Early assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by semi-quantitative analysis of high-temporal resolution DCE-MRI: preliminary results

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether semi-quantitative analysis of high temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) acquired early in treatment can predict the response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

As part of an IRB-approved prospective study, 21 patients with LABC provided informed consent and underwent high temporal resolution 3T DCE-MRI before and after 1cycle of NAC. Using measurements performed by two radiologists, the following parameters were extracted for lesions at both examinations: lesion size (short and long axes, in both early and late phases of enhancement), radiologist's subjective assessment of lesion enhancement, and percentages of voxels within the lesion demonstrating progressive, plateau, or washout kinetics. The latter data were calculated using two filters, one selecting for voxels enhancing ≥50% over baseline and one for voxels enhancing ≥100% over baseline. Pretreatment imaging parameters and parameter changes following cycle 1 of NAC were evaluated for their ability to discriminate patients with an eventual pathological complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

All 21 patients completed NAC followed by surgery, with 9 patients achieving a pCR. No pretreatment imaging parameters were predictive of pCR. However, change after cycle 1 of NAC in percentage of voxels demonstrating washout kinetics with a 100% enhancement filter discriminated patients with an eventual pCR with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.77. Changes in other parameters, including lesion size, did not predict pCR.

CONCLUSION

Semi-quantitative analysis of high temporal resolution DCE-MRI in patients with LABC can discriminate patients with an eventual pCR after one cycle of NAC.

Patient perceptions and expectations regarding imaging for metastatic disease in early stage breast cancer

Purpose

The probability of detecting radiologically evident metastatic disease in asymptomatic women with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer is low. Despite the recommendations of most practice guidelines imaging is still frequently performed. Relatively little is known about what patients believe is important when it comes to radiologic staging.

Methods

Patients with early stage breast cancer who had completed their definitive breast surgery were surveyed about their personal experiences, perceptions, and expectations on the issue of perioperative imaging for distant metastatic disease.

Results

Over a 3 month period, 245 women with primary operable breast cancer completed the questionnaire (87.0% response rate) and 80.8% indicated having had at least one imaging test for distant metastatic disease. These were either of the thorax (72.2%), abdomen (55.9%) or skeleton (65.3%) with a total of 701 imaging tests (average of 3.5 tests per patient imaged) performed. Overall, 57.1% indicated that they would want imaging done if the chance of detecting metastases was ≤10%. Although 80.0% of patients indicated that, “doing whatever their doctor recommended” was important to them, 70.4% also noted that they would be uncomfortable if their physician did not order imaging, even if this was in keeping with practice guidelines.

Conclusions

Most patients with early stage breast cancer recall having imaging tests for distant metastases. Given the choice, most would prefer having imaging performed, even if this is not in line with current guidelines. If patient expectations are, in part, driving excessive imaging, new strategies addressing this are required.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-176) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pre-operative progesterone benefits operable breast cancer patients by modulating surgical stress

PURPOSE

We have reported a survival benefit of single injection of hydroxyprogesterone prior to surgery for primary tumour in patients with node-positive operable breast cancer. Hydroxyprogesterone was meant to recapitulate the luteal phase of menstrual cycle in these women. We wanted to understand the molecular basis of action of hydroxyprogesterone on primary breast tumours in a peri-operative setting.

METHODS

We performed whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) of primary breast tumour samples collected from patients before and after hydroxyprogesterone exposure and controls. Paired breast cancer samples were obtained from patients who were given hydroxyprogesterone before surgery and a group of patients who were subjected to only surgery.

RESULTS

A test of significance between the two groups revealed 207 significantly altered genes, after correction for multiple hypothesis testing. We found significantly contrasting gene expression patterns in exposed versus unexposed groups; 142 genes were up-regulated post-surgery among exposed patients, and down-regulated post-surgery among unexposed patients. Significantly enriched pathways included genes that respond to progesterone, cellular stress, nonsense-mediated decay of proteins and negative regulation of inflammatory response. These results suggest that cellular stress is modulated by hydroxyprogesterone. Network analysis revealed that UBC, a mediator of stress response, to be a major node to which many of the significantly altered genes connect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that pre-operative exposure to progesterone favourably modulates the effect of surgical stress, and this might underlie its beneficial effect when administered prior to surgery.

