Evaluation of a new paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in an in vivo porcine peripheral venous model: Feasibility, safety, and drug deliverability

PURPOSE

To evaluate in vivo the feasibility, safety, and paclitaxel (PTX) deliverability of a newly developed non-commercially available Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon (PCB) catheter in the swine healthy peripheral vein model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total 12 PCBs were deployed in 12 venous segments. Primary feasibility endpoint was the successful application of the devices to the veins of the animals. Primary efficacy endpoint was the determination of the drug content in the venous tissue at 24 h and 7 days after balloon expansion, as assessed by analysis of the vein tissue with High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Primary safety endpoint was freedom from any major adverse event. Secondary endpoint was the investigation of any independent factor affecting the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

Paclitaxel was detected in five out of six tissue samples 24 h post-intervention and five out of six tissues at 7 days following the procedure (10 tissue samples out of 12). The mean weight of tissue that was examined was 0.20604 ± 0.29822 g (range: 1.02823-0.03377 g) and the mean PTX concentration detected was 8.4 ± 13.1 μg/g (range: 0-36.1 μg/g). The average drug content detected at 24 h (17.1 ± 17.1 μg/g) was numerically superior, but non-statistically significant, compared to 7 days (3.1 ± 3.6 μg/g). An average of 33.8% of the drug remained on the balloon after retrieval. According to the multiple linear regression analysis, there was no significant correlation between transition time, PTX remaining on the balloon, time of analysis (24 h/7 days) and PTX tissue concentration. No abnormalities were noted during autopsy.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed PCB successfully delivered within the healthy venous wall a dose of Paclitaxel that inhibits neointimal hyperplasia. No safety issues were raised at short-term follow-up.

Clinical Outcome of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion

AIMS

In-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) represents a unique challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention. Whether the optimal treatment for IS-CTO is angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) or repeat stenting with drug-eluting stents (DESs) is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of PCB angioplasty and DES repeat stenting for DES IS-CTO.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients with DES IS-CTO who underwent successful PCB angioplasty or DES repeat stenting from January 2016 to December 2019. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Cox proportional hazards model was performed to compare the risk of MACEs between PCB angioplasty and DES repeat stenting, and to further explore the prognostic factors of patients with DES IS-CTO.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients with DES IS-CTO were enrolled: 78 patients (36.4%) treated with PCB and 136 patients (63.6%) treated with DES respectively. The median follow-up was 1160 days, and MACEs were observed in 28.2% of patients with PCB angioplasty versus 26.5% of patients with DES repeat stenting (P = 0.784), mainly driven by TLR (21.8% vs. 19.9%, P = 0.735). There was no significant difference in the risk of MACEs between the PCB group and the DES group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-2.46, P = 0.512). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that chronic kidney disease and ≥ 3 stent layers in the lesion were independent predictors of MACEs, while switching to another antiproliferative drug was an independent protective factor (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PCB angioplasty was an effective alternative treatment strategy for DES IS-CTO, which had similar long-term outcomes to DES repeat stenting in contemporary practice, but both were accompanied by a high rate of long-term MACEs. Improving the poor prognosis of patients with DES IS-CTO remains a challenge.

The Role of Drug-Coated Balloon in Haemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis Management

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis is a common problem leading to dialysis access dysfunction. The conventional balloon (CB) is the most commonly used device during angioplasty but suffers from poor durability of results due to neointimal hyperplasia-mediated recurrence. The drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an adjunct to balloon angioplasty that reduces neointimal hyperplasia, thereby improving post-angioplasty patency. Despite the heterogeneity of DCB clinical trials to date, the evidence suggests that DCBs of different brands are not necessarily equal, and that patient selection, adequate lesion preparation and proper DCB procedural technique are important to realize the benefit of DCB angioplasty.

Drug-coated balloon for early recurrent arteriovenous fistula dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To report the efficacy and safety of a drug-coated balloon (Ranger, Boston Scientific) in patients with dysfunctional autogenous arteriovenous fistula.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated, prospective observational cohort study, 25 participants with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula were enrolled from January 2018 to June 2019. The drug-coated balloon was applied after successful vessel preparation by high-pressure balloon angioplasty. The primary endpoint was the target lesion primary patency rate at 6 months. The secondary outcome included anatomical and clinical success rate, postoperative major adverse events within 30 days, and the target lesion primary patency rate at 12 months. Statistical analysis of the data was performed. The χ test or Fisher's exact test was used for analyzing categorical variables, and continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-test. Also, Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the target lesion primary patency days with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the target lesion primary patency rate was 68% in the drug-coated balloon treatment group. The anatomical and clinical success rates were 100%. One patient had thrombosed access 10 days after the index procedure, and two died of cardiovascular events 4 months after the operation. Subgroup analysis showed that the early recurrent stenosis group had non-inferior mean drug-coated balloon primary patency days (less than 90 days after prior percutaneous angioplasty, n = 10) compared with the late recurrence group (prior PTA patency days more than 90 days, n = 10), 179.3 ± 102.9 versus 257.1 ± 71 days (p = 0.153). DCB angioplasty had significant improvement in primary patency days for early recurrent stenosis (67.7 ± 19.3 vs 179.3 ± 102.9, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated the appliance of Ranger DCB in stenotic AVFs is a safe and effective treatment modality, especially for early recurrent AVF stenosis.

