Longitudinal associations between the neighborhood social, natural, and built environment and mental health: A systematic review with meta-analyses

This review aimed to assess the longitudinal associations between neighborhood social, natural, and built environments, and multiple mental health outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, common mental disorder, and pooled mental disorders). Of 6,785 records retrieved, 30 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Meta-analytical results primarily obtained from developed country studies showed that composite neighborhood socioeconomic status was negatively associated with depression (p = 0.007) and pooled mental disorders (p = 0.002), while neighborhood urbanicity was positively associated with depression (p = 0.012) and pooled mental disorders (p = 0.005). Future longitudinal studies with similar designs and standardized exposure assessments are warranted.

[Potentials and limits of aging cohort studies for geriatric psychiatry]

The sizeable number of population-based cohort studies of aging in Germany have provided highly valuable contributions for the specification of risk factors and predictors for frequent mental disorders in old age, especially dementia and depression. The results from these cohort studies enable the specification of mechanisms for the development of and preventative interventions for common mental disorders in old age. On the other hand, there is a significant paucity of clinical cohort studies investigating disease trajectories and possible markers for specific individualized interventions of frequent mental disorders in old age. In this article, we report selected key findings from cohort studies of aging and discuss novel approaches for the integration and harmonization of population-based and clinical cohort studies.

Panel studies of air pollution in patients with COPD: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies have shown an increase in morbidity and mortality rates in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) following exposure to elevated levels of air pollution. Panel studies have been used to assess short-term effects of air pollution which are not detected by registry studies, specifically lung function and symptoms. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the evidence of panel studies on acute effects of air pollution among patients with COPD.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database, and identified additional studies by inspecting reference lists and literature reviews. We identified and summarized 25 panel studies that were published between 1993 and February 2016. Results were presented in forest plots and effect estimates of sufficiently comparable outcomes and pollutants were summarized by a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed that a 10µg/m³ increase in ambient levels of particles less than 10µm in diameter (PM₁₀) had a small, but statistically significant impact on FEV₁ (-3.38mL, 95% CI -6.39 to -0.37) and PEF (-0.61L/min, -1.20 to -0.01). There was significant heterogeneity across the included studies. A forest plot showing associations between PM₁₀ and respiratory symptoms was also suggestive of an adverse effect of particulate air pollution, but this was not formally tested in a meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of outcomes. Results for gaseous pollutants were inconsistent for lung function or symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from the identified panel studies indicated statistically significant associations of particulate matter air pollution with lung function in patients with COPD.

[Health impact of exposure to pollens: A review of epidemiological studies]

The aim of this review is to describe the health impact of exposure to pollen based on recently published epidemiological studies. The methodology chapter, describes a review of the literature and outlines important elements of these studies: measurement of exposure to pollens, study types used, study populations and the health indicators related to pollen exposure. In this review, two types of studies have been used to assess the epidemiological evidence of short-term links between pollen exposure and hay fever or asthma. Ecological time-series studies use daily indicators of asthma exacerbations (emergency room admissions or hospitalizations), consultations for rhinitis or conjunctivitis, or anti-allergic drug consumption within general population. Panel studies relate measurements of pollen grain concentrations to nasal, ocular and bronchial symptom severity in a group of subjects sensitized to a specific pollen, monitored during the pollen season. In both cases, the studies show a relationship on a day-to-day basis between health indicators and daily rates of atmospheric pollen collected by a pollen trap. These studies take into account confounding factors, such as air pollution, weather factors and sometimes exposure to outdoor molds. Unlike earlier studies, more and more studies focus on the shape of the dose-response relationship and the lag between pollen exposure and symptoms. Only rarely, individual susceptibility factors, the clinical phenomenon of priming and polysensitization are reported. Thus, ecological time-series studies and panel studies assess respectively the impact of pollen exposure in the general population and in groups of sensitized patients. Using appropriate statistical tools, these studies provide insight into the shape of the dose-response relationship, with a potential threshold below which symptoms are absent, then a linear relationship for nasal, ocular and bronchial symptoms and a plateau where the symptoms do not increase despite the continued increase in pollen.