a 10 cm, cosmetically more acceptable incision in the same session using this approach. Quadrilateral surface of the acetabulum can be directly seen using this approach and the osteotomy can be safely performed.

Supra-ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of acetabular fractures: reduction quality and early clinical results of a retrospective study

Background

To compare the efficacy of the operative techniques, complications, reduction quality and hip functional recovery by using the supra-ilioinguinal approach and the modified Stoppa approach for the management of acetabular fractures.

Methods

A consecutive cohort of 60 patients from September 2014 to October 2017 with displaced acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate were treated operatively with supra-ilioinguinal approach (group A) and modified Stoppa approach (group B), respectively. There were 36 patients in group A and 24 patients in group B. The surgical details, complications, radiographic and clinical results were recorded. The quality of reduction was assessed by measuring the residual step and gap displacement of postoperative CT with a standardized digital method.

Results

The complications, reduction quality (gaps and steps) and hip function recovery had no significant statistical difference in approaches. The mean operative time was shorter and the mean intraoperative haemorrhage was less in group A. There were statistical differences in the operative time (P = 0.025) and intraoperative haemorrhage (P = 0.003) between the supra-ilioinguinal approach and the modified Stoppa approach.

Conclusion

Compared to the modified Stoppa approach, the supra-ilioinguinal approach provides a closer visualization to the quadrilateral plate, the operative time was shorter and the intraoperative haemorrhage was clearly less. It is at least equal to or could be a better choice to deal with complicated acetabular fractures especially involving the quadrilateral plate and the anterior one third of the iliac bone.

Comparison between ilioinguinal approach and modified Stoppa approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The modified Stoppa (MS) approach is an alternative to the ilioinguinal (IL) approach and three meta-analyses comparing these two approaches for the treatment of acetabular fractures were published previously. The aim of this study was to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the MS approach with the IL approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures and to answer the following question: are the results of the MS approach superior to those of the IL approach in terms of reduction quality, operative time, operative blood loss, complications, and clinical outcomes for treatment of acetabular fractures?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An updated systematic literature review was conducted using relevant original studies from various databases (PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library). Pooling of data was performed using RevMan software (version 5.3, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). A p-value of<0.05 was considered to be significant. We calculated the mean differences (MDs) for continuous data and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed based on I² using the standard Chi² test. When I²>50%, significant heterogeneity was assumed and a random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis. A fixed-effects model was applied in the absence of significant heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. The findings demonstrated that the rate of anatomical reduction was significantly higher in the MS approach than in the IL approach (I²=0%, OR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.13-2.69, p=0.01), the operative time was significantly shorter in the MS approach than in the IL approach (I²=88%, MD=-63.60, 95% CI: -93.01 - (-34.20), p<0.0001) and operative blood loss was significantly lower in the MS approach than in the IL approach (I²=75%, MD=-350.51, 95% CI: -523.45 - (-177.58), p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the rate of nerve injury (I²=0%, OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.16-1.39, p=0.17), the rate of vascular injury (I²=0%, OR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.17-1.49, p=0.22), the rate of infection (I²=0%, OR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.25-1.12, p=0.10), the rate of heterotopic ossification (I²=45%, OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.22-1.85, p=0.40), and the rate of excellent or good clinical score (I²=21%, OR=1.15, 95% CI: 0.56-2.38, p=0.70) between the two approaches.

DISCUSSION

The MS approach provided better reduction quality, shorter operative time, lower operative blood loss, although there were no significant differences in the rate of complications, and excellent or good clinical score between the two approaches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Periacetabular osteotomy: A novel application of modified Stoppa approach

BACKGROUND

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established procedure for symptomatic hip dysplasia in adolescents and young adults. However, it remains a technically demanding procedure, and several major complications have been described, many of which are related to the approach and surgical exposure. The current study evaluates the efficacy and safety of PAO performed through a modified Stoppa approach.

METHODS

A prospective series of nine consecutive patients with hip dysplasia were treated PAO through the modified Stoppa approach. The mean age was 22.4 years (15-30 years) and the mean follow-up was 3.2 years (2-5 years). Harris hip score (HHS) was used as a functional score, and the radiographic indices included the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and Tönnis roof angle.

