[De novo or secondary metastatic prostate cancer management in France: Observational study from "sentinel multidisciplinary meeting" of the French Association of Urology]

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is an heterogeneous disease. Metachronous mPCa (MM) seems to have a better prognosis than synchronous mPCa (SM). However, it is difficult to analyze their specificities from national registries. Data from the so-called "sentinel multidisciplinary meeting" (SMDM) would represent a "real life" data collection. The objective of this national pilot study was to evaluate the concept of SMDM through the description and comparison of the diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with synchronous or metachronous mPCa in 2018.

METHODS

A survey covering clinical, biological, radiological data as well as treatment initiated and follow-up at 3 and 6 months was sent to the SMDM. All patients diagnosed with metastatic disease (SM or MM) between 01/01/2018 and 11/30/2018 were included.

RESULTS

In total, 780 patients from 39 centers were included, 408 SM and 372 MM. SM were more symptomatic and had a higher metastatic burden than MM. PET were mostly performed in MM without a prior standard staging. SM patients received more chemotherapy than MM patients whereas new generation androgen deprivation therapy was mostly given to MM patients. At 6 months, there were no more significant difference in clinical presentation between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Specificities of SM and MM patients in terms of clinical presentation, metastatic burden and management were described, validating the concept of SMDM as a source of reliable informations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Impacts of lung cancer multidisciplinary meeting presentation: Drivers and outcomes from a population registry retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Multidisciplinary Meetings (MDM) are recommended in routine lung cancer care, however its broader impacts demand further evaluation. We assessed the drivers and impacts of MDM presentation in the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry (VLCR).

METHODS

We examined the effect of MDM presentation on receipt of treatment and survival in VLCR patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2020. We compared patient characteristics, drivers of MDM discussion and survival between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of 9,628 patients, 5,900 (61.3%) were discussed at MDM, 3,728 (38.7%) were not. In the non-MDM group, a lower proportion received surgery (22.1% vs. 31.2%), radiotherapy (34.2% vs. 44.4%) and chemotherapy (44.7% vs. 49.0%). Patients were less likely to be discussed if ≥80 years (OR 0.73, p < 0.001), of ECOG performance status (PS) 4 (OR 0.23, p < 0.001), clinical stage IV (OR 0.34, p < 0.001) or referred from regional (OR 0.52, p < 0.001) or private hospital (OR 0.18, p < 0.001). MDM-presented patients had better median survival (1.70 vs 0.75 years, p < 0.001) and lower adjusted mortality risk (HR 0.75; 0.71-0.80, p < 0.001), a protective effect consistent across all hospital types. Undocumented PS, histopathology and clinical stage were associated with lower likelihood of MDM discussion and worse mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In the VLCR, being male, ≥80 years, of poorer PS, advanced clinical stage and poor clinical characterisation significantly disadvantaged patients in relation to MDM discussion. MDM-discussed patients were more likely to undergo treatment and had a 25% lower risk of mortality. This study supports the use of MDMs in lung cancer and identifies areas of inequity to be addressed.

[Prospective assessment of a multidisciplinary meeting dedicated to inflammatory and vascular diseases during pregnancy]

OBJECTIVES

The pluridisciplinary meeting "PREGNANT - Pregnancy and Auto-immunity, Nephropathy, Thrombophilic Disorders" at the university hospital of Bordeaux is dedicated to inflammatory and thrombophilic disorders during pregnancy. The objective of our study was to evaluate the quality of this meeting in terms of: compliance with the mandatory criteria, adequacy with standard care, homogeneity of care, becoming of proposals issued.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study including patients whose files were submitted to the meeting from January 2018 to June 2019.

RESULTS

In all, 16 meeting were conducted with 152 cases presented. Sixty-two patients were pregnant and 90 were in preconception. The most common reasons for presentation were vasculo-placentary diseases (22.3%), systemic lupus (16.4%), venous thromboembolic diseases (15.1%) and chronic intervillositis of unknown etiology (9.8%). Other reasons were antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and repeated spontaneous miscarriages. The mandatory criteria for multidisciplinary meeting were met. For 89 cases (58.5%), the problem was dictated by recommendations. Decisions made were consistent with recommendations in 89.8% of cases. Among the 63 cases without any published recommendations (41.5%), there was some homogeneity of the proposals. In all, 92.8% of the proposals issued by the meeting were implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary meeting "PREGNANT" has a prominent locoregional role in the management of patients with autoimmune, inflammatory or thrombophilic disorders in a pregnancy context.

