OFF-times before, during, and after nighttime sleep periods in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations and the effects of opicapone: A post hoc analysis of diary data from BIPARK-1 and -2

INTRODUCTION

In BIPARK-1 and BIPARK-2, addition of once-daily opicapone to levodopa/carbidopa significantly reduced daily "OFF"-time relative to placebo in adults with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations. Diary data from these studies were pooled and analyzed post hoc to characterize "OFF"-times around nighttime sleep and to explore the effects of opicapone 50 mg.

METHODS

"OFF" before sleep (OBS), "OFF during the nighttime sleep period" (ODNSP), early morning "OFF" (EMO), and duration of nighttime sleep and awake periods were analyzed descriptively at baseline. Mean changes from baseline to Week 14/15 (end of double-blind treatment) were analyzed using two-sided t-tests in participants with data for both visits.

RESULTS

At baseline, 88.3 % (454/514) of participants reported having OBS (34.0 %), ODNSP (17.1 %), or EMO (79.6 %). Those with ODNSP had substantially shorter mean duration of uninterrupted sleep (4.4 h) than the overall pooled population (7.1 h). At Week 14/15, mean decrease from baseline in ODNSP duration was significantly greater with opicapone than with placebo (-0.9 vs. -0.4 h, P < 0.05). In participants with ODNSP at baseline, the decrease in total time spent awake during the night-time sleep period was significantly greater with opicapone than with placebo (-1.0 vs. -0.4 h, P < 0.05), as was the reduction in percent time spent awake during the night-time sleep period (-12.8 % vs. -4.5 %, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

"OFF"-times around nighttime sleep were common in BIPARK-1 and BIPARK-2. Opicapone may improve sleep by decreasing the amount of time spent awake during the night in patients with PD who have night-time sleep period "OFF" episodes.

Intrinsic auricular muscle zone stimulation for Parkinson disease: The EARSTIM-PD Phase II multi-center pilot study results

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested that intrinsic auricular muscle zones (IAMZ) stimulation alleviates motor features of Parkinson disease (PD).

METHODS

A randomized, blinded, active sham-controlled pilot trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and dose-response-time curve of Earstim using a 3-treatment, 3-period crossover design in PD patients experiencing OFF time on levodopa. Treatments were: short (20-min) IAMZ stimulation; long (60-min) IAMZ stimulation; and 20-min active sham stimulation of non-muscular areas. Assessment time points were: prior to treatment, and 20, 40, 60, 90, and 120 min after treatment onset. Primary safety endpoints were adverse events frequency and severity. Primary efficacy endpoint was the change in MDS-UPDRS motor score at 20 min after treatment onset in the IAMZ treatment groups versus sham.

RESULTS

Forty-six individuals consented; 38 were randomized (average age 64 years, 65 % male, mean 8.2 years from diagnosis). No serious adverse events or significant device-related events occurred. At 20 min after treatment onset, motor improvements did not differ between IAMZ treatments versus sham. However, at 60 min after treatment onset, motor improvement peaked on IAMZ treatments compared to sham (difference: 3.1 [-5.9 to 0.3], p = 0.03). While the difference in 120-min AUC change between IAMZ treatments versus sham was not significant, the short-stimulation IAMZ treatment showed the largest aggregate motor score improvement (AUC = -456 points, 95 % CI -691 to -221) compared to sham.

CONCLUSION

Earstim was well-tolerated. The greatest motor improvement occurred at 60 min after stimulation onset in the short-stimulation IAMZ treatment, and supports its further study to alleviate OFF periods.

Long-term safety and efficacy of apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease patients with persistent motor fluctuations: Results of the open-label phase of the TOLEDO study

INTRODUCTION

The randomized, double-blind phase (DBP) of the TOLEDO study confirmed the efficacy of apomorphine infusion (APO) in reducing OFF time in PD patients with persistent motor fluctuations despite optimized oral/transdermal therapy. Here we report safety and efficacy results including the 52-week open-label phase (OLP).