Outcome after revascularization with paclitaxel-coated devices in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Data regarding the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel (PTX)-coated peripheral arterial devices for femoropopliteal artery (FPA) atherosclerotic disease is derived from studies that mainly evaluated patients with claudication. Outcomes of PTX treatment for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is incompletely defined. This study compares outcome in patients with CLTI treated with and without PTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients who underwent FPA intervention for an indication of CLTI in the Vascular Quality Initiative peripheral vascular intervention database from 2016 to 2020. Patients who had concomitant iliac or tibial interventions were included. One limb per patient was studied. Propensity score matching based on demographics, comorbidities, indication, and pharmacological therapy was performed to generate balanced cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression compared limb salvage, overall survival, primary patency, and major adverse limb events (MALE) between patients treated with and without PTX.

RESULTS

Demographics, comorbidities, indications, and procedural details were similar between 14,065 PTX and 14,065 non-PTX propensity-matched patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 18-month follow-up demonstrated that the PTX group compared with the non-PTX group had a significantly higher rates of limb salvage (89.2% vs 86.5%; P < .001), primary patency (80.3% vs 76.9%; P < .001), and freedom from MALE (72.6% vs 67.9%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis also showed that PTX treatment was associated with a lower risk of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.82; P < .001), loss of primary patency (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87; P < .001), and MALE (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.82; P < .001). Overall, 21% of patients had a prior ipsilateral peripheral vascular intervention. Removing these patients from the analysis yielded similar results at 18 months. Overall survival at 54 months was not statistically different between the PTX and non-PTX groups in the overall cohort (73.5 vs 71.3%; P = .07), but significant in the de-novo treated patients (73.9% vs 70.7%; P = .02).Multivariate analyses showed a lower mortality risk in the PTX patients (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

FPA intervention with a PTX-coated device is associated with improved limb salvage, primary patency, and freedom from MALE at the 18-month follow-up compared with uncoated devices. This benefit was not associated with an increase in all-cause mortality out to 4.5 years. Further study is necessary to determine the optimal role for PTX in the treatment of the FPA for patients with CLTI and to understand its long-term outcome.

Long-term outcomes of paclitaxel-coated balloons for non-malignant ureteral strictures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon (DCB) ureteroplasty for the management of non-malignant ureteral strictures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective "off-label" monocentric single-arm pilot study investigating the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) (Lutonix^®; BD, USA) was performed. Twenty-five patients with benign ureteral strictures related to uretero-enteric anastomosis (n = 13); lithiasis (n = 5), post-surgical complications (iatrogenic n = 5), transplanted kidney (n = 1) and post-radiotherapy (n = 1) were included. Following lesion crossing, predilatation was performed using 4-7 mm high-pressure balloon catheter (5-6Fr) with a balloon pressure of 6-7 atm based on the manufacturer's recommendation. In the absence of rupture of the ureteral wall, the DCB was dilated for 4 min. across the lesion. The process was repeated if deemed necessary to a maximum of three stricture dilatations. We analysed both clinical and radiological primary patency (no signs of ipsilateral hydronephrosis or improvement of the existing residual dilatation at the follow-up examinations) and secondarily safety endpoints.

RESULTS

Mean lesion length was 40 ± 28.5 mm. Mean time follow up was 36 months ± 10.46 months. Strictures were located at upper ureteric (12%), lower ureteric (32%), ureterovesical anastomosis (4%) and uretero-enteric anastomosis (52%) levels. The overall radiological success at 1-year follow-up was 88% (22/25 patients). In 56% patients (14/25 patients with primary patency) the nephrostomy catheter was removed 21 days following a single DCB procedure. In 32% (8/25 patients) an additional dilatation sessions were required for maintaining the ureteral patency. The overall failure rate at 1-year follow-up was 12% (3/25 patients). Only one case of febrile urinary tract infection in a female patient (acute pyelonephritis) was encountered after the first dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel-coated balloon ureteroplasty proved to be safe and effective for the treatment of non-malignant ureteral strictures. Larger studies are warranted to validate these promising initial results.

