A dynamic charge-charge interaction modulates PP2A:B56 substrate recruitment

The recruitment of substrates by the ser/thr protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is poorly understood, limiting our understanding of PP2A-regulated signaling. Recently, the first PP2A:B56 consensus binding motif, LxxIxE, was identified. However, most validated LxxIxE motifs bind PP2A:B56 with micromolar affinities, suggesting that additional motifs exist to enhance PP2A:B56 binding. Here, we report the requirement of a positively charged motif in a subset of PP2A:B56 interactors, including KIF4A, to facilitate B56 binding via dynamic, electrostatic interactions. Using molecular and cellular experiments, we show that a conserved, negatively charged groove on B56 mediates dynamic binding. We also discovered that this positively charged motif, in addition to facilitating KIF4A dephosphorylation, is essential for condensin I binding, a function distinct and exclusive from PP2A-B56 binding. Together, these results reveal how dynamic, charge-charge interactions fine-tune the interactions mediated by specific motifs, providing a new framework for understanding how PP2A regulation drives cellular signaling.

PP2A-B56γ is required for an efficient spindle assembly checkpoint

The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) is part of a complex feedback system designed to ensure that cells do not proceed through mitosis unless all chromosomal kinetochores have attached to spindle microtubules. The formation of the kinetochore complex and the implementation of the SAC are regulated by multiple kinases and phosphatases. BubR1 is a phosphoprotein that is part of the Cdc20 containing mitotic checkpoint complex that inhibits the APC/C so that Cyclin B1 and Securin are not degraded, thus preventing cells going into anaphase. In this study, we found that PP2A in association with its B56γ regulatory subunit, are needed for the stability of BubR1 during nocodazole induced cell cycle arrest. In primary cells that lack B56γ, BubR1 is prematurely degraded and the cells proceed through mitosis. The reduced SAC efficiency results in cells with abnormal chromosomal segregation, a hallmark of transformed cells. Previous studies on PP2A's role in the SAC and kinetochore formation were done using siRNAs to all 5 of the B56 family members. In our study we show that inactivation of only the PP2A-B56γ subunit can affect the efficiency of the SAC. We also provide data that show the intracellular locations of the B56 subunits varies between family members, which is consistent with the hypothesis that they are not completely functionally redundant.

MPS1 localizes to end-on microtubule-attached kinetochores to promote microtubule release

In eukaryotes, the spindle assembly checkpoint protects genome stability in mitosis by preventing chromosome segregation until incorrect microtubule-kinetochore attachment geometries have been eliminated and chromosome biorientation has been completed. These error correction and checkpoint processes are linked by the conserved Aurora B and MPS1 Ser/Thr kinases.^1,2 MPS1-dependent checkpoint signaling is believed to be initiated by kinetochores without end-on microtubule attachments,^3,4 including those generated by Aurora B-mediated error correction. The current model posits that MPS1 competes with microtubules for binding sites at the kinetochore.^3,4 MPS1 is thought to first recognize kinetochores not blocked by microtubules and then initiate checkpoint signaling. However, MPS1 is also required for chromosome biorientation and correction of microtubule-kinetochore attachment errors.^5,6,7,8,9 This latter function, which must require direct interaction with microtubule-attached kinetochores, is not readily explained within the constraints of the current model. Here, we show that MPS1 transiently localizes to end-on attached kinetochores and that this recruitment depends on the relative activities of Aurora B and its counteracting phosphatase PP2A-B56 rather than microtubule-attachment state per se. MPS1 autophosphorylation also regulates MPS1 kinetochore levels but does not determine the response to microtubule attachment. At end-on attached kinetochores, MPS1 actively promotes microtubule release together with Aurora B. Furthermore, in live cells, MPS1 is detected at attached kinetochores before the removal of microtubules. During chromosome alignment, MPS1, therefore, coordinates both the resolution of incorrect microtubule-kinetochore attachments and the initiation of spindle checkpoint signaling.