METHODS

All patients completing the 12-week DBP (including those switching early to open-label treatment) were offered OLP entry. The primary objective was the evaluation of long-term safety of APO.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients entered the OLP (40 previously on APO, 44 on placebo) and 59 patients (70.2%) completed the study. The safety profile of APO was consistent with experience from extensive clinical use. Common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate infusion site nodules, somnolence and nausea. Fourteen (16.7%) patients discontinued the OLP due to AEs, those involving >1 patient were infusion site reactions (n = 4) and fatigue (n = 2); hemolytic anemia occurred in one case. Reduction in daily OFF time and improvement in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia were sustained for up to 64 weeks. Pooled data for week 64 (n = 55) showed a mean (SD) change from DBP baseline in daily OFF time of -3.66 (2.72) hours and in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia of 3.31 (3.12) hours. Mean (±SD) daily levodopa-equivalent dose decreased from DBP baseline to week 64 by 543 mg (±674) and levodopa dose by 273 mg (±515).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy of APO infusion were demonstrated with long-term use for persistent motor fluctuations, allowing substantial reductions in oral PD medication.

Long-term efficacy of opicapone in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients: a pooled analysis of data from two phase 3 clinical trials and their open-label extensions

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor opicapone (25 and 50 mg) as adjunct therapy to levodopa in a pooled population of Parkinson's disease patients who participated in the pivotal double-blind trials of opicapone and their 1-year open-label extensions.

METHODS

Data (placebo, opicapone 25 mg and opicapone 50 mg) from the BIPARK-1 and BIPARK-2 double-blind and open-label studies were combined. The studies had similar designs, eligibility criteria and assessment methods. The primary efficacy variable in both double-blind studies was the change from baseline in absolute OFF time based on patient diaries.

RESULTS

Double-blind treatment with opicapone (25 and 50 mg) significantly reduced absolute daily OFF time from a baseline of 6.1-6.6 h. The mean (and 95% confidence interval) treatment effect versus placebo was -35.1 (-62.1, -8.2) min (P = 0.0106) for the 25 mg dose and -58.1 (-84.5, -31.7) min (P < 0.0001) for the 50 mg dose. Reductions in OFF time were mirrored by significant increases in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001 for the 25 and 50 mg doses, respectively). No significant differences were observed for ON time with troublesome dyskinesia. Patient diary results from the open-label phase indicated a maintenance of effect for patients previously treated with opicapone 50 mg. The group previously treated with the 25 mg dose benefitted with further optimization of therapy during the open-label phase, whilst switching from placebo to opicapone led to significant reductions in OFF time and increased ON time.

CONCLUSIONS

Over at least 1 year of open-label therapy, opicapone consistently reduced OFF time and increased ON time without increasing the frequency of troublesome dyskinesia.

Adjunct rasagiline to treat Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations: a randomized, double-blind study in China

Background

The use of adjunct rasagiline in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations is supported by findings from large-scale clinical studies. This study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunct rasagiline in Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease, as a product registration study.

Methods

This 16-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, placebo-controlled study of rasagiline 1 mg/day included levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline in total daily OFF time over 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints were Clinical Global Impressions – Improvement (CGI-I), and change in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Activities of daily living (ADL) and Motor scores. Patient well-being (EQ-5D), and the frequency of adverse events were also assessed.

Results

In total, 324 levodopa-treated patients were randomized to rasagiline 1 mg/day (n = 165) or placebo (n = 159). Over 16 weeks, rasagiline statistically significantly reduced the mean [95% confidence interval] total daily OFF time versus placebo (− 0.5 h [− 0.92, − 0.07]; p = 0.023). There were also statistically significant improvements versus placebo in CGI-I (− 0.4 points [− 0.61, − 0.22]; p < 0.001), UPDRS-ADL OFF (− 1.0 points [− 1.75, − 0.27]; p = 0.008), and UPDRS-Motor ON (− 1.6 points [− 3.05, − 0.14]; p = 0.032) scores, as well as the EQ-5D utility index (p < 0.05). Rasagiline was safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions

In levodopa-treated Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations, adjunct rasagiline 1 mg/day statistically significantly reduced OFF time, and improved daily function and overall well-being, versus placebo. Consistent with findings in other countries, adjunct rasagiline was proven efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese patients.

Trial registration number

NCT01479530. Registered 22 November 2011.

The role of extended-release amantadine for the treatment of dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease patients

Levodopa is the most efficacious treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Long-term treatment with levodopa is limited due to dyskinesia. Dyskinesia in PD can be socially and functionally disabling. Extended-release amantadine (amantadine ER) is the first approved medication for the treatment of dyskinesia. When it is given at bedtime, it reaches plasma concentration approximately twice the level achieved by amantadine immediate release. Amantadine ER reduces the severity and duration of dyskinesia during the day, reduces OFF time and increases ON time without troublesome dyskinesia. The most common side effects are hallucination, dizziness, orthostatic hypotension and pedal edema. This review discusses the safety and efficacy of amantadine ER in dyskinesia in PD patients.