Central sensitization in spinal cord injured humans assessed by reflex receptive fields

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of central sensitization, elicited by intramuscular injection of capsaicin, by comparing the reflex receptive fields (RRF) of spinally-intact volunteers and spinal cord injured volunteers that present presensitized spinal nociceptive mechanisms.

METHODS

Fifteen volunteers with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) and fourteen non-injured (NI) volunteers participated in the experiment. Repeated electrical stimulation was applied on eight sites on the foot sole to elicit the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR). RRF were assessed before, 1min after and 60min after an intramuscular injection of capsaicin in the foot sole in order to induce central sensitization.

RESULTS

Both groups presented RRF expansion and lowered NWR thresholds immediately after capsaicin injection, reflected by the enlargement of RRF sensitivity areas and RRF probability areas. Moreover, the topography of the RRF sensitivity and probability areas were significantly different in SCI volunteers compared to NI volunteers in terms of size and shape.

CONCLUSIONS

SCI volunteers can develop central sensitization, despite adaptive/maladaptive changes in synaptic plasticity and lack of supraspinal control.

SIGNIFICANCE

Protective plastic mechanisms may still be functional in SCI volunteers.

Modulation of nociceptive threshold by combined hormonal contraceptives in women with oestrogen-withdrawal migraine attacks: a pilot study

Background

Menstrually-related headache and headaches associated with oestrogen withdrawal are common conditions, whose pathophysiology has not been completely elucidated. In this study we evaluated the influence of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) on pain threshold in women presenting migraine attacks during hormone-free interval.

Findings

Eleven women with migraine attacks recurring exclusively during the oestrogen-withdrawal period were studied with the nociceptive flexion reflex, a neurophysiological assessment of the pain control systems, during the third week of active treatment and during the hormone-free interval.

During the hormone-free interval, nociceptive withdrawal reflex threshold was significantly lower (12.8 ± 8.0 mA) as compared to the third week of hormonal treatment (15.6 ± 6.6 mA) (p = 0.02). No change was observed in the pain perceived and in the temporal summation.

Conclusions

Oestrogen withdrawal may mediate an increased sensitivity to somatosensory stimuli in women with migraine attacks recurring during the hormone-free interval.

Pain processing in atypical Parkinsonisms and Parkinson disease: A comparative neurophysiological study

OBJECTIVE

Pain is a frequent non-motor feature in Parkinsonism but mechanistic data on the alteration of pain processing are insufficient to understand the possible causes and to define specifically-targeted treatments.

METHODS

we investigated spinal nociception through the neurophysiological measure of the threshold (TR) of nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) and its temporal summation threshold (TST) comparatively in 12 Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) subjects, 11 Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) patients, 15 Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects and 24 healthy controls (HC). We also investigated the modulatory effect of L-Dopa in these three parkinsonian groups.

RESULTS

We found a significant reduction in the TR of NWR and in the TST of NWR in PSP, MSA and PD patients compared with HC. L-Dopa induced an increase in the TR of NWR in the PSP group while TST of NWR increased in both PSP and PD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our neurophysiological findings identify a facilitation of nociceptive processing in PSP that is broadly similar to that observed in MSA and PD. Specific peculiarities have emerged for PSP.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data advance the knowledge of the neurophysiology of nociception in the advanced phases of parkinsonian syndromes and on the role of dopaminergic pathways in the control on pain processing.

Long term reliability of nociceptive withdrawal reflex thresholds

BACKGROUND

The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) is a polysynaptic spinal reflex protecting the body from harmful stimuli. Two different methods to assess its' threshold (NWR-T) have been part of clinical trials concerning the evaluation of the nociceptive system in the human body. NWR-T's are gathered by stimulation at the sole of the foot and over the sural pathway. Consequently, EMG analyzes the muscle activity over the biceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscle. Past studies favor stimulation at the sole of the foot.

NEW METHOD

The two methods were compared concerning retest-reliability and subjective pain ratings. The retest-reliability was tested over a period of 21 days using an up-down staircase method. Reliability was evaluated with a Bland Altman agreement analysis. Subjective pain ratings were evaluated with a numeric rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS

NWR-T assessment was successful for all subjects. The EMG muscle activity had larger reflex amplitudes for measurements of the tibialis anterior muscle. NWR-T values showed greater variability than NRS values.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD

The retest-reliability over a period of 21 days showed stable NWR-T results for both stimulation sites, but superior reliability was gathered with stimulation at the sole of the foot. Subjects rated stimulation over the sural pathway as more painful.

