1
|
Takeshita N, Enokida T, Okano S, Fujisawa T, Wada A, Sato M, Tanaka H, Tanaka N, Onaga R, Hoshi Y, Sakashita S, Ishii G, Tahara M. Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) combination followed by nivolumab for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). Oral Oncol 2023; 147:106615. [PMID: 37931493 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cetuximab-based chemotherapy is a standard 1st-line treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). However, few studies have reported survival data for a treatment sequence consisting of a PCE regimen (paclitaxel + carboplatin + cetuximab) followed by an immune checkpoint inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively assessed 37 patients with R/M SCCHN from the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who received PCE as 1st-line treatment followed by nivolumab as 2nd-line at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between December 2016 and July 2021. For comparison, we also analyzed 14 patients who did not receive nivolumab after PCE. RESULTS Of the 37 patients who received nivolumab, overall response rate (ORR) by PCE was 48.6%, and median time to response and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 2.1 months (range: 0.8-4.8) and 4.4 months, respectively. In the nivolumab phase, ORR was 10.8%. 23 patients received 3rd-line therapy. Median PFS2, PFS3, and overall survival (OS) were 6.8, 11.6, and 19.5 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis by PD-L1 expression showed no significant difference in OS. Analysis of the comparison group revealed a trend toward improved OS in those who received nivolumab compared to those who did not (HR 0.47, 95%CI [0.19-1.13], p = 0.084). CONCLUSION PCE followed by nivolumab shows a favorable survival outcome, representing the potential for rapid tumor response with PCE and extension of OS by the addition of nivolumab regardless of combined positive score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohiro Takeshita
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Enokida
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Susumu Okano
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takao Fujisawa
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Akihisa Wada
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masanobu Sato
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hideki Tanaka
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Tanaka
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Ryutaro Onaga
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Yuta Hoshi
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shingo Sakashita
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Genichiro Ishii
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Makoto Tahara
- Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Sluis K, van Sandick JW, van Dieren JM, Vollebergh MA, Grootscholten C, van den Berg JG, Snaebjornsson P, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof AAFA, Chalabi M, Kodach LL. The clinical impact of testing for biomarkers in gastric cancer patients: a real-world cohort. Histopathology 2023; 82:826-836. [PMID: 36694277 DOI: 10.1111/his.14869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In gastric cancer (GC), HER2 was the first biomarker for guided therapy registered for clinical use. Considering the recent approvals of immune check-point blockade (ICB) in gastro-oesophageal cancers, testing for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) is becoming increasingly important. Here we describe a real-world cohort on biomarker assessment in GC patients. METHODS Patients diagnosed with GC between 2017 and 2021 were included. Biomarker results were retrieved from electronic patient files. PD-L1 CPS was determined retrospectively on dMMR and EBV-positive (EBV+) tumours. Data on genomic sequencing were analysed separately. RESULTS Of 363 patients identified, 45% had metastatic disease. In 335 patients (92%) at least one biomarker was tested. The prevalence of HER2+, dMMR and EBV+ tumours was 10% (32 of 319), 7% (20 of 294) and 1% (three of 235), respectively. Of the dMMR and EBV+ tumours, 95% had a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. Therapeutic strategy was adjusted in 31 of 55 patients and consisted of anti-HER2 therapies as well as ICB in clinical trials. Genomic alterations were found in 44 of 60 tested patients. TP53 (73%) and PIK3CA (20%) mutations were most common, followed by KRAS mutations (11%) and amplifications (11%). CONCLUSIONS In this real-world cohort, testing for HER2, dMMR and EBV status affected treatment decisions in 56% of the patients. Although most dMMR and EBV+ tumours had a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, not all patients with a high probability of treatment response are identified. Based on these results, a stepwise diagnostic strategy is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen van der Sluis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jolanda M van Dieren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke A Vollebergh
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cecile Grootscholten
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José G van den Berg