[Management of immune-related toxicities associated with immune checkpoints inhibitors: Data from the multidisciplinary meeting « ToxImmun » in Eastern Occitania]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause numerous and complex immune-related adverse events whose management need a multidisciplinary approach. Herein, we investigated 114 requests, mostly concerning patients suffering from lung cancer, that were submitted to the « ToxImmun » multidisciplinary meeting in Eastern Occitania between December the 17th 2018 and January the 20th 2020. The leading reasons for the request concerned the putative causal link between immunotherapy and immune-toxicity and its management, followed by possible retreatment after temporary withdrawn because of adverse event, and finally the possibility to initiate ICIs in patients with pre-existing autoimmunity. Colitis, hepatitis and myocarditis were the most frequent immune-related adverse events (IRAEs), both all grade and grade 3-4. Sicca syndrome (with or without Sjogren criteria) was also frequent (26% of cases) and seems to be associated with severe toxicity and multi-toxicity. The mean time to first IRAE was 3.8 months, a time shortened with the use of anti-PD-L1 agents or ICI combination. A majority of requests came from initial evaluation by the internist confirming the early and main role of this specialty in the management of immunotoxicity. Expansion of this regional multidisciplinary meeting, coordinated by internists and medical oncologists, could improve management of immune-related adverse events for the patients' benefits.

Better survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement by process improvements

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess the effects on procedural, 30-day, and 1‑year all-cause mortality by a newly introduced quality improvement strategy in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Methods

In October 2015, a coherent set of quality improving interventions with respect to patient geriatric screening, general diagnostic examination and safety of the procedure was implemented at a single centre in the Netherlands. Patients undergoing TAVR in 2013–2018 were included for retrospective analysis. Mortality was assessed in the pre-quality improvement strategy cohort (January 2013 to October 2015; cohort A) and in the post-quality improvement strategy cohort (November 2015 to December 2018; cohort B). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the influence of patient and procedural characteristics on the results of the quality improvement strategy in terms of procedural, 30-day, and 1‑year all-cause mortality.

Results

In total, 806 patients were analysed with 274 patients in cohort A and 532 patients in cohort B. After introduction of the quality improvement strategy, procedural (4.4% to 1.3%, p < 0.01), 30-day (8.4% to 2.7%, p < 0.01) and 1‑year (16.4% to 8.5%, p < 0.01) all-cause mortality significantly decreased. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the quality improvement strategy also significantly reduced 30-day (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09–0.42) and 1‑year (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24–0.61) all-cause mortality if corrected for patient characteristics.

Conclusion

Structural meetings on evaluation of outcomes highlight potential areas for improvement and subsequent outcome-based quality improvement initiatives can result in lower procedural, 30-day, and 1‑year all-cause mortality.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-020-01526-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The impact of adrenal tumor multidisciplinary team meetings on clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) to address various clinical problems have become common, especially for cancer care. However, the impact of MDMs on adrenal tumor care has rarely been reported. We organized an endocrine tumor MDM including adrenal tumors in August 2014. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of our adrenal tumor MDMs on patient clinical outcomes. We compared several parameters measuring clinical outcomes before and after MDMs were instituted.

METHODS

The adrenal tumor MDMs included an endocrinologists, urologists, radiologists, pathologists, and residents. We analyzed 128 consecutive cases of functioning adrenal tumors (primary aldosteronism (PA), n = 53; Cushing's syndrome (CS), n = 24; pheochromocytoma (PCC), n = 51) who underwent surgery in Kobe University Hospital from 2008 to 2019, and compared clinical parameters before (n = 68) and after (n = 60) MDMs were instituted.

RESULTS

Twenty-one selected cases including PA, CS, PCC, adrenocortical carcinoma, and metastatic adrenal tumor were discussed in the MDM. In the analysis of 128 cases, the difference between pre- and postoperative systolic BP (ΔBP) in patients with PA after MDMs were instituted was smaller compared with those before (p = 0.02). In CS, preoperative steroid synthesis inhibitors were used more often (33 vs. 100%, p < 0.01), postoperative plasma ACTH levels were higher (29.1 vs. 84.5 pg/mL, p < 0.01), and postoperative decrease in systolic BP was milder (p < 0.01) after MDMs were instituted. In PCC, doses of preoperative doxazosin were higher (p < 0.01) after MDMs institution. Operating time, bleeding volume, and cure rate did not differ between each tumor type.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that instituting MDMs improved the perioperative management of functioning adrenal tumors.