CONCLUSIONS

The NWR-T upholds reliable measurements over a longer period of time and seems to be a stable measure for pain condition. Reliability estimations, EMG recordings, and subject's rating show stimulation at the sole of the foot could be the better choice.

Bladder filling attenuates spinal cord nociceptive reflexes in humans

OBJECTIVE

To examine the viscerosomatic interaction between bladder afferents and somatic nociception we evaluated the effect of bladder filling on the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) in 21 healthy subjects.

METHODS

NWR was evoked in the lower and upper limbs by stimulating the sural and index finger digital nerves, respectively, while simultaneously recording EMG activity in the biceps femoris and biceps brachialis. NWR pain-related perception was quantified on a 10-point pain scale. Bladder filling was evaluated with suprapubic bladder sonography. Subjects were examined during empty bladder, medium and high level of bladder filling sessions.

RESULTS

NWR magnitude in both upper and lower limbs and perceived pain for the upper limb were significantly decreased at higher levels of bladder filling compared to empty bladder sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced NWR magnitude in both upper and lower limbs during bladder filling strongly indicates that bladder control and nociception share common modulatory descending pathways. Bladder afferents may activate these pathways to suppress the micturition reflex, but they may also inhibit spinal reflexes to maintain continence during pain stimuli.

SIGNIFICANCE

The effect of bladder filling on the NWR may represent a useful tool to investigate interactions between the neural pathways controlling the bladder and pain.

Repeated electrical stimulations as a tool to evoke temporal summation of nociceptive inputs in healthy, non-medicated experimental sheep

The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) model is used in animal pain research to quantify nociception. The aim of this study was to evaluate the NWR evoked by repeated stimulations in healthy, non-medicated standing sheep. Repeated electrical stimulations were applied at 5 Hz for 2s to the digital nerves of the right thoracic and the pelvic limbs of 25 standing sheep. The stimulation intensities applied were fractions (0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 1) of the individual previously determined nociceptive threshold (It) after single stimulation. Surface-electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded from the deltoid, the femoral biceps or the peroneus tertius muscles. The repeated stimulation threshold (RS It) was reached if at least one stimulus in the train was followed by a reflex with a minimal root-mean-square-amplitude (RMSA) of 20 μV. The behavioural reaction following each series of stimulations was scored on a scale from 0 (no reaction) to 5 (vigorous whole-body reaction). For the deltoid muscle, RS It was 2.3 mA (1.6-3 mA) with a reaction score of 2 (1-2) and at a fraction of 0.6 (0.5-0.8)×It. For the biceps femoris muscle, RS It was 2.9 mA (2.6-4 mA) with a reaction score of 1 (1-2) at a fraction of and 0.55 (0.4-0.7)×It while for the peroneus tertius muscle RS It was 3 mA (2.8-3.5 mA) with a reaction score of 1 (1-2) and at a fraction of 0.8 (0.8-0.95)×It. Both, RMSA and reaction scores increased significantly with increasing stimulation intensities in all muscles (p<0.001). The repeated application of electrical stimuli led to temporal summation of nociceptive inputs and therefore a reduction of the stimulus intensity evoking a withdrawal reaction in healthy, standing sheep. Data achieved in this study can now serve as reference for further clinical or experimental applications of the model in this species.

Are changes in nociceptive withdrawal reflex magnitude a viable central sensitization proxy? Implications of a replication attempt

OBJECTIVE

The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) has been proposed to read-out central sensitization (CS). Replicating a published study, it was assessed if the NWR magnitude reflects sensitization by painful heat. Additionally, NWR response rates were compared for two stimulation, the sural nerve at the lateral malleolus (SU) and the medial plantar nerve on the foot sole (MP), and three recording sites, biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles.

METHODS

16 subjects underwent one experiment with six blocks of eight transcutaneous electrical stimulations to elicit the NWR while surface electromyography was collected. Tonic heat was concurrently applied in the same dermatome. Temperatures rose from 32 °C in the first to 46 °C in the last block following the previously published protocol.

RESULTS

Tonic heat did not influence NWR magnitude. The highest NWR response rate was obtained for MP-TA combination (79%). Regarding elicitation in all three muscles, SU stimulation outperformed MP (59% vs 57%).

CONCLUSIONS

The replication failed. NWR magnitude as a CS proxy in healthy subjects needs continued investigation. With respect to response rates, MP-TA proved efficient, whereas SU stimulation seemed preferable for multiple muscle recordings.

SIGNIFICANCE

Unclear methodological descriptions in the original study affected CS and NWR replication. The NWR magnitude changes induced by CS may closely depend on the different stimulation methods used.

