Neutral posture education during cough can reduce urine leakage in women with cough-related stress urinary incontinence

BACKGROUND

Current literature highlights the difficulty in identifying an optimal educational technique for maintaining continence during cough.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the effects of an educational intervention focusing on neutral posture during cough in women with cough-induced urinary incontinence (UI).

METHODS

This interventional study design included women with cough-induced UI. We recorded PFMs surface electromyographic (sEMG) peak activity, and assessed symptoms and quality of life (QoL) 6 weeks after the intervention. The effect of the experimental situation was estimated using a linear mixed model, sEMG measurements during coughing were indexed to each situation and adjusted to the resting value at, and a moderation analysis was used.

RESULTS/FINDINGS

Eighteen participants were included. The measurement situations (control versus experimental) did not have a statistically significant impact on sEMG peak activity during coughing: mean effect [95% CI] 3.42 [-1.28; 7.66]. Six weeks post-intervention, participants reported statistically significant decrease in urinary symptoms (P=0.0246) and significant improvement in QoL (P=0.00776). This was also particularly marked on the dimension related to effort activities (P=0.00162).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a brief educational intervention focusing on neutral posture during cough, without voluntary pre-contraction of the PFMs, has no clinically significant influence on sEMG peak activity of the PFMs in women with cough-induced UI. However, this intervention can lead to a significant improvement in urinary symptoms and QoL at 6 weeks. These improvements seem to be independent of electromyographic PFMs peak activity recorded during cough. As such, our preliminary results pave the way for future research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NP4.

Association between isokinetic abdominal muscle strength, pelvic floor muscle strength and stress urinary incontinence severity

OBJECTIVES

Studies have shown that there is co-activation between abdominal and pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in physiological conditions. This study aimed to assess pelvic floor and isokinetic trunk flexors function in non-active incontinent women, and to investigate the association between the strength of these muscle groups and the severity of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out. Twenty-five incontinent women were enrolled after one-hour pad test results and compared to twenty asymptomatic women. The severity of SUI was determined by the Pad test and Urinary Distress Inventory, Short Form (UDI-6). PFM function was assessed using the modified Oxford Scale, intra-vaginal PFM electromyography, and PFM endurance according to the PERFECT scheme. Trunk flexors strength was assessed using a Cybex Norm II dynamometer.

RESULTS

Incontinent women had a weaker PFM and isokinetic abdominal muscle strength compared to continent women (P<0,05). SUI severity was negatively correlated with PFM strength (r=-0,620, P=0,001), isokinetic trunk flexors strength (r=-0,605, P=0,001), and PFM endurance (r=-0,561, P=0,003) in incontinent women. A positive correlation between PFM function and isokinetic trunk flexors strength was found in incontinent women (r=0,488, P=0,013).

CONCLUSION

Non-active incontinent women had weaker pelvic floor muscles and isokinetic trunk flexors strength compared to continent ones. The positive correlation found between these two muscle groups may be explained by their synergic activity. These findings suggest that the severity of SUI could be related not only to PFM strength but also to abdominal muscle weakness. Further research is needed to recommend abdominal wall training as an alternative method to treat SUI.

LEVEL OF PROOF

3.

Verbal instruction to obtain voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction: Acceptability, and understanding

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to describe verbal instructions used to obtain a voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction and to evaluate their understanding and acceptability.

METHODS

This prospective study led in two phases. A questionnaire was submitted to experts to collect the most frequently used instructions to obtain a PFMC. Then a questionnaire was submitted to subjects in order to: estimate the pelvic floor anatomical knowledge; estimate understanding and acceptability of these instructions; select the best instruction.

RESULTS

First phase: 46 experts proposed 356 instructions. Forty-four percent were functional instructions ("hold a gas"), 40% anatomical ("squeeze your anus") and 16% allied both. Fifteen instructions for the women and 11 for the men were selected. Second phase: 33 subjects completed the questionnaire. More than 75% had correct answers for anatomical knowledge. The instructions judged by the subjects as the most adapted to obtain a PFMC were: "contract the anus", "do as if you wanted to hold a strong desire to void". The items including "perineum" or "vagina" were less understood.

CONCLUSIONS

The more understandable and acceptable instruction to assess the PFMC is the association of two simple instructions: one anatomical and one functional.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

[Benefits of pelvic floor education in perineal re-education in women]

AIM

Evaluate the impact of pelvic floor education on the symptoms of female patients referred for pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT).