Drug Coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Haemodialysis Venous Access: A Patient Level Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To perform an individual patient data level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing drug coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) against conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of dysfunctional haemodialysis venous access.

METHODS

A search was conducted from inception to 13 November 2020. Kaplan-Meier curves comparing DCB with PTA by target lesion primary patency (TLPP) and access circuit primary patency (ACPP) were graphically reconstructed to retrieve patient level data. One stage meta-analyses with Cox models with random effects shared frailties were conducted to determine hazard ratios (HRs). Dynamic restricted mean survival times (RMST) were conducted in view of violation of the proportional hazards assumption. Conventional two stage meta-analyses and network meta-analyses under random effects Frequentist models were conducted to determine overall and comparative outcomes of paclitaxel concentrations used. Where outliers were consistently detected through outlier and influence analyses, sensitivity analyses excluding those studies were conducted.

RESULTS

Among 10 RCTs (1 207 patients), HRs across all models favoured DCB (one stage shared frailty HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 - 0.73, p < .001; two stage random effects HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 - 0.86, p = .018, I² = 65%) for TLPP. Evidence of time varying effects (p = .005) was found. TLPP RMST was + 3.54 months (25.0%) longer in DCB treated patients compared with PTA (p = .001) at three years. TLPP at six months, one year, and two years was 75.3% vs. 58.1%, 51.1% vs. 37.1%, and 31.4% vs. 26.0% for DCB and PTA, respectively. The P-Scores within the Frequentist network meta-analysis suggest that higher concentrations of paclitaxel were associated with better TLPP and ACPP. Among six RCTs (854 patients), the one stage model favoured DCB (shared frailty HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 - 0.87, p < .001) for ACPP. Conversely, the two stage random effects model demonstrated no significant difference (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35 - 1.67, p = .41, I² = 81%). Sensitivity analysis excluding outliers significantly favoured DCB (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 - 0.91, p = .027, I² = 62%).

CONCLUSION

Overall evidence suggests that DCB is favoured over PTA in TLPP and ACPP.

Paclitaxel-coated peripheral arterial devices are associated with improved overall survival and limb salvage in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Paclitaxel (PTX)-coated peripheral arterial devices have been shown to decrease femoropopliteal artery restenosis and the need for reintervention compared with non-PTX-coated devices. The data regarding PTX efficacy and safety come from randomized controlled trials that almost exclusively enrolled patients with claudication. The outcomes of PTX treatment in patients who present with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are unknown. This study compares long-term outcomes in patients with CLTI treated with and without PTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 983 patients with CLTI treated with femoropopliteal artery angioplasty, atherectomy, stent, or combination between 2011 and 2019. Procedures were performed with additional proximal or distal tibial interventions as needed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox-regression analysis compared overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS), freedom from major amputation (ff-MA), and freedom from target vessel revascularization (ff-TVR) between patients treated with and without PTX.

RESULTS

Demographics, comorbidities, and Rutherford class were similar between 574 PTX (58.5%) and 409 non-PTX (41.6%) patients except that non-PTX patients were more likely to be male (56.2% vs 49.7%), dialysis dependent (19.6% vs 14.3%), and have higher average creatinine (2.3 vs 1.8 mg/dL). Through 4-year follow-up, the PTX group demonstrated a significant increase in OS (56.2% vs 43.9%, P = .013), AFS (52.6% vs 36.1%, P < .0001), ff-MA (87.4% vs 78.7%, P = .0007), and ff-TVR (77.6% vs 70.6%, P = .012). Multivariable Cox-regression analysis demonstrated that PTX treatment was associated with improved OS, AFS, ff-MA, and ff-TVR.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CLTI, treatment with a PTX-coated device is associated with improved OS, AFS, ff-MA, and ff-TVR through 4-year follow-up. PTX-coated devices may be especially beneficial in patients who present with CLTI.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of death and patency after application of paclitaxel-coated balloons in the hemodialysis access

