Is quantitative sensory testing helpful in the management of oxaliplatin neuropathy? a two-year clinical study.
Cancer Treat Res Commun 2018;
17:31-36. [PMID:
30343217 DOI:
10.1016/j.ctarc.2018.10.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To better understand how quantitative sensory testing could help the clinician in the management of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in terms of earlier and more reliable detection, we conducted a two-year prospective study.
METHODS
Thermal sensory assessment, tactile sensory assessment, neuropathic pain assessment and adverse events gradation (NCI-CTC) were performed during treatment and 6 months after treatment completion.
RESULTS
35 patients were enrolled and followed-up during one year. Cold and Warm Detection Thresholds were higher 6 months after treatment completion than at enrollment. Mechanical detection thresholds didn't change significantly. Neurotoxicity was mostly grade-1, only 18% grade-2 and no grade-3. Grade-2 patients received lower oxaliplatin cumulative dose than grade-1, which reveals effective dose adaptation and grade-2 patients were more likely to develop painful neuropathy.
CONCLUSION
Thermal thresholds impairment emerges too late to help the clinician in the prophylaxis of neuropathy. Management of OXA-treatment based on NCI-CTC, as currently recommended, remains the best way to detect neuropathy and ensure treatment adaptation.
Collapse