Hematologist and transplant physicians: How and where to meet for the best of sickle cell disease patients?

Despite huge progress in the fields of newborn screening, encapsulated bacterial infection prophylaxis, immunization, and supportive care in general, people suffering from sickle cell anemia still continue to have a shorter life expectancy and a poorer quality of life due to painful vaso-occlusive events and strokes during childhood, and later, cardiac, pulmonary, and renal injuries, including in Western and high-income countries. From the 2000s, allogeneic stem cell transplantation for severe sickle cell disease from a sibling donor provided the best results-overall as well as disease-free survival-never obtained for any other disease. Nevertheless, this only curative option is proposed to few patient numbers, including in Western countries with high-level medical equipment development, with discrepancies between (i) patients and family, (ii) physicians and care centers dedicated to sickle cell disease, and (iii) hematopoietic stem cell transplant teams. Due to these discrepancies and in order to provide the same quality of discussion and treatment choice for every sickle cell disease patient, we developed a National French multidisciplinary pluri-annual meeting dedicated to sickle cell disease patients and transplantation. We report here our experience of such a meeting.

A second expert pathology review of cutaneous melanoma in multidisciplinary meetings: Impact on treatment decisions

Melanoma causes substantial burden of medical costs and years of life lost. Wide variations in melanoma diagnosis and treatment have been identified at least in the United States, Australia, Germany, Italy and France [1]. The variation especially in the quality of reporting on pathological specimens has been reported. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of expert pathology review of melanoma on the staging and thus treatment decisions in cutaneous melanoma patients in a multidisciplinary tumor board. A total of 567 patients were referred to the multidisciplinary meeting with a diagnosis of new invasive or in situ melanoma from 14.10.2014 to 31.5.2018. Among these patients, a second expert histopathologic review resulted in changes in interpretation for 46 out of 567 (8%) patients. Of patients originally diagnosed with melanoma, pathologic review led to a change in diagnosis to benign lesions in 19 cases. The Breslow thickness changed >0.3 mm in 22 cases leading changes in staging and thus treatment. Minor changes (≤0.3 mm) in Breslow thickness was found in 5 cases. Our data suggest that review of melanoma by an expert dermatopathologist results in frequent, clinically meaningful alterations in diagnosis, staging and surgical treatment. The confirmation of a cancer diagnosis should be the first step in the initiation of multidisciplinary monitoring especially in patients younger than 40 years old and early-stage tumors.

The "Friday peak" in surgical referrals for spinal metastases: lessons not learned. A retrospective analysis of 201 consecutive cases at a tertiary center

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord compression and fracture are potential complications of spine metastasis (SM). Rapid management by an expert team can reduce these adverse developments. Delays in seeking therapeutic advices, which lead to the need for sub-optimal emergency procedures, were already demonstrated nearly 20 years ago. We aimed to analyze the current weak points of referrals for vertebral metastasis so as to improve the care pathways.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients admitted on an emergency or elective basis who underwent palliative surgery for the treatment of neoplastic spine lesions in our institution (tertiary referral neurosurgical unit) between January 2009 and December 2016.

RESULTS

This retrospective study included 201 patients, 121 men and 80 women (mean age 65.1 years ± 10.9). Cancer was known for 59.7% of cases. Patients were neurologically asymptomatic in 52.7% of cases (Frankel E), and 123 (60.7%) were hospitalized for emergency reasons, including 51 (41.5% of emergencies) on a Friday (p < 0.0001). A significant increase in emergencies occurred over the studied period (p = 0.0027). The "emergency" group had significantly unfavorable results in terms of neurological status (p < 0.001), the occurrence of complications (p = 0.04), the duration of hospitalization (p = 0.02), and the clinical evolution (p = 0.04). Among 123 patients hospitalized for emergency reasons, 65 (52.8%) had known cancers, of which 33 had an identified SM, including 22 with neurological deficits (Frankel A-D), without prior surgical assessment (17.8% of emergencies).