OBJECTIVE

The comparison between paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty and plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) for hemodialysis (HD) access stenosis or occlusion has not been well investigated. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare all-cause mortality, HD access primary patency, and circuit primary patency after endovascular maintenance procedures using PCB angioplasty vs PBA.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were systematically searched to identify all the relevant studies on paclitaxel-coated devices for stenosis or thrombosis of HD access. A random effects model was applied to pool the effect measures. Dichotomous data were presented using an odds ratio (OR). Effect data were presented using pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included in this meta-analysis, 12 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies involving 1086 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for HD access stenosis or occlusion. All-cause mortality rates at 6, 12, and 24 months after intervention were similar between the PCB and PBA groups (6 months: OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.38-2.96; P = .907; I² = 19.2%]; 12 months: OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.66-2.16; P = .554; I² = 0%]; 24 months: OR, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.83-2.45; P = .195; I² = 0%]). There was a significant improvement of primary patency in the PCB group compared with the PBA group (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.69; P < .001; I² = 67.3%). This benefit was consistent with the analysis of randomized controlled trials, whereas cohort studies were excluded. Further subgroup analysis of target lesions demonstrated that primary patency was significantly higher in the PCB group than in the PBA group, not only for arteriovenous fistula (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.98; P = .041; I² = 76.8%) but also for central venous stenosis (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.71; P = .002; I² = 0%). The PCB group was associated with higher 6-month (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.59; P < .001) and 24-month lesion primary patency (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.72; P = .009) than PBA and was marginally associated with 12-month lesion primary patency (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26-1.03; P = .06). Circuit primary patency analysis showed a marginal trend toward better outcome in the PCB group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) but no statistical significance (P = .052).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that PCB angioplasty is associated with significantly improved primary patency of arteriovenous fistula and central venous stenosis for HD access maintenance, with no evidence of increasing all-cause mortality based on short-term and midterm follow-up. Further large cohort study is needed to investigate long-term mortality.

Sustained drug retention after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for superficial femoral artery disease: Follow-up intravascular imaging

A 63 year-old woman with claudication underwent endovascular therapy for diffuse stenosis of the right superficial femoral artery in our hospital. We performed paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty using the IN.PACT™ Admiral™ and achieved acceptable results. After 42 days, we performed follow-up optical frequency domain imaging for the right superficial femoral artery lesion treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon and observed several high-intensity regions with attenuation on the lumen surface. Sustained drug availability is a notable characteristic of paclitaxel-coated balloon. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the visualization of sustained drug retention on the lumen surface using follow-up optical frequency domain imaging after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in a human patient with superficial femoral artery disease.

Paclitaxel-coated peripheral artery devices are not associated with increased mortality

OBJECTIVE

Long-term safety concerns have been raised that the use of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents is linked to excess mortality. Our objective was to compare outcomes in patients treated with paclitaxel vs uncoated devices and to analyze long-term mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-institution review of 1170 consecutive patients who underwent femoropopliteal percutaneous revascularization by angioplasty, atherectomy, stent placement, or combination between 2011 and 2018. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Groups were divided into patients who received paclitaxel (n = 652) and those who did not (n = 518). Categorical variables were assessed using χ² analysis and continuous variables with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A multivariable analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression models. Mortality was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Demographics, risk factors, and Rutherford class were similar between the groups, except that the paclitaxel group was more likely to have diabetes (60.9% vs 55.0%; P = .04), was less likely to be on dialysis (10.7% vs 14.9%; P = .04), and had lower average creatinine concentration (1.6 ± 1.8 mg/dL vs 2.0 ± 2.3 mg/dL; P = .003). There were no differences in all-cause mortality through 2 years between paclitaxel and no-paclitaxel cohorts (25.5% vs 30.3%; log-rank, P = .098). At 3 years and 3.5 years, mortality was significantly lower in the paclitaxel group: year 3, 32.1% vs 39.4% (log-rank, P = .041); year 3.5, 35.2% vs 43.9% (log-rank, P = .027). Survival rates were not significantly different in examining subgroups by diabetes, chronic kidney disease, presence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia, or paclitaxel-coated balloon manufacturer. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age, dialysis, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure were independent risk factors for mortality, whereas paclitaxel use was associated with lower mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents does not increase mortality compared with uncoated devices out to 3.5 years. Paclitaxel-coated devices can be used with continued caution, especially in patients at increased risk of restenosis. Further long-term studies are needed to determine the risk of late mortality.

Stentless treatment strategy for left circumflex artery ostial stenosis: Directional coronary atherectomy followed by drug-eluting balloon

A 60-year-old man with history of exertional angina pectoris was referred for treatment of an ostial left circumflex (LCX) coronary artery stenosis. The branch angle between left anterior descending artery (LAD) and LCX was shallow, therefore stent implantation seemed at risk of "carina shift" of plaque to the LAD ostium as well as higher in-stent restenosis. Therefore, directional coronary atherectomy (DCA, Atherocut™, L-size, NIPRO, Osaka, Japan) was performed at the ostium of the LCX lesion. After evaluating plaque accumulation using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), DCA was circumferentially performed 16 times, from 2 atm to 3 atm, using an 8 fr guide system. Although angiogram and IVUS showed excellent results, adjunctive balloon dilatation with 3.5 mm paclitaxel-coated balloon was performed to prevent restenosis. At 8 months, the patient reported being angina-free, and subsequent follow-up angiogram showed no restenosis of LCX. Paclitaxel-coated balloon following DCA for LCX ostial stenosis seems to be safe and effective for both acute and chronic results, suggesting a potential stentless therapeutic option. <Learning objective: Directional coronary atherectomy in combination with drug-eluting balloon may be a potential stentless therapeutic option, especially for the ostial stenosis of left circumflex artery.>.

Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions

Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR in de novo lesion treatment with PCB. Baseline, post-balloon and 9-month angiographical parameters were obtained from 116 lesions of 104 patients. The cutoff value of iFR after balloon angioplasty used to define functionally nonsignificant residual stenotic lesions was 0.86 and they were subdivided into PCB or Stent group according to the treated device. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 9 months and the secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years. Fifty-eight lesions were treated with PCB only and 58 lesions were treated with metal stent implantation. There were no differences in iFR between PCB and Stent groups at baseline (0.76 ± 0.19 vs. 0.73 ± 0.23, p = 0.630) and after procedure (0.93 ± 0.04 vs. 0.94 ± 0.05, p = 0.574). At 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly lower in PCB group compared with Stent group (0.04 ± 0.32 mm vs. 0.59 ± 0.77 mm, p = 0.001). At 3-year follow-up, TVF were not different between the treatment groups (5.2% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.453). PCB treatment guided by iFR measured right after balloon angioplasty is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions with good angiographic results at 9 months and similar clinical outcomes at 3 years compared to stent group.

Comparison of fractional flow reserve and angiographic characteristics after balloon angioplasty in de novo coronary lesions

Lesion characteristics determined by angiography after balloon angioplasty such as residual dimeter stenosis (DS) or dissection type has been used to determine the treatment method of drug-coated balloon (DCB) or metal stent for de novo coronary lesions. The aim of this study is to identify angiographic and functional mismatch using residual DS, dissection type and fractional flow reserve (FFR). Baseline and post-balloon parameters were obtained from 151 patients with 167 lesions. Angiographically significant parameters after balloon angioplasty are residual DS > 30% or dissection type C or more. Post-balloon FFR cutoff value of 0.75 was used to define functionally significant lesions. The weak correlation was found between residual DS and post-balloon FFR (r =  - 0.317, p < 0.001). There were 68.7% of mismatch population (residual DS > 30% and post-balloon FFR ≥ 0.75) and 7.1% of reverse mismatch population (residual DS ≤ 30% and post-balloon FFR < 0.75). All reverse mismatch lesions were found in left anterior descending artery. There was no correlation between dissection severity and post-balloon FFR (p = 0.654). In high post-balloon FFR group, long-term clinical outcomes showed no difference between DCB and stent groups with (p = 0.788) or without (p = 0.426) the adjustment of lesion characteristics. There were high frequencies of mismatch between angiographic lesion characteristics and FFR values after balloon angioplasty. Post-balloon FFR measurements may be safe and effective compared to angiography-guided treatment if DCB only treatment is considered.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes of coronary dissection after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease

The mechanism of how angiographic results following paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment for small vessel disease affect patient outcome remains unknown. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the correlation between coronary dissection immediately after PCB angioplasty and midterm outcome. From March 2014 to March 2017, 171 consecutive patients with 228 native coronary artery lesions who received PCB angioplasty at a single center were enrolled retrospectively. Lesions with a reference vessel diameter > 2.8 mm were excluded. There were dissections in 80% of the lesions immediately following PCB angioplasty. Of these, 38% were type A, 29% were type B, and 13% were type C or more severe dissection. No patient required revascularization during hospitalization. We were able to follow 159 patients (212 lesions) clinically for > 6 months, from among whom target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 7% of the patients. Follow-up angiography was performed on 143 lesions (67%), and complete healing of all dissections was noted. The rates of restenosis and late lumen enlargement were 12% and 56%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified that a bending lesion was an independent predictor of TLR, and type C-E dissection and imaging device use were independent predictors of restenosis. Conversely, lesions with type B dissection had a larger net gain than lesions with type A or no dissection. Leaving the dissection uncovered after PCB angioplasty seems to be safe, resulting in a low acute event rate. The type B dissection after PCB angioplasty was the most therapeutic dissection.

Paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for functionally nonsignificant residual coronary lesions after balloon angioplasty

There is limited data on the efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) compared to stents for de novo coronary lesions. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of PCB treatment with stent implantation for de novo coronary lesions after successful plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR). In 200 patients scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo lesions, FFR was measured after POBA (POBA-FFR). If POBA-FFR was ≥ 0.75, patients were treated with PCB (PCB group, n = 78) or stent (Stent group, n = 73). If POBA-FFR was < 0.75, stent was implanted as planned (Reference group, n = 42). The primary endpoint was late lumen loss at 9 months and the secondary endpoint was adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion thrombosis, or repeat revascularization) at 12 months follow-up. There was no between-group differences in the POBA-FFR (0.87 ± 0.05 in PCB, 0.89 ± 0.06 in stent, p = 0.101). At 9 months, late lumen loss was significantly lower in the PCB group compared to the Stent group (0.05 ± 0.33 vs. 0.59 ± 0.76 mm, p < 0.001). Adverse cardiac events were not different between the PCB, Stent and Reference groups (2.6, 5.5, and 9.5% respectively; p = 0.430 for PCB vs. Stent group; p = 0.229 for the reference vs. both other groups). PCB treatment guided by POBA-FFR showed excellent 9 months angiographic and functional results, as well as comparable 12 months clinical outcomes, compared with stent implantation for de novo coronary lesions.

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Early Restenosis of Central Veins in Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Center Initial Experience

Objective

To report the results of angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of early restenosis of central veins in hemodialysis patients.

Materials and Methods

Sixteen patients (9 men and 7 women; mean age 65.8 ± 14.4 years; range, 40-82 years) with 16 episodes of early restenoses of central veins within 3 months (median patency duration 2.5 months) were enrolled from January 2014 to June 2015. Ten native central veins and 6 intra-stent central veins were treated with double paclitaxel-coated balloons (diameter 6-7 mm) plus a high pressure balloon (diameter 12-14 mm). The study outcomes included procedural success (< 30% residual stenosis) and primary patency of the treated lesion (< 50% angiographic stenosis without re-intervention).

Results

Procedural success was achieved in all 16 cases of central vein stenoses. The mean diameter of the central vein was 3.7 ± 2.4 mm before the procedure vs. 11.4 ± 1.8 mm after the initial procedure. There were no procedure-related complications. The mean diameters of the central veins at 6 months and 12 months were 7.8 ± 1.3 mm and 6.9 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The primary patency rates at 6 months and 12 months were 93.8% and 31.2%, respectively. One patient had significant restenosis of the central vein at 3 months. The median primary patency period was 9 months for paclitaxel-coated balloons and 2.5 months for the last previous procedure with conventional balloons (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In our limited study, paclitaxel-coated balloons seem to improve the patency rate in cases of early restenosis of central veins. However, a further randomized control trial is necessary.

Quantified frequency-domain optical coherence tomography analysis for the thin-high signals on restenotic tissue after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty

Thin-high signals (THS), detectable by optical coherence tomography (OCT), represent the paclitaxel coverage of in-stent restenotic tissue. This study was conducted to assess the relationship between THS and angiographic outcomes by means of quantified post-procedural frequency-domain OCT (FD-OCT) analysis. From January 2014 to July 2016, 41 patients underwent FD-OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) to prevent in-stent restenosis. Of these, we retrospectively enrolled 32 patients (38 lesions) who underwent a 6- to 9-month follow-up angiogram. THS were assessed quantitatively, as THS length and lumen perimeter length were measured using semi-automated software; %THS was calculated by the following formula; total THS area/lumen perimeter area × 100. THS were detected in all 38 lesions that had undergone PCB angioplasty. THS and %THS were significantly higher in lesions without binary restenosis (3.34 ± 2.11 vs. 11.48 ± 8.53 mm², p = 0.001 and 1.49 ± 0.73 vs. 4.42 ± 2.71%, p = 0.001, respectively). Values for THS, which indicates the paclitaxel coverage on restenotic tissue, are associated with reducing restenosis after PCB for in-stent restenosis.

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is an established form of therapy for femoropopliteal artery disease. Currently, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is carried out using standard balloon with or without deployment of a stent but is associated with a high rate of restenosis and stent-related complications. Treatment options for restenosis, especially in-stent restenosis, are limited. Drug-coated balloons promise to reduce the rates of restenosis by effective delivery of antiproliferative agent (paclitaxel) directly to vessel wall without the need for a permanent implant. In this review, we look at the technology and rationale behind drug-coated balloons and examine the evidence available so far.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, several studies tested the effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty compared to that of standard PTA in both de novo lesions and in-stent restenosis of femoropopliteal artery. Paclitaxel-coated balloon use resulted in reduced rates of restenosis and favourable clinical outcomes in both these lesion groups. However, in complex lesions, there is still lack of data to support the use of these balloons. Paclitaxel-coated balloon is a safe and effective therapeutic option in patients with both de novo lesions and in-stent restenosis involving femoropopliteal artery. In light of the new evidence, it is time to consider incorporation of this effective therapeutic option into clinical practice. However, further research is needed for the use of paclitaxel-coated balloons in complex femoropopliteal lesions like calcified lesions especially as adjuncts to cutting balloons and debulking strategies.

