Personalized medicine in CF: from modulator development to therapy for cystic fibrosis patients with rare CFTR mutations

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common life-shortening genetic disease affecting ~1 in 3,500 of the Caucasian population. CF is caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. To date, more than 2,000 CFTR mutations have been identified, which produce a wide range of phenotypes. The CFTR protein, a chloride channel, is normally expressed on epithelial cells lining the lung, gut, and exocrine glands. Mutations in CFTR have led to pleiotropic effects in CF patients and have resulted in early morbidity and mortality. Research has focused on identifying small molecules, or modulators, that can restore CFTR function. In recent years, two modulators, ivacaftor (Kalydeco) and lumacaftor/ivacaftor (Orkambi), have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat CF patients with certain CFTR mutations. The development of these modulators has served as proof-of-concept that targeting CFTR by modulators is a viable therapeutic option. Efforts to discover new modulators that could deliver a wider and greater clinical benefit are still ongoing. However, traditional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) require large numbers of patients and become impracticable to test the modulators' efficacy in CF patients with CFTR mutations at frequencies much lower than 1%, suggesting the need for personalized medicine in these CF patients.

Nutrition-Related N-of-1 Studies Warrant Further Research to Provide Evidence for Dietitians to Practice Personalized (Precision) Medical Nutrition Therapy: A Systematic Review

N-of-1 trials provide a higher level of evidence than randomized controlled trials for determining which treatment works best for an individual, and the design readily accommodates testing of personalized nutrition. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize nutrition-related studies using an N-of-1 design. The inclusion criterion was adult participants; the intervention/exposure was any nutrient, food, beverage, or dietary pattern; the comparators were baseline values, a control condition untreated or placebo, or an alternate treatment, alongside any outcomes such as changes in diet, body weight, biochemical outcomes, symptoms, quality of life, or a disease outcome resulting from differences in nutritional conditions. The information sources used were Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and PsychInfo. The quality of study reporting was assessed using the Consort Extension for N-of-1 trials (CENT) statement or the STrengthening Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines, as appropriate. From 211 articles screened, a total of 7 studies were included and were conducted in 5 countries with a total of 83 participants. The conditions studied included prediabetes, diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome, weight management, and investigation of the effect of diet in healthy people. The quality of reporting was mostly adequate, and dietary assessment quality varied from poor to good. The evidence base is small, but served to illustrate the main characteristics of N-of-1 study designs and considerations for moving research forward in the era of personalized medical nutrition therapy.