Phase II Study of S-1 Combined With Low-Dose Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Operable Breast Cancer Patients (N-1 Study)

BACKGROUND

To improve the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, we devised new neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Efficacy and safety of the oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1 (Taiho Pharmaceutical Co, Tokyo, Japan) combined with low-dose docetaxel (S-1+DOC) were evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated with docetaxel (40 mg/m² intravenously on day 1) and S-1 (40 mg/m² orally twice per day on days 1-14) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. In accord with the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 criteria, the patients who showed a complete response (CR) underwent surgery, and those who achieved a partial response (PR) underwent 4 more cycles of S-1+DOC. Patients who achieved stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) received EC (epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) or HT (trastuzumab and paclitaxel) according to their HER2 status. The primary end point was the pCR rate.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients entered the study. After 4 cycles of S-1+DOC, CR was noted in 5 patients, PR in 57, SD in 18, and PD in 3. Of the patients who achieved SD and PD, 12 received EC, and 9 received HT. Among the 83 assessable patients, the pCR rate was 34.9%, and the response rate was 80.7%. The pCR rates were 19.5% in the luminal type group, 53.8% in the luminal HER2 group, 46.1% in the HER2 group, and 50.0% in the triple-negative group.

CONCLUSION

The S-1+DOC regimen in this study could be well tolerated and a new candidate neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients. It is also expected to be effective even in patients with luminal type disease. However, further randomized control trials are needed to ascertain whether pCR can contribute to favorable outcomes.

Prognostic Factors of Local-Regional Recurrence in Patients with Operable Breast Cancer in Asia: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cause of recurrence of breast cancer is multifactorial. Also, the occurrence of breast cancer in Asian patients has some different factors from the recurrence of breast cancer in western countries.

AIM

This study aims to determine the prognostic factors of local-regional recurrence in patients with operable breast cancer in Asia.

METHODS

The authors conducted a meta-analysis of published research articles published in an online database of PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO between January 2000 and July 2018. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated using fixed and random-effect models. Data were processed by using Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3).

RESULTS

This study reviewed 879 articles. There were 11 studies conducted a systematic review then continued by meta-analysis of relevant data with total patients involved were 5,213 patients. The prognostic factors found of local-regional recurrence in patients with operable breast cancer were Nodal (N) stage with the highest risk ratio (RR = 6.35 [95% CI 3.78-10.67]) followed by HER2 positive (RR = 2.14 [95% CI 1.16-3.97]), stage of cancer (RR = 1.82 [95% CI 1.44-2.31]), tumor size (RR = 1.55 [95% CI 1.04-2.31]), tumor grade (RR = 1.43 [95% CI 1.23-1.65]), PR status (RR = 0.65 [95% CI 0.48-0.88]) and the least was ER status (RR = 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.91]). Homogeneity of variance was found in N stage, tumor size and tumor grade for recurrence of operable breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirmed the correlation of N stage, HER2, stage of cancer, tumour size, tumour grade, ER and PR status with recurrence in patients with operable breast cancer in Asia.

Expression of the RAC1, RHOA and CXCR4 proteins and their interaction as risk factors for infiltration to the nipple areola complex in operable breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nipple areola complex (NAC) infiltration in operable breast carcinoma (OBC) is associated with local recurrence. NAC infiltration in OBC suggests that RAC1, RHOA and CXCR4 proteins are risk factors for migration and infiltration of OBC to NAC. This study aims to analyze the expression and interactions of these proteins as risk factors for NAC infiltration in OBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an analytic observational cross-sectional study coupled with a categorical comparative study in each 40 subjects of OBC with and without NAC infiltration. The immunohistochemistry performed with a cut-off point based on the result of a receiver operating characteristics (ROC).

RESULTS

RAC1, p < 0.001 with POR 5.76, 95% CI: 2.06-16.08; RHOA, p < 0.001 with POR 7.00, 95% CI: 2.28-21.53; and CXCR4, p = 0.001 with POR 6.33, 95% CI 2.06-19.49. There was an interaction between RAC1 and RHOA (p < 0.001 with POR 17.14, 95% CI: 3.07-125.66); between RAC1 and CXCR4 (p < 0.001 with POR 30.93, 95% CI 3.62-686.89); between RHOA and CXCR4 (p < 0.001 with POR 10.21, 95% CI 2.19-54.17); and between the RAC1, RHOA and CXCR4 proteins (p < 0.001 with POR = 23.69, 95% CI 2.51-544.86).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the expression of the RAC1, RHOA, and CXCR4 proteins and their interactions play a role as risk factors of NAC infiltration.