CONCLUSION

Too many patients with previously identified metastases are referred for emergency reasons, including with a neurological deficit. Optimizing upstream pathways and referrals is imperative for improving the management of these patients. Involving a spine surgeon at the slightest symptom or an abnormal image is critical for defining the best treatment upstream. The use of telemedicine and the development of dedicated tumor boards are ways of improving this involvement.

Multidisciplinary meetings specific to hepatocellular carcinoma: How to proceed?

The French "cancer plan" has created a framework for good practice in the course of care for cancer patients. Decisions must be made in a multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM) and an individualized care plan (ICP) is to be established for each patient. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer with complex treatments that warrant a dedicated meeting. Cancer coordination centers (3C) ensure the organization and the functioning of MDMs. Multidisciplinary, standardized and systematic assessment of HCC patients allows for personalized management and orients them toward treatment that is either curative (transplantation, surgical resection, ablathermy) or palliative (chemoembolization, radiotherapy, systemic treatment, supportive care). MDMs bring together all the professionals treating the disease, and who are tasked with producing an enforceable document effective that justifies decisions and is often an essential step towardinclusion of patients in a clinical trial. It must be carried out according to a systematic schema in an approach applied from initial diagnosis to treatment outset and throughout the treatment. Numerous advances in HCC treatments have rendered their management complex, with the possibility of liver transplantation, twhose access is regulated by the Biomedicine Agency requiring the submission of MDM reports. MDMs must meet specific quality criteria to ensure effective management based on general guidelines and yet specifically tailored to each patient.

Cross-sectional increase of adherence to multidisciplinary tumor board decisions

BACKGROUND

Cancer research has made great progress in the recent years. With the increasing number of options in diagnosis and therapy the implementation of tumorboards (TUBs) has become standard procedure in the treatment of cancer patients. Adherence tests on tumor board decisions are intended to enable quality assurance and enhancement for work in tumor boards in order to continuously optimize treatment options for cancer patients.

METHODS

Subject of this study was the adherence of the recommendations made in three of 14 tumorboards, which take place weekly in the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) at the University Hospital Bonn. In total, therapy recommendations of 3815 patient cases were checked on their implementation. A classification into four groups has been made according to the degree of implementation. A second classification followed regarding the reasons for differences between the recommendation and the therapy which the patient actually received.

RESULTS

The study showed that 80.1% of all recommendations in the three TUBs were implemented. 8.3% of all recommendations showed a deviance. Most important reasons for the deviances were patient wish (36.5%), patient death (26%) and doctoral decision, due to the patient's comorbidities or side effects of the treatment (24.1%).Interestingly, deviance in all three tumor boards in total significantly decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Aim of the study was to clarify the use of tumor boards and find approaches to make them more efficient. Based on the results efficiency might be optimized by increased consideration of patients` preferences, improved presentation of patient-related data, more detailed documentation and further structuring of the tumor board meetings.

[Cancer plans apply to surgical treatment of prostate cancer: A geographically isolated center balance]

INTRODUCTION

Since 2003, fight against cancer was structured by 3 national cancer programs (CP). The objective of this study is to evaluate the application of these measures in the case of surgical prostate cancer (PCa) treatment in a geographically isolated center.

MATERIAL

Monocentric retrospective study carried in a 100-bed clinic located 2hours away from a Cancer Regional Reference Center. Between August 2009 and December 2014, 251 consecutive patients were treated by total laparoscopic prostatectomy (TLP). Fifty-seven patients (22.7 %) received a secondary treatment after TLP. The study focused on the delay between prostate biopsies and PTL, the traceability of AD elements, the return of active patients, inclusion in clinical trials (GETUG 17, GETUG 20 and GETUG 22). Data were collected in September 2016. The follow-up defined by the time between the date of the last visit and the prostate biopsy allows a median follow-up of 43.1 months (2.4-80.5).

RESULTS

All elements of the CAP are totally gathered on 45 % of the patients (113/251). Thirty-four (13.5 %) patients were active at the time of the intervention. Thirty-one (91.2 %) will return to an identical activity after a median work stoppage of 1.7 month (0.25-6). Fourteen percent (35/251) of the patients are eligible to a clinical trial. Seventeen percent (6/35) of them were proposed to one of a trial after multidisciplinary meeting and 5.7 % (2/35) are eventually included in one trial.

