Cardiac arrest related lung edema: examining the role of downtimes in transpulmonary thermodilution analysis

Pulmonary edema and its association with low flow times has been observed in postcardiac arrest patients. However, diagnosis of distinct types of lung pathology is difficult.The aim of this study was to investigate pulmonary edema by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and the correlation to downtimes. In this retrospective single-center study consecutive patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following OHCA, age ≥ 18, and applied TPTD were enrolled. According to downtimes, patients were divided into a short and a long no-flow-time group, and data of TPTD were analysed. We identified 45 patients (n = 25 short no-flow time; n = 20 long no-flow time) who met the inclusion criteria. 24 h after ROSC, the extra vascular lung water index (EVLWI) was found to be lower in the group with short no-flow time compared to the group with long no-flow time (10.7 ± 3.5 ml/kg vs. 12.8 ± 3.9 ml/kg; p = 0.08) and remained at a similar level 48 h (10.9 ± 4.3 ml/kg vs. 12.9 ± 4.9 ml/kg; p = 0.25) and 72 h (11.1 ± 5.0 ml/kg vs. 13.9 ± 7.7 ml/kg; p = 0.27) post-ROSC. We found a statistically significant and moderate correlation between no-flow duration and EVLWI 48 h (r = 0.51; p = 0.002) and 72 h (r = 0.54; p = 0.004) post-ROSC. Pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) was not correlated with downtimes. Our observation underlines the presence of cardiac arrest-related lung edema by determination of EVLWI. The duration of no-flow times is a relevant factor for increased extravascular lung water index.

Effect of the laryngeal tube on the no-flow-time in a simulated two rescuer basic life support setting with inexperienced users

INTRODUCTION

Intubation with a laryngeal tube (LT) is a recommended alternative to endotracheal intubation during advanced life support (ALS). LT insertion is easy; therefore, it may also be an alternative to bag-mask ventilation (BMV) for untrained personnel performing basic life support (BLS). Data from manikin studies support the influence of LT on no-flow-time (NFT) during ALS.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized manikin study using a two-rescuer model to compare the effects of ventilation using a LT and BMV on NFT during BLS. Participants were trained in BMV and were inexperienced in the use of a LT.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in total NFT with the use of a LT and BMV (LT: mean 83.1 ± 37.3 s; BMV: mean 78.7 ± 24.5 s; p = 0.313), but we found significant differences in the progression of the scenario: in the BLS-scenario, the proportion of time spent performing chest compressions was higher when BMV was used compared to when a LT was used. The quality of chest compressions and the ventilation rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. The mean tidal volume and mean minute volume were significantly larger with the use of a LT compared with the use of BMV.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in a two-rescuer BLS scenario, NFT is longer with the use of a LT (without prior training) than with the use of BMV (with prior training). The probable reasons for this result are higher tidal volumes with the use of a LT leading to longer interruptions without chest compressions.