METHODS

Forty female patients suffering from pelvic floor disorders and referred to independent practice for PFME between February and May 2019 answered a survey on symptoms and quality of life before PFME, after four sessions of pelvic floor education and at the end of PFME. The ICIQ-SF, USP, Contilife, PDFI 20, Kess, and Wexner scores were used to evaluate the results. The protocol consisted in four initial sessions of pelvic floor education including information on each field of perineology ; the fifth session was dedicated to visual feedback using a mirror ; the following five sessions were tailored according to the care objectives established based on the initial assessment.

RESULTS

The scores were significantly improved after the four initial sessions of pelvic floor education. The improvement was significant at the end of the re-education program. The PFDI-20 score dropped from 66,9 to 20,9 (P=0,002), the ICIQ-SF score from 8,4 to 1,5 (P<10^-3), the Wexner score from 7,4 to 5,1 (P<10^-3) and the Kess score from 14,2 to 8,7 (P=0,05).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that female patients undergoing perineal re-education including pelvic floor education sessions show a significant improvement in their symptoms already immediately after the pelvic floor education sessions.

[Postpartum pelvic floor muscle training and abdominal rehabilitation: Guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

Provide guidelines for clinical practice concerning postpartum rehabilitation.

METHODS

Systematically review of the literature concerning postpartum pelvic floor muscle training and abdominal rehabilitation.

RESULTS

Pelvic-floor rehabilitation using pelvic floor muscle contraction exercises is recommended to treat persistent urinary incontinence at 3 months postpartum (grade A), regardless of the type of incontinence. At least 3 guided sessions with a therapist is recommended, associated with pelvic floor muscle exercises at home. This postpartum rehabilitation improves short-term urinary incontinence (1 year) but not long-term (6-12 years). Early pelvic-floor rehabilitation (within 2 months following childbirth) is not recommended (grade C). Postpartum pelvic-floor rehabilitation in women presenting with anal incontinence, is associated with a lower prevalence of anal incontinence symptoms in short-term (1 year) (EL3) but not long-term (6 and 12) (EL3). Postpartum pelvic-floor rehabilitation is recommended to treat anal incontinence (grade C) but results are not maintained in medium or long term. No randomized trials have evaluated the pelvic-floor rehabilitation in asymptomatic women in order to prevent urinary or anal incontinence in medium or long term. It is therefore not recommended (expert consensus). Rehabilitation supervised by a therapist (physiotherapist or midwife) is not associated with better results than simple advice for voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor muscles to prevent/correct, in short term (6 months), a persistent prolapse 6 weeks postpartum (EL2), whether or not with a levator ani avulsion (EL3). Postpartum pelvic-floor rehabilitation is not associated with a decrease in the prevalence of dyspareunia at 1-year follow-up (EL3). Postpartum pelvic-floor rehabilitation guided by a therapist is therefore not recommended to treat or prevent prolapse (grade C) or dyspareunia (grade C). No randomized trials have evaluated the effect of pelvic floor muscle training after an episode of postpartum urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction symptoms, or for the primary prevention of anal incontinence following third-degree anal sphincter tear or in patients presenting with anal incontinence after third-degree anal sphincter tear. The electrostimulation devices used alone were not assessed in this postpartum context (regardless of symptoms); therefore, isolated pelvic floor electrostimulation is not recommended (expert consensus).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic floor muscle therapy is recommended for persistent postpartum urinary (grade A) or anal (grade C) incontinence (3 months after delivery).

[Evaluation of the electromyography activity of pelvic floor muscle during postural exercises using the Wii Fit Plus©. Analysis and perspectives in rehabilitation]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of postural awareness by using the Wii Fit Plus© on the quality of the baseline (automatic) activity of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) measured by intravaginal surface electromyography (sEMG).

METHODS

Four healthy continent female subjects, all able to perform a voluntary contraction, undertook 2 sets of 3 various exercises offered by the software Wii Fit Plus© using the Wii balance board© (WBB): one set without any visual control and the second set with postural control and sEMG visual feedback. Simultaneously, we recorded the sEMG activity of the PFM.

RESULTS

Mean baseline activity of PFM in standing position at start was 2.87 mV, at submaximal voluntary contraction the sEMG activity raised at a mean of 14.43 mV (7.87-21.89). In the first set of exercises on the WBB without any visual feedback, the automatic activity of the PFM increased from 2.87 mV to 8.75 mV (7.96-9.59). In the second set, with visual postural and sEMG control, mean baseline sEMG activity even raised at 11.39 mV (10.17-11.58).

CONCLUSION

Among women able of a voluntary contraction of PFM, visualisation of posture with the help of the WBB and of sEMG activity of the PFM during static and dynamic Wii Fit Plus© activities, may improve the automatic activation of the PFMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.