A highly conserved pocket on PP2A-B56 is required for hSgo1 binding and cohesion protection during mitosis

The shugoshin proteins are universal protectors of centromeric cohesin during mitosis and meiosis. The binding of human hSgo1 to the PP2A-B56 phosphatase through a coiled-coil (CC) region mediates cohesion protection during mitosis. Here we undertook a structure function analysis of the PP2A-B56-hSgo1 complex, revealing unanticipated aspects of complex formation and function. We establish that a highly conserved pocket on the B56 regulatory subunit is required for hSgo1 binding and cohesion protection during mitosis in human somatic cells. Consistent with this, we show that hSgo1 blocks the binding of PP2A-B56 substrates containing a canonical B56 binding motif. We find that PP2A-B56 bound to hSgo1 dephosphorylates Cdk1 sites on hSgo1 itself to modulate cohesin interactions. Collectively our work provides important insight into cohesion protection during mitosis.

A bifunctional kinase-phosphatase module balances mitotic checkpoint strength and kinetochore-microtubule attachment stability

Two major mechanisms safeguard genome stability during mitosis: the mitotic checkpoint delays mitosis until all chromosomes have attached to microtubules, and the kinetochore-microtubule error-correction pathway keeps this attachment process free from errors. We demonstrate here that the optimal strength and dynamics of these processes are set by a kinase-phosphatase pair (PLK1-PP2A) that engage in negative feedback from adjacent phospho-binding motifs on the BUB complex. Uncoupling this feedback to skew the balance towards PLK1 produces a strong checkpoint, hypostable microtubule attachments and mitotic delays. Conversely, skewing the balance towards PP2A causes a weak checkpoint, hyperstable microtubule attachments and chromosome segregation errors. These phenotypes are associated with altered BUB complex recruitment to KNL1-MELT motifs, implicating PLK1-PP2A in controlling auto-amplification of MELT phosphorylation. In support, KNL1-BUB disassembly becomes contingent on PLK1 inhibition when KNL1 is engineered to contain excess MELT motifs. This elevates BUB-PLK1/PP2A complex levels on metaphase kinetochores, stabilises kinetochore-microtubule attachments, induces chromosome segregation defects and prevents KNL1-BUB disassembly at anaphase. Together, these data demonstrate how a bifunctional PLK1/PP2A module has evolved together with the MELT motifs to optimise BUB complex dynamics and ensure accurate chromosome segregation.

The cellular protein phosphatase 2A is a crucial host factor for Marburg virus transcription

Little is known regarding the molecular mechanisms that highly pathogenic Marburg virus (MARV) utilizes to transcribe and replicate its genome. Previous studies assumed that dephosphorylation of the filoviral transcription factor VP30 supports transcription, while phosphorylated VP30 reduces transcription. Here, we focused on the role of the host protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) for VP30 dephosphorylation and promotion of viral transcription. We could show that MARV NP interacts with the subunit B56 of PP2A, as previously shown for the Ebola virus, and that this interaction is important for MARV transcription activity. Inhibition of the interaction between PP2A and NP either by mutating the B56 binding motif encoded on NP, or the use of a PP2A inhibitor, induced VP30 hyperphosphorylation, and as a consequence a decrease of MARV transcription as well as viral growth. These results suggest that NP plays a key role in the dephosphorylation of VP30 by recruiting PP2A. Generation of recombinant (rec) MARV lacking the PP2A-B56 interaction motif on NP was not possible suggesting an essential role of PP2A-mediated VP30 dephosphorylation for the MARV replication cycle. Likewise, we were not able to generate recMARV containing VP30 phosphomimetic mutants indicating that dynamic cycles of VP30 de- and rephosphorylation are a prerequisite for an efficient viral life cycle. As the specific binding motifs of PP2A-B56 and VP30 within NP are highly conserved among the filoviral family, our data suggest a conserved mechanism for filovirus VP30 dephosphorylation by PP2A, revealing the host factor PP2A as a promising target for pan-filoviral therapies.

IMPORTANCE

Our study elucidates the crucial role of host protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in Marburg virus (MARV) transcription. The regulatory subunit B56 of PP2A facilitates VP30 dephosphorylation, and hence transcription activation, via binding to NP. Our results, together with previous data, reveal a conserved mechanism of filovirus VP30 dephosphorylation by host factor PP2A at the NP interface and provide novel insights into potential pan-filovirus therapies.