RESULTS

The approach allowed the osteotomy lines to be performed under direct visualization from the intra-pelvic surface of the acetabulum, aided by fluoroscopy. A lateral window was added to perform the final iliac cut and for subsequent mobilization and fixation of the acetabular fragment. The mean HHS improved significantly from 70.8 ± 4.9 points to 90.1 ± 3.3 points (p < 0.001). The mean LCEA improved from 8.2° ± 4.9 (range: 0-14) to 32.7° ± 5.3 (range: 26-40), with a mean improvement of 24.5°. The mean Tönnis angle improved from 28.4° ± 4.4 (range: 22-35) to 3.8° ± 3.3 (range: 0-10). Two patients had irritation from prominent screw heads that necessitated removal 1 year after the index procedure. One patient had radiographic progression of osteoarthritis. No cases of infection, non-union, heterotopic ossification, or nerve palsy were identified till the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Ganz PAO can be safely conducted through the modified Stoppa approach, providing direct exposure to the osteotomized surfaces, and protecting susceptible neuro-vascular structures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical Outcomes of the Modified Stoppa Combined with Iliac Fossa Approach for Complex Acetabular Fractures: A Medium- and Long-term Retrospective Study

Objective

The modified Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach has gained increasing popularity. Although early clinical outcomes have been satisfactory, extensive long‐term clinical outcomes are relatively scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the medium‐ and long‐term outcomes of this approach for complex acetabular fractures.

Methods

This was a retrospective study involving 57 patients with complex acetabular fractures from January 2009 to January 2016. All fractures were treated with the modified Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach. Follow‐up was at least 5 years. Primary outcome measures, including quality of reduction and clinical outcomes, were recorded by an independent observer. Secondary outcome measures included time to surgery, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative complications.

Results

Fifty‐seven patients (range, 18–80 years) included 46 males and 11 females. There were 32 cases on the left side and 25 cases on the right side. The most common associated injury was pulmonary contusion. According to the Judet–Letournel classification, there were 27 both‐column fractures, 16 anterior column with posterior hemitransverse fractures and 14 T‐type fractures. The average time from injury to surgery was 7.3 days. The average intraoperative blood loss and transfusion were 750.9 ml and 564.3 ml, respectively. All fractures healed within 6 months after surgery. The average follow‐up time was 7.7 years, and there was no loss of follow‐up. The quality of reduction was graded as anatomical in 23 cases (40.4%), imperfect in 22 cases (38.6%), and poor in 12 cases (21.0%). According to grading system of Merle d’ Aubigne and Postel, clinical outcomes at 1 year follow‐up were excellent in 17 cases (29.8%), good in 25 cases (43.9%), fair in four cases (7.0%), and poor in 11 cases (19.3%). The excellent and good rate was 73.7% and the difference was not statistically significant compared with the clinical outcomes at the last follow‐up. Intraoperative complications included four cases of obturator nerve injury and two cases of vascular injury. Postoperative complications included one case of wound delayed healing, two cases of deep vein thrombosis, two cases of avascular necrosis of femoral head, three cases of heterotopic ossification and five cases of post‐traumatic arthritis. Only one of these patients underwent reoperation for femoral head necrosis.

Conclusions

The modified Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach can achieve satisfactory reduction quality and hip function. It might be a valuable alternative to the ilioinguinal approach for the surgical management of acetabular fractures.

Comparison of Two Surgical Approaches for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Retrospective Study of Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

OBJECTIVE

Given the intricate challenges and potential complications associated with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Our study aimed to compare the clinical and imaging benefits and drawbacks of two surgical approaches, the modified Stoppa combined iliac spine approach and the modified Smith-Peterson approach, for treating PAO and to provide guidance for selecting clinical approaches.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 56 patients with 62 DDHs was conducted from June 2018 to January 2022. The experimental group underwent surgery via the modified Stoppa combined iliac spine approach, while the control group underwent surgery via the modified Smith-Peterson approach for periacetabular osteotomy and internal fixation. Basic statistical parameters, including age, sex, BMI, and preoperative imaging data, were analyzed. Differences in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative imaging data were compared, as were differences in preoperative and postoperative imaging data between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 28 hips in the experimental group and 34 in the control group. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the basic parameters between the experimental and control groups. Before and after the operation, for the LCE angle, ACE angle, and Tonnis angle, there was no significant difference in acetabular coverage (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of the above four indicators before and after the operation (p < 0.05). After the operation, the experimental group exhibited significant increases in both lateral and anterior acetabular coverage of the femoral head. However, the experimental group had longer operation times and greater bleeding volumes than did the control group. Despite this, the experimental group demonstrated significant advantages in protecting the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

The modified Stoppa combined iliac spine approach can be considered a practical approach for PAO and is more suitable for patients with DDH who plan to be treated by one operation than the classic modified Smith-Peterson approach for PAO.

[TREATMENT OF ACETABULAR ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR COLUMN FRACTURES BY MODIFIED Stoppa APPROACH]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical techniques, perioperative complications, clinical outcomes of the modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of acetabular anterior and posterior column fractures.