Polymelia in a chimeric Simmental calf: nociceptive withdrawal reflex, anaesthetic and analgesic management, anatomic and genetic analysis

BACKGROUND

Polymelia is a congenital defect characterized by one or more supernumerary legs. The genetics and aetiology of this condition in cattle have not yet been thoroughly investigated even though several case reports do exist. The model of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) has been characterized in several species to study spinal nociceptive processing. It is a polysynaptic spinal reflex that can be elicited by noxious electrical stimulation and recorded by electromyography. Thorough nociceptive examination and preventive analgesic management has not yet been an aspect in the perioperative management of polymelia cases.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 4-month-old female Simmental calf was presented with notomelia. The animal was in good health and showed no neurologic deficiencies. Preoperatively, computed tomography was performed to gain more detailed anatomical information. To evaluate the sensitivity of the accessory limb, NWR testing was performed and revealed a connection of the afferent reflex pathway of the accessory limb to the efferent of the normal limb. The accessory limb was surgically removed under general anaesthesia. Intensive care included multimodal pain therapy adapted to the pain intensity scored during regular pain assessment. A gross anatomical dissection as well as a genetic analysis of the accessory limb were performed postoperatively. The calf was identified as a chimera.

CONCLUSION

This calf was successfully relieved of its accessory limb. Chimerism has not been described in the congenital defect polymelia. As the accessory limb was pain sensitive and a common nociceptive reflex pathway was identified, thorough perioperative pain management was performed with the intention to prevent chronic neuropathic pain development.

Healthy women show more experimentally induced central sensitization compared with men

ABSTRACT

Women more often experience chronic pain conditions than men. Central sensitization (CS) is one key mechanism in chronic pain that can differ between the sexes. It is unknown whether CS processes are already more pronounced in healthy women than in men. In 66 subjects (33 women), a thermal CS induction protocol was applied to the dorsum of one foot and a sham protocol to the other. Spatial extent [cm 2 ] of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia (SMH) and dynamic mechanical allodynia were assessed as subjective CS proxy measures, relying on verbal feedback. Changes in nociceptive withdrawal reflex magnitude (NWR-M) and response rate (NWR-RR) recorded through surface electromyography at the biceps and rectus femoris muscles were used as objective CS proxies. The effect of the CS induction protocol on SMH was higher in women than in men (effect size 2.11 vs 1.68). Nociceptive withdrawal reflex magnitude results were statistically meaningful for women (effect size 0.31-0.36) but not for men (effect size 0.12-0.29). Differences between men and women were not meaningful. Nociceptive withdrawal reflex response rate at the rectus femoris increased in women after CS induction and was statistically different from NWR-RR in men (median differences of 13.7 and 8.4% for 120 and 140% reflex threshold current). The objective CS proxy differences indicate that dorsal horn CS processes are more pronounced in healthy women. The even larger sex differences in subjective CS proxies potentially reflect greater supraspinal influence in women. This study shows that sex differences are present in experimentally induced CS in healthy subjects, which might contribute to women's vulnerability for chronic pain.

Clinical neurophysiology of neuropathic pain

Timely and accurate diagnosis of neuropathic pain is critical for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing treatment delays. According to current standards, the diagnosis of definite neuropathic pain requires objective confirmation of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system. This can be provided by specialized neurophysiological techniques as conventional methods like nerve conduction studies and somatosensory evoked potentials may not be sufficient as they do not assess pain pathways. These specialized techniques apply various stimuli, such as thermal, electrical, or mechanical, alongside assessments of spinal/cortical potential or electromyographic reflex recordings. The selection of techniques is guided by the patient's clinical history and examination. The most common neurophysiological tests used in clinical practice are pain-related evoked potentials (PREPs) providing an objective evaluation of nociceptive pathways. Four types of PREPs are employed: laser evoked potentials, contact-heat evoked potentials, intra-epidermal electrical stimulation evoked potentials, and pinprick evoked potentials, with the two former ones being the most robust and reliable ones. These techniques investigate small-diameter fibers, primarily Aδ-fibers, and spinothalamic tracts allowing the identification of peripheral or central nervous system lesions. Yet, they are limited in capturing neuronal mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain or in providing objective quantification of pain sensation. Two neurophysiological measures which investigate the pain system beyond its integrity are the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and the N13 component of somatosensory evoked potentials. Both of these methods are more commonly used in research than clinical practice, but they pose interesting approaches to quantify central sensitization, a key underlying mechanism of neuropathic pain. Future investigations in neuropathic pain are therefore warranted.