CONCLUSION

CP define a course of high quality care. A better transparency of the founding of the enforceable measures and a better consideration for the local specificities should facilitate their application. The TLP treat the PCa with the reasonable objective of a return to an identical professional activity. The multidisciplinary meeting does not guarantee the participation to clinical trial, which depends mainly on distance from the Cancer Regional Reference Center and the vigilance of the Urologist.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

[Evaluation of the management of soft tissue sarcomas in Franche-Comté since the establishment of a multidisciplinary meeting at University Hospital. About 47 cases]

GOALS OF STUDY

A multidisciplinary meeting (RCP) dedicated to the treatment of sarcoma was established in Franche-Comte in 2010. The goals of the study are: (a) To evaluate the treatment of sarcomas by confrontation with the existing literature; (b) To evaluate the influence of the multidisciplinary meeting on the management of sarcomas by hospitals at the regional level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective single center study from 2010 to 2015 on patients with sarcoma and peripheral soft tissue drawn from a Netsarc database (National Network of sarcomas) and communicating cancer record. A database Cleanweb especially dedicated is created.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were included: ten sarcomas at the upper member 26 to the lower limbs, 11 on the trunk. Forty patients were operated on: ten out of the university hospital, 28 at the university hospital and two in a coordinating center. Ninety percent of patients treated at the university hospital were in accordance with the recommandations. None of the patients operated out of the university hospital benefited from medical care in accordance to the recommendations. There is an increase in the number of files sent by the hospitals out of the university hospital discussed in multidisciplinary meeting, before treatment.

CONCLUSION

The creation of a dedicated multidisciplinary meeting sarcoma improves the medical management of these tumors and decreases inappropriate medical managements thanks to a better education of the regional physicians.

Management of neoplastic spinal tumors in a spine surgery care unit

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal cord compression and fracture are possible complications of spine metastasis and multiple myeloma. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of threatening lesions are likely to reduce the frequency of these dreaded complications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the proportion of neoplastic spine lesions operated on emergency.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All patients who underwent palliative surgery for the treatment of a neoplastic spine lesion in our institution between 2005 and 2012.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of patients who underwent surgery as an emergency for acute fracture or rapid neurological decline.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients who underwent palliative surgery for the treatment of a neoplastic spine lesion from solid cancer or multiple myeloma, in our institution between January 2005 and December 2012. The study was supported by grant from our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients were included in the study. There were 166 men and 151 women and the mean age was 57.97 years (range 26-88; SD 12.45). The cancer was known for 224 patients, while the lesion revealed the disease for the other 93 patients. The percentage of patients with known cancer operated as an emergency in our institution decreased significantly between 2005 and 2012 (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

Due to the variability of clinical and radiological presentations, best care requires a truly multidisciplinary approach, to offer each patient a prompt and individualized treatment option, which is likely to reduce the incidence of emergency surgeries.

[Diagnostic value of multidisciplinary meetings on orbital inflammatory pathologies discussed in Nantes University Medical Center]

INTRODUCTION

Observational study of the diagnoses and the treatment modalities used for orbital inflammatory pathologies discussed in multidisciplinary meetings (MDM) in Nantes University Medical Center over 4 years.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A multidisciplinary meeting to discuss eyelid and orbital pathologies (excluding cancer) has been held in Nantes three times per year since October 2008. This retrospective study focuses on the cases of orbital inflammatory pathologies discussed at this meeting from October 2008 to October 2012 (49 cases included).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight (57%) patients were diagnosed with orbital inflammation, 16 (33%) cases with isolated myositis and 5 (10%) with dacryoadenitis. In the diagnostic work-up, orbital biopsy was performed in 64% of orbital inflammation cases, 38% of myositis cases and 80% of dacryoadenitis cases. These specimens led to the diagnosis of 9 lymphomas, 2 histiocytoses and 1 metastasis. The internal medicine work-up allowed for the diagnosis of 3 granulomatoses with polyangiitis, one patient with sarcoidosis, and one patient with tuberculosis. Despite work-up, there remained 14 (29%) idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndromes (IOIS).

DISCUSSION

The MDM of orbital pathology allows for the collective approach to the most difficult cases of management and is not concerned with stable orbitopathies or those presenting no diagnostic dilemma. Despite a multidisciplinary, rational etiologic work-up (frequently involving a biopsy), we find a higher rate of IOIS than reported in the literature.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach appears to be useful in improving management of orbital disease.