METHODS

Between March 2008 and October 2014, 42 cases of acetabular anterior and posterior column fractures were treated by modified Stoppa approach or modified Stoppa approach combined with iliac fossa approach, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 females and 22 males with an average age of 43.2 years (range, 19-68 years). Fractures were caused by traffic accident in 21 cases, by falling from height in 16 cases, and by heavy pound in 5 cases. The time from injury to operation was 3-15 days (mean, 6 days). According to fracture classification of Letournel-Judet, there were 20 cases of both column fractures, 15 cases of anterior and posterior hemi-transverse fractures and 7 cases of T-shaped fractures. The intraoperative blood loss, the amount of blood transfusion, the operation time, the volumn of drainage, and complication were recorded. Matta radiological standard was used to evaluate the reduction quality of fracture, and Merled'Aubigné-Postel system to evaluate hip function.

RESULTS

The average intraoperative blood loss was 900 mL; the average amount of blood transfusion was 400 mL; the average volume of drainage was 110 mL; and the average operation time was 165 minutes. Intraoperative complications included 4 cases of tractive injury of obturator nerve and 2 cases of the external iliac vein injury, and postoperative complications included 2 cases of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsies and 1 case of deep vein embolism of lower extremity, which were improved after treatment. The patients were followed up 36 months on average (range, 12-48 months). There was no infection or heterotopic ossification. According to Matta radiological evaluation system, the reduction quality of fractures was rated as excellent in 21 cases, good in 16 cases, and poor in 5 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 88.1%. The healing time of fracture was 3.5-8.0 months (mean, 5.1 months). According to Merled'Aubigné-Postel system for hip function, 20 cases were graded as excellent, 15 cases as good, 4 cases as fair, and 3 cases as poor, with an excellent and good rate of 83.3% at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified Stoppa approach or with iliac fossa approach can get full exposure of quadrilateral area, good reduction, and firm internal fixation in the treatment of acetabular fractures associated with T-shaped fractures, both column fractures, anterior and posterior hemi-transverse fractures.

Outcomes of Direct Infrapectineal Buttress Plate for Quadrilateral Surface Fractures of Acetabulum Using an Anterior Intrapelvic Approach

Purpose

Reduction and stable fixation of the quadrilateral plate are challenging primarily due to its location in the true pelvis, limited bone stock, juxta-articular nature, and its comminution. The current study aimed to investigate the quality of reduction and functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with infrapectineal buttress plating of the quadrilateral surface via an anterior intrapelvic approach.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of twenty-one patients with acetabular fractures involving quadrilateral plate operated at Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital between January 2017 and December 2018. Radiological assessment of the quality of reduction was conducted using criteria described by Matta. Functional outcomes were evaluated using a modified Postel Merle d'Aubigné score.

Results

The current study included 15 males and 6 females with a mean age of 40.67±12.17 years (range, 22–62 years). The most common fracture pattern was anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse in eight patients followed by true bicolumn and T-type fractures in seven and four patients respectively. Both transverse fractures were transtectal. The quality of reduction according to Matta criteria was anatomical in 14 patients, imperfect in five and poor in two. Functional outcomes were excellent in 47.6% cases, good in 42.9%, and fair in 9.5% cases. Both patients with fair outcomes had non-anatomical reduction, and one required total hip arthroplasty at a later time.

Conclusion

Quadrilateral plate reconstruction with an infrapectineal buttress plate applied though an anterior intrapelvic approach provides high rates of anatomical reduction and yields good functional outcomes.

A comparison between ilioinguinal and modified Stoppa approach in anterior column acetabular fractures

INTRODUCTION

Pelvis fractures are among the most difficult fractures to manage and treat for Orthopedic surgeons. Anatomic reduction is the main goal to reach in the acetabular fractures' treatment. The following study compares clinical outcomes and complications of Ilioinguinal versus modified Stoppa approach in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of anterior column acetabulum fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comparative analysis on 90 patients undergoing ORIF on acetabular fracture has been performed. Patients have been divided into two groups. The first group was treated by Ilioinguinal approach (n = 48), the second group by modified Stoppa approach (n = 42). The following parameters have been compareted: quality of fragment reduction; operative time; peri‑ and post-operative blood loss; complications; clinical and radiographic outcomes.

