Quality of life after mastoid surgery. Is there a real benefit to preserving the posterior wall of the external auditory canal? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomies represent the most common cholesteatoma surgical techniques. In this meta-analysis, we compare the postoperative quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with either CWU or CWD mastoidectomy.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the following three electronic databases: Medline/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Articles were assessed for eligibility in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and data were extracted independently by two authors. Biases assessment was conducted for each study according to the Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Meta-analysis was performed for postoperative QoL following CWU versus CWD mastoidectomy.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included four studies that met the inclusion criteria, three prospective cohort studies, and one retrospective cohort study. The meta-analysis did not favor treatment with one of the two surgical techniques. Postoperative QoL did not show a statistically significant difference between CWU and CWD mastoidectomies (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review and meta-analysis results indicate that QoL is not statistically significantly better among patients who underwent CWU mastoidectomies when compared with CWD. The trend of selecting CWU over CWD mastoidectomies in selected cases - for QoL purposes - is not always based on evidence-based data. The statistically insignificant difference between the two surgical techniques suggests that an initial more radical approach might prevent patients from further surgeries, without affecting postoperative QoL.

Mastoid obliteration with S53P4 bioactive glass after canal wall down mastoidectomy: Preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Bioactive glass (S53P4), abbreviated BG, currently seems to be the best material for reconstructing the posterior wall of the auditory canal and obliterating the postoperative cavity.

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to report preliminary results of otosurgery involving obliteration of the mastoid cavity after canal wall down mastoidectomy.

METHODS

11 adult patients who had had a history of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma in one or both ears and previous canal wall down mastoidectomy. The duration of the follow-up was 6 months, with routine visits after 7 days, then 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The patient's medical history, noting other diseases potentially affecting the healing process, was analyzed. Healing, audiometric results, reduction of the volume of the cavity after surgery, and reduction of bacterial flora growth were assessed.

RESULTS

There was not worsening in the audiological evaluation. Healing period was uneventful. There was a reduction in volume of the postoperative cavity, no development of pathological flora, and no recurrence of cholesteatoma.

CONCLUSION

Obliteration of the mastoid process with S53P4 bioactive glass is a safe and effective method of treatment. Such a procedure should be considered as a treatment for patients after canal wall down surgery (CWD).

Three-dimensional force analysis of surgical manipulations at the long process of the incus

PURPOSE

Surgical manipulation with application of inappropriate force may damage middle ear structures leading to hearing loss. This work analyzes the forces applied in simulated otosurgical exercises in a laboratory set-up by measuring the spatial components of applied forces with objective assessment criteria. With these criteria, the individual force characteristics applied by the surgeon can be quantified and an objective feedback can be given about their surgical maneuvers.

METHODS

A natural size model of the human incus was mounted on a load cell to measure the spatial forces in all three directions during different manipulation tasks performed under the microscope by ten surgeons from our department having different levels of experience in otosurgery. The motions of the incus model and the instrument tip were recorded simultaneously with a video camera.

RESULTS

Independent of surgical experience, a three-dimensional force pattern could be detected with components transverse to the desired force directions. The measured forces applied by trainees showed larger variations in magnitude, in spatial distribution and in temporal course than those applied by experienced surgeons. A better repeatability of identical tasks, constancy of force patterns and low peak force values could be seen in the group of experienced surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

The laboratory system presented in this study using simultaneous video and 3-D force registration allows the objective assessment of surgical manipulations, e.g., at the long process of the incus. Training with video and force feedback provides information about surgical techniques and skill development of surgeons and has the potential to shorten the learning curve and to diminish intra-operative risks to patients.