Novel paclitaxel-coated scoring ballon for de novo complex coronary lesions-first report

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are being used for in-stent restenosis treatment and there is some preliminary experience in other coronary settings, including small vessels and side branches. Scoring balloons (SB) are a useful tool for the preparation of fibro-calcific lesions. Because of the controlled micro-dissections that SB induce, it has been hypothesized that they may have a role in helping paclitaxel deliverability inside the vessel wall. The AngioSculpt®X (Spectranetics) is a novel paclitaxel-coated SB with encouraging preliminary data for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. We here describe our first experience treating two de novo coronary lesions with angiographic follow up.

A multicenter randomized comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon with plain balloon angioplasty in patients with small vessel disease

AIM

We investigated the efficacy and safety of using paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) to treat small vessel disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial, one-hundred and thirty-five patients with native coronary lesions in small vessels were randomized into a PCB group and plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) group at a ratio of 2:1. There were no differences in target vessel failure (TVF) that was defined as cardiac death or target vessel-related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization (TLR), between the two groups (3.4 vs. 10.3%; P = 0.20), and TLR was slightly lower in the PCB group (2.3%) than that in the POBA group (10.3%) during 24 weeks follow-up. The late lumen loss (LLL) was significantly lower in the PCB group (0.01 ± 0.31 vs. 0.32 ± 0.34 mm; P < 0.01) and late lumen enlargement (LLE) was more frequently observed in the PCB group (48 vs. 15%; P < 0.01) by angiographic follow-up after 24 weeks. There were no cases of death, myocardial infarction, thrombosis and reocclusion in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was not able to demonstrate superiority of PCB compared with POBA.

A Comparison of Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction between Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent on De Novo Coronary Lesions

PURPOSE

This study compared the impact of paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) or drug eluting stents (DES) on peri-procedural myocardial infarction (PMI) on de novo coronary lesion in stable patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this observational study, we compared the incidence of PMI amongst patients with single vessel de novo coronary lesions who underwent treatment with a PCB or DES. Propensity score-matching analysis was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics. PMI was classified as myocardial infarction occurring within 48 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention with a threshold of 5 x the 99th percentile upper reference limit of normal for creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) or troponin T (TnT).

RESULTS

One hundred four patients (52 receiving PCB and 52 receiving DES) were enrolled in this study. The peak mean values of CK-MB and TnT were significantly higher in the DES group. There was a significantly higher rate of PMI in the DES group (23.1% vs. 1.9%, p=0.002). Total occlusion of the side-branch occurred in two patients treated with DES, while no patients treated with PCB. In multivariable analysis, DES was the only independent predictor of PMI compared with PCB (odds ratio 42.85, 95% confidence interval: 3.44-533.87, p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with a PCB on de novo coronary lesion might be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of PMI compared to DES.

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Dialysis Access. Results from a Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) for the treatment of dysfunctional dialysis access.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center, single-arm, retrospective analysis of 39 patients (23 male, 59 %) undergoing 61 interventions using 69 PCBs in a 20-month period. There was a balance between arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and grafts (AVG) (20 AVFs, 19AVGs), and the majority of lesions were restenotic (25/39, 64.1 %). Mean balloon diameter used was 6.6 mm and length 73.4 mm. Primary outcome measure was target lesion primary patency (TLPP) at 6 months, while secondary outcome measures included factors affecting TLPP and major complications. As there were lesions treated more than once with PCB, authors also compared patency results after first and second PCB angioplasty.

RESULTS

TLPP was 72.2 % at 6 months with a median patency of 260 days according to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. No major complications occurred. TLPP between AVFs and AVGs (311 vs. 237 days, respectively; p = 0.29) and de novo and restenotic lesions was similar (270.5 vs. 267.5 days, respectively; p = 0.50). In 14 cases, in which lesions were treated with two PCB angioplasties, a statistically significant difference in TLPP after the second treatment was noted (first intervention 179.5 days vs. second intervention 273.5 days; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, Lutonix PCB proved to be safe and effective in treating restenosis in dysfunctional dialysis access with results comparable to the literature available. Larger studies are needed to prove abovementioned results.

Usefulness of paclitaxel-releasing high-pressure balloon associated with cutting balloon angioplasty for treatment of outflow stenoses of failing hemodialysis arteriovenous shunts

AIM

To evaluate the technical and clinical success, primary patency (PP) and complications of angioplasty performed with paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCBs) associated with cutting balloon and for the treatment of the outflow stenoses of failing hemodialysis arteriovenous shunt.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From September 2014 to September 2015, 50 patients with 66 stenoses were registered. Vascular accesses were autogenous (n = 20) and prosthetic (n = 30). Stenosis were documented during follow-up with routine echo-color Doppler, clinical evaluation and in the remaining incidentally during fistulography. Angioplasty was performed with cutting balloon and afterward with PCB. The mean follow-up time was 8 months (range 6-15 months). Technical success, clinical success, primary patency and complications were registered.