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen J Hartemink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Myriam Chalabi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klinghammer K, Lorini L, Nevens D, Simon C, Machiels JP, Bossi P. Treatment Stratification in First-Line Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer, on Behalf of the EORTC Young Investigator Head and Neck Cancer Group. Front Oncol 2022; 12:730785. [PMID: 35155222 PMCID: PMC8830482 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.730785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple factors differentially influence treatment decisions in the first line treatment of recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. The EORTC Young investigator group launched a survey among treating physicians to explore the main influencing factors for treatment stratification. The questionnaire was posted as a web-survey link from May to August 2020. Next to defining the factors that mostly influence therapeutic decision the survey was complemented by a clinical case discussion of five patient cases. A total of 118 responses from 19 countries were collected. The key factors identified to guide treatment decision were performance status, PD-L1 Expression, time from last systemic treatment above or below 6 months, and disease burden. Prospective evaluation of patient characteristics and additional potential predictive biomarkers for novel treatment options remains an important question to stratify personalized treatment for RM HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konrad Klinghammer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.,Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luigi Lorini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Daan Nevens
- Iridium Netwerk, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christian Simon
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Lausanne, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Pascal Machiels
- Institut Roi Albert II, Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale (Pole MIRO), UC Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cao Y, Qin S, Luo S, Li Z, Cheng Y, Fan Y, Sun Y, Yin X, Yuan X, Li W, Liu T, Hsu CH, Lin X, Kim SB, Kojima T, Zhang J, Lee SH, Bai Y, Muro K, Doi T, Bai C, Gu K, Pan HM, Bai L, Yang JW, Cui Y, Lu W, Chen J. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma enrolled in the randomized KEYNOTE-181 trial in Asia. ESMO Open 2021; 7:100341. [PMID: 34973513 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-181 study, pembrolizumab prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥10. We report a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) enrolled in KEYNOTE-181 in Asia, including patients from the KEYNOTE-181 China extension study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred and forty Asian patients with advanced/metastatic ESCC were enrolled in KEYNOTE-181, including the China cohort. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for ≤2 years or investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan. OS, progression-free survival, response, and safety were analyzed without formal comparisons. OS was evaluated based on PD-L1 CPS expression level. RESULTS In Asian patients with ESCC, median OS was 10.0 months with pembrolizumab and 6.5 months with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR), 0.63; 95% CI 0.50-0.80; nominal P < 0.0001]. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 months with pembrolizumab and 3.1 months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; nominal P = 0.020). Objective response rate was 17.1% with pembrolizumab and 7.1% with chemotherapy; median duration of response was 10.5 months and 7.7 months, respectively. In patients with PD-L1 CPS <1 tumors (pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy), the HR was 0.99 (95% CI 0.56-1.72); the HR (95% CI) for death was better for patients with PD-L1 CPS cut-offs >1 [CPS ≥1, 0.57 (0.44-0.75); CPS ≥5, 0.56 (0.41-0.76); CPS ≥10, 0.53 (0.37-0.75)]. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 71.8% of patients in the pembrolizumab group and 89.8% in the chemotherapy group; grade 3-5 events were reported in 20.0% and 44.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy in Asian patients with ESCC, with fewer treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 is an appropriate cut-off and a predictive marker of pembrolizumab efficacy in Asian patients with ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Cao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
| | - S Qin
- PLA Cancer Centre of Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - S Luo
- The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Z Li
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Y Cheng
- Jilin Cancer Hospital, Jilin, China
| | - Y Fan
- Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Y Sun
- The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, and The Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - X Yin
- Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - X Yuan
- Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - W Li
- Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - T Liu
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - C-H Hsu
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - X Lin
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - S-B Kim
- Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - T Kojima
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - J Zhang
- Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - S-H Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Y Bai
- Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - K Muro
- Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - T Doi
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - C Bai
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - K Gu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - H-M Pan
- Sir Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - L Bai
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - J-W Yang
- Fujian Province Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Y Cui
- MSD China, Shanghai, China
| | - W Lu
- MSD China, Shanghai, China
| | - J Chen
- Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|