RESULTS

The modified Stoppa approach has shown a shorter mean operative time (146 min vs 175 min), fewer complications (14/48 vs 6/42), less blood loss both in the perio-operative phase (0.8 Hb pt vs 1.3 Hb pt) than in postoperative one (1.1 Hb pt vs 1.5 Hb pt), a lower rate of nerve, infections and critical complications. On the other hand, the ilioinguinal approach has showed better results in terms of quality of fracture reduction (43/48 patiens with anatomical or near anatomical reduction vs. 37/42). No significant differences concerning vascular lesions, clinical and functional outcomes have been found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Stoppa approach results in shorter operative time, less intra-operative blood loss and fewer complications than the ilioinguinal one. Greater anatomic reduction is achieved by Ilioinguinal approach; however, this does not necessarily translate into better clinical and functional outcomes which, overall, are comparable in the two analysed approaches. In conclusion, the modified Stoppa approach is deemed to be a better alternative in treating these fractures.

Comparison of the MIPPO technique and the modified Stoppa approach in the treatment of unstable anterior pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Anterior pelvic ring injuries have gradually become common. Using a minimally invasive technique to treat this injury may be feasible if the reduction and stability can be effectively achieved. We describe a percutaneous technique, minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO), to fixate the anterior pelvis via establishing a subperiosteal tunnel between two limited incisions over the iliac crest(s) and pubic ramus in this research.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study comparing the MIPPO technique (n = 60) versus the modified Stoppa approach (n = 53) for anterior pelvic ring injuries with posterior ring instability was performed from September 2016 to January 2023. The relative surgery variables, follow-up function evaluation, and complications were compared in two groups. The reduction quality of fracture was assessed according to the Matta criterion, and the functional score was evaluated using the Majeed score.

RESULTS

All patients completed follow-up, with an average interval of 39.90 ± 17.53 months (range 12-78). In the MIPPO technique group, the surgery interval and blood losses were lower compared to the modified Stoppa approach group (P<0.05). The mean procedure times and intraoperative blood losses were 69.56 ± 14.04 min/side (range 50-110) and 156.23 ± 49.75 mL/side (range 90-250) for unilateral anterior ring MIPPO fixation separately. All patients got a satisfactory reduction of the fracture. In the follow-up, earlier ambulation, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and lower complication rates were observed for patients using the MIPPO technique compared to the modified Stoppa approach (P<0.05). However, there is no statistical difference in these indicators including fracture union interval, full load time, the Majeed score, patient satisfaction level, and return to pre-injured work rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This clinical experience gives support for the use of the MIPPO technique to stabilize the anterior pelvis. This minimally invasive technique was an effective and safe surgery method and could obtain satisfactory function results, particularly fitting to part of patients with resistance using the modified Stoppa approach.

Perioperative complications of the modified Stoppa approach for the treatment of pelvic bone fractures: a single-institution review of 48 cases

Purpose

The current study aimed to report the perioperative complications of the modified Stoppa approach for the treatment of pelvic bone fractures.

Methods

We analyzed 48 consecutive operations in 45 patients who were treated with internal fixation using the modified Stoppa approach between March 2016 and July 2018. This included three revision operations. The mean age of the patients was 54.5 years, and the patients included 35 male patients and 10 female patients. All fractures occurred as a consequence of high-energy trauma and 70.3% had associated injuries at the time of the fracture. The mean Injury Severity Score was 9.03±5.60. The perioperative complications found during and immediately after surgery were recorded and were classified into three categories: vascular injuries, nerve injuries, and other complications.

Results

Overall, 14 perioperative complications (29.2%) in 14 cases were identified. The most common complications were nerve injuries, which occurred in seven cases, all involving the obturator nerve. Uncontrollable vascular injuries occurred in six cases, which required additional incisions and support of vascular surgeons or postoperative interventions. Additionally, one case of peritoneal tearing occurred, which required help from an abdominal surgeon.

Conclusions

While the modified Stoppa approach seems to be a viable method to treat pelvic fractures, significant perioperative complications may occur, suggesting that surgeons should pay careful attention to minimize the damage to other structures and that appropriate support from other surgical departments is paramount.

Treatment of hip instability after total hip replacement with pelvic osteotomy using a modified Stoppa approach

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Hip dislocation remains a significant complication following total hip arthroplasty, even though its incidence has decreased. While closed reduction is typically performed for early dislocations, delayed or chronic dislocations often necessitate acetabular or femoral component revision.