RESULTS

Technical success was 100 %. Clinical success was 94.7 %. Primary patency rate was 87.7 %; in five patients, a significant re-stenosis (≥50 %) was registered. A residual asymptomatic stenosis (<30 %) was registered in four cases (7 %). No major complications were registered.

CONCLUSIONS

A short-term patency benefit may be obtained including PCB in angioplasty treatment of failing hemodialysis arteriovenous shunts.

Serial Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Paclitaxel-coated Balloon for de Novo Lesions

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is limited data on the serial morphological and functional assessment of paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment using coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography, and fractional flow reserve.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center observational study, patients with de novo lesions were treated with the paclitaxel-coated balloon. Serial angiographic, optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve measurements were performed before and after plain old balloon angioplasty, as well as at 9-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (21 lesions) were enrolled in this study. The reference vessel diameter was 2.68±0.34mm and late luminal loss was 0.01±0.21mm. The median changes in the minimal lumen area between pre- and postplain old balloon angioplasty, and postplain old balloon angioplasty and follow-up were an increase of 75.2% [interquartile range of 37.2 to 164.7] and 50.0% [interquartile range of 1.1% to 64.5%], respectively. Intimal dissections were seen in all postprocedural optical coherence tomography images, and 66.6% of them were sealed on follow-up optical coherence tomography (median 278 days). The fractional flow reserve distal to the target lesion was 0.71±0.14 predilatation, 0.87±0.04 postdilatation, and 0.83±0.08 at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The paclitaxel-coated balloon restores coronary blood flow by means of plaque modification, causing an increment in minimal lumen area. At 9-month follow-up, coronary flow was sustained and the luminal patency was the result of suppressed luminal narrowing progression from local drug effects on the de novo coronary lesions.

Serial Morphological Changes of Side-Branch Ostium after Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions of Main Vessels

PURPOSE

The effects on the side-branch (SB) ostium, following paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment of de novo coronary lesions of main vessels have not been previously investigated. This study was aimed at evaluating the serial morphological changes of the SB ostium after PCB treatment of de novo coronary lesions of main vessels using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-center observational study enrolled patients with de novo lesions, which were traversed by at least one SB (≥1.5 mm) and were treated with PCB. The SB ostium was evaluated with serial angiographic and OCT assessments pre- and post-procedure, and at 9-months follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixteen main vessel lesions were successfully treated with PCB, and 26 SBs were included for analysis. Mean SB ostial lumen area increased at 9-months follow-up (0.92±0.68 mm² pre-procedure, 1.03±0.77 mm² post-procedure and 1.42±1.18 mm² at 9-months). The SB ostial lumen area gain was 0.02±0.24 mm² between pre- and post-procedure, 0.37±0.64 mm² between post-procedure and 9-months, and 0.60±0.93 mm² between pre-procedure and 9-months. The ostial lumen area increased by 3.9% [interquartile range (IQR) of -33.3 to 10.4%] between pre- and post-procedure, 52.1% (IQR of -0.7 to 77.3%) between post-procedure and 9-months and 76.1% (IQR of 18.2 to 86.6%) between pre-procedure and 9-months.

CONCLUSION

PCB treatment of de novo coronary lesions of main vessels resulted in an increase in the SB ostial lumen area at 9-months.

Comparison of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Treatment and Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty for De Novo Coronary Lesions

PURPOSE

This study compared the angiographic outcomes of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) treatment for de novo coronary artery lesions. At present, there is no available data comparing the efficacy of PCB versus POBA for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective observational study enrolled patients with de novo coronary lesions with a reference vessel diameter between 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm and lesion length ≤ 24 mm who were successfully treated with PCB or POBA. Angiographic measurements and quantitative coronary analysis were performed before and after the procedure, and at 9 months follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients (49 receiving PCB and 23 receiving POBA) were enrolled in this study. Late luminal loss was -0.12 ± 0.30 mm in the PCB group and 0.25 ± 0.50 mm in the POBA group (p<0.001). There was a higher percentage of binary restenosis (diameter stenosis ≥ 50%) in POBA, compared to PCB (30.4%, n=7 vs. 4.1%, n=2, p<0.001). Target vessel revascularization was higher in the POBA group (13.0%, n=3 vs. 0%, p=0.033).

CONCLUSION

PCB treatment of de novo coronary lesions showed better 9-month angiographic outcomes than POBA treatment alone.