Development and Reliability of an Appropriateness and Prioritization Instrument for Eye Care Practice: A Modified Delphi Process

Purpose: To modify the Western Canada Waiting List Project (WCWLP) cataract prioritization criteria into measurement instruments for assessing appropriateness and prioritization emphasizing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and examining reliability.Methods: A modified Delphi process was conducted using two rounds of online surveys and a face-to-face meeting. A panel of eye care experts rated the relevancy of criteria on a 5-point scale. Patient narratives highlighted the patient experience. A G-theory framework was used to assess inter- and intra-rater agreement using the criteria.Results: Nine Ophthalmologists, three Optometrists, and one General Practitioner participated in the modified Delphi process. Consensus to include/exclude was reached on all criteria. Seventeen criteria were included and 16 were excluded. The most significant changes were related to the categorization of comorbidities and expansion of HRQoL questions. The overall reliability was good (_ϕ = 0.852).Conclusion: The WCWLP was modified to include appropriateness and to better reflect HRQoL. Having achieved consensus and demonstrated reliability of the criteria, the next step is to estimate weights for criteria and to validate against patient health outcomes data.

THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING CONSENSUS GUIDELINES BY DENTAL ONCOLOGISTS FOR PRE-RADIOTHERAPY DENTAL CARE IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS USING THE MODIFIED DELPHI TECHNIQUE

BACKGROUND

There is a range of pre-radiation therapy (RT) dental care strategies used to prevent the side effects associated with the use of RT in the treatment of head and neck cancer. However, there is a paucity of evidence-based, prospectively tested clinical practice guidelines for dentists to utilize in the provision of care prior to RT.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to describe the process of creating consensus guidelines for dental care in head and neck cancer patients undergoing RT using the Modified Delphi Technique.

PROCEDURE

We invited 44 dental oncologists to participate as panelists in the study. Three rounds of iterative structured surveys were completed within eight months, followed by a virtual meeting to conclude the modified Delphi process. Questions were divided into six main domains and patients were categorized as low, moderate, and high-risk based on factors identified by panelists and agreed upon during the first round. The threshold value set for each round of the Delphi process was a 70% response rate and 75% Consensus level.

FINDINGS

Eighteen panelists out of the forty-four (41% overall response rate) completed the study. The number of questions that achieved the set consensus level in rounds 1,2,3 and the virtual meeting were 24%, 62%,61% and 81%, respectively. A confidence level of 95% and a response rate of >75% were reached throughout the process.

CONCLUSION

Consensus was attained in most of the questions in all domains, which will be utilized to develop guidelines for dental care in head and neck cancer patients before the commencement of RT.

Development of theoretical framework and digital competence assessment checklist (DCAC) for nursing students

Background

The rapid development of digital technology impacts all aspects, including nursing education. Nursing programs are tasked with equipping graduates with both clinical skills and digital competence. However, inconsistencies in the conceptual understanding of digital competence in nursing literature, underscore the need to refine the concept.

Design

This study involved two phases including a modified Delphi approach and psychometric testing. In Phase 1, the panel of experts in nursing was invited to evaluate the theoretical framework, domain, and item of assessment checklist. In Phase 2, the psychometric properties of the assessment checklist were tested using a quantitative survey.

Setting

The study was conducted in Taiwan, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

Participant

Participants included 12 nursing experts from Taiwan, Indonesia, and Vietnam during the development phase and 417 nursing students from these countries in the validation phase.

Methods

Phase 1 utilized a modified Delphi approach establishing a theoretical framework and assessment checklist. Experts provided feedback on a Likert scale, aiming for consensus. Phase 2 involved a quantitative survey where graduate nursing students rated the DCAC. The analysis process following the recommendation of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN).

Results

The theoretical framework defined digital competence across four domains. In the first Delphi round, all items were rated above the consensus threshold. After two rounds, the CVI ranged from .8 to 1.0, suggesting strong agreement among experts. The second phase revealed high discriminant validity among survey items, with Cronbach's alpha indicating high internal consistency. The refined 22-item DCAC showed improved fit indices, confirming the assessment checklist's structure.

Conclusion

The developed 22-item DCAC is a valid and reliable tool for measuring digital competence among nursing students. Integration of digital competence into nursing education is essential for preparing students to excel in the healthcare environment.

Constructing the scale to measure entrepreneurial traits by using the modified delphi method

Higher entrepreneurial traits significantly increase the likelihood of graduate students venturing into entrepreneurship. This study intended to develop a scale for assessing the entrepreneurial traits of graduate students, recognizing a gap in existing literature and measurement tools predominantly developed for countries with conducive entrepreneurial climates. Aligned with Ajzen's theory of planned behavior, the study employed a modified Delphi method, including prototype development, two Delphi surveys, and subsequent statistical analyses. The robustness of the final items and scale in effectively capturing the entrepreneurial traits of graduate students is supported by descriptive statistical analyses (SD ≤ 1.5, Interquartile Range ≤1, and Level of Agreement ≥70%), content validity analysis (I-CVI≥ 0.8, S-CVI/Ave = 0.92; S-CVI/UA = 0.4), and Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance analysis (X2 (37, N = 30) = 700.504, W = 0.631, p < 0.01). Ultimately, the scale comprises 38 items organized into three overarching thematic areas: life philosophy, creating and utilizing mindset, and supportive and motivating environment. Consistent with existing literature, entrepreneurial traits are intricately linked to individuals' life perspectives, often characterized by a desire for self-autonomy. Additionally, the ability to create or leverage available resources and the presence of a conducive external environment emerge as pivotal dimensions in entrepreneurial traits. Notably, the study highlights the critical influence of a country's environment and policies, mainly through university courses and short-term programs, in shaping the development of entrepreneurial traits.

A consensus guideline on preferred items for reporting case series in homeopathy: The PITCH statement

BACKGROUND

Case series is a valuable tool for sharing clinical experiences and generating research questions in the field of medicine. However, there is a lack of standardized reporting guideline for case series in homeopathy, which limits their utility and comparability. The aim of this study is to develop a reporting guideline for case series in homeopathy using a Delphi consensus process.

METHOD

A group of 21 experts, with experience in reviewing, publishing, or editing case reports or series in homeopathy, were participated in the study. A modified Delphi consensus process was conducted with three rounds of electronic surveys to gather feedback and opinions on the items to be included in the reporting guideline. The GRADE group's nine-point Likert scale was used to rate each item's importance and criticality.

RESULT

The Delphi process resulted in a consensus-based reporting guideline for case series in homeopathy, which includes recommendations for reporting case series in eleven sections, including 'Title,' 'Abstract,' 'Keywords,' 'Introduction,' 'Methods,' 'Results,' 'Discussion,' 'Conclusion,' 'Patient Perspectives,' 'References,' and 'Additional Information.' PITCH comprises a total of 59 items that achieved consensus agreement. Of these, 13 are optional items and 14 items are exclusively applicable for prospective type of case series.

CONCLUSION

The PITCH reporting guideline provides a structured and standardized approach for reporting case series in homeopathy. The authors, journal editors, reviewers, and educators are encouraged to adopt and implement the guideline to enhance the quality of case series in homeopathic publications.