Disparities in quality of life among patients with breast cancer based on surgical methods: a cross-sectional prospective study

To determine the impact of breast conservation on quality of life and identify treatment-related and other demographic factors associated with post-breast cancer treatment quality of life. A prospective study was conducted on 392 women who underwent breast cancer surgery at Hangzhou Cancer Hospital from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022. Operable breast cancer patients who had completed all treatments except endocrine therapy were included. Patients with tumor recurrence/metastasis, bilateral or male breast cancer, and other primary malignancies were excluded. After enrollment, patients were asked to complete the BREAST-Q scale, and their pathological and medical records were reviewed. Analysis of variance was used to compare the quality of life scores among the groups. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with quality of life scores in different domains. Participants completed the BREAST-Q scale at a median of 4.6 years after surgery. Quality of life scores varied based on the therapeutic strategy. Breast conservation has significant advantages over mastectomy in terms of breast satisfaction, psychosocial, and sexual well-being. Compared to oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy was independently associated with decreased breast satisfaction, psychosocial, and sexual well-being, while conventional breast-conserving surgery showed comparable outcomes to oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in terms of these factors. Breast conservation leads to an improvement in quality of life compared to mastectomy. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery does not lead to a decrease in quality of life compared to conventional breast-conserving surgery and offers better outcomes compared to mastectomy.

Prevalence of Distant Metastases in High-Risk Operable Breast Cancer (HROBC) pT1-2 N2a or Higher at Diagnosis

Current standard guidelines do not recommend a routine staging workup in early operable breast cancer (OBC) as the incidence of de novo metastasis is only 1-2%. Some of these patients are at high risk for relapse based on the higher axillary nodal burden. This prospective study evaluated the presence of de novo asymptomatic distant metastases in HROBC with pT1/2 N2a/N3 on upfront surgery. A single-centre study was carried out in upfront operated OBC patients with four or more axillary nodes positive after definitive surgery. Comprehensive metastatic workup was carried out, including an ultrasound abdomen, bone scan, and CT scan (thorax-abdomen-pelvis) or PET scan before initiating adjuvant treatment. If a distant disease was detected, the adjuvant treatment intent was tailored accordingly. The study accrued a prospective consecutive cohort of 97 women with pT1-2 N2a-3 during 2015-2018 operated upfront for OBC with cT1-2 N0-1. Forty percent of women were premenopausal, 54 (55.6%) had pN2a, and 43 (44.3%) had pN3 disease. Distant disease was seen in 8 of 97 women (8.24%) of these high-risk early cancers, 5 had oligometastatic denovo disease (5.15%), and 3 had polymetastatic (3.09%). Between the 2 groups, the pickup rate of distant disease was higher in pN3 (11.4%) as against pN2a (5.6%), p = NS. Only 3.09% of patients with extensive metastases were treated with palliative intent. The study shows potential to optimize the management of HROBC with heavy nodal disease identified post-primary surgery by selective staging investigations, adequate resource stratification, and thereby improved management, including modifying treatment plans early.

Randomized phase III trial of a neoadjuvant regimen of four cycles of adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel (AC4-D4) versus a shorter treatment of three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (FEC3-D3) in node-positive breast cancer (Neo-shorter; NCT02001506)

PURPOSE

To determine whether six cycles of FEC3-D3 has a comparable efficacy to eight of AC4-D4.

METHODS

The enrolled patients (pts) were clinically diagnosed with stage II or III breast cancer. The primary endpoint was a pathologic complete response (pCR), and the secondary endpoints were 3 year disease-free survival (3Y DFS), toxicities, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We calculated that 252 pts were needed in each treatment group to enable the detection of non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin of 10%).

RESULTS

In terms of ITT analysis, 248 pts were finally enrolled. The 218 pts who completed the surgery were included in the current analysis. The baseline characteristics of these subjects were well balanced between the two arms. By ITT analysis, pCR was achieved in 15/121 (12.4%) pts in the FEC3-D3 arm and 18/126 (14.3%) in the AC4-D4 arm. With a median follow up of 64.1 months, the 3Y DFS was comparable between the two arms (75.8% in FEC3-D3 vs. 75.6% in AC4-D4). The most common adverse event (AE) was Grade 3/4 neutropenia, which arose in 27/126 (21.4%) AC4-D4 arm pts vs 23/121 (19.0%) FEC3-D3 arm cases. The primary HRQoL domains were similar between the two groups (FACT-B scores at baseline, P = 0.35; at the midpoint of NACT, P = 0.20; at the completion of NACT, P = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

Six cycles of FEC3-D3 could be an alternative to eight of AC4-D4. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02001506. Registered December 5,2013. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02001506.