CASE PRESENTATION

This document describes the treatment of hip dislocation in a 56-year-old patient through pelvic osteotomy without component revision. An acetabular component malposition was identified, exhibiting an 80-degree inclination and 20-degree cup anteversion. Owing to limited bone stock, a modified Stoppa approach was used for pelvic osteotomy to reduce acetabular inclination. The patient displayed remarkable clinical improvement, achieving a Harris Hip Score of 85 at the two-year check-up with no signs of dislocation.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Recurrent hip dislocation is difficult to manage. It frequently necessitates component revision, presenting a challenge due to issues with cup extraction and limited bone stock. Preoperative detection of loosened components is crucial. If it goes undetected, the extraction process can result in bone loss, potentially leading to pelvic insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

Successful revisions of hip arthroplasties can be achieved with geometric modifications to the pelvis.

Supra-pectineal quadrilateral buttress plating versus infra-pectineal plating in the management of quadrilateral plate fractures: A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Management of quadrilateral plate fractures is technically demanding and requires specific fixation techniques. Infra-pectineal plating is the gold standard method of fixation. However, we recorded a high incidence of medial wall displacement and reoperations. Therefore, the aim of our study was to identify whether supra-pectineal quadrilateral buttress plating provides much more rigid fixation with a better functional and radiological outcome or not.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors conducted this prospective, randomized control, single-blinded study at a level 1 single trauma centre. Between March 2022 and June 2023, 34 patients with quadrilateral plate fractures had anterior fixation, either via the anatomical QLP (17 cases) or infra-pectineal plating (17 cases) (Groups A and B, respectively). The radiological and clinical outcomes, as well as residual medial wall displacement, were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 14.47 months in group A and 15.24 months in group B. In group A, the mean operative time (p = 0.02) was shorter, and the mean blood loss (p < 0.001) was significantly lower. However last follow-up showed no statistically significant differences as regards residual medial wall displacement (p = 1.0), final radiological (p = 0.86), and clinical outcomes (p = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

Authors concluded that the anatomical QLP made it easier to reduce and fix acetabular fractures with a displaced medial wall. This was done by using multidirectional screws in the posterior column through its infra-pectineal extension and a strong screw purchase aimed at the posterior column through its supra-pectineal part. The two groups were similar in terms of final radiological and clinical outcomes, as well as residual medial wall displacement rates. However, the QLP had less morbidity than the classic infra-pectineal plating (shorter operation time and less blood loss).

Efficacy and safety of pararectus approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The pararectus (PR) approach combines the advantages of the second window of the ilioinguinal approach and the medial view of the modified Stoppa approach. However, it is unclear whether the PR approach is more effective or safer than the other approaches, as few clinical studies have compared the PR approach with the other approaches. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the PR approach with the other approaches for the treatment of acetabular fractures and to answer the following question: Are the results of the PR approach superior to those of the other approaches in terms of reduction quality, operative time, operative blood loss, complications, and clinical outcomes for treatment of acetabular fractures?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using relevant original studies from various databases. Pooling of data was performed using RevMan software (version 5.3, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). A p-value<0.05 was considered to be significant. We calculated the mean differences for continuous data and odds ratio for dichotomous data with 95% confidence intervals for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed based on I2 using the standard χ2 test.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The findings demonstrated that operative blood loss was significantly lower in the PR approach than in the other approaches (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in the rate of anatomical reduction, the operative time, the rate of complications, and the rate of excellent or good clinical score between the PR approach and the other approaches.

DISCUSSION

The PR approach provided lower operative blood loss, although there was no significant difference in reduction quality, operative time, complications, and excellent or good clinical score between the PR approach and the other approaches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Pararectus approach: a preferred surgical approach for fixation of acetabular fractures predominantly involving the anterior column - a narrative review

Beginning in France in the 1960s, the management of acetabular fractures has increasingly evolved toward surgical treatment strategies. The basic principles established by the pioneers of acetabular surgery, Letournel and Judet - anatomical reconstruction of the joint and stable osteosynthesis - remain unchanged. Modern advancements in surgical techniques aim to reduce access-related trauma and minimize complications. The notable rise in acetabular fractures among the elderly, which predominantly affect the anterior aspects of the acetabulum, has driven the development of less invasive, soft tissue-sparing anterior approaches. This evolution began with the ilio-inguinal approach in the 1960s, progressed to the modified Stoppa approach in the 2000s and, most recently, the Pararectus approach in the 2010s. Each of these approaches upholds the fundamental principles of effective acetabular fracture care, while offering distinct advantages and disadvantages. In this review, we examine the merits and limitations of the Pararectus approach, specifically focusing on its utility in the surgical treatment of anterior column posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures. Ultimately, the success of the individual patient's outcome is less dependent on the chosen approach and more on the surgeon's experience and expertise. Ideally, surgeons should be proficient in all these approaches to tailor the surgical strategy to the individual patient's requirements, thereby ensuring optimal outcomes.